CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03067350VORIGENEUpdated Feb 18, 2019

Influence of a Combined Pharmacogenetic Score on Through Plasma Voriconazole Concentrations in Haematological Patients

An observational study in Invasive Aspergillosis, Haematological Cancer Patients and Voriconazole, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
47
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Hypothesis: A pharmacogenetic score integrating both CYP3A genotypes could be influence initial trough voriconazole plasma concentrations and thus useful to adapt a priori voriconazole dosing in order to get adequate voriconazole exposure as possible after starting treatment.

Main Objective: To determine predictive value of a combined pharmacogenetic score on onset of trough voriconazole plasma concentration inferior than lower therapeutic target.

Read the detailed description

Voriconazole (VRC), the gold-standard treatment of invasive aspergillosis is characterized by variables and nonlinear pharmacokinetics, causing many under- or over-dosing. A link exist between trough plasma concentrations (Cmin) of VRC and effectiveness but also its toxicity. Thus the longitudinal therapeutic drug monitoring of VRC is now recommended with a therapeutic range between 1 and 5 mg/L. The pharmacokinetic variability of VRC is in part explained by its metabolism, mainly dependent on cytochrome P 450 (CYP), particularly CYP2C19, 3A4, 3A5; all these CYP exhibiting genetic polymorphisms. The authors, recently shown, and for the first time , in a retrospective study conducted in 29 patients allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell that initial VRC Cmin adjusted the dose was not only influenced by the route of administration but also by a pharmacogenetics score whose determination is to assign each genotype CYP2C19 and CYP3A a score expressed in a arbitrary units.

The combined pharmacogenetic score was strongly correlated with the original Cmin (r= -0.748; p = 0.002) and was the only independent predictor of initial Cmin (after adjusting the dose and the route of administration). In addition, none of the patients having a genetic score \<2 (ie metabolizing capacity of reduced VRC) did not show an initial Cmin below 1 mg/L, while the initial Cmin was below this threshold efficiency in 47% of patients with a genetic score >2. The aim of this new study is to confirm the impact of the pharmacogenetic score on the initial VRC Cmin over a larger prospective cohort of 60 adult patients with onco-hematological diseases.

02

Conditions studied

  • Invasive Aspergillosis
  • Haematological Cancer Patients
  • Voriconazole

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • voriconazole
  • pharmacogenetics
  • pharmacokinetics
  • therapeutic drug monitoring
03

In context

Aspergillosis

201 studies on the registry are indexed under Aspergillosis; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is below the median of 150 across 81 observational studies indexed under Aspergillosis.

Browse Aspergillosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 815 studies on the registry; 205 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patients suffering from haematological cancer Followed at the hematolofic clinic of Grenoble University Hospital Starting treatment by voriconazole whatever the route of administration

Inclusion criteria

  • patients suffering from haematological cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • less than 18-years old
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of initial voriconazole trough plasma concentration in the therapeutic range (1-4mg/l)

    Initial voriconazole trough plasma concentration

    Time frame: concentration measured between 5 to 10 days after voriconazole treatment initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. initial voriconazole trough plasma concentrations adjusted on the dose

    Initial voriconazole trough plasma concentration

    Time frame: concentration measured between 5 to 10 days after voriconazole treatment initiation

  2. number of patients with therapeutic success

    treatment outcome determined 3 months after voriconazole initiation (failure, stable response, success)

    Time frame: 3 months after voriconazole therapy initiation

  3. number of patients with adverse effects

    adverse effects include neurological disorders such as visual disturbance and/or hallucinations and hepatotoxicity (evaluated by ALAT/ASAT, bilirubin and γ-GT levels),

    Time frame: duration of voriconazole treatment (maximum length of follow-up : 3 months)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes
    Grenoble, 38043, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gautier-Veyret E, Fonrose X, Tonini J, Thiebaut-Bertrand A, Bartoli M, Quesada JL, Bulabois CE, Cahn JY, Stanke-Labesque F. Variability of voriconazole plasma concentrations after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: impact of cytochrome p450 polymorphisms and comedications on initial and subsequent trough levels. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):2305-14. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04838-14. Epub 2015 Feb 2. PubMed 25645831 ↗
  • Gautier-Veyret E, Fonrose X, Stanke-Labesque F. A genetic score combining CYP450 2C19 and 3A4 genotypes to predict voriconazole plasma exposure? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016 Aug;48(2):221-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 Jun 7. No abstract available. PubMed 27318623 ↗
  • Tonini J, Bailly S, Gautier-Veyret E, Wambergue C, Pelloux H, Thiebaut-Bertrand A, Cornet M, Stanke-Labesque F, Maubon D. Contribution of a Simple Bioassay in Effective Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Posaconazole and Voriconazole. Ther Drug Monit. 2015 Oct;37(5):685-8. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000199. PubMed 26384041 ↗
  • Tonini J, Thiebaut A, Jourdil JF, Berruyer AS, Bulabois CE, Cahn JY, Stanke-Labesque F. Therapeutic drug monitoring of posaconazole in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients who develop gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Oct;56(10):5247-52. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00815-12. Epub 2012 Jul 30. PubMed 22850515 ↗
  • Jourdil JF, Tonini J, Stanke-Labesque F. Simultaneous quantitation of azole antifungals, antibiotics, imatinib, and raltegravir in human plasma by two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2013 Mar 1;919-920:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.12.028. Epub 2013 Jan 9. PubMed 23384531 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03067350
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 1, 2017
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Jan 2019
Completion
Jan 2019
Last update
Feb 18, 2019

Study contacts

Elodie GAUTIER
principal investigator · University Hospital, Grenoble

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion