A Phase 3 interventional study of SHP640 and PVP-I 0.6% in Adenoviral Conjunctivitis, sponsored by Shire. Terminated at 130 sites in 16 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-14.
Sponsored by Shire · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine if an investigational treatment is effective compared with placebo and PVP-Iodine in the treatment of adults and children with adenoviral conjunctivitis.
361 studies on the registry are indexed under Conjunctivitis; 17 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 219 is above the median of 100 across 299 interventional studies indexed under Conjunctivitis.
Browse Conjunctivitis studies →Shire is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Of its 47 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (100%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Meet at least 1 of the 2 criteria below:
a) Have a positive AdenoPlus test at Visit 1 in at least 1 eye. b) Have at least 2 of the following 5 criteria, based upon medical history and examination: i.Symptoms within the past 7 days consistent with acute upper respiratory tract infection (eg. sore throat, cough, rhinorrhea, etc).
ii. Contact within the past 7 days with family members or other individuals with recent onset of symptoms consistent with conjunctivitis iii. Acute onset within the past 4 days of one or more of the following ocular symptoms: burning/irritation, foreign body sensation, light sensitivity.
iv. Enlarged periauricular lymph node(s). v. Presence of follicles on tarsal conjunctiva. Note:If the participant only meets Inclusion Criterion (a positive AdenoPlus test in at least 1 eye), then the same eye must meet the mentioned below Inclusion Criterion.
Have a clinical diagnosis of suspected adenoviral conjunctivitis in at least 1 eye confirmed by the presence of the following minimal clinical signs and symptoms in that same eye:
Exclusion Criteria:
Note:history or concomitant presence of presumed seasonal or perennial allergic conjunctivitis signs/symptoms is not exclusionary.
Within 30 days prior to the first dose of investigational product:
Participants will receive one drop of SHP640 (0.1 percent \[%\] dexamethasone and 0.6% PVP-I) ophthalmic suspension in each eye 4 times daily (QID) for 7 days.
Drug: SHP640
Participants will receive one drop of 0.6% PVP-I ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
Drug: PVP-I 0.6%
Participants will receive one drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID for 7 days.
Other: Placebo
Participants will receive one drop of SHP640 (0.1 % dexamethasone and 0.6% PVP-I) ophthalmic suspension in each eye QID (with a minimum of 2 hours between doses) for 7 days.
Also known as: FST-100
Participants will receive one drop of PVP-I ophthalmic solution in each eye QID (with a minimum of 2 hours between doses) for 7 days.
Participants will receive one drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye QID (with a minimum of 2 hours between doses) for 7 days.
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution Among Who Received SHP640 or Placebo on Day 6
Clinical resolution of adenoviral conjunctivitis was defined as the absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her cell culture-immunofluorescence assay (CC-IFA) results at baseline. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on a 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern)-4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from the validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Watery conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0-3 scale (0 - None and 3 - Severe: Abundant quantity of watery discharge observed in the lower conjunctival fornix and in the lower lid margin). Higher score represent worse symptoms for both scores. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
Time frame: Day 6
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution Among Who Received SHP640 or Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) on Day 6
Clinical resolution of adenoviral conjunctivitis was defined as the absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on a 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern)-4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from the validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Watery conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0-3 scale (0 - None and 3 - Severe: Abundant quantity of watery discharge observed in the lower conjunctival fornix and in the lower lid margin). Higher score represent worse symptoms for both scores. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and PVP-I 0.6% reporting groups only but not in placebo.
Time frame: Day 6
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution Among Who Received Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) or Placebo on Day 6
Clinical resolution of adenoviral conjunctivitis was defined as the absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on a 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern)-4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from the validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Watery conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0-3 scale (0 - None and 3 - Severe: Abundant quantity of watery discharge observed in the lower conjunctival fornix and in the lower lid margin). Higher score represent worse symptoms for both scores. Data analysis was performed in PVP-I 0.6% and placebo reporting groups only but not in SHP640.
Time frame: Day 6
Number of Participants With Adenoviral Eradication Among Who Received Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) or Placebo on Day 3
Adenoviral eradication for the study eye was defined as negative Cell Culture- Immunofluorescence Assay (CC-IFA) in that eye. CC-IFA for each eye was conducted using conjunctival swab samples collected at each visit to determine the presence of adenovirus. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Data analysis was performed in PVP-I 0.6% and placebo reporting groups only but not in SHP640.
Time frame: Day 3
Number of Participants With Adenoviral Eradication Among Who Received SHP640 or Placebo on Day 6
Adenoviral eradication for the study eye was defined as negative CC-IFA in that eye. CC-IFA for each eye was conducted using conjunctival swab samples collected at each visit to determine the presence of adenovirus. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
Time frame: Day 6
Number of Participants With Adenoviral Eradication Among Who Received SHP640 or Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) on Day 6
Adenoviral eradication for the study eye was defined as negative CC-IFA in that eye. CC-IFA for each eye was conducted using conjunctival swab samples collected at each visit to determine the presence of adenovirus. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and PVP-I 0.6% reporting groups only but not in placebo.
Time frame: Day 6
Percent Change From Baseline in Adenovirus Viral Titer as Assessed by Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) at Day 6 and 8
qPCR test was performed on all CC-IFA positive samples at all visits to determine viral count in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Percent (%) change from baseline in adenovirus viral titer as assessed by qPCR was reported.
Time frame: Day 6 and 8
Number of Participants With Adenoviral Eradication on Day 8 and 12/Early Termination (ET)
Adenoviral eradication for the study eye was defined as negative CC-IFA in that eye. CC-IFA for each eye was conducted using conjunctival swab samples collected at each visit to determine the presence of adenovirus. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline.
Time frame: Day 8 and 12/ET
Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution on on Day 3, 8 and 12/Early Termination (ET)
Clinical resolution of adenoviral conjunctivitis was defined as the absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on a 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern)-4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from the validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Watery conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0-3 scale (0 - None and 3 - Severe: Abundant quantity of watery discharge observed in the lower conjunctival fornix and in the lower lid margin). Higher score represent worse symptoms for both scores.
Time frame: Day 3, 8 and 12/ET
Change From Baseline in Individual Clinical Signs Score at Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/Early Termination (ET)
The Individual clinical signs score (bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge) in the study were reported. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CCIFA results at baseline.
Time frame: Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/ET
Number of Participants With at Least 2 Point Reduction From Baseline in the Global Clinical Score at Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/Early Termination (ET)
Global clinical score was the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline.
Time frame: Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/ET
Number of Participants With Modified Clinical Resolution on Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/Early Termination (ET)
Modified clinical resolution was defined as a global clinical score of 0 or 1. Global clinical score was the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge. The study eyewas defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline.
Time frame: Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/ET
Number of Participants With Expanded Clinical Resolution on Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/Early Termination (ET)
Expanded clinical resolution was defined as a global clinical score of 0, 1, or 2 with neither injection nor discharge having a score of 2. Global clinical score was the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline.
Time frame: Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/ET
Number of Participants With Status of Cross-over Infection on Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/Early Termination (ET)
Number of participants with status of cross-over infection to a participant's fellow eye. Participants with only 1 infected eye at baseline were reported.
Time frame: Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/ET
Time to Clinical Resolution on Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/Early Termination (ET)
Time to clinical resolution were reported based on the assessments in the study eye.
Time frame: Day 3, 6, 8 and 12/ET
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) of SHP640
An Adverse Event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital abnormality/birth defect, is an important medical event. Any AE that occured after the first dose of IP instillation was considered a TEAE.
Time frame: From start of the study up to Day 14
This study was conducted at 97 sites in 15 countries between 27 March 2017 (first participant enrolled) to 13 May 2019 (last participant completed).
| Milestone | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 86 | 90 | 43 |
| Completed | 78 | 81 | 37 |
| Not completed | 8 | 9 | 6 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 4 | 5 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Physician decision | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by parent/guardian | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Clinical resolution of adenoviral conjunctivitis was defined as the absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her cell culture-immunofluorescence assay (CC-IFA) results at baseline. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on a 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern)-4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from the validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Watery conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0-3 scale (0 - None and 3 - Severe: Abundant quantity of watery discharge observed in the lower conjunctival fornix and in the lower lid margin). Higher score represent worse symptoms for both scores. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution Among Who Received SHP640 or Placebo on Day 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Clinical resolution of adenoviral conjunctivitis was defined as the absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on a 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern)-4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from the validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Watery conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0-3 scale (0 - None and 3 - Severe: Abundant quantity of watery discharge observed in the lower conjunctival fornix and in the lower lid margin). Higher score represent worse symptoms for both scores. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and PVP-I 0.6% reporting groups only but not in placebo.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution Among Who Received SHP640 or Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) on Day 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
Clinical resolution of adenoviral conjunctivitis was defined as the absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on a 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern)-4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from the validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Watery conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0-3 scale (0 - None and 3 - Severe: Abundant quantity of watery discharge observed in the lower conjunctival fornix and in the lower lid margin). Higher score represent worse symptoms for both scores. Data analysis was performed in PVP-I 0.6% and placebo reporting groups only but not in SHP640.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Clinical Resolution Among Who Received Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) or Placebo on Day 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Adenoviral eradication for the study eye was defined as negative Cell Culture- Immunofluorescence Assay (CC-IFA) in that eye. CC-IFA for each eye was conducted using conjunctival swab samples collected at each visit to determine the presence of adenovirus. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Data analysis was performed in PVP-I 0.6% and placebo reporting groups only but not in SHP640.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adenoviral Eradication Among Who Received Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) or Placebo on Day 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 |
Adenoviral eradication for the study eye was defined as negative CC-IFA in that eye. CC-IFA for each eye was conducted using conjunctival swab samples collected at each visit to determine the presence of adenovirus. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adenoviral Eradication Among Who Received SHP640 or Placebo on Day 6 | 14 | 0 | 7 |
Adenoviral eradication for the study eye was defined as negative CC-IFA in that eye. CC-IFA for each eye was conducted using conjunctival swab samples collected at each visit to determine the presence of adenovirus. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and PVP-I 0.6% reporting groups only but not in placebo.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adenoviral Eradication Among Who Received SHP640 or Povidone-Iodine (PVP-I) on Day 6 | 14 | 20 | 0 |
qPCR test was performed on all CC-IFA positive samples at all visits to determine viral count in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Percent (%) change from baseline in adenovirus viral titer as assessed by qPCR was reported.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Adenoviral eradication for the study eye was defined as negative CC-IFA in that eye. CC-IFA for each eye was conducted using conjunctival swab samples collected at each visit to determine the presence of adenovirus. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 8 | 20 | 22 | 13 |
| Day 12/ET | 28 | 28 | 13 |
Clinical resolution of adenoviral conjunctivitis was defined as the absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge in the study eye. The study eye was defined based on participant's bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on a 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern)-4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from the validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Watery conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0-3 scale (0 - None and 3 - Severe: Abundant quantity of watery discharge observed in the lower conjunctival fornix and in the lower lid margin). Higher score represent worse symptoms for both scores.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Day 8 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| Day 12/ET | 20 | 13 | 8 |
The Individual clinical signs score (bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge) in the study were reported. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CCIFA results at baseline.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Global clinical score was the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 3 | 15 | 5 | 7 |
| Day 6 | 22 | 20 | 11 |
| Day 8 | 24 | 23 | 13 |
| Day 12/ET | 30 | 27 | 12 |
Modified clinical resolution was defined as a global clinical score of 0 or 1. Global clinical score was the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge. The study eyewas defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Expanded clinical resolution was defined as a global clinical score of 0, 1, or 2 with neither injection nor discharge having a score of 2. Global clinical score was the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and watery conjunctival discharge. The study eye was defined based on participants bulbar conjunctival redness and watery conjunctival discharge scores at baseline as well as his/her CC-IFA results at baseline.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Number of participants with status of cross-over infection to a participant's fellow eye. Participants with only 1 infected eye at baseline were reported.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Time to clinical resolution were reported based on the assessments in the study eye.
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
An Adverse Event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital abnormality/birth defect, is an important medical event. Any AE that occured after the first dose of IP instillation was considered a TEAE.
| Participants | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events | 23 | 28 | 10 |
| Serious Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Collected over From start of the study up to Day 14. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHP640 | 0/86 (0%) | 0/86 (0%) | 12/86 (14%) |
| PVP-I 0.6% | 0/90 (0%) | 1/90 (1.1%) | 8/90 (8.9%) |
| Placebo | 0/41 (0%) | 0/41 (0%) | 1/41 (2.4%) |
| Event | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumonia bacterialInfections and infestations | 0/86 | 1/90 | 0/41 |
| Event | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instillation site painGeneral disorders | 12/86 | 8/90 | 1/41 |
Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population consisted of all screened participants who were randomized.
| Age, Continuous(Years) | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 41.3 ± 19.56 | 42.7 ± 21.43 | 43.4 ± 23.67 | 42.3 ± 21.10 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 46 | 47 | 24 | 117 |
| Male | 40 | 43 | 19 | 102 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 23 | 16 | 10 | 49 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 63 | 73 | 31 | 167 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | SHP640 | PVP-I 0.6% | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Asian | 14 | 11 | 5 | 30 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 9 | 11 | 5 | 25 |
| White | 62 | 64 | 30 | 156 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Showing the first 100 of 130 sites across 16 countries.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr
This study is terminated, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Conjunctivitis, Inclusion
Shire