ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03029299Updated Sep 25, 2017

Implementation Assessment and Clinical Utility of the FilmArray® Respiratory Panel (RP) EZ in a CLIA-waived Setting

An interventional study of FilmArray RP EZ in Respiratory Tract Infections, sponsored by BioFire Diagnostics, LLC. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-25.

Sponsored by BioFire Diagnostics, LLC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Sep 2017, 9 years 1 month ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

BioFire Diagnostics, LLC (BioFire; a bioMerieux company), has developed a multiplexed molecular-based in vitro diagnostic platform for infectious disease testing known as the FilmArray. The FilmArray Respiratory Panel (RP) EZ is a test designed for use with the FilmArray 2.0 EZ Configuration instrument that identifies common bacterial and viral microorganisms associated with respiratory tract infections from a nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimen collected in viral transport media (VTM). The RP EZ was granted CLIA-waived classification by the FDA in October 2016 and is the first highly-multiplexed molecular test to receive this designation.

The purpose of this study is to measure patient outcomes following implementation of the RP EZ test and to also gather data about physician office workflow and user interactions with the device. These data will be used to understand how the adoption of such tests may influence patient care in the CLIA-waived setting.

Read the detailed description

The FilmArray RP EZ may offer improvements over conventional CLIA-waived testing for respiratory infections. Molecular-based testing provides increased sensitivity and specificity relative to current clinical reference methods and multiplexed panels offer a greater breadth of organism identification and diagnostic yield than is available using standard methods available in the CLIA-waived setting. Because of these attributes, the results from this test have the potential to enable clinicians to more accurately diagnose and treat respiratory illness.

It is hypothesized that the sensitive, specific, and comprehensive results provided by FilmArray RP EZ will allow clinicians to more rapidly diagnose respiratory illness and implement appropriate therapy, as well as provide subjects with appropriate expectations about their course of illness.

This interventional clinical trial that will be initiated during the 2016-2017 respiratory illness season to measure the utility of FilmArray RP EZ when implemented in an outpatient care setting. At least three different outpatient or urgent care clinics within the UCLA Health system will be selected for participation. Subjects will be randomized into two groups within each site. The control group will receive standard of care according to the subject's provider's determination. The intervention group will receive testing with FilmArray RP EZ.

Outcome measures will include (but are not limited to) total healthcare costs, antimicrobial prescription rates, timeliness, and appropriateness of therapy, clinician attitudes towards laboratory test capabilities, and subject satisfaction with their healthcare encounter.

As specimens will be collected specifically for this research study, written informed consent, assent, and/or parental permission will be obtained from all study participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Tract Infections
03

In context

Respiratory Tract Infections

751 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Tract Infections; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is below the median of 200 across 540 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Tract Infections.

Browse Respiratory Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

BioFire Diagnostics, LLC is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject presents with signs/symptoms of respiratory infection including but not limited to fever, cough, sore throat, runny nose, myalgia, headache, chills, or fatigue.
  • Subject provides written /assent/parental permission
  • Willing and able to provide NPS specimen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is unable to provide consent/assent/parental permission
  • Children whose legal guardian is not available to give permission
  • Unable/unwilling to provide NPS specimen
  • Non-English speaking
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Subjects receive standard of care testing as determined by the clinician.

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Subjects are tested using the FilmArray RP EZ and the results are provided to the clinician for use in determination of patient care (along with any other clinician-ordered testing)

    Device: FilmArray RP EZ

Interventions

  • DeviceFilmArray RP EZ

    Patients in the intervention arm will be tested with the FilmArray RP EZ and the results of the test will be provided to the treating clinician

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time duration from initial visit to receipt of appropriate therapy

    Time to appropriate therapy as measured in days compared between intervention and control arms.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction scores

    Subject and clinician satisfaction with healthcare encounter as measured on 4 point preference scale (highly satisfied, satisfied, dissatisfied, highly dissatisfied) and compared between intervention and control arms

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

  2. Total healthcare costs

    Comparison of total healthcare costs measured in dollars for patients in Control vs Intervention arm

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Los Angeles
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2017 to primary completion in Sep 2017, 5 months.

Of 27 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Respiratory Tract Infections, half reached primary completion within 6 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 13. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 143 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 29.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 14, 2017
First posted
Jan 24, 2017
StartActual
Apr 4, 2017
Primary completionActual
Sep 15, 2017
CompletionActual
Sep 15, 2017
Last update
Sep 25, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 25, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03029299
Lead sponsor
BioFire Diagnostics, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 24, 2017
Start date
Apr 4, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2017
Completion
Sep 15, 2017
Last update
Sep 25, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion