CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03054337Updated Apr 8, 2021Results posted

Dose-Finding Study of Vadadustat in Japanese Subjects With Anemia Secondary to Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease (NDD-CKD)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Vadadustat and Placebo in Anemia and Non-dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease, sponsored by Akebia Therapeutics. Completed at 18 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-08.

Sponsored by Akebia Therapeutics · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2016, registered Feb 2017).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study to assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) of orally administered vadadustat in Japanese participants with anemia secondary to Non-dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease (NDD-CKD).

02

Conditions studied

  • Anemia
  • Non-dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease

Keywords

  • Anemia
  • kidney
  • non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease
  • CKD
  • NDD-CKD
  • renal
  • vadadustat
  • AKB-6548
  • hypoxia-inducible factor
  • hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)
  • HIF
  • prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor (PHI)
  • PHI
  • Japan
  • Japanese
  • Akebia (AKB)
03

In context

Kidney Diseases

3,840 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Diseases; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 70 across 2,640 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Diseases.

Browse Kidney Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Akebia Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 21 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 12 (57%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female Japanese participants ≥20 years of age
  • Diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 milliliters per minute per 1.73 meters squared (mL/min/1.73 m\^2)
  • Hemoglobin (Hb) ≤10.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL)
  • Not currently being treated with dialysis and not expected to start dialysis within 3 months of screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anemia due to a cause other than CKD or presence of active bleeding or recent blood loss
  • Sickle cell disease, myelodysplastic syndromes, bone marrow fibrosis, hematologic malignancy, myeloma, hemolytic anemia, thalassemia, or pure red cell aplasia
  • Red blood cell transfusion within 4 weeks prior to or during screening
  • Intravenous iron within 4 weeks prior to or during screening
  • Any use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents within 6 weeks prior to or during screening
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vadadustat, Dose 1

    Daily oral dose

    Drug: Vadadustat

  • Experimental
    Vadadustat, Dose 2

    Daily oral dose

    Drug: Vadadustat

  • Experimental
    Vadadustat, Dose 3

    Daily oral dose

    Drug: Vadadustat

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Daily oral dose

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugVadadustat

    Also known as: AKB-6548

  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Levels From Pre-treatment to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    The pre-treatment value for Hb was defined as the average of 2 values obtained prior to treatment, i.e., the qualifying screening value and the Baseline value. Change from Pre-treatment was calculated as the Week 6 value minus the Pre-treatment value.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment; Week 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Reach the Target Hb Level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL From Baseline up to Week 16

    Time for this analysis was measured from Day 1 (Baseline) through the point in time during either the Primary Efficacy Period or the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period when a participant's Hb level achieved the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL.

    Time frame: from Baseline up to Week 16

  2. Mean Hb Levels at the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    Data are reported as mean of the actual Week 6 values.

    Time frame: up to Week 6

  3. Mean Hb Levels at the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Data are reported as mean of the actual Week 16 values.

    Time frame: up to Week 16

  4. Number of Participants Who Achieved the Target Hb Level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL at the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Time frame: up to Week 16

  5. Mean Change in Hb Between Pre-treatment and the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    The pre-treatment value for Hb was defined as the average of 2 values obtained prior to treatment, i.e., the qualifying screening value and the Baseline value. Change from Pre-treatment was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Pre-treatment value.

    Time frame: Pre-treatment; Week 16

  6. Mean Change in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count and Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  7. Mean Change in RBC Count and Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

  8. Mean Change in Hematocrit and Reticulocytes From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  9. Mean Change in Hematocrit and Reticulocytes From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

  10. Mean Change in Iron and Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  11. Mean Change in Iron and TIBC From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

  12. Mean Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  13. Mean Change in TSAT From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

  14. Mean Change in Ferritin and Hepcidin From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  15. Mean Change in Ferritin and Hepcidin From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

  16. Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents (ESAs) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    ESA rescue is defined as participants with ESA administration and 1) the participant experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or symptoms of anemia, 2) the participant's Hb level is \<9.0 g/dL, and 3) reason for early study withdrawal of worsening of anemia requiring ESA rescue or blood transfusion. Participants who initiated rescue therapy (including ESAs) were required to stop study drug treatment and were discontinued from the study.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  17. Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With ESAs From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    ESA rescue is defined as participants with ESA administration and 1) the participant experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or symptoms of anemia, 2) the participant's Hb level is \<9.0 g/dL, and 3) reason for early study withdrawal of worsening of anemia requiring ESA rescue or blood transfusion. Participants who initiated rescue therapy (including ESAs) were required to stop study drug treatment and were discontinued from the study.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

  18. Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With a RBC Transfusion From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

    Participants who initiated rescue therapy (including RBC transfusion) were required to stop study drug treatment and were discontinued from the study.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 6

  19. Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With a RBC Transfusion From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Participants who initiated rescue therapy (including RBC transfusion) were required to stop study drug treatment and were discontinued from the study.

    Time frame: Baseline; Week 16

  20. Number of the Participants With the Indicated Number of Dose Adjustments From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    Increases in dose were not allowed during the 6-week Primary Efficacy Period.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

  21. Number of Participants Who Maintained Iron Sufficiency From Baseline to Week 6

    Iron sufficiency was defined as ferritin ≥50 ng/mL and TSAT ≥20%.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 6

  22. Number of Participants Who Maintained Iron Sufficiency From Baseline to Week 16

    Iron sufficiency was defined as ferritin ≥50 ng/mL and TSAT ≥20%.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

  23. Plasma Concentration Profile of Vadadustat and Its Metabolites Using a Pre-dose Sample From Week 4

    Blood samples were collected for analysis.

    Time frame: Week 4, pre-dose

  24. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the Primary Efficacy Period

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding) that occurred in the protocol-specified AE reporting period. An AE included medical conditions, signs, and symptoms not previously observed in the participant that emerged during the protocol-specified AE reporting period, including signs or symptoms associated with pre-existing underlying conditions that were not present prior to the AE reporting period. An AE that met one or more of the following criteria or outcomes was classified as serious: death; life-threatening; in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; was considered a medically important event not meeting the above criteria, but which could jeopardize a participant, or could require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the criteria listed in this definition.

    Time frame: up to Week 6

  25. Number of Participants With TEAEs and Treatment-emergent SAEs in the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding) that occurred in the protocol-specified AE reporting period. An AE included medical conditions, signs, and symptoms not previously observed in the participant that emerged during the protocol-specified AE reporting period, including signs or symptoms associated with pre-existing underlying conditions that were not present prior to the AE reporting period. An AE that met one or more of the following criteria or outcomes was classified as serious: death; life-threatening; in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; was considered a medically important event not meeting the above criteria, but which could jeopardize a participant, or could require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the criteria listed in this definition.

    Time frame: up to Week 16

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2021

Participant flow

Primary Efficacy Period (6 Weeks)
Participant flow — Primary Efficacy Period (6 Weeks)
MilestoneVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Started121213545
Completed121213545
Not completed000000
Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
Participant flow — Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
MilestoneVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Started121213545
Completed111012544
Not completed121001
Withdrew: Investigator discretion121001

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Levels From Pre-treatment to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

The pre-treatment value for Hb was defined as the average of 2 values obtained prior to treatment, i.e., the qualifying screening value and the Baseline value. Change from Pre-treatment was calculated as the Week 6 value minus the Pre-treatment value.

Time frame:
Pre-treatment; Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · grams per deciliter (g/dL)
Mean Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Levels From Pre-treatment to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
grams per deciliter (g/dL)Vadadustat 150Vadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Mean Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Levels From Pre-treatment to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period0.43 ± 0.2241.13 ± 0.2231.62 ± 0.215-0.47 ± 0.206
Statistical analysis
  • Vadadustat 150 vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0045 · Least squares mean difference: 0.90 · 95% CI 0.29 to 1.51The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model included treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Least squares mean difference: 1.59 · 95% CI 0.98 to 2.21The ANCOVA model included treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Least squares mean difference: 2.09 · 95% CI 1.49 to 2.70The ANCOVA model included treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
SecondaryTime to Reach the Target Hb Level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL From Baseline up to Week 16

Time for this analysis was measured from Day 1 (Baseline) through the point in time during either the Primary Efficacy Period or the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period when a participant's Hb level achieved the target range of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL.

Time frame:
from Baseline up to Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time to Reach the Target Hb Level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL From Baseline up to Week 16
daysVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Time to Reach the Target Hb Level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL From Baseline up to Week 1656.8 ± 43.3139.0 ± 38.5225.6 ± 16.4779.0 ± 11.3171.0 ± 14.0054.5 ± 33.67
SecondaryMean Hb Levels at the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

Data are reported as mean of the actual Week 6 values.

Time frame:
up to Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · g/dL
Mean Hb Levels at the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
g/dLVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Mean Hb Levels at the End of the Primary Efficacy Period10.392 ± 0.728010.675 ± 1.269311.162 ± 1.11699.421 ± 0.9242
SecondaryMean Hb Levels at the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

Data are reported as mean of the actual Week 16 values.

Time frame:
up to Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · g/dL
Mean Hb Levels at the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
g/dLVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Mean Hb Levels at the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period10.973 ± 0.571111.230 ± 0.751411.342 ± 0.647310.860 ± 0.585711.425 ± 0.917911.950 ± 0.6608
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Achieved the Target Hb Level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL at the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
Time frame:
up to Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Achieved the Target Hb Level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL at the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Number of Participants Who Achieved the Target Hb Level of 10.0 to 12.0 g/dL at the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period11811532
SecondaryMean Change in Hb Between Pre-treatment and the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

The pre-treatment value for Hb was defined as the average of 2 values obtained prior to treatment, i.e., the qualifying screening value and the Baseline value. Change from Pre-treatment was calculated as the Week 16 value minus the Pre-treatment value.

Time frame:
Pre-treatment; Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · g/dL
Mean Change in Hb Between Pre-treatment and the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
g/dLVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Mean Change in Hb Between Pre-treatment and the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period0.982 ± 0.36761.610 ± 1.16921.779 ± 0.81170.790 ± 0.30701.538 ± 0.52502.075 ± 0.2784
SecondaryMean Change in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count and Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · 10^6 cells/microliter (μL)
Mean Change in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count and Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
10^6 cells/microliter (μL)Vadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
RBC Count0.17 ± 0.0750.34 ± 0.0750.48 ± 0.073-0.17 ± 0.070
Absolute Reticulocyte Count0.01 ± 0.0040.01 ± 0.0030.01 ± 0.0030.01 ± 0.003
Statistical analysis
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0018 · Least squares mean difference: 0.34 · 95% CI 0.13 to 0.55The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Least squares mean difference: 0.51 · 95% CI 0.30 to 0.72The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Least squares mean difference: 0.66 · 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.7804 · Least squares mean difference: 0.00 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0986 · Least squares mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.00 to 0.02The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1661 · Least squares mean difference: 0.01 · 95% CI -0.00 to 0.02The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
SecondaryMean Change in RBC Count and Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · 10^6 cells/μL
Mean Change in RBC Count and Absolute Reticulocyte Count From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
10^6 cells/μLVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
RBC Count0.305 ± 0.18700.476 ± 0.44060.593 ± 0.31860.186 ± 0.21650.438 ± 0.21750.608 ± 0.1771
Absolute Reticulocyte Count0.003078 ± 0.00940080.008001 ± 0.01568840.000196 ± 0.00850290.010716 ± 0.02799090.009703 ± 0.01033480.000595 ± 0.0171563
SecondaryMean Change in Hematocrit and Reticulocytes From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage
Mean Change in Hematocrit and Reticulocytes From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
percentageVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Hematocrit2.13 ± 0.6964.13 ± 0.6966.07 ± 0.667-1.17 ± 0.643
Reticulocytes0.16 ± 0.1110.28 ± 0.1110.19 ± 0.1070.25 ± 0.103
Statistical analysis
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0010 · Least squares mean difference: 3.30 · 95% CI 1.40 to 5.20The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Least squares mean difference: 5.30 · 95% CI 3.38 to 7.22The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Least squares mean difference: 7.24 · 95% CI 5.37 to 9.11The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.5889 · Least squares mean difference: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.39 to 0.22The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.8074 · Least squares mean difference: 0.04 · 95% CI -0.27 to 0.34The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.6952 · Least squares mean difference: -0.06 · 95% CI -0.36 to 0.24The ANCOVA model will include treatment assignment (3 dosed groups; 1 placebo group) and pre-treatment Hb value as a covariate.
SecondaryMean Change in Hematocrit and Reticulocytes From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Mean Change in Hematocrit and Reticulocytes From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
percentageVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Hematocrit3.28 ± 1.9475.17 ± 4.9915.39 ± 2.8442.32 ± 1.8275.80 ± 1.5666.05 ± 1.997
Reticulocytes-0.02 ± 0.2320.07 ± 0.442-0.18 ± 0.2790.28 ± 0.8930.15 ± 0.238-0.18 ± 0.377
SecondaryMean Change in Iron and Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms per deciliter (μg/dL)
Mean Change in Iron and Total Iron Binding Capacity (TIBC) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
micrograms per deciliter (μg/dL)Vadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Iron-1.8 ± 19.58-2.4 ± 20.754.4 ± 30.82-7.4 ± 19.92
TIBC44.9 ± 32.975.2 ± 35.6093.8 ± 44.747.6 ± 23.55
Statistical analysis
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.3702test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.5524test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1589test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0092test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
SecondaryMean Change in Iron and TIBC From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · μg/dL
Mean Change in Iron and TIBC From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
μg/dLVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Iron11.7 ± 38.253.5 ± 31.1711.5 ± 28.56-1.4 ± 21.825.5 ± 24.665.8 ± 25.59
TIBC51.8 ± 48.4143.4 ± 42.7742.8 ± 28.2847.6 ± 21.7173.5 ± 39.9544.5 ± 43.19
SecondaryMean Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Mean Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
percentageVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Mean Change in Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period-4.96 ± 7.343-7.31 ± 8.380-6.78 ± 10.609-4.72 ± 8.931
Statistical analysis
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.9092test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1484test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1313test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
SecondaryMean Change in TSAT From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · percentage
Mean Change in TSAT From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
percentageVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Mean Change in TSAT From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period-1.47 ± 10.365-2.68 ± 13.201-0.19 ± 9.857-7.00 ± 12.247-5.03 ± 11.342-2.68 ± 10.608
SecondaryMean Change in Ferritin and Hepcidin From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
Mean Change in Ferritin and Hepcidin From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)Vadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Ferritin-38.48 ± 34.227-69.36 ± 49.965-101.54 ± 57.697-11.44 ± 31.408
Hepcidin-24.622 ± 20.0165-40.819 ± 27.2486-37.964 ± 21.0819-3.824 ± 18.4986
Statistical analysis
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.1080test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0002test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0672test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 300 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.0004test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
  • Vadadustat 600 mg vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001test of treatment group difference based on ANCOVA model
SecondaryMean Change in Ferritin and Hepcidin From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 16
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Mean Change in Ferritin and Hepcidin From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
ng/mLVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Ferritin-79.45 ± 39.655-62.35 ± 36.808-59.68 ± 59.843-69.26 ± 46.519-146.63 ± 34.261-59.43 ± 13.618
Hepcidin-29.522 ± 22.7101-23.061 ± 53.0161-2.502 ± 21.2660-9.464 ± 19.1361-38.920 ± 23.4788-9.745 ± 9.2100
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Required Rescue With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents (ESAs) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

ESA rescue is defined as participants with ESA administration and 1) the participant experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or symptoms of anemia, 2) the participant's Hb level is \<9.0 g/dL, and 3) reason for early study withdrawal of worsening of anemia requiring ESA rescue or blood transfusion. Participants who initiated rescue therapy (including ESAs) were required to stop study drug treatment and were discontinued from the study.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents (ESAs) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents (ESAs) From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period0000
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Required Rescue With ESAs From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

ESA rescue is defined as participants with ESA administration and 1) the participant experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or symptoms of anemia, 2) the participant's Hb level is \<9.0 g/dL, and 3) reason for early study withdrawal of worsening of anemia requiring ESA rescue or blood transfusion. Participants who initiated rescue therapy (including ESAs) were required to stop study drug treatment and were discontinued from the study.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With ESAs From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With ESAs From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period021000
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Required Rescue With a RBC Transfusion From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period

Participants who initiated rescue therapy (including RBC transfusion) were required to stop study drug treatment and were discontinued from the study.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With a RBC Transfusion From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With a RBC Transfusion From Baseline to the End of the Primary Efficacy Period0000
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Required Rescue With a RBC Transfusion From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

Participants who initiated rescue therapy (including RBC transfusion) were required to stop study drug treatment and were discontinued from the study.

Time frame:
Baseline; Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With a RBC Transfusion From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Number of Participants Who Required Rescue With a RBC Transfusion From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period011001
SecondaryNumber of the Participants With the Indicated Number of Dose Adjustments From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

Increases in dose were not allowed during the 6-week Primary Efficacy Period.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of the Participants With the Indicated Number of Dose Adjustments From Baseline to the End of the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
0 dose adjustments312001
1 dose adjustment571311
2 dose adjustments343112
3 or more dose adjustments107121
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Maintained Iron Sufficiency From Baseline to Week 6

Iron sufficiency was defined as ferritin ≥50 ng/mL and TSAT ≥20%.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Maintained Iron Sufficiency From Baseline to Week 6
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Iron sufficiency maintained7449
Iron sufficiency not maintained5895
Statistical analysis
  • Vadadustat 150 mg vs Placebo · Fisher Exact · p = 0.0895
  • Vadadustat 300 mg · Fisher Exact · p = 1.000
  • Vadadustat 600 mg · Fisher Exact · p = 0.3845
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Maintained Iron Sufficiency From Baseline to Week 16

Iron sufficiency was defined as ferritin ≥50 ng/mL and TSAT ≥20%.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Maintained Iron Sufficiency From Baseline to Week 16
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
Iron sufficiency maintained624110
Iron sufficiency not maintained6109435
SecondaryPlasma Concentration Profile of Vadadustat and Its Metabolites Using a Pre-dose Sample From Week 4

Blood samples were collected for analysis.

Time frame:
Week 4, pre-dose
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)
Plasma Concentration Profile of Vadadustat and Its Metabolites Using a Pre-dose Sample From Week 4
micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL)Vadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
Vadadustat5530.9 ± 4168.8612955.8 ± 9771.6519291.5 ± 9325.30—
O-glucuronide3914.7 ± 5772.3912358.6 ± 7586.7316586.2 ± 12363.44—
Acyl-glucuronide0.00 ± 0.0001.95 ± 6.7558.99 ± 16.430—
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the Primary Efficacy Period

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding) that occurred in the protocol-specified AE reporting period. An AE included medical conditions, signs, and symptoms not previously observed in the participant that emerged during the protocol-specified AE reporting period, including signs or symptoms associated with pre-existing underlying conditions that were not present prior to the AE reporting period. An AE that met one or more of the following criteria or outcomes was classified as serious: death; life-threatening; in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/ incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; was considered a medically important event not meeting the above criteria, but which could jeopardize a participant, or could require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the criteria listed in this definition.

Time frame:
up to Week 6
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in the Primary Efficacy Period
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo
TEAEs4775
Treatment-emergent SAEs0000
SecondaryNumber of Participants With TEAEs and Treatment-emergent SAEs in the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (including a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding) that occurred in the protocol-specified AE reporting period. An AE included medical conditions, signs, and symptoms not previously observed in the participant that emerged during the protocol-specified AE reporting period, including signs or symptoms associated with pre-existing underlying conditions that were not present prior to the AE reporting period. An AE that met one or more of the following criteria or outcomes was classified as serious: death; life-threatening; in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; was considered a medically important event not meeting the above criteria, but which could jeopardize a participant, or could require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the criteria listed in this definition.

Time frame:
up to Week 16
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With TEAEs and Treatment-emergent SAEs in the Dose Adjustment and Maintenance Period
ParticipantsVadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mg
TEAEs9106333
Treatment-emergent SAEs052112

Adverse events

Collected over up to Week 18. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Primary Efficacy Period: 150 mg Vadadustat0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)4/12 (33.3%)
Primary Efficacy Period: 300 mg Vadadustat0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)7/12 (58.3%)
Primary Efficacy Period: 600 mg Vadadustat0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)7/13 (53.8%)
Primary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 150 mg Vadadustat0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
Primary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 300 mg Vadadustat0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)2/4 (50%)
Primary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 600 mg Vadadustat0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)3/5 (60%)
Dose Adjustment and Maintenance: 150 mg Vadadustat0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)9/12 (75%)
Dose Adjustment and Maintenance: 300 mg Vadadustat0/12 (0%)5/12 (41.7%)10/12 (83.3%)
Dose Adjustment and Maintenance: 600 mg Vadadustat0/13 (0%)2/13 (15.4%)6/13 (46.2%)
Dose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 150 mg Vadadustat0/5 (0%)1/5 (20%)2/5 (40%)
Dose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 300 mg Vadadustat0/4 (0%)1/4 (25%)2/4 (50%)
Dose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 600 mg Vadadustat0/5 (0%)2/5 (40%)2/5 (40%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventPrimary Efficacy Period: 150 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: 300 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: 600 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 150 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 300 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 600 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: 150 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: 300 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: 600 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 150 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 300 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 600 mg Vadadustat
InfluenzaInfections and infestations0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/51/40/5
Arteriovenous shunt procedureSurgical and medical procedures0/120/120/130/50/40/50/123/120/130/50/40/5
Duodenal ulcer hemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/50/41/5
Spinal compression fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/131/50/40/5
Renal impairmentRenal and urinary disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/50/41/5
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/50/41/5
Hepatic function abnormalHepatobiliary disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/121/120/130/50/40/5
End-stage renal diseaseRenal and urinary disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/121/120/130/50/40/5
Lung infectionInfections and infestations0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/121/130/50/40/5
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/121/130/50/40/5
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 64
Most frequent other events
EventPrimary Efficacy Period: 150 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: 300 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: 600 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 150 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 300 mg VadadustatPrimary Efficacy Period: Placebo Matched to 600 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: 150 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: 300 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: 600 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 150 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 300 mg VadadustatDose Adjustment and Maintenance: Placebo to 600 mg Vadadustat
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/121/120/130/51/40/51/121/121/131/50/40/5
HypertensionVascular disorders0/123/122/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/50/40/5
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/51/40/5
CystitisInfections and infestations0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/51/40/5
DizzinessNervous system disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/51/40/5
Loss of consciousnessNervous system disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/120/120/130/51/40/5
Uterine prolapseReproductive system and breast disorders0/120/120/130/51/40/50/120/120/130/50/40/5
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/122/120/130/50/41/5
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/120/120/130/50/40/50/121/121/131/50/40/5
Oedema due to renal diseaseGeneral disorders1/120/120/130/50/41/50/120/120/130/50/41/5

Baseline characteristics

Baseline data are reported for members of the Safety Population, comprised of all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. The Safety Population was based on the actual treatment that participants received.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Vadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mgTotal
Mean71.9 ± 10.3365.8 ± 11.5371.5 ± 12.8473.4 ± 3.0568.0 ± 21.2172.2 ± 8.6470.2 ± 11.55
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Vadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mgTotal
Female55811222
Male77543329
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Vadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mgTotal
Count of participants——————0
Hemoglobin Levels
Hemoglobin Levels(grams per deciliter (g/dL))Vadadustat 150 mgVadadustat 300 mgVadadustat 600 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 150 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 300 mgPlacebo to Vadadustat 600 mgTotal
Mean9.958 ± 0.80519.492 ± 0.88679.500 ± 0.844610.280 ± 0.93659.625 ± 0.65519.680 ± 0.81989.710 ± 0.8410
08

Study locations

18 sites
  • Aichi, Japan
  • Chiba, Japan
  • Ehime, Japan
  • Gunma, Japan
  • Hiroshima, Japan
  • Hokkaido, Japan
  • Hyogo, Japan
  • Ibaraki, Japan
  • Kanagawa, Japan
  • Nagano, Japan
  • Nara, Japan
  • Niigata, Japan
  • Oita, Japan
  • Okayama, Japan
  • Okinawa, Japan
  • Osaka, Japan
  • Shiga, Japan
  • Tokushima, Japan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2. PubMed 36005278 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 15, 2016
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 24, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03054337
Lead sponsor
Akebia Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 15, 2017
Start date
Oct 2016
Primary completion
Jul 4, 2017
Completion
Aug 28, 2017
Results posted
Apr 8, 2021
Last update
Apr 8, 2021

Study contacts

Akebia Therapeutics
study director · Sponsor GmbH

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion