ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02851511ACTUpdated Apr 17, 2024Results posted

Augmenting Cognitive Training In Older Adults

An interventional study of Cognitive Training and tDCS (active stimulation) in Aging, sponsored by University of Florida. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 89 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-17.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
379
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A two-phase adaptive randomized clinical trial will examine the individual and combined impact of pairing cognitive training with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS is a method of non-invasive brain stimulation that directly stimulates brain regions involved in active cognitive function and could enhance neural plasticity when paired with a training task. We will compare changes in cognitive and brain function resulting from CT and ET combined with tDCS using a comprehensive neurocognitive, clinical, and multimodal neuroimaging assessment of brain structure, function, and metabolic state. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) will be used to assess brain response during working memory, attention, and memory encoding; the active cognitive abilities trained by CT. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) will assess cerebral metabolites, including GABA concentrations sensitive to neural plasticity. We hypothesize that: 1) tDCS will enhance neurocognitive function, brain function, and functional outcomes from CT, with combined CT and tDCS providing the most benefit; 2) Effects of tDCS on CT will be maintained up to 12 months following training, and 3) Neuroimaging biomarkers of cerebral metabolism, neural plasticity (GABA concentrations) and functional brain response (FMRI) during resting vs. active cognitive tasks will predict individual response to tDCS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aging
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,285 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 177 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 141 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 65 to 89 years; this age group was selected because it is at high risk of age-related cognitive decline and have a sufficiently long life expectancy to participate in the study.
  2. Evidence of age-related cognitive decline in the Cognitive Training assessment defined by performance below the 80th percentile.
  3. Ability to participate in the intervention and attend training sessions; willingness to be randomized to either treatment group.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Neurological disorders (e.g., dementia, stroke, seizures, traumatic brain injury).
  2. Evidence of cognitive impairment (as defined by NACC UDS performance below 1.5 standard deviations on age/sex/education normative data in at least one cognitive domain).
  3. Past opportunistic brain infection.
  4. Major psychiatric illness (schizophrenia, intractable affective disorder, current substance dependence diagnosis or severe major depression and/or suicidality.
  5. Unstable (e.g., cancer other than basal cell skin) and chronic (e.g. severe diabetes) medical conditions.
  6. MRI contraindications (e.g., claustrophobia, metal implants).
  7. Physical impairment precluding motor response or lying still for 1 hr and inability to walk two blocks without stopping.
  8. Currently on GABA-ergic or glutamatergic medications, or on sodium channel blockers.
  9. Left-handedness.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
379 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive Training + Active Stimulation

    This arm receives cognitive training combined with active tDCS.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Training · Device: tDCS (active stimulation)

  • Experimental
    Cognitive Training + Sham Stimulation

    This arm receives cognitive training combined with sham tDCS.

    Behavioral: Cognitive Training · Device: tDCS (sham stimulation)

  • Experimental
    Educational Training + Active Stimulation

    This arm receives educational training combined with active tDCS.

    Device: tDCS (active stimulation) · Behavioral: Educational Training

  • Experimental
    Educational Training + Sham Stimulation

    This arm receives educational training combined with sham tDCS.

    Device: tDCS (sham stimulation) · Behavioral: Educational Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Training

    Cognitive Training employs an eight component, PositScience BrainHQ suite via its researcher portal.

  • DevicetDCS (active stimulation)

    A Soterix Clinical Trials Direct Current Stimulator will apply 20 minutes of 2.0mA direct current through two biocarbon rubber electrodes encased in saline soaked 5cm x 7cm sponges (8cc of 0.9% saline solution per sponge) placed over the frontal cortices at F3 and F4 (10-20 system).

  • DevicetDCS (sham stimulation)

    Sham stimulation is performed with the same device and all procedures will be identical except for the duration of stimulation. Participants will receive 30 seconds of 2 mA of direct current stimulation at the beginning of the session. Participants habituate to the sensation of tDCS within 30-60 seconds of stimulation. This procedure provides the same sensation of tDCS without the full duration of stimulation, making it a highly effective sham procedure.

  • BehavioralEducational Training

    Educational training involves watching educational videos produced by the National Geographic Channel, which cover a range of topics such as history, nature, and wildlife. Participants will be asked to complete questions on the content of the videos to ensure sustained attention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Cognitive Ability.

    Composite measure of cognitive ability as defined by NIH toolbox fluid cognition fully corrected T-score. Minimum change = -13, Maximum change = 26. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The minimum and maximum for Cognitive Training + Active Stimulation, Cognitive Training + Sham Stimulation, Educational Training + Active Stimulation and Educational Training + Sham Stimulation are (-13, 20) and (-10, 26), respectively. This outcome is measured for the participants who received cognitive training, including both Phase I and Phase II participants, N=334 (Phase I N=42, Phase II N=292).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to post assessment (3 months).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Phase I POSIT BrainHQ Cognitive Training Composite Performance Measure.(Phase I POSIT Z-Score)

    POSIT BrainHQ Cognitive Training Composite Performance measure involves performance on the 8 selected cognitive training tasks set to the medium difficulty level and provides a measure of proximal performance on cognitive training tasks central to the cognitive training condition. The higher score indicates better performance. The range of POSIT Z-Score at 3-month is -1.04 to 1.75. the minimum and maximum for Cognitive training group and Education training group are (-0.24, 1.75) and (-1.04, 1.39), respectively.

    Time frame: Baseline to post assessment (3 months).

07

Results

Posted Jul 17, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow is reported with three periods. Period 1 includes all randomized participants (combined Phase I and Phase II). Period 2 contains only the Phase I participants. Period 3 contains only the Phase II participants. In Phase II the two education training arms were eliminated, hence the allocation of 0 to those groups. Participants who were enrolled in Phase I education training were not randomized again in Phase II (there is no crossover).

Overall (Phase I + Phase II)
Participant flow — Overall (Phase I + Phase II)
MilestoneCognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham Stimulation
Started1681662322
Completed1261272318
Not completed423904
Withdrew: Physician decision181601
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject201703
Withdrew: Covid-19 lockdown, no reason specified4500
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0100
Phase I
Participant flow — Phase I
MilestoneCognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham Stimulation
Started21212322
Completed19202318
Not completed2104
Withdrew: Physician decision0001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2103
Phase II
Participant flow — Phase II
MilestoneCognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham Stimulation
Started14714500
Completed10710700
Not completed403800
Withdrew: Physician decision181600
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject181600
Withdrew: Covid-19 lockdown, no reason specified4500
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0100

Outcome measures

PrimaryImprovement in Cognitive Ability.

Composite measure of cognitive ability as defined by NIH toolbox fluid cognition fully corrected T-score. Minimum change = -13, Maximum change = 26. Higher scores mean a better outcome. The minimum and maximum for Cognitive Training + Active Stimulation, Cognitive Training + Sham Stimulation, Educational Training + Active Stimulation and Educational Training + Sham Stimulation are (-13, 20) and (-10, 26), respectively. This outcome is measured for the participants who received cognitive training, including both Phase I and Phase II participants, N=334 (Phase I N=42, Phase II N=292).

Time frame:
Change from baseline to post assessment (3 months).
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Improvement in Cognitive Ability.
units on a scaleCognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham Stimulation
Improvement in Cognitive Ability.4.7 ± 6.54.5 ± 6.1
Statistical analysis
  • Cognitive Training + Active Stimulation vs Cognitive Training + Sham Stimulation · Regression, Linear · p = <0.05 (Formal statistical inference of the tDCS effect was based on the inverse-normal combination of two p-values, one from the Phase I data (N=42) and the other from the Phase II data (N=292).) · Slope: 0.33 · 95% CI -0.91 to 1.56
SecondaryPhase I POSIT BrainHQ Cognitive Training Composite Performance Measure.(Phase I POSIT Z-Score)

POSIT BrainHQ Cognitive Training Composite Performance measure involves performance on the 8 selected cognitive training tasks set to the medium difficulty level and provides a measure of proximal performance on cognitive training tasks central to the cognitive training condition. The higher score indicates better performance. The range of POSIT Z-Score at 3-month is -1.04 to 1.75. the minimum and maximum for Cognitive training group and Education training group are (-0.24, 1.75) and (-1.04, 1.39), respectively.

Time frame:
Baseline to post assessment (3 months).
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Phase I POSIT BrainHQ Cognitive Training Composite Performance Measure.(Phase I POSIT Z-Score)
units on a scaleCognitive TrainingEducation Training
Phase I POSIT BrainHQ Cognitive Training Composite Performance Measure.(Phase I POSIT Z-Score)0.95 ± 0.41-0.06 ± 0.47

Adverse events

Collected over The adverse events were collected over an approximate one year period. They were collected from study enrollment until the 1 year followup visit.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cognitive Training + Active Stimulation0/168 (0%)16/168 (9.5%)69/168 (41.1%)
Cognitive Training + Sham Stimulation0/166 (0%)19/166 (11.4%)75/166 (45.2%)
Educational Training + Active Stimulation0/23 (0%)4/23 (17.4%)12/23 (52.2%)
Educational Training + Sham Stimulation0/22 (0%)5/22 (22.7%)12/22 (54.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 44
Most frequent serious events
EventCognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham Stimulation
Cat biteInfections and infestations0/1680/1660/231/22
Chest PainCardiac disorders1/1681/1660/231/22
HerniaGastrointestinal disorders0/1680/1660/231/22
Pulmonary EmbolismVascular disorders0/1680/1660/231/22
Skin cancer spot removalNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1680/1661/231/22
Transient ischemic attackVascular disorders1/1680/1660/231/22
Allergic reactionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1680/1661/230/22
Cyst removalSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/1680/1661/230/22
FallGeneral disorders0/1682/1661/230/22
Torn arteryVascular disorders0/1680/1661/230/22
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 105
Most frequent other events
EventCognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham Stimulation
Skin cancer spot removalSurgical and medical procedures19/16824/1664/233/22
Urinary tract infectionRenal and urinary disorders3/1689/1661/233/22
ArthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/1688/1660/232/22
Migraine headacheNervous system disorders6/16810/1661/231/22
Cataract surgerySurgical and medical procedures10/1686/1661/230/22
Anxiety and DepressionPsychiatric disorders2/1682/1660/231/22
Bladder infectionRenal and urinary disorders0/1680/1660/231/22
ColonoscopySurgical and medical procedures3/1682/1660/231/22
Hearing impairmentEar and labyrinth disorders1/1680/1660/231/22
High Blood PressureCardiac disorders6/1681/1660/231/22

Baseline characteristics

The study is a 2-phase adaptive design study. After first phase, 2 education arms were dropped. all participants were randomly assigned to 2 cognitive training groups in Phase II.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham StimulationTotal
Mean71.5 ± 5.471.5 ± 4.870.0 ± 5.173.1 ± 4.771.5 ± 5.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham StimulationTotal
Female1041111011236
Male64551311143
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham StimulationTotal
Hispanic or Latino1481225
Not Hispanic or Latino1541582220354
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham StimulationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native35109
Asian03104
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00101
Black or African American1180221
White1461482018332
More than one race52029
Unknown or Not Reported30003
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham StimulationTotal
United States16816623220
Years of Education
Years of Education(years)Cognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham StimulationTotal
Mean16.3 ± 2.316.4 ± 2.416.7 ± 2.115.6 ± 2.416.3 ± 2.4
MOCA Total Score
MOCA Total Score(units on a scale)Cognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham StimulationTotal
Mean26.7 ± 2.026.8 ± 1.926.9 ± 1.726.1 ± 2.126.7 ± 1.9
Average POSIT z-score:
Average POSIT z-score:(z-score)Cognitive Training + Active StimulationCognitive Training + Sham StimulationEducational Training + Active StimulationEducational Training + Sham StimulationTotal
Mean-0.18 ± 0.44-0.20 ± 0.46-0.11 ± 0.47-0.44 ± 0.55-0.20 ± 0.46

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

3 sites
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85721, United States
  • Village of Gainesville
    Gainesville, Florida 32606, United States
  • University of Florida McKnight Brain Institute
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 16, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Feb 11, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02851511
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 1, 2016
Start date
Aug 8, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2022
Completion
Apr 30, 2022
Results posted
Jul 17, 2023
Last update
Apr 17, 2024

Study contacts

Adam Woods, Ph.D
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion