CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02866942SNIFFLE-4Updated May 10, 2019Results posted

Safety of Nasal Influenza Immunisation in Children With Asthma

A Phase 4 interventional study of Administration of Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Asthma, sponsored by Imperial College London. Completed. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-10.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
479
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
2 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A new influenza vaccine, known as LAIV (Live Attenuated Intranasal Vaccine) has recently been approved by a number of licensing boards and is given by a spray into the nose. In the United Kingdom (UK), the vaccine has been demonstrated to be highly effective against influenza infection. Further, despite concerns that LAIV can cause wheezing in children under age 2 years, the previous SNIFFLE studies have demonstrated it to be safe in children over 2 years with mild-moderate asthma.

The objective of this multicentre study is to further assess the safety of intranasal LAIV in children with asthma and recurrent wheeze, including those with severe symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

03

In context

Asthma

3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 506 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 479 is above the median of 83 across 2,751 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London is the lead sponsor of 824 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 2 - 18 years old (inclusive)
  • Physician diagnosis of asthma or recurrent wheezing (by the hospital specialist) AND (i) in children age 2-4 years: ≥2 exacerbations in the past year requiring oral steroids or observation in-hospital beyond 4 hours duration, OR (ii) in children ≥ 5 years of age, receiving treatment equivalent to at least BTS/SIGN step 2 therapy.
  • Written informed consent from parent/guardian (or the patient themselves from age 16 years), with assent from children aged 8 years and above wherever possible.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Admission to Paediatric Intensive Care for invasive ventilation due to a respiratory illness in the preceding 2 years.
  2. Contraindications to LAIV (notwithstanding allergy to egg protein), which include:

    1. Hypersensitivity to the active ingredients, gelatin or gentamicin (a possible trace residue)
    2. Previous systemic allergic reaction to LAIV
    3. Previous allergic reaction to an influenza vaccine (not LAIV) is a relative contra-indication, which must be discussed with the site PI to confirm patient suitability
    4. Children/adolescents who are clinically immunodeficient due to conditions or immunosuppressive therapy such as: acute and chronic leukaemias; lymphoma; symptomatic HIV infection; cellular immune deficiencies; and high-dose corticosteroids**.

      **High-dose steroids is defined as a treatment course for at least one month, equivalent to a dose greater than 20mg prednisolone per day (any age), or for children under 20kg, a dose greater than 1mg/kg/day.

      NB: LAIV is not contraindicated for use in individuals with asymptomatic HIV infection; or individuals who are receiving topical/inhaled/low-dose oral systemic corticosteroids or those receiving corticosteroids as replacement therapy, e.g. for adrenal insufficiency.

    5. Children and adolescents younger than 18 years of age receiving salicylate therapy because of the association of Reye's syndrome with salicylates and wild-type influenza infection.
    6. pregnancy
  3. Contraindications to vaccination on that occasion, e.g. due to child being acutely unwell:

    1. Febrile ≥38.0 degrees C in last 72 hours
    2. *Acute wheeze in last 72 hours requiring treatment beyond that normally prescribed for regular use by the child's treating healthcare professional
    3. *Recent admission to hospital in last 2 weeks for acute asthma
    4. *Current oral steroid for asthma exacerbation or course completed within last 2 weeks
    5. Any other significant condition or circumstance which, in the opinion of the investigator, may either put the participant at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.

      • Items 3b-3d are relative contra-indications: Many children with "difficult-to-control" symptoms may meet fail to meet these criteria on a routine basis. Where these are present, the study centre PIs are able to authorise participation on a case-by-case basis, after assessing the child and their lung function at the time of enrolment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
479 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Asthma

    LAIV administration in children with asthma receiving treatment according to British Thoracic Society step 2+

    Drug: Administration of Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV)

Interventions

  • DrugAdministration of Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV)

    Also known as: Flumist, Fluenz

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Asthma Symptoms and Control Pre and 4 Weeks Post LAIV, as Assessed by Validated Questionnaire

    The validated questionnaire to be used will depend on the age of the enrolled child: * Age 2-4 years: TRACK questionnaire * Age 5-11 years: Children's Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) score * Age 12+ years: Asthma Control Test (ACT) score The change in score (using the appropriate questionnaire for age) between pre- and 4 weeks post LAIV will be used to assess the primary outcome across all participants. a change in (c-)ACT of at least 3 points, or 10 points for TRACK will be determined a significant change. For TRACK, the minimum and maximum score possible is 0 and 100 respectively, the higher the score, the better is symptom control. For c-ACT, the minimum and maximum score possible is 0 and 27 respectively, the higher the score, the better controlled are asthma symptoms. For ACT, the minimum and maximum score possible is 5 and 25 respectively, the higher the score, the better controlled are asthma symptoms.

    Time frame: 4 weeks post LAIV

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Children Receiving LAIV

    Incidence of a 'significant exacerbation' in asthma, defined as: i. At least 3 day course of oral steroids following an unscheduled contact with a healthcare professional; OR ii. Unscheduled visit to an Emergency department or admission to hospital for treatment of asthma symptoms, requiring systemic corticosteroids

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks post LAIV administration

07

Results

Posted Apr 26, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAsthma
Started479
Completed478
Not completed1
Withdrew: Invalid consent1

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Asthma Symptoms and Control Pre and 4 Weeks Post LAIV, as Assessed by Validated Questionnaire

The validated questionnaire to be used will depend on the age of the enrolled child: * Age 2-4 years: TRACK questionnaire * Age 5-11 years: Children's Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) score * Age 12+ years: Asthma Control Test (ACT) score The change in score (using the appropriate questionnaire for age) between pre- and 4 weeks post LAIV will be used to assess the primary outcome across all participants. a change in (c-)ACT of at least 3 points, or 10 points for TRACK will be determined a significant change. For TRACK, the minimum and maximum score possible is 0 and 100 respectively, the higher the score, the better is symptom control. For c-ACT, the minimum and maximum score possible is 0 and 27 respectively, the higher the score, the better controlled are asthma symptoms. For ACT, the minimum and maximum score possible is 5 and 25 respectively, the higher the score, the better controlled are asthma symptoms.

Time frame:
4 weeks post LAIV
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Asthma Symptoms and Control Pre and 4 Weeks Post LAIV, as Assessed by Validated Questionnaire
ParticipantsAsthma
Improvement >= MID28
No change254
Deterioration >= MID37
Statistical analysis
  • Asthma · McNemar · p = 0.26
SecondaryIncidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Children Receiving LAIV

Incidence of a 'significant exacerbation' in asthma, defined as: i. At least 3 day course of oral steroids following an unscheduled contact with a healthcare professional; OR ii. Unscheduled visit to an Emergency department or admission to hospital for treatment of asthma symptoms, requiring systemic corticosteroids

Time frame:
Up to 4 weeks post LAIV administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Children Receiving LAIV
ParticipantsAsthma
Incidence of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in Children Receiving LAIV47

Adverse events

Collected over 72 hours post LAIV administration. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Asthma0/478 (0%)4/478 (0.8%)150/478 (31.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAsthma
WheezingRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/478
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAsthma
RhinitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders54/478
MalaiseGeneral disorders42/478
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders27/478
WheezingRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders27/478

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Asthma
<=18 years476
Between 18 and 65 years2
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Asthma
Median9.3 (2.0 to 18.7)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Asthma
Female190
Male288
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Asthma
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Asthma
United Kingdom478
British Thoracic Society (BTS) Treatment Step 4+
British Thoracic Society (BTS) Treatment Step 4+(Participants)Asthma
Count of participants229
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Turner PJ, Southern J, Andrews NJ, Miller E, Erlewyn-Lajeunesse M; SNIFFLE Study Investigators. Safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine in atopic children with egg allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Aug;136(2):376-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.12.1925. Epub 2015 Feb 13. PubMed 25684279 ↗
  • Turner PJ, Southern J, Andrews NJ, Miller E, Erlewyn-Lajeunesse M; SNIFFLE-2 Study Investigators. Safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine in young people with egg allergy: multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2015 Dec 8;351:h6291. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6291. PubMed 26645895 ↗
  • Jackson D, Pitcher M, Hudson C, Andrews N, Southern J, Ellis J, Hoschler K, Pebody R, Turner PJ, Miller E, Zambon M. Viral Shedding in Recipients of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 Influenza Seasons in the United Kingdom. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 10;70(12):2505-2513. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz719. PubMed 31642899 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 5, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 10, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02866942
Lead sponsor
Imperial College London
Collaborators
Public Health England
Responsible party
Paul Turner (MRC Clinician Scientist, Imperial College London) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2016
Start date
Oct 2016
Primary completion
Mar 2017
Completion
Mar 2017
Results posted
Apr 26, 2019
Last update
May 10, 2019

Study contacts

Paul J Turner
principal investigator · Imperial College London / Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust / Public Health England

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion