CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02977013Updated Apr 4, 2017

Anti-Xa Assay Correlation to the Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin in the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism

An observational study in Anti-Xa Assay in Pulmonary Embolism, sponsored by Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Abbas. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-04.

Sponsored by Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Abbas · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
42
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the present study is to monitor anticoagulant therapy by anti-Xa assay and correlate its level to the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Read the detailed description

This prospective randomized trial was conducted on 42 patients 18 years of age or older in ICU diagnosed to have pulmonary embolism and confirmed by the presence of intraluminal filling defect in CT pulmonary angiography and treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg/12 hours. The study was conducted from August 2013 to September 2016.

All the patients were examined daily over a period of 4 weeks for symptoms and signs of recurrent pulmonary embolism (recurrent pulmonary embolism was diagnosed if the repeat CT angiography revealed a new sudden arterial branch cutoff or a new intraluminal filling defect that was not present on the first angiogram), Platelet count (patients with platelet count less than 50,000/mm3 or those with bleeding and platelet count between 50,000 and 100,000/mm3 are considered having severe thrombocytopenia), bleeding (defined as major overt bleeding requiring blood transfusion > 2 units or marked hemoglobin drop > 2 gm/dl or if the bleeding was intracranial or retroperitoneal) and death (defined as all deaths occurring within the 4 weeks of the study) , Then the results were correlated to anti-Xa assay.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anti-Xa Assay in Pulmonary Embolism
03

In context

Pulmonary Embolism

738 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Embolism; 158 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 383 across 323 observational studies indexed under Pulmonary Embolism.

Browse Pulmonary Embolism studies →

Lead sponsor

Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Abbas is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study was conducted on 42 patients in ICU diagnosed to have pulmonary embolism by CT pulmonary angiography and treated by subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg every 12 hours. Anticoagulant therapy was followed by anti-Xa assay done 4 hours after the third dose of subcutaneous enoxaparin and the results were correlated to the clinical outcome of the patients as regards complications (recurrent pulmonary embolism, bleeding, low platelet count and death).

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients in ICU and diagnosed to have pulmonary embolism and confirmed by the presence of intraluminal filling defect in CT pulmonary angiography and treated with subcutaneous enoxaparin 1 mg/kg/12 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent thrombolysis, embolectomy or if they are unfit for anticoagulant therapy because of major bleeding or thrombocytopenia (a platelet count below 100,000 per cubic millimeter). Patients were also excluded if they had impaired kidney function with a serum creatinine level above 2 mg/dl or uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure > 160/100 mmHg).
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with pulmonary embolism treated with enoxaparin

    Anti-Xa assay correlation to the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism

    Diagnostic Test: Anti-Xa assay

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testAnti-Xa assay

    Correlation between anti-Xa assay and the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin in the treatment of pulmonary embolism

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrent pulmonary embolism

    Recurrent pulmonary embolism was diagnosed if the repeat CT angiography revealed a new sudden arterial branch cutoff or a new intraluminal filling defect that was not present on the first angiogram.

    Time frame: 4 Weeks

  2. Platelet count

    Patients with platelet count less than 50,000/mm3 or those with bleeding and platelet count between 50,000 and 100,000/mm3 are considered having severe thrombocytopenia

    Time frame: 4 Weeks

  3. Bleeding

    Defined as major overt bleeding requiring blood transfusion \> 2 units or marked hemoglobin drop \> 2 gm/dl or if the bleeding was intracranial or retroperitoneal

    Time frame: 4 Weeks

  4. Death

    Defined as all deaths occurring within the 4 weeks of the study

    Time frame: 4 Weeks

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Montalescot G, Collet JP, Tanguy ML, Ankri A, Payot L, Dumaine R, Choussat R, Beygui F, Gallois V, Thomas D. Anti-Xa activity relates to survival and efficacy in unselected acute coronary syndrome patients treated with enoxaparin. Circulation. 2004 Jul 27;110(4):392-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000136830.65073.C7. Epub 2004 Jul 12. PubMed 15249498 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 4, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02977013
Lead sponsor
Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Abbas
Responsible party
Mohamed Sayed Mohamed Abbas (Doctor, Al Mouwasat Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 30, 2016
Start date
Aug 2013
Primary completion
Sep 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Last update
Apr 4, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion