CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02871570Updated Jul 9, 2020Results posted

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of IV Doses of Rivipansel in Subjects With Moderate Hepatic Impairment and in Healthy Subjects With Normal Hepatic Function

A Phase 1 interventional study of Rivipansel in Moderate Hepatic Impairment and Normal Hepatic Function, sponsored by GlycoMimetics Incorporated. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-09.

Sponsored by GlycoMimetics Incorporated · Phase 1, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of hepatic impairment on rivipansel PK and safety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Moderate Hepatic Impairment
  • Normal Hepatic Function

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hepatic Impairment
  • Rivipansel
03

In context

Liver Diseases

2,081 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Diseases; 390 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 50 across 1,323 interventional studies indexed under Liver Diseases.

Browse Liver Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

GlycoMimetics Incorporated is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Female subjects of non-childbearing potential or male subjects

    • Body Mass Index (BMI) of 17.5 to 40.0 kg/m2
    • Normal Hepatic function for the healthy subjects
    • Stable Hepatic Impairment for the subjects with moderate hepatic impairment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days of the dose of study medication
  • Pregnant females, breastfeeding female subjects and male subjects with partners currently pregnant
  • Use of herbal supplements in the 28 days prior to the dose of study medication
  • Blood donation (excluding plasma donation) of approximately 1 pint or more within 56 days prior to study medication
  • A positive urine drug screen for illicit drugs
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Moderate Hepatic Impairment

    A single dose of IV Rivipansel over 20 minutes

    Drug: Rivipansel

  • Experimental
    Normal Hepatic Function

    A single dose of IV Rivipansel over 20 minutes

    Drug: Rivipansel

Interventions

  • DrugRivipansel

    A single dose of IV Rivipansel over 20 minutes

    Also known as: GMI-1070

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Post-baseline Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examinations

    A full physical examination was performed for each participant, and it included head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes and gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurological systems. Clinical significance of laboratory findings was determined by the investigator.

    Time frame: Day 5

  2. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device, regardless of its causal relationship with study treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between administration of study medication and up to follow-up visit (28-31 days after administration) that were absent before treatment or that worsened after treatment. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.

    Time frame: Day 1 to follow-up visit (28-31 days after administration of study medication on Day 1)

  3. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-defined Summarization Criteria

    Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization), QRS duration (time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization), and QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with ECG findings meeting the following criteria is presented: (1) PR interval \>=300 msec; (2) QRS duration \>=200 msec; (3) QTcF interval: 450 to \<480 msec; (4) QTcF interval: 480 to \<500 msec; (5) QTcF interval \>=500 msec; (6) PR interval percent increase from baseline \>=25/50 percent; (7) QRS duration percent increase from baseline \>=50 percent; (8) QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to \<60 msec; (9) QTcF interval increase from baseline \>=60 msec.

    Time frame: Day 5

  4. Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-defined Summarization Criteria

    Absolute values and changes from baseline (increase and decrease) were summarized for supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP), supine systolic blood pressure (SBP), and supine pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs findings meeting the following criteria is presented: (1) supine DBP \<50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg); (2) supine DBP \>90 mm Hg; (3) supine SBP \<90 mm Hg; (4) supine SBP \>140 mm Hg (for normal hepatic function group); (5) supine SBP \>160 mm Hg (for moderate hepatic impairment group); (6) supine pulse rate \< 40 beats per minute (bpm); (7) supine pulse rate \>120 bpm; (8) supine DBP increase from baseline \>=20 mm Hg; (9) supine SBP increase from baseline \>=30 mmHg; (10) supine DBP decrease from baseline \>=20 mm Hg; (11) supine SBP decrease from baseline \>=30 mm Hg.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Day 5

  5. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

    Laboratory tests included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red and white blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio), chemistry (blood urea nitrogen/urea and creatinine, fasting glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total carbon dioxide, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein), urinalysis (pH, qualitative glucose, protein, and blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, and microscopy), and other tests (follicle stimulating hormone, urine drug test and serologic tests on human immunodeficiency virus-1 antibody, Hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C antibody). Abnormality was determined by the investigator using widely accepted criteria in clinical practice.

    Time frame: Day 5

  6. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Rivipansel

    AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast\*/kel), where Clast\* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log linear regression analysis, kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

  7. Total Clearance From Plasma (CL) of Rivipansel

    CL of rivipansel was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf referred to the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to the infinite time.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Rivipansel

    Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of rivipansel was determined using a linear/log trapezoidal method.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

  2. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Rivipansel

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

  3. Terminal Half-Life of Rivipansel

    Terminal half-life of rivipansel was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

  4. Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Rivipansel

    Vss of rivipansel was calculated as CL\*MRT, where MRT was the mean residence time and CL was the clearance from plasma.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. Time for Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Rivipansel

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1

07

Results

Posted Nov 28, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Started88
Completed88
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Post-baseline Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examinations

A full physical examination was performed for each participant, and it included head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes and gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, and neurological systems. Clinical significance of laboratory findings was determined by the investigator.

Time frame:
Day 5
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Post-baseline Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examinations
participantsModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Number of Participants With Post-baseline Clinically Significant Findings in Physical Examinations00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device, regardless of its causal relationship with study treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; was life-threatening (immediate risk of death); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were events between administration of study medication and up to follow-up visit (28-31 days after administration) that were absent before treatment or that worsened after treatment. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.

Time frame:
Day 1 to follow-up visit (28-31 days after administration of study medication on Day 1)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
participantsModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
AEs11
SAEs00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-defined Summarization Criteria

Maximum absolute values and increases from baseline were summarized for PR interval (time from the beginning of P wave to the start of QRS complex, corresponding to the end of atrial depolarization and onset of ventricular depolarization), QRS duration (time from Q wave to the end of S wave, corresponding to ventricle depolarization), and QTcF interval (time from the beginning of Q wave to the end of T wave corresponding to electrical systole corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula). Number of participants with ECG findings meeting the following criteria is presented: (1) PR interval \>=300 msec; (2) QRS duration \>=200 msec; (3) QTcF interval: 450 to \<480 msec; (4) QTcF interval: 480 to \<500 msec; (5) QTcF interval \>=500 msec; (6) PR interval percent increase from baseline \>=25/50 percent; (7) QRS duration percent increase from baseline \>=50 percent; (8) QTcF interval increase from baseline: 30 to \<60 msec; (9) QTcF interval increase from baseline \>=60 msec.

Time frame:
Day 5
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting Pre-defined Summarization Criteria
participantsModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
PR interval >=300 msec00
QRS duration >=200 msec00
QTcF interval: 450 to <480 msec10
QTcF interval: 480 to <500 msec00
QTcF interval >=500 msec00
PR interval increase from baseline >=25/50 percent00
QRS duration increase from baseline >=50 percent00
QTcF increase from baseline: 30 to <60 msec00
QTcF interval increase from baseline >=60 msec00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-defined Summarization Criteria

Absolute values and changes from baseline (increase and decrease) were summarized for supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP), supine systolic blood pressure (SBP), and supine pulse rate. Number of participants with vital signs findings meeting the following criteria is presented: (1) supine DBP \<50 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg); (2) supine DBP \>90 mm Hg; (3) supine SBP \<90 mm Hg; (4) supine SBP \>140 mm Hg (for normal hepatic function group); (5) supine SBP \>160 mm Hg (for moderate hepatic impairment group); (6) supine pulse rate \< 40 beats per minute (bpm); (7) supine pulse rate \>120 bpm; (8) supine DBP increase from baseline \>=20 mm Hg; (9) supine SBP increase from baseline \>=30 mmHg; (10) supine DBP decrease from baseline \>=20 mm Hg; (11) supine SBP decrease from baseline \>=30 mm Hg.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Day 5
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Data Meeting Pre-defined Summarization Criteria
participantsModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
supine DBP <50 mm Hg00
supine DBP >90 mm Hg00
supine SBP <90 mm Hg00
supine SBP >140 mm Hg (normal function group)—0
supine SBP >160 mm Hg (moderate impairment group)0—
supine pulse rate <40 bpm00
supine pulse rate >120 bpm00
supine DBP increase from baseline >=20 mm Hg10
supine SBP increase from baseline >=30 mmHg10
supine DBP decrease from baseline >=20 mm Hg00
supine SBP decrease from baseline >=30 mm Hg00
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

Laboratory tests included: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red and white blood cell count, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes, prothrombin time/international normalized ratio), chemistry (blood urea nitrogen/urea and creatinine, fasting glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total carbon dioxide, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid, albumin, total protein), urinalysis (pH, qualitative glucose, protein, and blood, ketones, nitrites, leukocyte esterase, urobilinogen, urine bilirubin, and microscopy), and other tests (follicle stimulating hormone, urine drug test and serologic tests on human immunodeficiency virus-1 antibody, Hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C antibody). Abnormality was determined by the investigator using widely accepted criteria in clinical practice.

Time frame:
Day 5
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)
participantsModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)70
PrimaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Rivipansel

AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast\*/kel), where Clast\* was the predicted plasma concentration at the last quantifiable time point estimated from the log linear regression analysis, kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hour*microgram/milliliter (hr*mcg/mL)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Rivipansel
hour*microgram/milliliter (hr*mcg/mL)Moderate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of Rivipansel599.7 ± 25770.0 ± 14
Statistical analysis
  • Moderate Hepatic Impairment Group vs Normal Hepatic Function Group · Ratio: 0.7789 · 90% CI 0.6514 to 0.9313Moderate hepatic impairment group represents the numerator, and normal hepatic function group represents the denominator.
SecondaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Rivipansel

Area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast) of rivipansel was determined using a linear/log trapezoidal method.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hr*mcg/mL
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Rivipansel
hr*mcg/mLModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Profile From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Rivipansel593.8 ± 26763.7 ± 14
Statistical analysis
  • Moderate Hepatic Impairment Group vs Normal Hepatic Function Group · Ratio: 0.7776 · 90% CI 0.6493 to 0.9311Moderate hepatic impairment group represents the numerator, and normal hepatic function group represents the denominator.
PrimaryTotal Clearance From Plasma (CL) of Rivipansel

CL of rivipansel was calculated as dose/AUCinf, where AUCinf referred to the area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time 0 extrapolated to the infinite time.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · liter/hour
Total Clearance From Plasma (CL) of Rivipansel
liter/hourModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Total Clearance From Plasma (CL) of Rivipansel1.401 ± 261.091 ± 14
Statistical analysis
  • Moderate Hepatic Impairment Group vs Normal Hepatic Function Group · Ratio: 1.2844 · 90% CI 1.0732 to 1.5372Moderate hepatic impairment group represents the numerator, and normal hepatic function group represents the denominator.
SecondaryMaximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Rivipansel
Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · mcg/mL
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Rivipansel
mcg/mLModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Rivipansel77.91 ± 3898.06 ± 28
Statistical analysis
  • Moderate Hepatic Impairment Group vs Normal Hepatic Function Group · Ratio: 0.7945 · 90% CI 0.5955 to 1.0599Moderate hepatic impairment group represents the numerator, and normal hepatic function group represents the denominator.
SecondaryTerminal Half-Life of Rivipansel

Terminal half-life of rivipansel was calculated as loge(2)/kel, where kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration time curve.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Terminal Half-Life of Rivipansel
hoursModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Terminal Half-Life of Rivipansel7.653 ± 0.9647.805 ± 0.923
SecondaryVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Rivipansel

Vss of rivipansel was calculated as CL\*MRT, where MRT was the mean residence time and CL was the clearance from plasma.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Reported as:
Geometric mean · liters
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Rivipansel
litersModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Rivipansel14.08 ± 2911.20 ± 14
Other pre-specifiedTime for Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Rivipansel
Time frame:
Pre-dose, 0.33, 1, 3, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-dose on Day 1
Reported as:
Median · hours
Time for Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Rivipansel
hoursModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Time for Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Rivipansel0.667 (0.667 to 3.33)0.667 (0.667 to 0.667)

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 to follow-up visit (28-31 days after administration of study medication on Day 1). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Moderate Hepatic Impairment Group0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)
Normal Hepatic Function Group0/8 (0%)0/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventModerate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function Group
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders1/80/8
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/81/8

Baseline characteristics

Baseline analysis population included all participants who received study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Moderate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function GroupTotal
Mean58.00 ± 3.8558.75 ± 4.4358.38 ± 4.03
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Moderate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function GroupTotal
Female112
Male7714
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Moderate Hepatic Impairment GroupNormal Hepatic Function GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White8614
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Orlando Clincial Research Center
    Orlando, Florida 32809, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tammara BK, Ryan K, Plotka A, Shafer FE, Wei H, Readett D, Fang A, Korth-Bradley JM. Effect of Renal or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Intravenous Rivipansel. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2020 Nov;9(8):918-928. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.842. Epub 2020 Jun 24. PubMed 32579796 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 27, 2016
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 2, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02871570
Lead sponsor
GlycoMimetics Incorporated
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2016
Start date
Sep 2016
Primary completion
Feb 2017
Completion
Mar 2017
Results posted
Nov 28, 2018
Last update
Jul 9, 2020

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion