CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02950909Updated Oct 8, 2021

Effect of Therapeutic Exercise on the Activation of the Neck Extensors in People With Chronic Neck Pain

An interventional study of Static exercise for emphasized neck extensors and Dynamic exercise for emphasized neck extensors in Neck Pain, sponsored by Moisés Giménez Costa. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-08.

Sponsored by Moisés Giménez Costa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary aim of this study therefore is to investigate the effects on pain and disability of an emphasized exercise program targeting the deep neck extensor semispinalis cervicis and a general exercise program for all neck extensor muscles in patients with chronic neck pain. As a secondary aim , pain intensity (VAS), cervical ROM, pressure pain threshold (PPT), cervical and thoracic posture and self-perceived benefit of treatment (GROC) were measured. The investigators hypothesized that both exercise programs would have similar effects on pain alleviation and pain related disability, but that the emphasized exercise program for the deep semispinalis cervicis would improve its activation more compared to the general exercise program. The results of this study will be relevant for designing effective rehabilitation/training programs for patients with chronic neck pain.

Read the detailed description

An independent group, repeated-measures study design was adopted to investigate the immediate effect of two different kinds of intervention: Emphasized exercises targeting the deep cervical extensors and general exercises targeting all neck extensors. Subjects were randomized into two exercise groups: the emphasized exercise group in which patients performed muscle contractions against resistance directly at the neck and the general exercise group in which the resistance was applied at the head. Sealed opaque envelopes were used to conceal allocation.

Exercise regimes was of 6-weeks duration and started within one week of the initial assessment. All subjects received personal instruction and supervision by one experienced physiotherapist, once a week, for the duration of the whole program.

Subjects received an exercise diary and were requested to practice their respective regime twice per day for the six-week duration of the trial, without provoking neck pain and with attention to correct performance of the exercises. Exercises at home occurred for a period of no longer than 15 to 20 minutes twice per day. Subjects were asked not to seek other interventions for neck pain during the duration of the study, although usual medication was not withheld.

All patients performed two static exercises and one dynamic exercise. The only difference between both groups was the location of the resistance, which was in the lower cervical spine approximately at level C4 for the emphasized exercise group and at the occiput for the general exercise group.

  1. Patients in the emphasized exercise group performed exercises emphasizing the deep cervical extensor muscles applying a resistance at the level of the vertebral arch of C4 either therapeutically with the therapist's fingers or as a home exercise with the aid of a towel or belt. These exercises were performed in sitting and standing in front of a table propped up on both forearms. In the latter position, a dynamic exercise was added moving the head from maximal flexion to maximal extension keeping the gaze fixed at an object lying between both elbows hoping to activate more the extensors in the lower cervical spine.
  2. Patients in the general exercise group performed exercises targeting all cervical extensor muscles including the superficial ones applying resistance at the head pushing against a wall or the therapist's hand or as a home exercise with the aid of a towel. As in the other group, these exercises were performed in sitting and standing in front of a table propped up on both forearms. In the latter position, the same dynamic exercise was added as in the other group with the only difference that the gaze was fixed at an object lying between both hands hoping to activate all cervical extensors.

The dosage for both exercise regimes required maximal muscle activation of the patient because it was shown that at this dosage the emphasized exercise results in muscle activation of about 20% to 25% MVC (Maximum Voluntary Contraction) and the general exercise of about 50% MVC (Schomacher et al., 2015). Patients were asked therefore to perform the exercises at their individual maximal force for a short time without provoking any pain neither during nor after the exercise. That is, submaximal effort without evoking pain during and after the exercises was used.

All exercises were repeated each for 3 sets with a break of 1-2 minutes between the sets. The two static exercises consisted of 6 repetitions of 6 seconds hold in each position with 6 seconds rest between each contraction. The dynamic exercise was performed with 6 repetitions through the whole range of motion with 2-3 seconds for each repetition without any rest between the repetitions. A break between the repetitions was added if necessary to avoid pain (Table 1). Patients repeated the exercise session one time per week under supervision of a physiotherapist, during 6 weeks. In addition, patients performed the exercise session twice per day seven days per week at home. Each exercise session lasted about 20 - 25 minutes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Therapeutic exercise
  • Chronic pain
  • Neck extensors
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Moisés Giménez Costa as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Mild to moderate pain intensity between 3 and 5 from 10 Visual Analogue Scale)to avoid exacerbation of pain with the neck exercises;.
  • Poor performance in the neck extensor resistance test as described by Lee et al. (Lee et al., 2005) and Parazza et al. (Parazza et al., 2014) of less than 250 seconds , which justify the application of an exercise program in the neck extensors.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurological signs in the upper limb
  • any contraindication for EMG like known risk of having infection following clinical needle insertion, coagulation disorders or medications affecting coagulation like aspirin
  • pregnancy
  • if they had participated in a neck exercise program in the past 12 months or had cervical spine surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Emphasized exercise group

    Patients in the emphasized exercise group performed exercises emphasizing the deep cervical extensor muscles applying a resistance at the level of the vertebral arch of C4 either therapeutically with the therapist's fingers or as a home exercise with the aid of a towel or belt. These exercises were performed in sitting and standing in front of a table propped up on both forearms. In the latter position, a dynamic exercise was added moving the head from maximal flexion to maximal extension keeping the gaze fixed at an object lying between both elbows hoping to activate more the extensors in the lower cervical spine.

    Procedure: Static exercise for emphasized neck extensors · Procedure: Dynamic exercise for emphasized neck extensors

  • Experimental
    General exercise group

    Patients in the general exercise group performed exercises targeting all cervical extensor muscles including the superficial ones applying resistance at the head pushing against a wall or the therapist's hand or as a home exercise with the aid of a towel. As in the other group, these exercises were performed in sitting and standing in front of a table propped up on both forearms. In the latter position, the same dynamic exercise was added as in the other group with the only difference that the gaze was fixed at an object lying between both hands hoping to activate all cervical extensors

    Procedure: Static exercise for general neck extensors · Procedure: Dynamic exercise for general neck extensors

Interventions

  • ProcedureStatic exercise for emphasized neck extensors

    Emphasized activation of the deep neck extensors was searched for applying a localized resistance with the thumb and index finger at the level of the vertebral arch of C4 while pushing into flexion in a ventral-cranial direction, approximately parallel to the surface of the zygapophyseal joint, asking the patient to resist maximally during 6 seconds in sitting position

  • ProcedureDynamic exercise for emphasized neck extensors

    The patient was asked to fix his gaze at an object lying between both elbows hoping to in order to emphasize extension in the lower cervical spine and consequently activation of the extensors in this region.

  • ProcedureStatic exercise for general neck extensors

    Emphasized activation of all neck extensors was searched for applying the resistance with the therapist's hand or a wall respectively a towel at the occiput in sitting position

  • ProcedureDynamic exercise for general neck extensors

    . The patient was asked to fix his gaze at an object lying between both hands. Extension consequently occurred in the entire cervical spine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neck Disability Index

    Variation in the Neck Disability Index scale

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neck pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Variation of 2 or more in the Scale

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Range of motion

    Measurements in goniometric degrees for neck flexion, extension, sidebending (left and right) and rotation (left and right)

    Time frame: 7 weeks

  3. Pressure pain threshold

    Measurement using a digital algometer positioned over the zygapophyseal joints of C2 and C5 on the most painful side, or on the right side when both sides were equally painful. In addition, a remote PPT site on the right tibialis anterior

    Time frame: 7 weeks

  4. Global Rating of Change scale

    Modification of the perceived pain and disability status with the questionary

    Time frame: 7 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Valencia
    Valencia, 46010, Spain
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Informed consent form · Sep 19, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02950909
Lead sponsor
Moisés Giménez Costa
Responsible party
Moisés Giménez Costa (Associated professor, University of Valencia) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 1, 2016
Start date
Oct 2016
Primary completion
Jun 28, 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Last update
Oct 8, 2021

Study contacts

Moises Giménez-Costa, Investigator
principal investigator · University of Valencia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion