CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03078608POEMUpdated Apr 16, 2025Results posted

POEM (Practice Of Embracing Each Moment) STUDY

An interventional study of Mindfulness meditation program (administered via mobile app) and Progressive muscle relaxation (via mobile app) in Distress, Cancer and Chemotherapy Effect, sponsored by Kaiser Permanente. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-16.

Sponsored by Kaiser Permanente · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
128
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A cancer diagnosis is extremely stressful, emotionally challenging, and often life-altering for both patients and their loved ones. Although more than one-third of patients experience distress, doctors are typically at a loss as to how to help patients and their families manage these emotional challenges. Mindfulness-based programs, including meditation, are offered at major medical centers in the US and have been found to help reduce stress and improve quality of life among cancer patients. However, these classes often require 30+ hours of in-person instruction over 8 weeks, which is neither practical nor feasible for patients undergoing chemotherapy due to side effects and scheduling conflicts.

This study will test whether an 8-week mobile app-based mindfulness program is accepted and useful for patients who have recently received chemotherapy and their loved ones. It will also test whether it is feasible to randomize participants into three groups: intervention, active control (receiving progressive muscle relaxation through the same app) and a wait list control group (will receive the meditation intervention 8 weeks later), so that a future study can test whether mindfulness intervention can help reduce stress and improve quality of life. Because many Americans own smartphone or tablet, an app that can teach stress reduction techniques at home or at infusion clinics has great potential to address emotional needs that providers often cannot.

The study will also include caregivers of patients who have recently received chemotherapy as research has shown that caregivers tend to show high levels of stress and depression and worse physical health compared to non-caregivers. The negative effects of caregiving are most pronounced in caregivers of patients with cancer. However, little support is directed to caregivers as most medical attention goes toward the patients. The patient-caregiver relationship may serve as a source of mutual support and a surrogate for community, which is traditionally considered to be an essential ingredient for sustaining mindfulness practices.

If this study is successful, it will justify a larger trial to determine if use of a mindfulness app is effective in reducing stress and improving quality of life for cancer patients and caregivers. If effective, this low-cost stress reduction strategy could be distributed and used for all types and stages of cancer patients and their caregivers, anywhere, any time, helping to improve the quality of life of the many individuals affected by cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Distress
  • Cancer
  • Chemotherapy Effect

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • quality of life
  • mindfulness
  • meditation
  • depression
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kaiser Permanente is the lead sponsor of 385 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • active member of Kaiser Permanente Northern California
  • a diagnosis of cancer, and currently undergoing chemotherapy or completed chemotherapy in the past 6 months at time of recruitment
  • English literacy/fluency, access to a smartphone, a tablet (e.g., iPad) or a computer with internet
  • Caregivers: a partner, other family member, or a close friend who identify him/herself as the patient's primary unpaid caregiver. English literacy/fluency, access to a smartphone, a tablet (e.g., iPad) or a computer with internet access

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deafness
  • severe mental illness
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score \<8 or >14 on either anxiety or depression scale (patient only)
  • current stress reduction practice
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
128 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention arm

    Participants in the intervention arm will receive access to a mobile app-based/online mindfulness meditation program and asked to practice meditation daily for 8 weeks.

    Behavioral: Mindfulness meditation program (administered via mobile app)

  • Active comparator
    Active control arm

    Participants in this arm will receive access to a mobile app-based/online progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) program and asked to practice PMR daily for 8 weeks.

    Behavioral: Progressive muscle relaxation (via mobile app)

  • Other
    Wait list control arm

    Participants in the wait list control arm will also receive access to a mobile app-based/online mindfulness meditation program and asked to practice meditation daily for 8 weeks, but they will not receive access to the program until after the intervention group completes the intervention (8 weeks later).

    Behavioral: Mindfulness meditation program (administered via mobile app)

Interventions

  • BehavioralMindfulness meditation program (administered via mobile app)

    Mobile app-based/online mindfulness meditation program

  • BehavioralProgressive muscle relaxation (via mobile app)

    Mobile app-based/online progressive muscle relaxation program

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Anxiety--patients

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure anxiety in patient-participants. This scale is frequently used to assess psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients. The HADS is a 14-item self-report measurement tool designed for use in medical outpatient settings to assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater distress; 0-7 is generally considered "normal," 8-10 "mild," 11-14 "moderate," and 15-21 "severe" symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  2. Change in Depression--patients

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure depression in patients. This scale is frequently used to assess psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients. The HADS is a 14-item self-report measurement tool designed for use in medical outpatient settings to assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater distress; 0-7 is generally considered "normal," 8-10 "mild," 11-14 "moderate," and 15-21 "severe" symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  3. Change in Anxiety--caregivers

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure anxiety in caregiver-participants. This scale is frequently used to assess psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients. The HADS is a 14-item self-report measurement tool designed for use in medical outpatient settings to assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater distress; 0-7 is generally considered "normal," 8-10 "mild," 11-14 "moderate," and 15-21 "severe" symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  4. Change in Depression--caregivers

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure depression in caregiver-participants. This scale is frequently used to assess psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients. The HADS is a 14-item self-report measurement tool designed for use in medical outpatient settings to assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater distress; 0-7 is generally considered "normal," 8-10 "mild," 11-14 "moderate," and 15-21 "severe" symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Distress--patients

    The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer will be used to assess current distress level in patient-participants. Respondents are asked to rate their level of distress during the past week by circling a number on an image of a thermometer, with 0 indicating "no distress" and 10 "extreme distress".

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  2. Change in Fatigue--patients

    The Brief Fatigue Inventory assesses the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue, asks about current level of fatigue, average and worst level of fatigue in the past 24 hours, and extent to which fatigue interfered with various aspects of life in the past 24 hours (e.g., mood, walking ability) on a 10-point Likert scale. A global fatigue score is calculated by averaging all items (ranging from 0 to 10). A higher score represents greater severity and impact of fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  3. Change in Pain Interference--patients

    The 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(PROMIS) pain interference scale will be used to measure the self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. This includes the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Scores range from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating more interference due to pain.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  4. Change in Distress--caregivers

    The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer will be used to assess current distress level in caregiver-participants. Respondents are asked to rate their level of distress during the past week by circling a number on an image of a thermometer, with 0 indicating "no distress" and 10 "extreme distress".

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  5. Change in Fatigue--caregivers

    The Brief Fatigue Inventory assesses the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue, asks about current level of fatigue, average and worst level of fatigue in the past 24 hours, and extent to which fatigue interfered with various aspects of life in the past 24 hours (e.g., mood, walking ability) on a 10-point Likert scale. A global fatigue score is calculated by averaging all items (ranging from 0 to 10). A higher score represents greater severity and impact of fatigue.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

  6. Change in Pain Interference--caregivers

    The 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(PROMIS) pain interference scale will be used to measure the self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. This includes the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Scores range from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating more interference due to pain.

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Apr 16, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTSIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS
Started54431714
Completed40321313
Not completed141141
Withdrew: Death1200
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject8100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5841

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Anxiety--patients

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure anxiety in patient-participants. This scale is frequently used to assess psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients. The HADS is a 14-item self-report measurement tool designed for use in medical outpatient settings to assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater distress; 0-7 is generally considered "normal," 8-10 "mild," 11-14 "moderate," and 15-21 "severe" symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Anxiety--patients
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTS
Change in Anxiety--patients-1.4 ± 3.5-1.5 ± 2.7
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--PATIENTS vs Wait List Control Arm--PATIENTS · ANOVA · p = 1.00 · F statistic: 0Repeated measures ANOVA
PrimaryChange in Depression--patients

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure depression in patients. This scale is frequently used to assess psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients. The HADS is a 14-item self-report measurement tool designed for use in medical outpatient settings to assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater distress; 0-7 is generally considered "normal," 8-10 "mild," 11-14 "moderate," and 15-21 "severe" symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Depression--patients
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTS
Change in Depression--patients-1.2 ± 3.10 ± 2.5
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--PATIENTS vs Wait List Control Arm--PATIENTS · ANOVA · p = 0.11 · F statistic: 2.58Repeated measures ANOVA
PrimaryChange in Anxiety--caregivers

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure anxiety in caregiver-participants. This scale is frequently used to assess psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients. The HADS is a 14-item self-report measurement tool designed for use in medical outpatient settings to assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater distress; 0-7 is generally considered "normal," 8-10 "mild," 11-14 "moderate," and 15-21 "severe" symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Anxiety--caregivers
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS
Change in Anxiety--caregivers-0.4 ± 3.20.3 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--CAREGIVERS vs Wait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS · ANOVA · p = 0.79 · F statistic: 0.07Repeated measures ANOVA
PrimaryChange in Depression--caregivers

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to measure depression in caregiver-participants. This scale is frequently used to assess psychosocial outcomes in cancer patients. The HADS is a 14-item self-report measurement tool designed for use in medical outpatient settings to assess depression and anxiety. Each subscale is scored from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater distress; 0-7 is generally considered "normal," 8-10 "mild," 11-14 "moderate," and 15-21 "severe" symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Depression--caregivers
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS
Change in Depression--caregivers-1.2 ± 2.0-0.3 ± 2.0
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--CAREGIVERS vs Wait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS · ANOVA · p = 0.29 · F statistic: 1.17Repeated measures ANOVA
SecondaryChange in Distress--patients

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer will be used to assess current distress level in patient-participants. Respondents are asked to rate their level of distress during the past week by circling a number on an image of a thermometer, with 0 indicating "no distress" and 10 "extreme distress".

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Distress--patients
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTS
Change in Distress--patients-0.8 ± 3.2-0.5 ± 1.8
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--PATIENTS vs Wait List Control Arm--PATIENTS · ANOVA · p = 0.67 · F statistic: 0.18Repeated measures ANOVA
SecondaryChange in Fatigue--patients

The Brief Fatigue Inventory assesses the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue, asks about current level of fatigue, average and worst level of fatigue in the past 24 hours, and extent to which fatigue interfered with various aspects of life in the past 24 hours (e.g., mood, walking ability) on a 10-point Likert scale. A global fatigue score is calculated by averaging all items (ranging from 0 to 10). A higher score represents greater severity and impact of fatigue.

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Fatigue--patients
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTS
Change in Fatigue--patients-0.8 ± 2.00 ± 1.5
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--PATIENTS vs Wait List Control Arm--PATIENTS · ANOVA · p = 0.24 · F statistic: 1.41Repeated measures ANOVA
SecondaryChange in Pain Interference--patients

The 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(PROMIS) pain interference scale will be used to measure the self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. This includes the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Scores range from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating more interference due to pain.

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pain Interference--patients
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTS
Change in Pain Interference--patients-2.2 ± 8.30.8 ± 8.5
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--PATIENTS vs Wait List Control Arm--PATIENTS · ANOVA · p = 0.25 · F statistic: 1.36Repeated measures ANOVA
SecondaryChange in Distress--caregivers

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Distress Thermometer will be used to assess current distress level in caregiver-participants. Respondents are asked to rate their level of distress during the past week by circling a number on an image of a thermometer, with 0 indicating "no distress" and 10 "extreme distress".

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Distress--caregivers
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS
Change in Distress--caregivers-0.7 ± 2.2-0.2 ± 1.9
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--CAREGIVERS vs Wait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS · ANOVA · p = 0.47 · F statistic: 0.53Repeated measures ANOVA
SecondaryChange in Fatigue--caregivers

The Brief Fatigue Inventory assesses the severity and impact of cancer-related fatigue, asks about current level of fatigue, average and worst level of fatigue in the past 24 hours, and extent to which fatigue interfered with various aspects of life in the past 24 hours (e.g., mood, walking ability) on a 10-point Likert scale. A global fatigue score is calculated by averaging all items (ranging from 0 to 10). A higher score represents greater severity and impact of fatigue.

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Fatigue--caregivers
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS
Change in Fatigue--caregivers-0.8 ± 1.2-0.1 ± 1.6
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--CAREGIVERS vs Wait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS · ANOVA · p = 0.23 · F statistic: 1.54Repeated measures ANOVA
SecondaryChange in Pain Interference--caregivers

The 8-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(PROMIS) pain interference scale will be used to measure the self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. This includes the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. Scores range from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating more interference due to pain.

Time frame:
Baseline to 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pain Interference--caregivers
score on a scaleIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS
Change in Pain Interference--caregivers2.2 ± 4.6-0.4 ± 6.0
Statistical analysis
  • Intervention Arm--CAREGIVERS vs Wait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS · ANOVA · p = 0.39 · F statistic: 0.8Repeated measures ANOVA

Adverse events

Collected over 8 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Arm--PATIENTS1/54 (1.9%)0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)
Wait List Control Arm--PATIENTS2/43 (4.7%)0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)
Intervention Arm--CAREGIVERS0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)
Wait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERS0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTSIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERSTotal
Mean59.3 ± 14.156.7 ± 14.757.1 ± 17.458.2 ± 18.658.0 ± 15.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTSIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERSTotal
Female33339984
Male21108544
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTSIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERSTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian43029
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American51017
White362715987
More than one race892221
Unknown or Not Reported13004
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Intervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTSIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERSTotal
Race — White362715987
Race — African American51017
Race — Asian43029
Race — Other892221
Race — Unknown/not reported13004
Education
Education(Participants)Intervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTSIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERSTotal
Some college or less18196548
College graduate15186443
Postgraduate degree2065536
Missing10001
Income
Income(Participants)Intervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTSIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERSTotal
Less than $75 00011212337
$75 000 to $99 999753318
$100 000 to $149 9991885132
$150 000 or more1255325
Missing642416
Cancer type
Cancer type(Participants)Intervention Arm--PATIENTSWait List Control Arm--PATIENTSIntervention Arm--CAREGIVERSWait List Control Arm--CAREGIVERSTotal
Breast13150028
Hematologic1380021
Gastrointestinal1020012
Genitourinary570012
Head and neck41005
Skin31004
Lung03003
Other21003
Sarcoma11002
N/A00171431
Missing34007
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California
    Oakland, California 94611, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kubo A, Kurtovich E, McGinnis M, Aghaee S, Altschuler A, Quesenberry C Jr, Kolevska T, Avins AL. A Randomized Controlled Trial of mHealth Mindfulness Intervention for Cancer Patients and Informal Cancer Caregivers: A Feasibility Study Within an Integrated Health Care Delivery System. Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735419850634. doi: 10.1177/1534735419850634. PubMed 31092044 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 19, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03078608
Lead sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
American Cancer Society, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 13, 2017
Start date
Oct 24, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 8, 2018
Completion
Nov 8, 2018
Results posted
Apr 16, 2025
Last update
Apr 16, 2025

Study contacts

Ai Kubo, PhD
principal investigator · Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Division of Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion