CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT02875353Updated Aug 17, 2026

Blood Flow Monitoring to Prevent Post-Polypectomy Induced Ulcer Bleeding

An interventional study of Doppler Endoscopic Probe in Delayed Post-Polypectomy Induced Ulcer Hemorrhage, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Active, not recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 35 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-17.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary specific aim is to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare rates of delayed hemorrhage after DEP detection of arterial blood flow and focal treatment in PPIU's (treatment arm) with standard treatment using medical guidelines alone (controls) for prevention of delayed bleeding in high risk patients (on anti-coagulants or anti-platelet drugs or with large ulcers) after snare resection of benign colon polyps.

Read the detailed description

VA Central Office recently opened back research study after suspension from March to Sept 2020 with COVID 19

Severe delayed post-polypectomy induced ulcer (PPIU) bleeding has become a much more common problem with the increased numbers of colonoscopies being performed and with more patients taking anti-coagulants or anti-platelet drugs. Current medical guidelines may reduce bleeding during polypectomy, but are not effective for prevention of delayed bleeding. Empiric closure of PPIU's with clips is not effective because ulcers > 15 mm cannot be closed, does not treat the underlying artery in the ulcer base, and when the clips often fall off within 7 the underlying artery is exposed. As preliminary results, the investigators studied delayed PPIU bleeds and their prevention, used a Doppler endoscopic probe (DEP) to localize arteries in PPIU's, reported the prevalence which rises significantly as ulcer size increases, and successfully obliterated blood flow with focal treatment. These studies form the basis for this new RCT. The primary specific aim is to perform a RCT to compare rates of delayed hemorrhage after DEP detection of arterial blood flow and focal treatment in PPIU's (treatment arm) with standard treatment using medical guidelines alone (controls) for prevention of delayed bleeding in high risk patients (on anti-coagulants or anti-platelet drugs or with large ulcers) after snare resection of benign colon polyps. Secondary specific aims are to evaluate the natural history and risk factors for delayed PPIU bleeding using univariate and multivariable analyses. This is a RCT performed by the CURE Hemostasis Research Group for high risk patients - those with PPIU's 15 mm in size or greater but not on drugs associated with bleeding; or patients who require anti-coagulants or anti-platelet drugs for treatment of co-morbid conditions and have PPIU's 10 mm or larger. Outpatients, scheduled for screening or surveillance colonoscopies, who give written informed consent and meet entry criteria will be randomized to control/no DEP (medical treatment without PPIU closure) or DEP (as a guide to arterial blood flow detection and focal obliteration of it with hemoclips and/or low power multipolar electrocautery [MPEC] probe). Patients will be prospectively followed at 7, 14, and 30 days for bleeding, complications, or unscheduled visits for healthcare after polypectomies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Delayed Post-Polypectomy Induced Ulcer Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Post-Polypectomy
  • Colon bleeding
  • Stigmata of recent hemorrhage
03

In context

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Ambulatory patients, 35 years old or more and who are having:

    • elective, outpatient screening
    • surveillance colonoscopy for colon cancer or polyps
    • or being evaluated for abdominal pain or change in bowel habits ---or have a large polyp needing removal by EMR or ESD
  • Clinically the patient has to have a medical indication and recommendation by their primary care physician (PCP) or specialist to take:

    • daily anti-coagulants (Warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH] or a newer agent)
    • or an anti-platelet drug (aspirin as 81 mg or more, Clopidogrel, or newer agents) for PPIU's 10-14mm
    • or if not on one of these drugs, they must have a PPIU 15 mm
  • On colonoscopy, they are required to have:

    • benign appearing polyps and for 1 or more PPIU to be 10 mm in size (for the anti-coagulant or anti-platelet groups)
    • or 15 mm or larger for the PPIU group who do not have to be (but may be) on these drugs that can induce bleeding
  • In the case of bleeding from the PPIU during polypectomy, hemorrhage must be completely controlled

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to give written informed consent or to return to the investigators' medical centers for follow-up (FU) in the next 30 days, in case of delayed bleeding or other complications
  • Intrinsic bleeding disorder with a history of recurrent bleeding either after:

    • surgeries
    • angiography
    • or other invasive procedures
  • Significantly abnormal coagulation tests related to co-morbid liver, hematologic, or infectious disorders and not anti-coagulant drugs, with platelet count \< 100,000; international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5; or partial thromboplastin time (PTT) more than 1.5 times normal
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Infectious colitis
  • Idiopathic colitis with a history of recurrent rectal bleeding
  • Recurrent rectal bleeding from another chronic colorectal condition such as:

    • colonic angiomas
    • radiation colitis
    • proctitis
    • or internal hemorrhoids
  • A sessile polyp that can not be raised up by saline injection or Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) techniques nor completely removed by snare polypectomy either en block or in pieces and there is a suspicion about possible malignancy by the colonoscopist.
  • Recently colonoscopy (within less than 3 years) unless the patient is referred for a large or multiple polyps (on more recent colonoscopy) and colonoscopic removal in the investigators' referral centers
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
180 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Standard endoscopy (not experimental)

    For Standard treatment group, the Doppler probe will not be used, nor will hemoclip closure of post-polypectomy ulcers be attempted. Standard published guidelines will be followed for management of blood thinners (anti-coagulants) and/or aspirin like drugs (anti-platelet drugs) before and after the colonoscopic polypectomies. This is the standard of care at the investigators' medical centers and part of written instructions that are given to the participants and their referring physicians during the scheduling process and prior to their preparation for screening or surveillance outpatient colonoscopies.

    Device: Doppler Endoscopic Probe

  • Experimental
    Doppler treatment (experimental)

    A colon length catheter (probe) will be used to check the non-bleeding post-polypectomy ulcer with shallow and medium depth Doppler probe settings (\< 4 mm deep) for arterial blood flow. If arterial flow is found, treatment through the colonoscope (either hemoclipping or multipolar electrocoagulation probe) will be used to stop the arterial flow. This will be confirmed by rechecking with Doppler probe after endoscopic treatment. Tatoos (Spot method) will be placed on two sides of the ulcer so treated.

    Device: Doppler Endoscopic Probe

Interventions

  • DeviceDoppler Endoscopic Probe

    A colon length catheter (probe).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of participants with delayed Post-Polypectomy Induced Ulcer (PPIU) bleeds.

    We will compare the proportion of participants with PPIU bleeding by 30 days follow up in Doppler endoscopic probe (DEP) versus standard treatment. The p value for testing this hypothesis will be computed using Fisher's exact test. The corresponding 95% confidence bounds for the true difference will also be reported.

    Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after participants are enrolled.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The proportion of participants hospitalized.

    We will compare the proportion of participants hospitalized for PPIU bleeds or other complications at 30 days, the number of participants in DEP group and standard group overall. Fisher's exact test will be used to compare the proportion hospitalized for PPIU bleeding by 30 days in DEP versus standard.

    Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after participants are enrolled.

  2. The total number of hospitalized days.

    We will determine if number of hospitalized days follows a count distribution such as the Poisson or Negative Binomial distribution or if the log total hospital days follows a normal or other parametric distribution. We will therefore use the appropriate count model, t test or non parametric test (Wilcoxon rank sum) to compare the number of days hospitalized distribution in DEP versus standard as well as report the corresponding descriptive statistics (n, range, quartiles, median, mean, SD, frequencies) and histogram.

    Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed at 30 days after participants are enrolled.

  3. The proportion of participants with rectal bleeding reported to us but not severe enough to be hospitalized

    Comparison of proportion of participants with rectal bleeding reported to us but not severe enough to be hospitalized. Fisher's exact test will be used to compare the proportion with this type of rectal bleeding after polypectomy up to 30 days after enrollment in the DEP versus standard treatment groups.

    Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed up to 30 days after enrollment

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Kaiser Permanente-Downey Medical Center
    Downey, California 90242, United States
  • University of California, Los Angeles, Ronald Reagan Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA
    West Los Angeles, California 90073-1003, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hui AJ, Wong RM, Ching JY, Hung LC, Chung SC, Sung JJ. Risk of colonoscopic polypectomy bleeding with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents: analysis of 1657 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jan;59(1):44-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02307-1. PubMed 14722546 ↗
  • Liaquat H, Rohn E, Rex DK. Prophylactic clip closure reduced the risk of delayed postpolypectomy hemorrhage: experience in 277 clipped large sessile or flat colorectal lesions and 247 control lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Mar;77(3):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.024. Epub 2013 Jan 11. PubMed 23317580 ↗
  • Zuckerman MJ, Hirota WK, Adler DG, Davila RE, Jacobson BC, Leighton JA, Qureshi WA, Rajan E, Hambrick RD, Fanelli RD, Baron TH, Faigel DO; Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guideline: the management of low-molecular-weight heparin and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Feb;61(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02392-2. PubMed 15729224 ↗
  • Baron TH, Kamath PS, McBane RD. New anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents: a primer for the gastroenterologist. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;12(2):187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jun 2. PubMed 23735447 ↗
  • Wong RC. Endoscopic Doppler US probe for acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Nov;60(5):804-12. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02046-2. No abstract available. PubMed 15557966 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02875353
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Collaborators
University of California, Los Angeles, Kaiser Permanente
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 23, 2016
Start date
Feb 15, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 17, 2026

Study contacts

Dennis M. Jensen, MD
principal investigator · VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion