CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02867202Updated Jan 2, 2020Results posted

Adjuvant Therapy for Intrauterine Adhesions Between Two Groups

An interventional study of Intrauterine balloon and Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter in Asherman Syndrome, sponsored by Wenzhou Medical University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-01-02.

Sponsored by Wenzhou Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
171
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study was taken out to compare two mechanical devices (intrauterine balloon and Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter) in the therapy for intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Participates were assigned into two groups by randomly.

Read the detailed description

Intrauterine balloon and Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter are both effective in the therapy for intrauterine adhesion.

The Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter are usually inserted into the uterine after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Foley Catheter is removed after three days while intrauterine device is removed two or three month later.

The heart-shaped intrauterine balloon is designed to fit into the cavity of the uterus, and usually removed on the 7th day after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asherman Syndrome

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • intrauterine balloon
  • Intrauterine Device Plus Foley Balloon Catheter
  • Asherman Syndrome
03

In context

Gynatresia

49 studies on the registry are indexed under Gynatresia; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 171 is above the median of 95 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Gynatresia.

Browse Gynatresia studies →

Lead sponsor

Wenzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion (AFS score ≥5)
  • Agreement to have a second-look hysteroscopy
  • no previous history of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minimal adhesion (AFS score\<5)
  • Previous hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
171 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intrauterine balloon

    The heart-shaped intrauterine balloon is designed to fit into the cavity of the uterus,and removed on the 7th day after surgery. And hysteroscopy was taken out again after two or three months to re-evaluate the uterine adhesions.

    Device: Intrauterine balloon

  • Experimental
    intrauterine device Plus Foley Catheter

    Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter are inserted into the uterine after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Foley Catheter is removed after three days while intrauterine device is removed at the second hysteroscopy. Uterine adhesions are judged again at the second hysteroscopy.

    Device: Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter

Interventions

  • DeviceIntrauterine balloon

    After the completion of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, intrauterine balloon was inserted and inflated with 3-5 mL normal saline which was removed after 1 week.

    Also known as: Cook balloon

  • DeviceIntrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter

    After the completion of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter were inserted into the uterine cavity. Foley Catheter was removed after three days and Intrauterine Device was removed at the second time of hysteroscopy.

    Also known as: Intrauterine Device Plus Foley Catheter

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the AFS Score at Second-look Hysteroscopy

    The AFS score is based on the American Fertility Society (AFS) Classification of Intra-uterine adhesions( 1988 version)The total range of AFS score is from 0 to 12, and the higher the score is, the worse the outcome is.

    Time frame: 2 or 3 months after the surgery

07

Results

Posted Jan 2, 2020

Participant flow

all patients were recruited from 1st affiliated hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Inclusion criteria were as follows:1) women aged 18 to 45 years. 2) agreed to have second-look hysteroscopy. 3) moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion (AFS score ≥5)

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntrauterine BalloonIntrauterine Contraceptive Device Plus Foley Catheter
Started8388
Completed6256
Not completed2132

Outcome measures

Primarythe AFS Score at Second-look Hysteroscopy

The AFS score is based on the American Fertility Society (AFS) Classification of Intra-uterine adhesions( 1988 version)The total range of AFS score is from 0 to 12, and the higher the score is, the worse the outcome is.

Time frame:
2 or 3 months after the surgery
Reported as:
Median · Units on a scale
the AFS Score at Second-look Hysteroscopy
Units on a scaleIntrauterine BalloonIntrauterine Device Plus Foley Catheter
the AFS Score at Second-look Hysteroscopy6.5 (1 to 10)8 (3 to 12)
Statistical analysis
  • Intrauterine Balloon vs Intrauterine Device Plus Foley Catheter · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months to 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 2.3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intrauterine Balloon0/83 (0%)0/83 (0%)21/83 (25.3%)
IUD Plus Foley Catheter0/88 (0%)0/88 (0%)32/88 (36.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventIntrauterine BalloonIUD Plus Foley Catheter
refuse to have second-look hysteroscopyInvestigations9/8321/88
suffered from moderate to severe postoperative painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications12/833/88
Not meeting inclusion criteriaInvestigations5/835/88
Declined to participateInvestigations4/834/88
Protocol violationInvestigations3/832/88

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(year)Intrauterine BalloonIUD Plus Foley CatheterTotal
Mean31.69 ± 5.26832.63 ± 6.12532.14 ± 5.685
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Intrauterine BalloonIUD Plus Foley CatheterTotal
Female6256118
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Intrauterine BalloonIUD Plus Foley CatheterTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian6256118
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Intrauterine BalloonIUD Plus Foley CatheterTotal
China6256118
Parity
Parity(Births)Intrauterine BalloonIUD Plus Foley CatheterTotal
Mean0.484 ± 0.5650.554 ± 0.5360.517 ± 0.551
08

Study locations

1 site
  • the 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
    Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lin XN, Zhou F, Wei ML, Yang Y, Li Y, Li TC, Zhang SY. Randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy of intrauterine balloon and intrauterine contraceptive device in the prevention of adhesion reformation after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):235-40. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Apr 30. PubMed 25936237 ↗
  • Johary J, Xue M, Zhu X, Xu D, Velu PP. Efficacy of estrogen therapy in patients with intrauterine adhesions: systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Aug 9. PubMed 23933351 ↗
  • Lin X, Wei M, Li TC, Huang Q, Huang D, Zhou F, Zhang S. A comparison of intrauterine balloon, intrauterine contraceptive device and hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of adhesion reformation following hysteroscopic surgery for Asherman syndrome: a cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Oct;170(2):512-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Aug 7. PubMed 23932377 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 1, 2017
  • Study protocol · Dec 1, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02867202
Lead sponsor
Wenzhou Medical University
Responsible party
Feng Lin (attending doctor, Wenzhou Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2016
Start date
Jun 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Results posted
Jan 2, 2020
Last update
Jan 2, 2020

Study contacts

Feng Lin, MD
principal investigator · The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion