An interventional study of Grape seed extract in Retention & Fracture of Emax Laminate Veneers, sponsored by Marwa Salem. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-20.
Sponsored by Marwa Salem · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of E-max veneers cemented with and without using grape seed extract before bonding.
Justification for undertaking the trial:
Ceramic veneers have become a popular dental procedure since its introduction because they provide excellent esthetics.1 Achieving the good esthetic results especially with ceramic veneers is probably the most challenging task encountered by dental practitioners and ceramist today. Ceramic veneers are indicated for teeth with moderate discoloration, restoration of traumatized, fractured, worn dentition and abnormal tooth anatomy.2 Many factors affect the long term success of ceramic laminate veneers. The most repeated failure patterns associated with ceramic laminate veneer were fractures, microleakage, colour change and detachment of restoration.3 The main reasons for failure were large marginal defect and fractures.4 The clinical performance of ceramic veneer has shown that the estimated survival rate for the teeth prepared with butt joint design are higher than for the teeth prepared with palatal chamfer design.5 The bonding technique, which is a time-consuming and technique sensitive procedure, is a key to the long-term success of these types of restorations. The strength and the durability of the bond between the porcelain, the luting cement and the enamel/dentin interface play an important role in the outcome of ceramic veneers, particularly when dentin is involved. 6
Expected benefits for the patient
Explanation for Choice of Comparators Resin cements are generally used for the bonding of all ceramic restorations since they provide adequate aesthetics, low solubility in oral environment, high bond strength to tooth structures, superior mechanical properties and support for ceramic.7 Since their retention relies solely on adhesion, durable adhesion of resin luting cements to both the enamel/dentin and the cementation surface of the ceramic is crucial. Luting cements used in conjunction with phosphoric acid etching followed by adhesive application on enamel show reliable adhesion.8 By studying the effect of incorporation of natural cross-linkers into the primer of a self-etching adhesive on resin-dentine bond strength, it had a positive influence on the immediate μTBS (micro tensile bond strength) and mechanical properties of the bonded interface.9
Statement of problem:
Ceramic veneers have become a popular dental procedure since its introduction because they provide excellent esthetics while being conservative. However, high failure rates of PLVs have been attributed to the exposure of dentin surface during preparation which greatly decrease the bonding strength at the dentin-cement interface. Natural and synthetic cross-linking agents have been introduced to restore dentin function, enhance bonding strength as well as positively affect the remineralization process in artificial roots. They have the ability to enhance the mechanical properties and stability of dentin matrix by the use of PA-rich collagen cross-linkers most likely due to the formation of a PA-collagen complex.10
Research hypothesis The null hypothesis of the study that there won't be a difference in the clinical performance \& adhesion of laminate veneers after application of grape seed extract before bonding.
This is the only study on the registry with Marwa Salem as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Grape seed extract as collagen cross-linking agent
Other: Grape seed extract
Other: Grape seed extract
Grape seed extract - collagen cross-linking agent
Retention of laminate veneers
using USPHS criteria for clinical evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Fracture of laminate veneers
using USPHS criteria for clinical evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
Marginal adaptation of laminate veneers
using USPHS criteria for clinical evaluation
Time frame: 1 year
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.