CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03014336memsorbUpdated Feb 23, 2026Results posted

A New and Innovative Method for CO2 Removal in Anesthetic Circuits

An interventional study of memsorb in Anesthesia, sponsored by DMF Medical Incorporated. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-23.

Sponsored by DMF Medical Incorporated · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
286
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The drawbacks of chemical CO2 absorbers include the production of compounds harmful to patients that also lead into increased cost and environmental impact, as well as the daily disposal of compound special waste. Sustainable management of general anesthesia is a growing concern. Continually diluting anesthetic circuits, and the disposal of chemical granulate are serious environmental problems.

Read the detailed description

DMF Medical has developed a next-generation CO2 filter in order to address the safety issues with current chemical CO2 absorbers in anesthesia.

memsorb uses patented advanced medical membrane technology to filter CO2 from anesthetic circuits rather than absorbing via a chemical reaction.

This game changing technology relies on a polymeric membrane core (similar to the ones used in oxygenators for cardiac surgery) that selectively allows CO2 to leave the rebreathing system, while maintaining the anesthetic vapor in the circuit.

memsorb is a cartridge similar in size and shape to current solutions that simply clicks in place.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia

Keywords

  • co2 removal, anesthesia
03

In context

Lead sponsor

DMF Medical Incorporated is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class I, II, III (low-medium risk patient)
  • English-speaking patients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported as pregnant
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class IV (high risk patient)
  • Patients scheduled for emergency surgery
  • Documented respiratory disease, including COPD and severe asthma
  • Documented elevated pressure in the brain (intra cranial pressure, ICP)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
286 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Patients receive standard care with a standard CO2 absorber and agree to include their data in the study.

  • Experimental
    memsorb

    Patients agree to receive standard care but using memsorb, the new CO2 filter evaluated in this study.

    Device: memsorb

Interventions

  • Devicememsorb

    memsorb is a CO2 filter replacing current chemical CO2 absorbers

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. End-tidal CO2 Concentration (%)

    The mean concentration of carbon dioxide during the expiratory cycle, measured as a percentage (%), measured over the course of the surgical procedure.

    Time frame: From the start to the end of the intra-operative period for each participant

Other outcomes

  1. Fraction of Anaesthetic Agent (%)

    Inhaled and exhaled fraction of anaesthetic agent as collected from the anaesthetic patient record database. Mean % inhalational anesthetic was calculated per surgical procedure. Those means were used to calculate the overall mean

    Time frame: From the start to the end of the intra-operative period for each participant

07

Results

Posted Feb 23, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Early termination in McGill branch due to limited ability to recruit.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControlMemsorb
Started111175
Completed111175
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryEnd-tidal CO2 Concentration (%)

The mean concentration of carbon dioxide during the expiratory cycle, measured as a percentage (%), measured over the course of the surgical procedure.

Time frame:
From the start to the end of the intra-operative period for each participant
Reported as:
Mean · % end-tidal CO2
End-tidal CO2 Concentration (%)
% end-tidal CO2ControlMemsorb
End-tidal CO2 Concentration (%)5.069 ± 0.80685.096 ± 0.5995
Other pre-specifiedFraction of Anaesthetic Agent (%)

Inhaled and exhaled fraction of anaesthetic agent as collected from the anaesthetic patient record database. Mean % inhalational anesthetic was calculated per surgical procedure. Those means were used to calculate the overall mean

Time frame:
From the start to the end of the intra-operative period for each participant
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of fractional anesthetic agen
Fraction of Anaesthetic Agent (%)
percentage of fractional anesthetic agenControl Group - inspSEVOControl Group - ExpSEVOControl Group - InspDesControl Group - ExpDesMemsorb Group - inspSEVOMemsorb Group - ExpSEVOMemsorb Group - inspDesMemsorb Group - ExpDes
Fraction of Anaesthetic Agent (%)2.119 ± 0.74441.603 ± 0.63986.535 ± 1.5825.505 ± 1.4482.254 ± 0.62041.732 ± 0.57045.929 ± 1.5395.158 ± 1.536

Adverse events

Collected over From the start to the end of the intra-operative period for each participant, an average of 1 hour.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control0/111 (0%)0/111 (0%)0/111 (0%)
Memsorb0/175 (0%)0/175 (0%)0/175 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Surgical patients

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)ControlMemsorbTotal
≥ 18 years111175286
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlMemsorbTotal
Female5587142
Male5688144
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)ControlMemsorbTotal
Count of participants——0
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Queen Elizabeth II HSC, Halifax Infirmary Site
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3A7, Canada
  • McGill University Health Centre
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 20, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03014336
Lead sponsor
DMF Medical Incorporated
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 9, 2017
Start date
Mar 20, 2017
Primary completion
May 10, 2022
Completion
Jul 24, 2024
Results posted
Feb 23, 2026
Last update
Feb 23, 2026

Study contacts

Orlando Hung, MD
principal investigator · Nova Scotia Health Authority

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion