CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02903979Updated Jun 11, 2020

Impact of Different Restorative Treatments for Deep Caries Lesion in Primary Teeth

An interventional study of HVGIC and Indirect pulp capping in Deep Caries Lesion of Primary Teeth, sponsored by Universidade Ibirapuera. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 8 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-11.

Sponsored by Universidade Ibirapuera · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In front of a lack of evidence to determine the best treatment for deep cavitated carious lesions, the search for an effective restorative technique, which results in a least possible discomfort to patients, and reduce the time needed for the restorative treatment, if becomes relevant. The objective of this randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of high viscosity glass ionomer cement restorations (HVGIC) compared to restoration with calcium hydroxide restoration associated with high viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC) for treatment of deep lesions in primary molars, as well as the impact of treatment in the criteria focused on the patient as well as cost-efficacy of the techniques . Children with 4 to 8 years will be selected randomly at the Clinic for Children at the University Ibirapuera of Dentistry. 108 teeth will be randomized into two groups: (1) restoration with calcium hydroxide cement associated with HVGIC and (2) HVGIC restoration. The restorations will be evaluated after 6, 12 and 24 months by two trained examiners blinded to the treatments. The efficacy of each treatment is measured by four main outcomes, which are: (1) criteria related to the effectiveness of the restorative treatment (2) criteria focused on the patient and (3) cost-efficacy. For comparison between the two groups will be used the Kaplan-Meier survival and the long-rank test. Cox regression is performed the assessment of the influence of some other variable results. For all analyzes, the significance level is set at 5%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Deep Caries Lesion of Primary Teeth
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universidade Ibirapuera is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Children will be included that have at least one primary molar with deep cavitated carious lesions in occlusal surface.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will be excluded with special needs, using orthodontics devices and / or systemic diseases which may affect the oral cavity. Also, teeth with pulp exposure, spontaneous pain, mobility, presence of abscess or fistula next to the tooth, teeth with restorations, sealants or enamel formation defects will also be excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HVGIC

    Restorations with only HVGIC in deep caries lesion of primary teeth.

    Other: HVGIC

  • Active comparator
    Indirect pulp capping

    Indirect pulp capping with calcium hydroxide cement, restored with HVGIC:

    Other: Indirect pulp capping

Interventions

  • OtherHVGIC

    In experimental group, the researches will be performed a restoration, after partial caries removal, with high viscosity glass ionomer cement in the teeth with deep caries lesion.

  • OtherIndirect pulp capping

    In control group, the researches will be performed a indirect pulp capping with calcium hydroxide cement and high viscosity glass ionomer cement in the teeth with deep caries lesion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pulp Vitality

    To evaluate the survival of different restorative treatments considering the pulp vitality.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wong-Baker scale to discomfort

    To evaluate the discomfort of different restorative treatments by a Wong-Baker scale.

    Time frame: Immediately to restoration procedure.

  2. Cost-efficacy analysis by total value of treatment in relation to efficacy

    To evaluate the cost-efficacy of different restorative treatments by total value in dollar of treatment in relation to efficacy. The researchers would like to analyze that a treatment of low cost show the similar efficacy of a high cost treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months

  3. Restoration longevity

    To evaluate the restoration longevity by clinical examination.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months.

  4. Caries progression

    To evaluate the caries progression by radiography.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universidade Ibirapuera
    São Paulo, SP 04661-100, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • da Silva GSQ, Raggio DP, Machado GFR, Mello-Moura ACV, Gimenez T, Floriano I, Tedesco TK. Impact of different restorative treatments for deep caries lesion in primary teeth (CEPECO 1) - study protocol for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0703-3. PubMed 30621659 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02903979
Lead sponsor
Universidade Ibirapuera
Responsible party
Tamara Kerber Tedesco (PhD in Pediatric Dentistry, Universidade Ibirapuera) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 16, 2016
Start date
Nov 2016
Primary completion
Mar 2018
Completion
May 2020
Last update
Jun 11, 2020
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion