ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03048318Updated Jun 29, 2017

Antegrade Arterial and Portal Flushing Versus Portal Flushing Only in LDLT

A Phase 4 interventional study of Arterial Flushing and Portal Flushing in Biliary Complications and Graft Function, Delayed, sponsored by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-29.

Sponsored by Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2015, registered Jan 2017).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Arterial flushing is a standard recommendation in deceased donor liver transplantation but not in living donor liver transplantation due to the risk of arterial intimal injury and short cold ischaemia time. There is recent evidence on benefit of retrograde arterial perfusion using hepatic venous occlusion and its benefits on post transplant cholestasis. However there is no data on antegrade arterial flushing.

Read the detailed description

Biliary reconstruction has been labeled the "Achilles heel" of liver transplantation and is a common cause of postoperative morbidity and also mortality .Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has a higher incidence of biliary complications of up to 30% which is higher than Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation and does not seem to improve significantly with experience.The virtually unchanged incidence of biliary strictures suggests that they are not simply "technical" in origin, but probably represent a mucosa ischemic injury inherent in the transplantation procedure. The blood supply of the bile duct is mainly from the arterial system and skeletonisation of the duct during dissection impairs the blood supply rendering it ischemic.

Various donor maneuvers for better flushing and preserving peribiliary vascular plexus and biliary mucosa have been studied to decrease biliary complications. LDLT have advantages of haemodynamic stable donor and short cold ischemia but also has disadvantages of small graft size, small ducts, complicated reconstruction and absence of arterial flush. Conventional portal flush in animal livers could not remove warm blood from the arterial system and grafts without retrograde arterial flush had higher post operative bilirubin.With further studies in Living Donor Liver Transplant, it was concluded that retrograde flushing may ameliorate post operative cholestasis. There has not been data published on antegrade arterial flushing and its effect on biliary complications in Living Donor Liver Transplant. This study aims to compare back table graft arterial and portal flushing with portal flushing alone and evaluate biliary and arterial complications.

Arterial flushing has been made part of standard protocol at our institute and its safety established. There are centers which routinely perform back table arterial flush.

02

Conditions studied

  • Biliary Complications
  • Graft Function, Delayed

Browse trials for

03

In context

Delayed Graft Function

83 studies on the registry are indexed under Delayed Graft Function; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is close to the median of 90 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Delayed Graft Function.

Browse Delayed Graft Function studies →

Lead sponsor

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India is the lead sponsor of 302 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients undergoing living donor liver transplant for decompensated chronic liver disease with right lobe grafts only

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Donor artery size less than 2 mm
  • More than one donor artery
  • GRWR \<0.8
  • ABO incompatible grafts
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Emergency transplants
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arterial and Portal Flushing of Graft

    Back table flush of portal vein and graft artery

    Procedure: Arterial Flushing · Procedure: Portal Flushing

  • Active comparator
    Portal Flushing only of Graft

    Back table flush of portal vein only

    Procedure: Portal Flushing

Interventions

  • ProcedureArterial Flushing
  • ProcedurePortal Flushing
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effects on biliary complications

    Occurence of biliary complication

    Time frame: Three months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital stay

    Occurrence of complications

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Morbidity

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Effect on graft function

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pamecha V, Sandhyav R, Sinha PK, Bharathy KGS, Sasturkar S. Antegrade Arterial and Portal Flushing Versus Portal Flushing Only for Right Lobe Live Donor Liver Transplantation-A Randomized Control Trial. Transplantation. 2018 Apr;102(4):e155-e162. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002088. PubMed 29334530 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03048318
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2017
Start date
Oct 1, 2015
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2017
Completion
Apr 30, 2017
Last update
Jun 29, 2017

Study contacts

Rommel Sandhyav, MS
principal investigator · Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
Viniyendra Pamecha, MS, FRSS, FEBS
principal investigator · Professor
Senthil Kumar, MS, FRCS
principal investigator · Additional Professor
Shridhar Sasturkar, MS, MCh
principal investigator · Assistant Professor
Piyush Kumar Sinha, MS, MCh
principal investigator · Assistant Professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion