CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02928874Updated Oct 16, 2019

Eating Phenotypes for Childhood Obesity in the Context of Familial Obesity Risk

An interventional study of % COMPX (low ED vs. high ED preload) and EAH (low ED vs. high ED snacks) in Obesity, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years to 9 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-16.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2014, registered Oct 2016).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
212
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
7 Years to 9 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Using an integrated approach, this study examines multiple eating traits concurrently under states of hunger and satiety. It examines the impact of short-term appetite and intake regulation on longer-term energy intake control and weight development in a cohort of ethnically diverse normal-weight and obese boys and girls with different familial predispositions to obesity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
03

In context

Obesity

6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 212 is above the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years to 9 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 7-9 years of age
  • Normal-weight or overweight/obese who are at low risk or high risk for obesity based on maternal BMI
  • Like most foods served during the study
  • Be regular breakfast eaters

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have serious medical conditions known to affect food intake or body weight
  • Have any developmental, medical, or psychiatric conditions that might impact study compliance
  • Have a learning disability or poor reading ability/comprehension
  • Have visual or auditory impairment
  • Are taking medications associated with developmental, medical, or psychiatric disorders or medications known to affect appetite, food intake or body weight
  • Are underweight
  • Have food allergies related to the foods served in the study or are lactose intolerant
  • Do not regularly eat breakfast
  • Do not like or cannot eat foods served during experimental meal or are unable to finish compulsory preload
  • Mothers who are pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
212 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Caloric compensation

    Twenty-five minutes before breakfast, participants will be asked to consume in full one of two oatmeal preloads that will vary in ED. The order of preload conditions will be randomized across groups of children participating in the visits.

    Behavioral: % COMPX (low ED vs. high ED preload)

  • Experimental
    Eating in the absence of hunger (EAH)

    During both study visits, children's EAH will be assessed after lunch and again after dinner. The order of presenting the low and high ED snacks will be counterbalanced across meals.

    Behavioral: EAH (low ED vs. high ED snacks)

Interventions

  • Behavioral% COMPX (low ED vs. high ED preload)
  • BehavioralEAH (low ED vs. high ED snacks)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent caloric compensation index (%COMPX)

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Appetite ratings assessed via Visual Analog Scales

    Appetite ratings include self-reported perceived hunger, desire to eat, prospective consumption, and fullness.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Total energy intake per day (number of calories consumed over 24-hours)

    Number of calories consumed over 24-hours assessed via measured food intake in the laboratory and via parent-reported food intake at home.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. BMI z-score

    Time frame: Change from baseline BMI z-score at 1-year follow-up

  5. Waist circumference (cm)

    Time frame: Change from baseline waist circumference at 1-year follow-up

  6. Percentage body fat

    Time frame: Change from baseline percentage body fat at 1-year follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Eating in the absence of hunger (kcal)

    Time frame: Baseline (number of calories consumed from snacks)

  2. Home food environment

    Time frame: Baseline home food environment assessed using the Home Food Inventory

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kral TVE, Moore RH, Chittams J, O'Malley L, Jones E, Quinn RJ, Fisher JO. Caloric compensation and appetite control in children of different weight status and predisposition to obesity. Appetite. 2020 Aug 1;151:104701. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104701. Epub 2020 Apr 11. PubMed 32289325 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02928874
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 10, 2016
Start date
Sep 2014
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2018
Completion
Aug 30, 2019
Last update
Oct 16, 2019

Study contacts

Tanja Kral, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion