ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02868970Updated Dec 16, 2024Results posted

Pharmacists as Immunizers to Improve Coverage and Provider/Recipient Satisfaction

A Phase 4 interventional study of Meningococcal B and High-Dose TIV in Healthy, sponsored by Canadian Immunization Research Network. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-16.

Sponsored by Canadian Immunization Research Network · Phase 4, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,404
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project proposes to implement and compare new community pharmacy-based strategies for improving vaccine coverage.

Read the detailed description

Although there are many safe and effective vaccines for adults, the Public Health Agency of Canada has noted that public perception of vaccination is that it is primarily for infants and children. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) recommends adults and adolescents receive the influenza vaccine, tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap), and meningococcal vaccines (MenACWY, 4CMenB). As well, NACI recommends that people 60 years or older receive the herpes zoster vaccine and that Canadians who travel to high-risk areas should consider getting vaccinated to protect themselves against travel-related illnesses, such as Hepatitis A and Typhoid Fever. While NACI makes recommendations, provinces and territories (P/Ts) determine if they will fund and implement vaccine programs. Unlike the childhood immunization programs which tend to be funded by P/Ts, many adult vaccines are unfunded, resulting in poor population uptake. In this project,the investigators propose to implement and compare new community pharmacy-based strategies for improving vaccine coverage.

Patients are typically educated about preventative health care during face-to-face visits with physicians in office settings. The ability to educate and deliver preventative health care is limited by the available provider time during office visits - providers often focus on acute needs and current disease management. New delivery models and a means of extending preventative health care delivery outside of traditional face-to-face office visits are needed.

Pharmacists are in a unique position of being among the most accessible of health professionals. Given their extended operating hours, accessibility, and established trust with patients, pharmacists are well-positioned to improve vaccination rates and health system efficacy through injection administration.

Vaccine coverage rates will be measured using the following:

  1. pharmacy database analysis,
  2. public health vaccine reports by physicians,
  3. number of vaccine doses delivered to pharmacies in all four regions, and
  4. public survey within the study communities to determine immunization status.

Intervention communities include Saint John, New Brunswick and New Glasgow/Pictou/Antigonish, Nova Scotia area, which include the smaller towns of Stellarton and Westville, Nova Scotia. Control communities include Moncton, New Brunswick and Kentville/New Minas/Wolfville, Nova Scotia, which include the smaller towns of Canning and Coldbrook, Nova Scotia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Canadian Immunization Research Network is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  • For the selection of the four communities include population size (approximately 30,000 adults >18 years of age), stable population, service by a centralized regional hospital and local community hospitals, availability of community pharmacies, interest of community pharmacists (sufficient numbers of pharmacists qualified to provide vaccinations), and lack of substantial health care spill over to adjacent communities.
  • Spill over is defined as a pattern of health-care utilization where patients regularly receive care at different regional health centers.
  • Intervention communities include Saint John, New Brunswick and New Glasgow/Pictou/Antigonish, Nova Scotia area, which include the smaller towns of Stellarton and Westville, Nova Scotia.
  • Control communities include Moncton, New Brunswick and Kentville/New Minas/Wolfville, Nova Scotia, which include the smaller towns of Canning and Coldbrook, Nova Scotia.

Exclusion criteria: Not meeting inclusion criteria

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,404 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Community (2 in NB, 2 from NS)

    There are four communities involved in the study, two in New Brunswick and two in Nova Scotia. All pharmacies in each community will be allocated to one intervention. Interventions include: High-Dose TIV, Meningococcal B Vaccine, Meningococcal ACWY vaccine, Tdap, Herpes Zoster vaccine and Travel Health vaccines (Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Typhoid Fever).

    Biological: Meningococcal B · Biological: High-Dose TIV · Biological: Tdap (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis) · Biological: Meningococcal ACWY · Biological: Herpes Zoster · Biological: Travel Health (Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Typhoid Fever)

Interventions

  • BiologicalMeningococcal B

    Bexsero is indicated for active immunisation of individuals from 2 months of age and older against invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis group B.

    Also known as: Bexsero

  • BiologicalHigh-Dose TIV

    Fluzone High-Dose is an injectable influenza vaccine made to protect against the flu strains most likely to cause illness for that particular flu season.

    Also known as: FluZone

  • BiologicalTdap (tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis)

    Tdap is a combination vaccine that protects against three potentially life-threatening bacterial diseases: tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (whooping cough).

  • BiologicalMeningococcal ACWY

    Meningococcal ACWY vaccine is indicated for active immunization of individuals up to 55 years of age against invasive meningococcal diseases caused by Neisseria meningitides serogroups A, C, W-135 and Y.

  • BiologicalHerpes Zoster

    Herpes zoster vaccine is indicated for the immunization of individuals 50 years of age or older for the prevention of herpes zoster (shingles).

  • BiologicalTravel Health (Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, Typhoid Fever)

    Hepatitis A vaccine is indicated for immunization against infections caused by hepatitis A virus; Hepatitis B vaccine is indicated for immunization against infection caused by hepatitis B virus; and typhoid fever vaccine is indicated for active immunization against Salmonella typhi, the organism which causes typhoid fever.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Vaccines Administered by Participating Pharmacies in the Intervention and Non-intervention Communities Before and During the Intervention.

    A 2-year demonstration program was conducted in two Canadian provinces (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia). One community in each province served as the intervention community, where pharmacies were allocated to implement various strategies specifically designed for each of the target vaccines. One community in each province also served as the non-intervention community, where immunization practice continued unchanged. Vaccine uptake was compared using pharmacy-generated reports of the number of vaccine doses administered before (from September 2015 to August 2017) and during (September 2017 to November 2019) the intervention and between non-intervention and intervention pharmacies.

    Time frame: At the time of vaccination, 1 day over two years from September 2017 to November 2019.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compare the Number of Flu Vaccine Recipients Who Were Recruited and Completed the Online AEFI Survey Among Intervention Pharmacies Using Active Recruitment Strategies and the Non-intervention Pharmacies Using Passive Recruitment Strategies.

    Recipients of a flu vaccine in the intervention communities were actively recruited to participate in the CANVAS survey by the intervention pharmacists who handed out information sheets and/or pointed to the QR code to sign up for the survey, while flu vaccine recipients in the non-intervention pharmacies were passively recruited through posters with the QR code displayed in waiting areas without telling them about the study. Note: For this secondary outcome, "recruited" means anyone who signed up for the survey but may not have necessarily completed the survey. The number of flu vaccine recipients who were actively recruited in the intervention pharmacies or passively recruited in the non-intervention pharmacies were compared to assess the effectiveness of the active versus passive recruitment approach.

    Time frame: At the time of survey recruitment, 1 day over the 5-month period the surveys remained open during the influenza seasons

  2. Determining the Awareness About Pharmacists as Immunizers and Vaccination Behaviours of the Targeted Public Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys

    As part of the pre- and post-KABB surveys, participants were asked questions regarding their awareness about pharmacists as immunizers and their vaccination behaviour. Questions related to their awareness about pharmacists as immunizers were "Are you aware that many pharmacists are trained to administer vaccines? (Yes or No)" and "Which of the following vaccines are currently administered by pharmacists in a pharmacy? (Check all that apply)". Questions related to their vaccination behaviour were "Did you get or have you ever received... (the following vaccines)?" \[Note: Those who answered 'Yes' to these yes/no questions are presented below\]

    Time frame: At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open

  3. Determining the Attitudes and Beliefs of the Targeted Public About Pharmacists as Immunizers Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys

    As part of the pre- and post-KABB surveys, participants were asked to indicate how much they agree/disagree with a list of statements about their attitudes and beliefs about pharmacists as immunizers: "Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements by clicking the box that best fits your opinion". \[Note: Those who answered 'agree' are presented below\].

    Time frame: At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open

  4. Determining the Awareness of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Guidelines and the Vaccinating Behaviors of Healthcare Providers Through Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviors (KABB) Surveys

    As part of the pre- and post-KABB surveys, healthcare providers were asked about their awareness of NACI recommendations and about their vaccinating behaviour. The questions for their awareness of NACI recommendations were "Are you aware that the Canadian guidelines (NACI) recommends/indicates (the following vaccines)". The questions about their vaccinating behaviour was "Do you offer/discuss/recommend (the following vaccines) according to NACI guidelines?" \[Note: Those who answered 'Yes' to these yes/no questions are presented below\]

    Time frame: At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open

  5. Determining the Attitudes and Beliefs of Healthcare Providers Regarding Pharmacists as Immunizers Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys

    As part of the pre- and post-KABB surveys, healthcare providers were asked about their attitudes and beliefs about pharmacists as immunizers. The questions were: "Where do you think vaccines should be administered? (Check all that apply)" \[Note: those who selected 'family doctor's office', 'public health clinic', and/or 'pharmacy' as the locations are presented below\]; and "Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements by clicking the box that best fits your opinion?" \[Note: Those who answered 'agree' are presented below\].

    Time frame: At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open

07

Results

Posted Dec 16, 2024
Limitations and caveats
The demonstration program was not able to separate which of the various outreach strategies had the most impact on vaccination uptake (e.g., unable to separate simulated public funding from other outreach strategies such as posters, targeted outreach for the Tdap vaccine). This may be an indication that pharmacies focused on the Tdap vaccine because it was "funded" (simulated public funding).

Participant flow

Pharmacies were recruited from four communities in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, Canada. One community in each province served as the intervention community, where community pharmacies were allocated to implement various strategies designed for each of the target vaccines. One community in each province also served as the non-intervention community, where immunization practice continued unchanged. Intervention and non-intervention pharmacies were assigned to each group rather than participants.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntervention CommunitiesNon-Intervention Communities
StartedNANA
CompletedNANA
Not completedNANA

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Vaccines Administered by Participating Pharmacies in the Intervention and Non-intervention Communities Before and During the Intervention.

A 2-year demonstration program was conducted in two Canadian provinces (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia). One community in each province served as the intervention community, where pharmacies were allocated to implement various strategies specifically designed for each of the target vaccines. One community in each province also served as the non-intervention community, where immunization practice continued unchanged. Vaccine uptake was compared using pharmacy-generated reports of the number of vaccine doses administered before (from September 2015 to August 2017) and during (September 2017 to November 2019) the intervention and between non-intervention and intervention pharmacies.

Time frame:
At the time of vaccination, 1 day over two years from September 2017 to November 2019.
Reported as:
Number · Number of vaccines administered
Number of Vaccines Administered by Participating Pharmacies in the Intervention and Non-intervention Communities Before and During the Intervention.
Number of vaccines administeredIntervention CommunitiesNon-Intervention Communities
Number of vaccines administered before the intervention (from September 2015 to August 2017)3,0935,011
Number of vaccines administered during the intervention (September 2017 to November 2019)6,1495,922
SecondaryCompare the Number of Flu Vaccine Recipients Who Were Recruited and Completed the Online AEFI Survey Among Intervention Pharmacies Using Active Recruitment Strategies and the Non-intervention Pharmacies Using Passive Recruitment Strategies.

Recipients of a flu vaccine in the intervention communities were actively recruited to participate in the CANVAS survey by the intervention pharmacists who handed out information sheets and/or pointed to the QR code to sign up for the survey, while flu vaccine recipients in the non-intervention pharmacies were passively recruited through posters with the QR code displayed in waiting areas without telling them about the study. Note: For this secondary outcome, "recruited" means anyone who signed up for the survey but may not have necessarily completed the survey. The number of flu vaccine recipients who were actively recruited in the intervention pharmacies or passively recruited in the non-intervention pharmacies were compared to assess the effectiveness of the active versus passive recruitment approach.

Time frame:
At the time of survey recruitment, 1 day over the 5-month period the surveys remained open during the influenza seasons
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Compare the Number of Flu Vaccine Recipients Who Were Recruited and Completed the Online AEFI Survey Among Intervention Pharmacies Using Active Recruitment Strategies and the Non-intervention Pharmacies Using Passive Recruitment Strategies.
ParticipantsIntervention CommunitiesNon-Intervention Communities
Compare the Number of Flu Vaccine Recipients Who Were Recruited and Completed the Online AEFI Survey Among Intervention Pharmacies Using Active Recruitment Strategies and the Non-intervention Pharmacies Using Passive Recruitment Strategies.2218
SecondaryDetermining the Awareness About Pharmacists as Immunizers and Vaccination Behaviours of the Targeted Public Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys

As part of the pre- and post-KABB surveys, participants were asked questions regarding their awareness about pharmacists as immunizers and their vaccination behaviour. Questions related to their awareness about pharmacists as immunizers were "Are you aware that many pharmacists are trained to administer vaccines? (Yes or No)" and "Which of the following vaccines are currently administered by pharmacists in a pharmacy? (Check all that apply)". Questions related to their vaccination behaviour were "Did you get or have you ever received... (the following vaccines)?" \[Note: Those who answered 'Yes' to these yes/no questions are presented below\]

Time frame:
At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Determining the Awareness About Pharmacists as Immunizers and Vaccination Behaviours of the Targeted Public Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys
ParticipantsPre-Intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys (Public)Post-Intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs & Behaviours (KABB) Surveys (Public)
Aware that pharmacists are trained to vaccinate850852
Awareness of pharmacists' ability to administer influenza vaccine724680
Awareness of pharmacists' ability to administer Tdap vaccine166122
Awareness of pharmacists' ability to administer Men ACWY vaccine11389
Awareness of pharmacists' ability to administer MenB vaccine11386
Awareness of pharmacists' ability to administer travel vaccines (hep A, hep B, typhoid vaccines)NA327
Awareness of pharmacists' ability to administer herpes zoster (shingles)NA249
Get the influenza vaccine510610
Ever received Men C or Men ACWY vaccine374248
Ever received Men B vaccine (contingency question for participants between 18-24 years old)160123
Ever received Tdap vaccine765411
Ever received high-dose influenza vaccine (contingency question for participants 65 years or older)412
Ever received vaccines for travel (hep A, hep B, typhoid vaccines)NA530
Ever received herpes zoster (shingles) vaccine (contingency question for participants 50+)NA100
Received all vaccines recommended for adults501421
Ever received a vaccination by a pharmacist in a pharmacy384557
SecondaryDetermining the Attitudes and Beliefs of the Targeted Public About Pharmacists as Immunizers Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys

As part of the pre- and post-KABB surveys, participants were asked to indicate how much they agree/disagree with a list of statements about their attitudes and beliefs about pharmacists as immunizers: "Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements by clicking the box that best fits your opinion". \[Note: Those who answered 'agree' are presented below\].

Time frame:
At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Determining the Attitudes and Beliefs of the Targeted Public About Pharmacists as Immunizers Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys
ParticipantsPre-Intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys (Public)Post-Intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs & Behaviours (KABB) Surveys (Public)
I feel comfortable receiving my vaccines from a pharmacist739772
It is convenient for me to receive my vaccines from my pharmacist696717
I think pharmacists have enough training to give vaccines756780
I would feel more comfortable receiving my vaccines in a pharmacy if my physician recommended it458337
I would feel more comfortable receiving my vaccines in a pharmacy if a PH nurse recommended it385290
I would get a vaccine if it was recommended by a doctorNA772
I would get a vaccine if it was recommended by a nurseNA738
I would get a vaccine if it was recommended by a pharmacistNA692
SecondaryDetermining the Awareness of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Guidelines and the Vaccinating Behaviors of Healthcare Providers Through Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviors (KABB) Surveys

As part of the pre- and post-KABB surveys, healthcare providers were asked about their awareness of NACI recommendations and about their vaccinating behaviour. The questions for their awareness of NACI recommendations were "Are you aware that the Canadian guidelines (NACI) recommends/indicates (the following vaccines)". The questions about their vaccinating behaviour was "Do you offer/discuss/recommend (the following vaccines) according to NACI guidelines?" \[Note: Those who answered 'Yes' to these yes/no questions are presented below\]

Time frame:
At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Determining the Awareness of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Guidelines and the Vaccinating Behaviors of Healthcare Providers Through Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviors (KABB) Surveys
ParticipantsPre-Intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys (Healthcare Providers)Post-Intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs & Behaviours (KABB) Surveys (Healthcare Providers)
Awareness that NACI recommends that adults receive vaccine for protection against influenza201163
Awareness that NACI recommends that older adults (65+) receive a high-dose influenza vaccine149140
Awareness that NACI recommends healthy adolescents/young adults receive vaccine for MenACWY152133
Awareness that NACI indicates that healthy adolescents/young adults may receive vaccine for MenB11297
Awareness that NACI recommends that adults receive vaccination for protection against whooping cough163143
Awareness that CATMAT recommends adults receive travel vaccines depending on where they travelNA161
Awareness that NACI recommend that adults 50+ receive a vaccine for protection against shinglesNA139
Discuss the option of receiving the MenB vaccine with eligible adolescents4150
Recommend that all adolescents who did not get the MenACWY vaccine through school get it5566
Routinely offer all eligible adults the Tdap vaccine7993
Offer all eligible adults travel vaccines (Hep A, Hep B, typhoid) according to CATMAT guidelinesNA121
Offer all eligible adults the shingles vaccinesNA132
SecondaryDetermining the Attitudes and Beliefs of Healthcare Providers Regarding Pharmacists as Immunizers Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys

As part of the pre- and post-KABB surveys, healthcare providers were asked about their attitudes and beliefs about pharmacists as immunizers. The questions were: "Where do you think vaccines should be administered? (Check all that apply)" \[Note: those who selected 'family doctor's office', 'public health clinic', and/or 'pharmacy' as the locations are presented below\]; and "Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statements by clicking the box that best fits your opinion?" \[Note: Those who answered 'agree' are presented below\].

Time frame:
At the time of survey administration, 1 day over the 9-month period each of the surveys remained open
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Determining the Attitudes and Beliefs of Healthcare Providers Regarding Pharmacists as Immunizers Using Pre-intervention and Post-intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys
ParticipantsPre-Intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Behaviours (KABB) Surveys (Healthcare Providers)Post-Intervention Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs & Behaviours (KABB) Surveys (Healthcare Providers)
Vaccines should be administered in family doctor's office188155
Vaccines should be administered in public health clinic197179
Vaccines should be administered in pharmacy170136
I support the expansion of pharmacists' scope of practice to include provision of vaccines to adults171150
I support the expansion of pharmacist scope of practice to include provision of vaccines to children156134
Pharmacists should be allowed to vaccinate children under the age of 5 years old6695
Pharmacists have enough training to administer vaccines136142
I would refer a patient to receive a vaccine from a pharmacist at a pharmacy (physician/nurses only)5075

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intervention Communities———
Non-Intervention Communities———

Baseline characteristics

Information on the number of participants is not available (NA) because no participants were assigned to the arms/groups. Instead, pharmacies from the selected community in each province were assigned to each arm/group. Pharmacies were not assessed for these baseline measures; therefore, data were not collected and cannot be reported.

Age, Continuous
Age, ContinuousIntervention CommunitiesNon-Intervention CommunitiesTotal
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, MaleIntervention CommunitiesNon-Intervention CommunitiesTotal
Female———
Male———
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)Intervention CommunitiesNon-Intervention CommunitiesTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native———
Asian———
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander———
Black or African American———
White———
More than one race———
Unknown or Not Reported———
08

Study locations

1 site
  • IWK Health Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia B3K 6R8, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 18, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2017 to primary completion in Jul 2021, 52 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2024, 3 years 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 11, 2016
First posted
Aug 16, 2016
StartActual
Feb 15, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jul 5, 2021
CompletionActual
Jul 5, 2021
Results first posted
Dec 16, 2024
Last update
Dec 16, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 16, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02868970
Lead sponsor
Canadian Immunization Research Network
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline, MCM Vaccines B.V., Canadian Center for Vaccinology, Dalhousie University
Responsible party
Jennifer Isenor (Principal Investigator, Canadian Immunization Research Network) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 16, 2016
Start date
Feb 15, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 5, 2021
Completion
Jul 5, 2021
Results posted
Dec 16, 2024
Last update
Dec 16, 2024

Study contacts

Scott A Halperin, MD
principal investigator · Dalhousie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: 4CMenB vaccine

Start the discussion