ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02922868Updated Sep 12, 2018Results posted

Assessment of Infection Control, Practice Efficiency, and Health Economics of Sheathed Versus Standard Cystoscopy

An interventional study of EndoSheath CST-5000 Scope and Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope in Bacteriuria, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-09-12.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2016, registered Sep 2016).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness and efficiency of using a sterile sheath (EndoSheath®) during cystoscopy versus a standard scope.

Read the detailed description

The increasing costs in health care and enhanced infection control requirements necessitate the efficient and reliable use of frequently used techniques like cystoscopy. The health economics of cystoscopy are dependent on maintaining low levels of post-cystoscopy sequelae like urinary tract infection (UTI) and its potential precursors, significant asymptomatic bacteriuria and leukocytosis. Another key component of the economics and efficiency of cystoscopy is the time and cost related to the reprocessing of these devices in preparation for re-use. The use of disposable endoscope sheaths may limit the need for high level disinfection (HLD) between procedures and reduce reprocessing time and potentially prolong the cystoscope lifespan. The rationale for this study is to determine if a sheathed cystoscopy system would provide the desired cost and efficiency advantages compared to procedures done with non-sheathed cystoscopes. This is a prospective, randomized, parallel group, single center clinical trial to assess the clinical outcomes, practice efficiency and health economics of the use of sheathed cystoscopes (EndoSheath® System) compared to using standard (non-sheathed) cystoscopes. The study will evaluate the infection control (via the change in bacteriuria), clinical practice efficiency and costs of the EndoSheath technology with CST 5000 scope compared to standard cystoscopy with Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 digital flexible scope. There will be 30 subjects in the control group undergoing cystoscopy with the standard scope at the clinic, the Olympus Visera Elite, and 30 subjects in the study group undergoing cystoscopy with the EndoSheath system. The study is designed as a prospective, randomized controlled trial. There will be no active blinding of clinicians or subjects; however, it is anticipated that most subjects will be unaware of differences in the cystoscopy equipment that will be utilized in their routine procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacteriuria

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Cystoscopy
  • EndoSheath
  • Infection Control
  • Bacteriuria
03

In context

Bacteriuria

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Bacteriuria; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 100 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Bacteriuria.

Browse Bacteriuria studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,351 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 332 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 251 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females, at least 18 years of age or older
  • Patients undergoing de novo or follow up diagnostic or therapeutic cystoscopy procedures in a Urology clinic setting
  • Antibiotic-free for at least 7 days prior to cystoscopy procedure
  • Patients willing to return to the clinic at approximately two weeks (10 -14 days) post-procedure for a urine test

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with significant lower urinary tract obstruction, gross hematuria
  • Patients having an acute pelvic inflammatory disease or symptomatic UTI
  • Patients with urethral strictures
  • Patients with chronic pain conditions
  • Patients unwilling to return to the clinic at approximately two weeks (10 -14 days) for a urine test
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EndoSheath CST-5000 Scope

    Cogentix Medical CST-5000 Flexible Video Cystoscope with Slide-On® EndoSheath® Technology. EndoSheath CST-5000 Scope.

    Device: EndoSheath CST-5000 Scope

  • Active comparator
    Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope

    Olympus HD Flexible Cysto-Nephro Videoscope (CYF-VH) with Olympus Visera Elite Platform, including OTV-S190 Video Processor CLV-S190 Xenon Light Source. Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope.

    Device: Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope

Interventions

  • DeviceEndoSheath CST-5000 Scope

    Cystoscopic procedures will be performed using the EndoSheath CST-5000 Scope.

  • DeviceOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope

    Cystoscopic procedures will be performed using the Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Who Had Post-Procedure Bacteriuria

    The primary endpoint will be the change in bacteriuria pre- and post-procedure between EndoSheath CST-5000 cystoscope and standard (non-sheathed) Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 cystoscope during the course of routine clinical use in a urology clinic. The pre-procedure measurement of bacteriuria will occur on the day of the procedure. The post-procedure measurement of bacteriuria will occur approximately two weeks (10-14 days) post-procedure. This will be assessed by urine culture exams.

    Time frame: 10-14 Days Post Procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Cystoscopes With Positive Bioburden Post-procedure.

    Immediately after completion of each cystoscopy procedure, the bioburden on the cystoscopes will be evaluated. The flexible cystoscope sheath was removed for bioburden assessment. For each cystoscope, whether sheathed or standard, two locations were assessed - the control body and the shaft. Cultures were obtained wiping the entire surface with sterile saline pledgets. The sample pledgets were placed in 1 ml sterile saline and shaken for 30 seconds. Ten drops of 0.02 ml aliquots from the sample were spotted on two 5% blood agar plates and incubated at 35°C in CO2.

    Time frame: Immediately after cystoscopy.

  2. Total Time to Reprocess a Cystoscope

    The total time required for a cystoscope to be reprocessed so that it is available for re-use in a subsequent procedure will be measured.

    Time frame: Beginning from the time a cystoscope is withdrawn from the urethral meatus at the end of a procedure until the completion of reprocessing, approximately 3,869 seconds

  3. Subject Assessment of Procedure.

    After undergoing cystoscopy, patients will be asked to complete Visual Analog Scales (VAS) instruments to determine their level of pain experienced during cystoscopy as well as their perception of discomfort with the procedure. The score range is 0 to 100. Higher scores denotes worse outcomes.

    Time frame: Approximately 2 min after the end of procedure.

  4. Staff Assessment of Cystoscope Reprocessing.

    At the end of each day while the study is in progress, 6 members of the medical staff directly involved with the reprocessing of cystoscopes will evaluate the ease of reprocessing based on a 5-point Likert scale for the following parameters: ease of Insertion, ease of manipulation, optical quality, overall ease of use. The score range is 0 to 5. Higher score denotes better outcomes. A single value was derived per staff member and summarized for the group as a whole during 6 months.

    Time frame: At the end of day of each procedure during 6 months

  5. Total Cost of Cystoscopy Reprocessing

    The health economics of reprocessing will be evaluated by associating personnel hourly costs with cystoscope reprocessing time segments. The total cost was averaged between pre-cleaning, cleaning, disinfection, rinsing, and drying for the 30 cystoscopes in each group for a duration of 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Number of Procedures Per Day Per Scope.

    Number of procedures per day per scope. On a daily basis urology outpatient clinic performs an average of 5 cystoscopies.

    Time frame: Per day.

07

Results

Posted Feb 22, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope
Started3030
Completed3030
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Who Had Post-Procedure Bacteriuria

The primary endpoint will be the change in bacteriuria pre- and post-procedure between EndoSheath CST-5000 cystoscope and standard (non-sheathed) Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 cystoscope during the course of routine clinical use in a urology clinic. The pre-procedure measurement of bacteriuria will occur on the day of the procedure. The post-procedure measurement of bacteriuria will occur approximately two weeks (10-14 days) post-procedure. This will be assessed by urine culture exams.

Time frame:
10-14 Days Post Procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Had Post-Procedure Bacteriuria
ParticipantsEndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope
Number of Participants Who Had Post-Procedure Bacteriuria01
SecondaryNumber of Cystoscopes With Positive Bioburden Post-procedure.

Immediately after completion of each cystoscopy procedure, the bioburden on the cystoscopes will be evaluated. The flexible cystoscope sheath was removed for bioburden assessment. For each cystoscope, whether sheathed or standard, two locations were assessed - the control body and the shaft. Cultures were obtained wiping the entire surface with sterile saline pledgets. The sample pledgets were placed in 1 ml sterile saline and shaken for 30 seconds. Ten drops of 0.02 ml aliquots from the sample were spotted on two 5% blood agar plates and incubated at 35°C in CO2.

Time frame:
Immediately after cystoscopy.
Reported as:
Number · bioburdens
Number of Cystoscopes With Positive Bioburden Post-procedure.
bioburdensEndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope
Shaft04
Body00
SecondaryTotal Time to Reprocess a Cystoscope

The total time required for a cystoscope to be reprocessed so that it is available for re-use in a subsequent procedure will be measured.

Time frame:
Beginning from the time a cystoscope is withdrawn from the urethral meatus at the end of a procedure until the completion of reprocessing, approximately 3,869 seconds
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Total Time to Reprocess a Cystoscope
secondsEndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope
Total Time to Reprocess a Cystoscope270.91 ± 1903838.78 ± 1270
SecondarySubject Assessment of Procedure.

After undergoing cystoscopy, patients will be asked to complete Visual Analog Scales (VAS) instruments to determine their level of pain experienced during cystoscopy as well as their perception of discomfort with the procedure. The score range is 0 to 100. Higher scores denotes worse outcomes.

Time frame:
Approximately 2 min after the end of procedure.
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subject Assessment of Procedure.
units on a scaleEndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope
VAS Pain29.3 ± 2326.5 ± 20.77
VAS Discomfort30.79 ± 21.4129.2 ± 17.57
SecondaryStaff Assessment of Cystoscope Reprocessing.

At the end of each day while the study is in progress, 6 members of the medical staff directly involved with the reprocessing of cystoscopes will evaluate the ease of reprocessing based on a 5-point Likert scale for the following parameters: ease of Insertion, ease of manipulation, optical quality, overall ease of use. The score range is 0 to 5. Higher score denotes better outcomes. A single value was derived per staff member and summarized for the group as a whole during 6 months.

Time frame:
At the end of day of each procedure during 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Staff Assessment of Cystoscope Reprocessing.
units on a scaleEndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope
Ease of Insertion4.27 ± 0.764.72 ± 0.55
Ease of Manipulation4.13 ± 0.834.5 ± 0.8
Optical Quality3.9 ± 1.154.3 ± 1.12
Overall Ease of Use4.02 ± 0.934.45 ± 0.85
SecondaryTotal Cost of Cystoscopy Reprocessing

The health economics of reprocessing will be evaluated by associating personnel hourly costs with cystoscope reprocessing time segments. The total cost was averaged between pre-cleaning, cleaning, disinfection, rinsing, and drying for the 30 cystoscopes in each group for a duration of 6 months.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · Dollars
Total Cost of Cystoscopy Reprocessing
DollarsEndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope
Total Cost of Cystoscopy Reprocessing57,000.0032,000.00
SecondaryNumber of Procedures Per Day Per Scope.

Number of procedures per day per scope. On a daily basis urology outpatient clinic performs an average of 5 cystoscopies.

Time frame:
Per day.
Reported as:
Mean · Number of procedures per day per scope
Number of Procedures Per Day Per Scope.
Number of procedures per day per scopeEndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope
Number of Procedures Per Day Per Scope.5 ± 25 ± 2

Adverse events

Collected over 15 days after procedure. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
EndoSheath CST-5000 Scope—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)
Olympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 Scope—0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)EndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 ScopeTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years252752
>=65 years538
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)EndoSheath CST-5000 ScopeOlympus Visera Elite OTV-S190 ScopeTotal
Female272552
Male358
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Wake Forest Baptist Health - Department of Urology
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 12, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02922868
Collaborators
Cogenix Medical Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 4, 2016
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Results posted
Feb 22, 2018
Last update
Sep 12, 2018

Study contacts

Gopal H Badlani, M.D.
principal investigator · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion