ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02907853Updated May 10, 2019

Contingency Management for Meth in South Africa Methamphetamine Abuse in South Africa

An interventional study of Contingency Management in Methamphetamine Abuse, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in South Africa. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-10.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2015, registered Sep 2016).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will link findings from neuroscience with clinical outcomes using contingency management (CM) to identify changes in brain structure and function that emerge during purely behavioral therapy for methamphetamine (MA) use.

Read the detailed description

This study will correlate MA-abstinence outcomes from an 8-week program of voucher-based incentives using an escalating schedule for 30 treatment-seeking, MA-dependent individuals with scores on tasks of working memory and assessments of neuropsychological and demographic status. At the beginning and end of the CM program, participants will participate in MRI scans while performing a working memory task and will complete a battery of select neurocognitive and psychological assays to address two specific aims: (1) to determine whether changes in neural function within frontostriatal circuitry from baseline to end of the 8-week CM program are associated with parallel changes in measures of cognitive control and impulsivity and with MA abstinence outcomes and (2) to determine whether structural changes in frontostriatal circuitry over the 8-week CM intervention correspond with neurocognitive, psychological and MA abstinence measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Methamphetamine Abuse
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,167 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 95 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 69 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • provide voluntary informed consent
  • meet DSM-5 criteria for MA or amphetamine use disorder
  • provide at least one urine sample positive for MA/amphetamine metabolites during screening (i.e. prior to the commencement of the study).
  • aged 18-45
  • right-handed
  • English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently receiving treatment for stimulant addiction or needing more intensive treatment than outpatient care
  • meet DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorder other than nicotine
  • unable to attend 4+ visits during the 2-week screening period or to complete measures
  • Physical or mental illness that would require intervention that would alter imaging or that would interfere with safe study participation
  • pregnant, claustrophobic, or have metal prostheses, cardiac pacemakers, or metal clips that are incompatible with the scanner
  • HIV positive status
  • unable to comprehend written or spoken English
  • currently taking psychiatric medication
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Contingency Management

    In exchange for consecutive urine samples documenting methamphetamine abstinence, participants receive increasingly valuable reinforcers.

    Behavioral: Contingency Management

Interventions

  • BehavioralContingency Management

    as described above

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Responses to Contingency Management

    urine samples documenting methamphetamine abstinence

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. fMRI Measures

    measures of resting state connectivity

    Time frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stop Signal Task

    measure of inhibitory control

    Time frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks

  2. Continuous Performance Task

    test of sustained attention

    Time frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks

  3. Stroop

    test of inhibitory control

    Time frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks

  4. Balloon Analog Risk Task

    measure of risk taking and decision making

    Time frame: Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Psychiatry at Groote Schuur Hospital
    Cape Town, 7925, South Africa
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be shared with other investigators following publication of the main paper or 2 years after the last subject completes participation, whichever comes first. Shared data will be stripped of all PHI and potentially personally identifying variables. Requests should briefly state the concept of interest, provide a brief timeline for analyzing the data and preparing a manuscript, and include a copy of the CV of the investigator making the request and documentation of proof of training in the ethical treatment of human subjects in research. The concept proposal will be evaluated based on three criteria, including the potential impact or contribution to the research in advancing knowledge; the feasibility of the proposed research; and that the aim of the proposed research will not overlap with any of the aims or planned analyses.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2015 to primary completion in Feb 2018, 29 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 13, 2016
First posted
Sep 20, 2016
StartActual
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Feb 15, 2018
CompletionActual
Feb 15, 2018
Last update
May 10, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02907853
Responsible party
Steve Shoptaw (Professor, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 20, 2016
Start date
Sep 1, 2015
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2018
Completion
Feb 15, 2018
Last update
May 10, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion