CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02892084Updated Jun 28, 2018

Augmentation of Locomotor Adaptation Post-Stroke

A Phase 1 interventional study of tDCS and Sham tDCS in Stroke, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-28.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project will evaluate two different methods of normalizing the center of mass acceleration (COMa) in individuals post-stroke, specifically focusing on rates and pattern of recovery to analyze walking-specific adaptations as precursors to motor learning. In addition, the proposed project seeks to establish the optimal configuration of electrodes to activate neural circuits involved in post-stroke locomotion. Once the better method of training COMa and optimal parameters of electrode placement for tDCS are identified, the investigators will evaluate the effects of tDCS on locomotor adaptations during single sessions and over a five-day training period.

Read the detailed description

The project seeks to establish the optimal configuration of electrodes to change the excitability of neural circuits involved in post-stroke locomotion, identify effective strategies for training a specific locomotor adaptation, and improve adaptations via adjunctive non-invasive brain stimulation. Tools to improve neural excitability may increase potential for locomotor skill learning, thereby improving rehabilitation outcomes. Non-invasive brain stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently emerged as a simple to administer, low-cost, and low-risk option for stimulating brain tissue. Cortical excitability is increased after application and preliminary results imply a relationship to increases in motor activity in those post-stroke. However, inhibition of the contralesional hemisphere is also shown to improve paretic motor output through inhibition of excessive maladaptive strategies, and combining the two electrode configurations may provide additional benefit for locomotor tasks requiring interlimb coordination. Furthermore, the effects of tDCS on walking function in conjunction with physical intervention strategies aimed at improving locomotor ability post-stroke are yet unstudied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chronic Stroke ( > 6 months)
  • non-invasive brain stimulation
  • rehabilitation
  • walking
  • kinetics
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 128 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Chronic Stroke

  1. age 18-70
  2. at least six month post-stroke
  3. residual paresis in the lower extremity (Fugl-Meyer LE motor score \<34)
  4. ability to sit unsupported for ≥ 30 sec
  5. ability to walk at least 10 ft.
  6. self-selected 10 meter gait speed \< 0.8 m/s
  7. provision of informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria: Acute Stroke

  1. Unable to ambulate at least 150 feet prior to stroke, or experienced intermittent claudication while walking \< 200 meters
  2. history of congestive heart failure, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe aortic stenosis, angina or dyspnea at rest or during activities of daily living
  3. History of COPD or oxygen dependence
  4. Preexisting neurological disorders, dementia or previous stroke
  5. History of major head trauma
  6. Legal blindness or severe visual impairment
  7. history of significant psychiatric illness
  8. Life expectancy \<1 yr
  9. Severe arthritis or orthopedic problems that limit passive ROM
  10. post-stroke depression (PHQ-9 ≥10)
  11. History of DVT or pulmonary embolism within 6 months
  12. Uncontrolled diabetes with recent weight loss, diabetic coma, or frequent insulin reactions
  13. Severe hypertension with systolic >200 mmHg and diastolic >110 mmHg at rest
  14. presence of cerebellar stroke.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Uphill COMa training

    Walking on an inclined treadmill, thus manipulating the permissive environment to elicit COMa adaptation, while receiving either tDCS or sham tDCS.

    Device: tDCS · Device: Sham tDCS

  • Experimental
    Downhill COMa training

    Walking on a declined treadmill, thus manipulating the permissive environment to elicit COMa adaptation, while receiving either tDCS or sham tDCS.

    Device: tDCS · Device: Sham tDCS

Interventions

  • DevicetDCS

    Constant non-invasive, low intensity, direct electrical current utilized to stimulate specific areas of the brain. Evaluating immediate effects of anodal/cathodal stimulation during 20 minutes of treadmill walking.

  • DeviceSham tDCS

    Per published protocols, tDCS will be administered for 30 secs allowing for sensory adaptation to occur and then turned off, so that the remaining sham "stimulation" will include zero current. Evaluating immediate effects during 20 minutes walking on a treadmill.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Center of Mass Acceleration Peak

    Peak full body center of mass acceleration during gait, expressed as m/sec\^2, captured during 30 seconds of treadmill walking at a steady-state, self-selected walking speed.

    Time frame: Pre (same as initial session) and post (immediately following final session) conducted within 5-10 days apart according to subject availability.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Center of Mass Acceleration Impulse

    Positive integral of the full body center of mass acceleration during the gait cycle, expressed as an average over all strides captured during 30 seconds of data collection at a steady-state, self-selected walking speed (m/sec).

    Time frame: Pre (directly prior to initial session) and post (immediately following final session) conducted within 5-10 days apart according to subject availability.

Other outcomes

  1. Self-selected walking speed

    Walking speed overground for 10 meters, average of 3 timed trials, expressed as m/sec.

    Time frame: Pre (directly prior to initial session) and post (immediately following final session) conducted within 5-10 days apart according to subject availability.

  2. Paretic step ratio

    Percentage of the total stride completed by paretic step. This is a unit-less measure. Each stride is initiated by foot strike of the paretic leg, and the data are expressed as an average over all strides captured during 30 seconds of data collection at a steady-state, self-selected walking speed.

    Time frame: Pre (directly prior to initial session) and post (immediately following final session) conducted within 5-10 days apart according to subject availability.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • MUSC Center for Rehabilitation Research in Neurologic Conditions
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boggio PS, Nunes A, Rigonatti SP, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(2):123-9. PubMed 17726271 ↗
  • Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke. 2006 Mar;37(3):872-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204063.75779.8d. Epub 2006 Feb 2. PubMed 16456121 ↗
  • Bowden MG, Behrman AL, Woodbury M, Gregory CM, Velozo CA, Kautz SA. Advancing measurement of locomotor rehabilitation outcomes to optimize interventions and differentiate between recovery versus compensation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012 Mar;36(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3182472cf6. PubMed 22333921 ↗
  • Bowden MG, Clark DJ, Kautz SA. Evaluation of abnormal synergy patterns poststroke: relationship of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment to hemiparetic locomotion. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 May;24(4):328-37. doi: 10.1177/1545968309343215. Epub 2009 Sep 30. PubMed 19794132 ↗
  • Brandell BR. Functional roles of the calf and vastus muscles in locomotion. Am J Phys Med. 1977 Apr;56(2):59-74. PubMed 851176 ↗
  • Devanne H, Lavoie BA, Capaday C. Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Apr;114(2):329-38. doi: 10.1007/pl00005641. PubMed 9166922 ↗
  • Fregni F, Boggio PS, Mansur CG, Wagner T, Ferreira MJ, Lima MC, Rigonatti SP, Marcolin MA, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neuroreport. 2005 Sep 28;16(14):1551-5. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000177010.44602.5e. PubMed 16148743 ↗
  • Hummel F, Cohen LG. Improvement of motor function with noninvasive cortical stimulation in a patient with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 Mar;19(1):14-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968304272698. PubMed 15673839 ↗
  • Jeffery DT, Norton JA, Roy FD, Gorassini MA. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Sep;182(2):281-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1093-y. Epub 2007 Aug 24. PubMed 17717651 ↗
  • Kim DY, Lim JY, Kang EK, You DS, Oh MK, Oh BM, Paik NJ. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;89(11):879-86. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f70aa7. PubMed 20962598 ↗
  • Lay AN, Hass CJ, Gregor RJ. The effects of sloped surfaces on locomotion: a kinematic and kinetic analysis. J Biomech. 2006;39(9):1621-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jun 28. PubMed 15990102 ↗
  • Leroux A, Fung J, Barbeau H. Postural adaptation to walking on inclined surfaces: II. Strategies following spinal cord injury. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1273-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.02.012. Epub 2006 Apr 27. PubMed 16644275 ↗
  • Leroux A, Fung J, Barbeau H. Postural adaptation to walking on inclined surfaces: I. Normal strategies. Gait Posture. 2002 Feb;15(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00181-3. PubMed 11809582 ↗
  • Shah B, Nguyen TT, Madhavan S. Polarity independent effects of cerebellar tDCS on short term ankle visuomotor learning. Brain Stimul. 2013 Nov;6(6):966-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 17. PubMed 23711765 ↗
  • Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:249-54. doi: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70229-6. PubMed 14677402 ↗
  • Peterson CL, Cheng J, Kautz SA, Neptune RR. Leg extension is an important predictor of paretic leg propulsion in hemiparetic walking. Gait Posture. 2010 Oct;32(4):451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.06.014. Epub 2010 Jul 24. PubMed 20656492 ↗
  • Reis J, Fritsch B. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011 Dec;24(6):590-6. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834c3db0. PubMed 21968548 ↗
  • Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, Celnik PA, Krakauer JW. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1590-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805413106. Epub 2009 Jan 21. PubMed 19164589 ↗
  • Roberts DR, Ramsey D, Johnson K, Kola J, Ricci R, Hicks C, Borckardt JJ, Bloomberg JJ, Epstein C, George MS. Cerebral cortex plasticity after 90 days of bed rest: data from TMS and fMRI. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2010 Jan;81(1):30-40. doi: 10.3357/asem.2532.2009. PubMed 20058735 ↗
  • Schlaug G, Renga V, Nair D. Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1571-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.65.12.1571. PubMed 19064743 ↗
  • Tanaka S, Hanakawa T, Honda M, Watanabe K. Enhancement of pinch force in the lower leg by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;196(3):459-65. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1863-9. Epub 2009 May 29. PubMed 19479243 ↗
  • Tanaka S, Takeda K, Otaka Y, Kita K, Osu R, Honda M, Sadato N, Hanakawa T, Watanabe K. Single session of transcranial direct current stimulation transiently increases knee extensor force in patients with hemiparetic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(6):565-9. doi: 10.1177/1545968311402091. Epub 2011 Mar 24. PubMed 21436391 ↗
  • Turns LJ, Neptune RR, Kautz SA. Relationships between muscle activity and anteroposterior ground reaction forces in hemiparetic walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Sep;88(9):1127-35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.05.027. PubMed 17826457 ↗
  • Werner C, Lindquist AR, Bardeleben A, Hesse S. The influence of treadmill inclination on the gait of ambulatory hemiparetic subjects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Jan-Feb;21(1):76-80. doi: 10.1177/1545968306289958. PubMed 17172557 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 28, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02892084
Lead sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Collaborators
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2016
Start date
Apr 2013
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2018
Completion
Mar 31, 2018
Last update
Jun 28, 2018

Study contacts

Mark G Bowden, PhD, PTf
principal investigator · Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion