CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02928796ACCPUpdated Oct 10, 2016

Attentional Capacity and Clinician Performance

An observational study in Change in Sustained Attention, sponsored by University College Cork. Status unknown at 1 site in Ireland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-10.

Sponsored by University College Cork · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
14
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Uncovering the distinct measurements and features that potentially exist in different levels of expertise when performing cardiology-based procedures. There is a belief that tracking the visual attention and other psychophysiological measures during performance of these procedures may assist in uncovering the attentional capacity of participants and how it links with overall performance.

Read the detailed description

Attentional capacity is the number of items a person can hold in their temporal memory whilst undertaking a task (researchers equivocate this to Random Access Memory in computing hardware). Therefore, attentional capacity is thought to play a role in task performance and if a person's attentional capacity is measured 'in-vivo' then one can predict that person's ability and aptitude (classifying if they are an expert or novice since an expert will not require the full capacity of their temporal capacity, as many of the routine steps are stored in their permanent memory). The measurement of performance is of interest in medical training and competency testing research. Eye-tracking and other novel methods could offer new and effective components for measuring performance during complex procedures. These novel methods have increasingly been spotted in new healthcare research studies which aim to use them for a multitude of purposes, mostly to uncover valuable insights between different participant performance levels. One form of medical training is high-fidelity virtual reality simulators that can provide an almost life-like training environment for the trainee and one common use of these simulators is for surgical training . Some work with eye-tracking has already been done with surgical tasks that indicates visual attention does discriminate between novice and expert level performance. There is scope for using eye-tracking technology to capture visual attention during complex surgical procedures to uncover the discriminatory measurements between participants at different levels of expertise.

Aims The first aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between attentional capacity and performance during cardiology-based procedures. The hypothesise is that a significant relationship will be found and that attentional capacity will be a statistically significant predictor for discriminating between experts and novices.

The second aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between visual attention (recorded via eye tracking) and the precisely recorded actions taken by the participant during the procedure.

A third aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between physiological metrics (Heart rate, GSR recorded via E4 wristband) and the precisely recorded actions taken by the participant during the procedure.

This will be facilitated by the capture of the participant's visual attention, through worn eye-tracking glasses, level of arousal, through worn GSR/EDA wristband and their verbalisation (thinking-aloud during task performance), recorded through video/microphone, during two simulated cardiology-based procedures. The simulator will provide its own metrics (duration etc.) to represent the participants' performance during the procedure. The simulation will be provided by a state of the art of surgical simulator in the ASSERT Centre, University College Cork. An extra display monitor will also be included to provide the extra stimulus to assess attentional capacity. The monitor will display a specific playing card at certain times during the proceedings. The participant will have to acknowledge what the card was. This and the visual attention capture will provide insight to the participants' attentional capacity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Change in Sustained Attention

Keywords

  • Attentional capacity
  • Working memory
  • Simulation-based training
  • Eye-tracking
  • Visual attention
  • Psychophysiological measurement
  • Surgical simulation
  • Computer-based simulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University College Cork is the lead sponsor of 116 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Qualified medical professionals, trainees/registrars or trainers/consultants, working within the cathlab environment and discipline of interventional cardiology.

Inclusion criteria

  • They must be qualified medical doctor with specific interest in cardiology (e.g. consultant cardiologist). Consultant group must contain consultants only and registrar group must have enrolled registrars only.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
14 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Trainees

    Registrar Cardiologists

    Behavioral: Cognitive Stimulus

  • Trainers

    Consultant Cardiologists

    Behavioral: Cognitive Stimulus

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Stimulus

    Participants to pay attention to a supplementary display monitor and respond to specified stimulus images, all while performing the simulated cardiology-based procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean attentional capacity

    The hypothesis is that a significant statistical relationship will be found between measured attentional capacity (via a card reading task) and overall surgical task performance grading. Attentional capacity, we hypothesise, will be a statistically significant predictor for discriminating between performance level.

    Time frame: Up to 12 Months.

  2. Visual attention characteristics for stimulus reading 'card' task

    The hypothesis is that a significant statistical relationship will be found with characteristics of participant's visual attention (e.g. mean fixation duration, mean saccade latency, overall visual latency before card acknowledgement) and the measured attentional capacity.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • ASSERT Centre, University College Cork
    Cork City, Cork, Ireland
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Currie J, Bond RR, McCullagh P, Black P, Finlay DD, Gallagher S, Kearney P, Peace A, Stoyanov D, Bicknell CD, Leslie S, Gallagher AG. Wearable technology-based metrics for predicting operator performance during cardiac catheterisation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Apr;14(4):645-657. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-01918-0. Epub 2019 Feb 7. PubMed 30730031 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02928796
Lead sponsor
University College Cork
Collaborators
University of Ulster
Responsible party
Prof Anthony G. Gallagher (Director of Research, Professor of Technology Enhanced Learning, University College Cork) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2016
Start date
Sep 2016
Primary completion
Oct 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 10, 2016

Study contacts

Jonathan Currie, BSc
Contact
currie-j@email.ulster.ac.uk
+447525778242
Anthony G. Gallagher, DSc, PhD
Contact
ag.gallagher@ucc.ie
Anthony G. Gallagher, DSc, PhD
principal investigator · University College Cork

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion