CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03007264Updated Aug 20, 2018

Cold Plasma for Wound Treatment, Safety Study

A Phase 1 interventional study of Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Intact Skin and Contaminant Given to Patient, sponsored by Association of Dutch Burn Centres. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-20.

Sponsored by Association of Dutch Burn Centres · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study the application of cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) will be tested on intact skin of volunteers. To test safety, several skin parameters will be monitored, the antimicrobial effect will be investigated as well. The investigators expect this treatment to have a good antimicrobial effect with acceptable, transient skin sensations.

Read the detailed description

Control of infection and bacterial colonisation constitutes a continuing challenge in patients with burns. Prevention of microbial contamination and infection is vital for burn wound care as bacterial presence can result in excessive inflammatory reactions, delayed re-epithelialisation, impaired matrix remodelling and bacteraemia. A novel method to decrease the likelihood of infection and to help cure wounds is cold atmospheric plasma (CAP). CAP has been shown in vitro to kill a wide range of pathogenic bacteria.

This safety study aims to demonstrate the safety, efficacy and efficiency of CAP for burn wound treatment. Intact skin of volunteers will be CAP treated. Local skin reaction (blister formation, pain, itching), erythema, local skin temperature, trans epidermal water loss (TEWL) and reduction of the bacterial load wil be monitored.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intact Skin
  • Contaminant Given to Patient

Keywords

  • cold atmospheric plasma
  • pain
  • bacteria
  • skin parameters
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Association of Dutch Burn Centres is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Able and willing to comply with the research protocol
  • No language barrier

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atopic dermatitis or other skin disease
  • Implanted electrical medical devices such cardiac pacemakers
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patients with infected wounds.
  • Life-threatening cardiac conductivity abnormality
  • Active malignancy
  • Women of childbearing age not using contraceptive measures
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CAP treated

    volar arm will be treated with cold atmospheric plasma.

    Device: Cold Atmospheric Plasma

  • Experimental
    CAP on bacteria

    volar arm with bacteria will be treated with cold atmospheric plasma.

    Device: Cold Atmospheric Plasma

  • No intervention
    no CAP on bacteria

    volar arm with bacteria will not be treated with cold atmospheric plasma. Sham comparator for measurements of skin parameters TEWL, temperature and bacterial load.

Interventions

  • DeviceCold Atmospheric Plasma

    CAP will be applied on one volar arm of volunteers for a total of 2 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. pain

    by using a visual analogue thermometer (VAT)

    Time frame: before to 30 minutes after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. local skin reaction

    blister formation, itching

    Time frame: directly to 30 minutes after treatment

  2. local skin temperature

    thermographic analysis

    Time frame: before to 30 minutes after treatment

  3. colour/pigmentation

    erythema, redness of the skin, by using a Dermaspectrometer

    Time frame: before to 30 minutes after treatment

  4. trans epidermal water loss

    barrier function of the skin by using TEWAmeter

    Time frame: before to 30 minutes after treatment

  5. reduction of the bacterial load

    quantified with scrub wash method

    Time frame: directly to 5 minutes after treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Association of Dutch Burn Centres
    Beverwijk, Noord-Holland 1942 LE, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kisch T, Schleusser S, Helmke A, Mauss KL, Wenzel ET, Hasemann B, Mailaender P, Kraemer R. The repetitive use of non-thermal dielectric barrier discharge plasma boosts cutaneous microcirculatory effects. Microvasc Res. 2016 Jul;106:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Mar 2. PubMed 26944583 ↗
  • Brehmer F, Haenssle HA, Daeschlein G, Ahmed R, Pfeiffer S, Gorlitz A, Simon D, Schon MP, Wandke D, Emmert S. Alleviation of chronic venous leg ulcers with a hand-held dielectric barrier discharge plasma generator (PlasmaDerm((R)) VU-2010): results of a monocentric, two-armed, open, prospective, randomized and controlled trial (NCT01415622). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jan;29(1):148-55. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12490. Epub 2014 Mar 25. PubMed 24666170 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03007264
Lead sponsor
Association of Dutch Burn Centres
Collaborators
Eindhoven University of Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 2, 2017
Start date
Jun 18, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 12, 2018
Completion
Jul 26, 2018
Last update
Aug 20, 2018

Study contacts

Esther Middelkoop, PhD
principal investigator · Red Cross Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion