CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03070067Updated Aug 18, 2017

SpecTRA; A Study of the Validation of Protein Biomarkers in Transient Ischemic Attack

An observational study in TIA, sponsored by Andrew Penn. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-18.

Sponsored by Andrew Penn · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,150
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A clinical decision support rule/tool for classification of TIA/mimic that will enable rapid detection of ACVS in hyper-acute settings is being developed. Also under development is a multi-protein test using mass spectrometry (MS). This test will provide TIA results within an hour or two for a fraction of the price of neuroimaging. With guidance provided by this test at their disposal, physicians can inform patients whether they can go home safely or whether they need further testing. The right patients will receive the right treatment, reduce unwarranted imaging risks and costs, and reduce the burden of stroke. The Heart and Stroke Foundation will work to ensure that physicians, allied healthcare providers, the public and other stakeholders are aware of the outcomes and clinical impacts of this project.

Further, work is being done to establish the mechanisms to develop a strong phenotype for TIA that includes medical imaging (MRI), cardiac monitoring, cognitive assessments, and surveillance of health outcomes for extended periods of time.

Read the detailed description

Patients who fulfill all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria after giving informed consent will be enrolled in the Validation study.

At enrollment, patients will receive a stroke nurse assessment in the Emergency Department (ED) and clinical information documented on an ACVS Assessment Form/SpecTRA Case Report Form. Patients will provide 6 mL of blood drawn into a purple-top EDTA tube that will be processed for proteomic analyses. These blood draws may or may not occur with the standard-of-care blood draw in the ED or stroke unit. Clinical orders include medical imaging (MRI +/- CT/CTA), cardiac monitoring (24hr +/- extended event monitoring). Patients will be referred by the attending ED physician to a stroke clinic for neurological consultation within 48 hours - 7 days, whereby diagnosis of (i) possible ACVS; (ii) definite ACVS or (iii) mimic will be made. At the stroke clinic a cognitive screening test will be administered either as part of usual clinical care by treating physicians, nurses, or a study coordinator. A re- assessment will be repeated at 90 days by phone. MRI will be reviewed initially for clinical interpretation at the neurological consultation for evidence of brain ischemia (DWI+) and later by neuro-radiologists for definitive diagnosis in study purposes. Final adjudication of TIA and aetiology will be done by the non-blinded principal investigators at each site based on diagnostic results plus 90-day and up to 2-year outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • TIA
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Andrew Penn is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population includes individuals presenting to the hospital ED or stroke clinic with symptoms suggesting mild ACVS who would be referred to the outpatient stroke clinic. Patients will be recruited primarily from emergency department settings or hospital-based stroke units.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Time from the neurologic event to study enrollment is within \<24 hours of first symptom onset.
  2. All planned diagnostic tests for stroke evaluation must be completed, including brain imaging (MRI) within 4-7 days; and 24-hour +/- extended cardiac monitoring.
  3. Be able to provide blood samples collected either under standard-of-care presentation in the ED or hospital-based stroke unit, or by a study-specific personnel outside of standard-of-care collections.
  4. Age ≥18 years.
  5. Written informed consent consistent with local regulations governing research in human subjects.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Stroke severity exceeding 4 on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Severity scale (NIHSS \<4).
  2. Contraindications to brain imaging.
  3. Non-English speaking, unless translator present.
  4. Isolated monocular blindness.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,150 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Mild ACVS-definite

    Clinical diagnosis of ACVS, and imaging positive (either DWI+ or CT/CTA+).

    Other: Non-Interventional Study

  • Mild ACVS-possible

    Clinical diagnosis of ACVS, and DWI- and/or CTA-.

    Other: Non-Interventional Study

  • Mimic

    Clinical diagnosis of mimic and imaging negative.

    Other: Non-Interventional Study

Interventions

  • OtherNon-Interventional Study

    This is a non-interventional study. However, several blood samples will be taken which would not be taken as part of standard of care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Validation of a Protein Classifier for the Diagnosis of TIA in the Emergency Department

    Calculated score for distinguishing ACVS from Mimic based on previously locked-down formula involving 16 proteins measured using multiple reaction monitoring in blood samples taken within 24 hours from onset of symptoms.

    Time frame: 24 Hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Validation of a Clinical Classifier for the Diagnosis of TIA in the Emergency Department.

    Calculated score for distinguishing ACVS from Mimic based on previously locked-down formula involving 50 clinical variables recorded on a standardized case report form.

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Foothills Medical Centre
    Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada
  • Vancouver Island Health Authority
    Victoria, British Columbia V8R 1J8, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Penn AM, Croteau NS, Votova K, Sedgwick C, Balshaw RF, Coutts SB, Penn M, Blackwood K, Bibok MB, Saly V, Hegedus J, Yu AYX, Zerna C, Klourfeld E, Lesperance ML. Systolic blood pressure as a predictor of transient ischemic attack/minor stroke in emergency department patients under age 80: a prospective cohort study. BMC Neurol. 2019 Oct 25;19(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1466-4. PubMed 31653207 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03070067
Lead sponsor
Andrew Penn
Collaborators
Genome Canada, Genome British Columbia, Genome Alberta, Vancouver Island Health Authority, LifeLabs, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Stroke Services BC, Bruker Daltonics, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control
Responsible party
Andrew Penn (Principal Investigator, Vancouver Island Health Authority) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 3, 2017
Start date
Apr 1, 2015
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2017
Completion
Mar 31, 2017
Last update
Aug 18, 2017

Study contacts

Andrew M Penn, M.D.
principal investigator · Vancouver Island Health Authority
Shelagh Coutts, M.D.
principal investigator · Alberta Health services
Christoph Borchers, P.hD
principal investigator · UVic-Genome BC Proteomics Centre

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion