CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02979041Updated May 24, 2018

VR Training for Pilots With Neck Pain

An interventional study of Interactive virtual reality training and Standard Care in Neck Pain and Cervical Pain, sponsored by University of Haifa. Completed at 2 sites in Israel. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-24.

Sponsored by University of Haifa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the proposed study is to investigate the effectiveness of an interactive, virtual reality (VR) training program for pilots compared with standard care. The study will be a randomized controlled trial (RCT) consisting of 60 pilots randomized into one of two groups: standard physiotherapy and medical care vs standard care and VR training. Outcome measures will include subjective scores of pain intensity and global perceived effect; objective measures of range of motion (ROM), neck motion velocity, and motion accuracy; and functional measure of days grounded due to neck pain. Data will be analyzed using ANOVA for within and between groups analyses.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the proposed study is to investigate the effectiveness of an interactive, virtual reality (VR) training program for pilots compared with standard care. The proposed intervention program includes training in neck range of motion, control, accuracy and coordination and is expected to reduce the prevalence and operational impact of neck pain in the intervention group more effectively than does standard care alone.

The proposed study will be designed as a randomized, controlled trial (RCT). Sixty fighter and helicopter pilots will be randomized into two groups, to receive either standard physiotherapy and medical care or standard care with the addition of interactive, dynamic, controlled training (a self-exercise program) in VR to address the fast, accurate head control required in flying tasks.

Subjective outcome measures will include pain intensity and global perceived effect. Objective measures will include range of motion, motion velocity and accuracy. The functional measure will include days grounded due to neck pain.

Statistical analysis will use independent, repeated measures ANOVA on each parameter, within and between groups. Post hoc comparisons, including several preplanned contrasts, will be performed to assess differences before and after treatment, and the stability of changes over time, in each group. The relationship of risk factors to performance failures will be assessed using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

This study is the first in the Israeli Air Force to evaluate this type of comprehensive, functional intervention program. Such research will dramatically advance the military's health care approach to neck pain, and may be further applied to other populations in and outside the Israeli Defence Force (IDF). This study may serve as a stepping stone to further research related to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention methods during a pilot's active service.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain
  • Cervical Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • neck pain
  • Virtual reality
  • Range of motion
  • physiotherapy
  • Air force
  • kinematics
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is close to the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Haifa is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • fighter and helicopter pilots from the Israeli Air Force
  • acute, sub-acute, and chronic neck pain, with or without referral to the upper limbs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological disorders (e.g. evidence for positive neurological signs), systemic disease, history of spinal surgery, or any disorders that may limit the ability to exercise
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    control

    Patients in the control group will receive standard physiotherapy and medical care, as provided to all patients with neck pain in the aviation medicine clinic. This will reflect the standard care that has been provided to all patients.

    Other: Standard Care

  • Experimental
    intervention

    Standard care (as provided to controls) with the addition of virtual reality training (a self-exercise program) using a VR system to address the fast, accurate head control required in flying tasks.

    Behavioral: Interactive virtual reality training

Interventions

  • BehavioralInteractive virtual reality training

    The proposed VR intervention program will provide active training to be performed individually 4 times a week for 20 minutes a session. The intervention program will be supervised by qualified, experienced physiotherapists, and will include individual training and two follow up meetings during the study period. The intervention program will include strengthening and endurance exercises for the cervical and shoulder girdle muscles. Training will include sensorimotor control and functional, quick, accurate, neck motion, using interactive VR training systems. This type of advanced training is very relevant to the pilots function in the cockpit as it includes interactive tasks aimed to increase range, speed, smoothness, accuracy, and control of cervical motion.

  • OtherStandard Care

    physiotherapy and medical care as provided currently

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity is measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100mm)

    Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0-100mm)

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

  2. Global perceived effect of the provided treatment is measured on a scale from -5 to +5.

    Global perceived effect of the provided treatment was measured on a scale from -5 to +5. Zero represented no change, +5 excellent improvement due to the treatment provided, and -5, vast worsening.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

  3. Functional outcome is measured by the number of grounding days from flying due to neck pain.

    The number of days the pilot was grounded due to neck pain.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cervical range of motion is measured using the neck VR system (ROM, degrees)

    Cervical range of motion (ROM, degrees) is measured using the neck VR system, into flexion, extension, right and left rotation.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

  2. Cervical motion velocity is measured using the neck VR system (degrees/second)

    Cervical motion velocity is measured using the neck VR system (degrees/second) into flexion, extension, right and left rotation.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

  3. Cervical muscles isometric strength is measures using a dynamometer (Newton)

    Cervical muscles isometric strength is measures using a dynamometer (Newton), in the directions of static flexion and extension.

    Time frame: change from baseline at 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months.

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • The Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences
    Haifa, 3498838, Israel
  • Medical Aviation Unit
    Tel Hashomer, Israel
08

References and documents

Publications

  • van den Oord MH, De Loose V, Meeuwsen T, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Neck pain in military helicopter pilots: prevalence and associated factors. Mil Med. 2010 Jan;175(1):55-60. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-09-00038. PubMed 20108843 ↗
  • Tucker B, Netto K, Hampson G, Oppermann B, Aisbett B. Predicting neck pain in Royal Australian Air Force fighter pilots. Mil Med. 2012 Apr;177(4):444-50. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00256. PubMed 22594136 ↗
  • Grossman A, Nakdimon I, Chapnik L, Levy Y. Back symptoms in aviators flying different aircraft. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012 Jul;83(7):702-5. doi: 10.3357/asem.3225.2012. PubMed 22779315 ↗
  • Knudson R, McMillan D, Doucette D, Seidel M. A comparative study of G-induced neck injury in pilots of the F/A-18, A-7, and A-4. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1988 Aug;59(8):758-60. PubMed 3178626 ↗
  • Sarig Bahat H, Weiss PL, Laufer Y. The effect of neck pain on cervical kinematics, as assessed in a virtual environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec;91(12):1884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.007. PubMed 21112430 ↗
  • Jones JA, Hart SF, Baskin DS, Effenhauser R, Johnson SL, Novas MA, Jennings R, Davis J. Human and behavioral factors contributing to spine-based neurological cockpit injuries in pilots of high-performance aircraft: recommendations for management and prevention. Mil Med. 2000 Jan;165(1):6-12. PubMed 10658420 ↗
  • Ang BO, Monnier A, Harms-Ringdahl K. Neck/shoulder exercise for neck pain in air force helicopter pilots: a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):E544-51. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa6870. PubMed 19770596 ↗
  • Alricsson M, Harms-Ringdahl K, Larsson B, Linder J, Werner S. Neck muscle strength and endurance in fighter pilots: effects of a supervised training program. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2004 Jan;75(1):23-8. PubMed 14736129 ↗
  • Hamalainen O, Heinijoki H, Vanharanta H. Neck training and +Gz-related neck pain: a preliminary study. Mil Med. 1998 Oct;163(10):707-8. PubMed 9795549 ↗
  • Sarig Bahat H, Takasaki H, Chen X, Bet-Or Y, Treleaven J. Cervical kinematic training with and without interactive VR training for chronic neck pain - a randomized clinical trial. Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 5. PubMed 25066503 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 24, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02979041
Lead sponsor
University of Haifa
Collaborators
Medical Corps, Israel Defense Force
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2016
Start date
Sep 1, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2017
Completion
Dec 30, 2017
Last update
May 24, 2018

Study contacts

Hilla Sarig-Bahat, PT, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Physical Therapy, University of Haifa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion