ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02926183Updated Oct 3, 2019

Study of NAC of GA Therapy for Patients With BRPC

A Phase 2 interventional study of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, sponsored by Wakayama Medical University. Status unknown at 18 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-03.

Sponsored by Wakayama Medical University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gemcitabine plus nub-paclitaxel (GA) regimen was recently presented at an international oncology meeting and represents a new standard regimen in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Therefore, it was decided to consider the balance of safety and efficacy on survival time as a preoperative chemotherapy, the investigators use the NAC-GA regimen includes only two cycles (three times weekly and one week rest) of GA regimen.

Read the detailed description

Gemcitabine plus nub-paclitaxel (GA) regimen was recently presented at an international oncology meeting and represents a new standard regimen in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. GA is one of the high response rate treatment regimen, the investigators considered as a promising treatment as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. On the other hand, incidences of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were significantly higher in the g group compared with gemcitabine group. Therefore, it was decided to consider the balance of safety and efficacy on survival time as a preoperative chemotherapy, the investigators use the NAC-GA regimen includes only two cycles (three times weekly and one week rest) of GEMABR regimen. The investigators also evaluate Recurrence free survival from the first day of protocol therapy, safety of the protocol therapy(Adverse effect), morbidity based on Clavien Dindo classification of more than Grade 3, response rate, preoperative/postoperative tumor marker (CA19-9, CEA), rate of mornalization, reduction rate of SUVmax value on PET-CT (limited only for PET-CT available institutions), chemotherapeutic effect grade based on Evans classification, resection rate, R0 resection rate, surgical data (operative time, blood loss, transfusion, postoperative hospital day), the overall morbidity rates (Reoperation, rate of re-admission, mortality), number of patient rate in postoperative adjuvant therapy (entry rate, completion rate), dose intensity for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Wakayama Medical University is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. or cytologically diagnosed as pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and consistent with NCCN guideline (Version 2. 2016) borderline resectable-arterial, borderline resectable-venous
  2. Case with
  3. treatment
  4. PS () 0-1
  5. >= 20 years old and \<80 years old
  6. The following criteria must be satisfied in laboratory tests within 14 days of registration

    • WBC count\<=12,000/mm3
    • >=1,500/mm3
    • >= 9.0g/dl
    • Plt >= 100,000/mm3
    • T.Bil \<2.0mg/dl (\<3=.0mg/dl in biliary drainage case)
    • Serum Cr\<= (ULN)
    • , ALT \<= 2.5xULN
  7. Written to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe drug
  2. Multiple primary cancers within 5 years
  3. Severe infection
  4. With grade2 or more severe peripheral neuropathy
  5. Interstitial pneumonia or pulmonary fibrosis
  6. With uncontrollable pleural effusion or ascites
  7. With uncontrollable diabetes mellitus
  8. With uncontrollable heart failure, angina, hypertension, arrhythmia
  9. With severe neurological/psychological symptoms
  10. With watery diarrhea
  11. Pregnant or lactating women or women with unknown or suspected pregnancy
  12. Inappropriate patients for entry on this study in the judgement of the investigator
  13. Diagnosed as Resectable/Unresectable pancreatic carcinoma on NCCN guideline (Version 2.2016)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel

    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel: Enrolled patients were administered a 30-min intravenous infusion of nab-paclitaxel at a dose of 125 mg/m2, followed by a 30-min intravenous infusion of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2, on day 1, 8, and 15 evey 4 weeks as one cycle of regimen.

    Drug: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel

Interventions

  • DrugNeoadjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel

    Enrolled patients were administered a 30-min intravenous infusion of nab-paclitaxel at a dose of 125 mg/m2, followed by a 30-min intravenous infusion of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2, on day 1, 8, and 15 evey 4 weeks as one cycle of regimen.

    Also known as: NAC-GA for BRPC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall survival time from the first day of protocol therapy

    Time frame: Up to 60 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Recurrence free survival from the first day of protocol therapy

    Time frame: Up to 60 months

  2. Adverse effect

    Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0.

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks

  3. Morbidity based on Clavien Dindo classification of more than Grade3

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks

  4. Response rate

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

  5. Chemotherapeutic effect grade based on Evans classification

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

  6. Resection rate

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks

  7. R0 resection rate

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks

  8. Intraoperative blood loss

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks

  9. The overall morbidity rates based on Clavien Dindo classification

    Time frame: Up to 50 weeks

  10. Number of patient rate in postoperative adjuvant therapy

    Time frame: Up to 30 weeks

  11. Dose intensity

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 18 sites recruiting
  • Hirosaki University
    Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Keinosuke Ishido, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
  • Kobe University
    Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Hirochika Toyama, M.D., PhD. · Contact
  • Hyogo College of Medicine
    Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Jiro Fujimoto, M.D., PhD. · Contact
    • Kazuhiro Suzumura, M.D., PhD. · Sub investigator
  • Nara Medical University
    Kashihara, Nara, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Masayuki Sho, M.D., PhD. · Contact
  • Kansai Medical University
    Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Sohei Satoi, M.D., PhD · Contact
  • Kinki University
    Sayama, Osaka, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Ippei Matsumoto, M.D., PhD · Contact
  • Osaka University
    Suita, Osaka, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Hidetoshi Eguchi, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
  • Osaka Medical University
    Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Mitsuhiro Asakuma, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
  • Shiga Medical University
    Ōtsu, Shiga, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Masaji Tani, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
  • Chiba University
    Chiba, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Hideyuki Yoshitomi, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
  • Gifu University
    Gifu, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Kazuhiro Yoshida, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
  • Hiroshima University
    Hiroshima, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Yoshiaki Murakami, M.D., PhD. · Contact
  • Kumamoto University
    Kumamoto city, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Daisuke Hashimoto, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
  • Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
    Kyoto, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Hisashi Ikoma, M.D., PhD · Contact
  • Kyoto University
    Kyoto, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Toshihiko Masui, M.D., Ph.D. · Contact
  • Nagoya University
    Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Tsutomu Fujii, M.D., PhD. · Contact
  • Osaka City University
    Osaka, Japan
    Not yet recruiting
    • Ryosuke Amano, M.D., PhD. · Contact
    • Ryosuke Amano, M.D., PhD. · Sub investigator
  • Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera
    Wakayama, 641-8510, Japan
    Recruiting
    • Ken-ichi Okada, M.D., Ph.D. · Contactokada@wakayama-med.ac.jp · +81-73-441-0613
    • Hiroki Yamaue, M.D., Ph.D. · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2016, a primary completion of Sep 2021 and a completion of Sep 2021. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 27, 2016
First posted
Oct 6, 2016
Start
Oct 2016
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2021
CompletionEst.
Sep 2021
Last update
Oct 3, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02926183
Lead sponsor
Wakayama Medical University
Responsible party
Hiroki Yamaue (NAC-GA investigator, Wakayama Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 6, 2016
Start date
Oct 2016
Primary completion
Sep 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 3, 2019

Study contacts

Ken-ichi Okada, M.D., Ph.D.
Contact
okada@wakayama-med.ac.jp
+81-73-441-0613

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion