An interventional study of Pedometers and Walking Logs and Phone Messaging in Physical Activity, sponsored by University of Southern California. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-13.
Sponsored by University of Southern California · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility, perceived usefulness, and potential effectiveness of a short text or voice message intervention to activate 1) physical activity behavior change among low-income, urban, Latino patients in diabetes management and 2) supportive behaviors by family members or close friends.
Despite the promise of phone-based interventions to effectively support diabetes self-management (DSM), little is known about their impact on the outcomes of highly vulnerable populations such as low-income, inner-city, racial/ethnic minorities. And while phone-based interventions have generally been successful at reaching and engaging adults with diabetes, they have failed to do the same with family members/friends (FF) whom are a promising source of ongoing support for DSM. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility, perceived usefulness, and potential effectiveness of a short text or voice message (ST/VM) intervention to activate 1) physical activity (PA) behavior change among low-income, urban, Latino patients in diabetes management and 2) supportive behaviors by FF. The investigators conducted a 12-week pilot study in which participants were randomized into one of three study arms: control, phone messaging (PM), and phone messaging plus social support from FF (PM+FF). Participants were recruited in person from a diabetes management program at a safety-net ambulatory care clinic. All participants were given a pedometer and walking log for self-monitoring. Participants in the PM and PM+FF arms received ST/VMs as reminders to review daily step goals and to self-monitor; explaining the benefits of regular PA, importance of regular PA to daily life, and ways to overcome commonly identified barriers to PA; asking participants to report on PA performance; providing feedback based on responses. Participants in the PM+FF identified a FF to receive ST/VMs with suggested behaviors that are perceived as supportive by individuals making PA behavior changes. Participants received semi-structured assessments in person at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Participants were asked about the extent to which the program enhanced the participant's ability to make PA behavior changes. The primary outcome measures were daily step counts and perceived FF social support.
University of Southern California is the lead sponsor of 773 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.
Of its 68 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 32 (47%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pedometers and walking logs
Behavioral: Pedometers and Walking Logs
Phone Messaging
Behavioral: Pedometers and Walking Logs · Behavioral: Phone Messaging
Phone Messaging + Family/Friend Support
Behavioral: Pedometers and Walking Logs · Behavioral: Phone Messaging · Behavioral: Family/Friend Support
Participants were recommended to use the pedometer and walking log to self-monitor how many steps participants walked each day. Participants were recommended to gradually increase daily steps over the course of 12 weeks until reaching 10,000 steps per day. Participants were also recommended to walk at a brisk pace for 3000 of these steps, which roughly translates to 30 minutes per day.
Participants received short text or voice messages (depending on participant preference) as reminders to review daily step goals and to self-monitor; explaining the benefits of regular physical activity, importance of regular physical activity to daily life, and ways to overcome commonly identified barriers to physical activity; asking participants to report on their physical activity performance; providing feedback based on responses.
Participants identified a family member or close friend (FF) to receive short text or voice messages (depending on FF preference) with suggested behaviors that are perceived as supportive by individuals making physical activity behavior changes.
Change in average daily steps assessed by pedometers
Change in average daily steps assessed using pedometer 7-day data storage
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in body mass index
Change in Body Mass Index, which was calculated as weight (in kilograms) over height squared (in centimeters)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in exercise self-efficacy assessed using the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale
Change in exercise self-efficacy assessed using the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in barriers self-efficacy assessed using the Barriers Self-Efficacy Scale
Change in barriers self-efficacy assessed using the Barriers Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in perceived family/friend social support assessed using the Social Support and Exercise Survey
Change in perceived family/friend social support assessed using the Social Support and Exercise Survey
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in perceived usefulness assessed using patient interviews
At the 6- and 12-week follow-up interviews, participants were asked a series of unstructured questions regarding the extent to which the program enhanced a participant's ability to make physical activity behavior changes. These questions inquired about participants' thoughts on setting PA goals, self-monitoring, educational and feedback ST/VMs, and the idea of using ST/VMs to communicate with patients about PA behavior change. For participants in the PM+FF arms, the questions also inquired about supportive behaviors exhibited by FF since the start of the program and participants' thoughts on the idea of using ST/VMs to communicate with FF about patients' PA behavior changes. Investigators also asked if participants would be willing to participate in a similar program in the future and if participants would be willing to recommend the program to other patients. The latter two were yes/no questions.
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in perceived usability of pedometers assessed via patient interviews
Semi-structured patient interview questions inquiring about the degree to which participants perceived the pedometers to be easy to use
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in perceived barriers to receipt of and engagement with ST/VMs assessed via patient interviews
Semi-structured patient interview questions inquiring about participants' perceived barriers to the receipt of and engagement with ST/VMs
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in engagement with ST/VMs requiring a response assessed via call logs
Percentage of times that participants responded to ST/VMs requiring a response
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in receipt of ST/VMs assessed via self-report and call logs
Percentage of short text messages delivered that were received assessed via self-report, and percentage of voice messages that were received assessed via call logs
Time frame: 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Change in non-compliance with wearing pedometer assessed via pedometer and walking log
Percentage of patients that did not wear the pedometer for a minimum of three consecutive days for at least 10 hours per day. This data will be obtained using the pedometer 7-day memory storage and participants' self-reported hours of use.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Recruitment and retention rates assessed via recruitment and follow-up logs
Percentage of patients that were screened, were eligible to participate, and enrolled in the study. Percentage of patients who completed the 6-week and 12-week follow-up assessments.
Time frame: 1 day (Recruitment), 6 weeks, 12 weeks
Sufficiency or restrictiveness of eligibility criteria assessed via recruitment logs
Percentage of patients that were screened, but were ineligible to participate and the reasons why
Time frame: 1 day (Recruitment)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Southern California