ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03071393Updated Nov 18, 2023Results posted

Intermittent Hypoxia to Enhance Motor Function After Spinal Cord Injury

An interventional study of Hypoxia via Hypoxico Hyp-123 and Sham via Hypoxico Hyp-123 in Spinal Cord Injuries, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine if acute intermittent hypoxia (brief episodes of breathing lower oxygen), which has been shown to enhance plasticity and motor output, can enhance functional outcomes and muscle activation in individuals with spinal cord injury. Our aim is to assess breathing, sitting, standing and walking functional ability before and after acute intermittent hypoxia, compared to a sham treatment. This information may be useful in advancing rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injuries.

Read the detailed description

Recent evidence has shown that acute intermittent hypoxia can strengthen motor pathways after spinal cord injury, and enhance walking outcomes after walking rehabilitation compared to walking rehabilitation alone. A single session of acute intermittent hypoxia has also been shown to temporarily enhance breathing and limb strength in people with spinal cord injury. Further evidence supports the hypothesis that acute intermittent hypoxia acts on all motor pathways, and thus can enhance the strength of most muscles in the body.

Spinal cord injury affects the muscles that control respiration. Decreased respiratory muscle function can lead to diseases of the respiratory system, which are the primary cause of death and significant cause of re-hospitalization after spinal cord injury. Deficits in postural muscle function affect one's ability to balance, safely maintain a seated position, or ambulate after spinal cord injury, severely impacting daily activities such as self-care and feeding skills.

This study will test the hypothesis that a single session of acute intermittent hypoxia will increase strength and activation of the muscles that control respiration and posture, leading to improved scores on functional assessments in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Our long term goal is to better understand the therapeutic potential of acute intermittent hypoxia combined with physical rehabilitation for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

  • acute intermittent hypoxia
  • breathing
  • spinal cord injury
  • motor function
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,988 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 516 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 24 across 1,594 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,285 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 177 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 141 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female, ages 18-65
  2. Greater than 6 months post-spinal cord injury
  3. Spinal cord injury affecting segments between C4-T12
  4. No other known neurological disorders
  5. Able to provide informed consent
  6. no severe musculoskeletal impairments, open wounds, or skin lesions that would limit participation in functional assessments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Presence of a self-reported uncontrolled medical condition including, but not limited to: cardiovascular disease; sleep apnea; obstructive lung disease; severe neuropathic or chronic pain; severe recurrent autonomic dysreflexia
  2. Severe, untreated bladder or urinary tract infection
  3. Presence of severe musculoskeletal impairments, open wounds, or skin lesions that would limit participation in functional assessments
  4. Women who report being pregnant or test positive on a pregnancy test
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acute Intermittent Hypoxia, then Sham Intermittent Hypoxia

    Subjects with chronic spinal cord injury first received an acute intermittent hypoxia protocol with low oxygen air (9-15% inspired oxygen). After a washout period of at least one week, they then received sham intermittent hypoxia with normal oxygen air (21% inspired oxygen).

    Device: Hypoxia via Hypoxico Hyp-123 · Device: Sham via Hypoxico Hyp-123

  • Experimental
    Sham Intermittent Hypoxia, then Acute Intermittent Hypoxia

    Subjects with chronic spinal cord injury first received a sham (placebo) intermittent hypoxia protocol with normal oxygen air (21% inspired oxygen). After a washout period of at least one week, they then received an acute intermittent hypoxia protocol with low oxygen air (9-15% inspired oxygen).

    Device: Hypoxia via Hypoxico Hyp-123 · Device: Sham via Hypoxico Hyp-123

Interventions

  • DeviceHypoxia via Hypoxico Hyp-123

    During acute intermittent hypoxia, subjects will undergo 15 brief exposures (60-120 seconds) of low oxygen air (9-15% inspired oxygen) delivered by an air generator, alternated with 15 brief exposures (60-120 seconds) of ambient room air.

    Also known as: Altitude Generator

  • DeviceSham via Hypoxico Hyp-123

    During sham intermittent hypoxia, subjects will undergo 15 brief exposures (60-120 seconds) of normal oxygen air (21% inspired oxygen) delivered by an air generator, alternated with 15 brief exposures (60-120 seconds) of ambient room air.

    Also known as: Altitude Generator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure

    An assessment of inspiratory muscle strength.

    Time frame: Change between baseline and 30 minutes post-intermittent hypoxia or sham.

  2. Change in Maximal Expiratory Pressure

    An assessment of expiratory muscle strength.

    Time frame: Change between baseline and 30 minutes post-intermittent hypoxia or sham.

  3. Change in Forced Vital Capacity

    An assessment of how much air a person can forcefully exhale after a maximal inspiratory effort.

    Time frame: Change between baseline and 30 minutes post-intermittent hypoxia or sham.

  4. Change in Mouth Occlusion Pressure (P0.1)

    An assessment of the pressure generated in the first 0.1 seconds of the participant's initiation of inhalation.

    Time frame: Change between baseline and 30 minutes post-intermittent hypoxia or sham.

07

Results

Posted Nov 18, 2023

Participant flow

Individuals were recruited through advertisements and rehabilitation health facilities in north Florida. Recruitment occurred from 07/2017 through 12/2019.

First Intervention (Single Day Session)
Participant flow — First Intervention (Single Day Session)
MilestoneAcute Intermittent Hypoxia, Then Sham Intermittent HypoxiaSham Intermittent Hypoxia, Then Acute Intermittent Hypoxia
Started710
Completed710
Not completed00
Washout (at Least 7 Days)
Participant flow — Washout (at Least 7 Days)
MilestoneAcute Intermittent Hypoxia, Then Sham Intermittent HypoxiaSham Intermittent Hypoxia, Then Acute Intermittent Hypoxia
Started710
Completed710
Not completed00
Intervention 2 (Single Day Session)
Participant flow — Intervention 2 (Single Day Session)
MilestoneAcute Intermittent Hypoxia, Then Sham Intermittent HypoxiaSham Intermittent Hypoxia, Then Acute Intermittent Hypoxia
Started710
Completed710
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure

An assessment of inspiratory muscle strength.

Time frame:
Change between baseline and 30 minutes post-intermittent hypoxia or sham.
Reported as:
Mean · cmH2O
Change in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure
cmH2OAll Study Participants - Acute Intermittent HypoxiaAll Study Participants - Sham
Change in Maximal Inspiratory Pressure8.2 ± 12.3-3.0 ± 11.3
Statistical analysis
  • All Study Participants - Acute Intermittent Hypoxia vs All Study Participants - Sham · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05
PrimaryChange in Maximal Expiratory Pressure

An assessment of expiratory muscle strength.

Time frame:
Change between baseline and 30 minutes post-intermittent hypoxia or sham.
Reported as:
Mean · cmH2O
Change in Maximal Expiratory Pressure
cmH2OAll Study Participants - Acute Intermittent HypoxiaAll Study Participants - Sham
Change in Maximal Expiratory Pressure4.3 ± 11.52.9 ± 9.8
Statistical analysis
  • All Study Participants - Acute Intermittent Hypoxia vs All Study Participants - Sham · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05
PrimaryChange in Forced Vital Capacity

An assessment of how much air a person can forcefully exhale after a maximal inspiratory effort.

Time frame:
Change between baseline and 30 minutes post-intermittent hypoxia or sham.
Reported as:
Mean · Liters
Change in Forced Vital Capacity
LitersAll Study Participants - Acute Intermittent HypoxiaAll Study Participants - Sham
Change in Forced Vital Capacity-0.01 ± 0.170.00 ± 0.21
Statistical analysis
  • All Study Participants - Acute Intermittent Hypoxia vs All Study Participants - Sham · ANOVA · p = <0.05
PrimaryChange in Mouth Occlusion Pressure (P0.1)

An assessment of the pressure generated in the first 0.1 seconds of the participant's initiation of inhalation.

Time frame:
Change between baseline and 30 minutes post-intermittent hypoxia or sham.
Reported as:
Mean · cmH2O
Change in Mouth Occlusion Pressure (P0.1)
cmH2OAll Study Participants - Acute Intermittent HypoxiaAll Study Participants - Sham
Change in Mouth Occlusion Pressure (P0.1)0.24 ± 0.300.15 ± 0.50
Statistical analysis
  • All Study Participants - Acute Intermittent Hypoxia vs All Study Participants - Sham · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05 (Uncorrected p values are reported.)

Adverse events

Collected over 3 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)
Sham Intermittent Hypoxia0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)All Study Participants
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years17
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Study Participants
Mean34.1 ± 14.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Study Participants
Female4
Male13
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)All Study Participants
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Study Participants
United States17
ASIA Impairment Scale
ASIA Impairment Scale(Participants)All Study Participants
AIS A Complete SCI6
AIS B motor complete SCI7
AIS C motor incomplete3
AIS D motor incomplete1
Spinal Cord Injury chronicity
Spinal Cord Injury chronicity(months)All Study Participants
Mean63.1 ± 112.9
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)(units on a scale)All Study Participants
Mean40.2 ± 15.3

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
  • Brooks Rehabilitation
    Jacksonville, Florida 32216, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gonzalez-Rothi EJ, Lee KZ, Dale EA, Reier PJ, Mitchell GS, Fuller DD. Intermittent hypoxia and neurorehabilitation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015 Dec 15;119(12):1455-65. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00235.2015. Epub 2015 May 21. PubMed 25997947 ↗
  • Hayes HB, Jayaraman A, Herrmann M, Mitchell GS, Rymer WZ, Trumbower RD. Daily intermittent hypoxia enhances walking after chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2014 Jan 14;82(2):104-13. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000437416.34298.43. Epub 2013 Nov 27. PubMed 24285617 ↗
  • Trumbower RD, Jayaraman A, Mitchell GS, Rymer WZ. Exposure to acute intermittent hypoxia augments somatic motor function in humans with incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Feb;26(2):163-72. doi: 10.1177/1545968311412055. Epub 2011 Aug 5. PubMed 21821826 ↗
  • Tester NJ, Fuller DD, Fromm JS, Spiess MR, Behrman AL, Mateika JH. Long-term facilitation of ventilation in humans with chronic spinal cord injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan 1;189(1):57-65. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201305-0848OC. PubMed 24224903 ↗
  • Satriotomo I, Nichols NL, Dale EA, Emery AT, Dahlberg JM, Mitchell GS. Repetitive acute intermittent hypoxia increases growth/neurotrophic factor expression in non-respiratory motor neurons. Neuroscience. 2016 May 13;322:479-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.060. Epub 2016 Mar 2. PubMed 26944605 ↗
  • Sutor T, Cavka K, Vose AK, Welch JF, Davenport P, Fuller DD, Mitchell GS, Fox EJ. Single-session effects of acute intermittent hypoxia on breathing function after human spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2021 Aug;342:113735. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113735. Epub 2021 May 2. PubMed 33951477 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 22, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 37 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2023, 3 years 2 months after primary completion.

Of 766 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Cord Injuries, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 65. This study's 37 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 816 studies reached it within 35 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 65.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 20, 2017
First posted
Mar 6, 2017
StartActual
Jul 10, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 1, 2020
CompletionActual
Sep 1, 2020
Results first posted
Nov 18, 2023
Last update
Nov 18, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03071393
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 6, 2017
Start date
Jul 10, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2020
Completion
Sep 1, 2020
Results posted
Nov 18, 2023
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Study contacts

Emily J Fox, MHS, DPT, PhD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion