ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02971553PEEPrestUpdated Jun 12, 2019

PEEP Resuscitation Trial

An interventional study of Upright Resuscitator with PEEP and Upright Resuscitator in Newborn Resuscitation, sponsored by Helse Stavanger HF. Completed at 1 site in Tanzania. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-12.

Sponsored by Helse Stavanger HF · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
330
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Each year, almost 3 million newborn babies die within their first month of life, often as a consequence of labour complications. Approximately 5% of newborns will not start breathing at birth and need immediate help. The optimal ventilation strategy with liquid-filled lungs has not been determined. Animal studies suggest that assisted ventilation with positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) improves the aeration of liquid-filled lungs leading to more rapid recovery. However, no large human clinical studies have investigated the clinical responses to assisted ventilation with PEEP in asphyxiated newborns.

Read the detailed description

Laerdal Global Health has developed a PEEP valve which has been tested and shown to provide reliable end-expiratory pressures in a manikin model, even with a high mask leak. Whether this PEEP valve provides reliable PEEP in vivo and whether this translates to clinical beneficial outcomes remains to be proven.

The aim is to study whether lung aeration can be improved by adding a device for positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) to better distend the airways in neonates more than 28 weeks gestation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Newborn Resuscitation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Helse Stavanger HF is the lead sponsor of 97 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Neonates who need assisted bag/mask ventilation after birth due to failure to initiate breathing the first 60 seconds after birth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Babies with major deformities not deemed to be viable.
  • Missing parental consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
330 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Upright Resuscitator with PEEP

    Ventilation with the Upright Resuscitator with PEEP

    Device: Upright Resuscitator with PEEP

  • Active comparator
    Upright Resuscitator

    Ventilation with the Upright Resuscitator (without PEEP)

    Device: Upright Resuscitator

Interventions

  • DeviceUpright Resuscitator with PEEP
  • DeviceUpright Resuscitator
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Delta heart rate (beats/minute) during each ventilation sequence

    Time frame: 10 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neonatal outcome dead versus alive

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

  2. Time to cessation of ventilation

    Time frame: Up to 1 hour

  3. Time to heart rate above 140 beats/minute

    Time frame: Up to 1 hour

  4. Mean ariway pressures given

    Time frame: Up to 1 hour

  5. Time to detection of exhaled CO2 above 1% and 4%

    Time frame: Up to 1 hour

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Research Institute
    Haydom, Manyara Region 9041, Tanzania
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Holte K, Ersdal H, Eilevstjonn J, Gomo O, Klingenberg C, Thallinger M, Linde J, Stigum H, Yeconia A, Kidanto H, Stordal K. Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Newborn Resuscitation Around Term: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4):e20200494. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0494. Epub 2020 Sep 11. PubMed 32917847 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2016 to primary completion in May 2018, 19 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 17, 2016
First posted
Nov 23, 2016
StartActual
Oct 2016
Primary completionActual
May 2018
CompletionActual
May 2018
Last update
Jun 12, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02971553
Lead sponsor
Helse Stavanger HF
Collaborators
Haydom Lutheran Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 23, 2016
Start date
Oct 2016
Primary completion
May 2018
Completion
May 2018
Last update
Jun 12, 2019

Study contacts

Hussein Kidanto, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Muhimibili National Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion