An interventional study of Triple Weil´s Osteotomy and Distal metatarsal minimally invasive osteotomy in Metatarsalgia, sponsored by Manuel Cuervas-Mons. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-20.
Sponsored by Manuel Cuervas-Mons · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
INTRODUCTION
Metatarsalgia is a vague term defining a symptom instead of a specific condition. The aim of surgical treatment of metatarsalgia is to decrease the pressure under metatarsal head, shortening and / or raising the metatarsal. It has been somewhat controversial, with more than 25 different lesser metatarsal osteotomies described to date.
The Triple´s Weil osteotomy described by Maceira is the most widely used surgical treatment in open distal metatarsal surgery but nowadays, percutaneous osteotomy has proven to be a valid technique that yields results similar to open osteotomy for the treatment of metatarsalgia and other forefoot problems. It has been somewhat controversial the choice between the different operative treatments, being nowadays the triple´s Weil osteotomy (TWO) and the distal minimally invasive osteotomy (DMMO) the most popular, gaining both defenders and retractors surgeons in open and percutaneous surgery.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results between two different surgical treatments: triple´s Weil osteotomy (TWO) and distal minimal invasive osteotomy (DMMO).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The investigators design an open randomized controlled clinical trial with patients operated in the same centre.
The patients are randomized to TWO and DMMO groups. Number of osteotomies is based on the criteria of Leventen formula. In all patients the metatarsal osteotomy can be combined with different surgical procedures in presence of associated deformities: (i) SCARF osteotomy for hallux valgus (HV) deformity, (ii) flexor and extensor tenotomies with distal phalangeal percutaneous osteotomy for lesser toes deformities.
INTRODUCTION
Metatarsalgia is a vague term defining a symptom instead of a specific condition. The aim of surgical treatment of metatarsalgia is to decrease the pressure under metatarsal head, shortening and / or raising the metatarsal, thus removing the overload and preserving the joint integrity. It has been somewhat controversial, with more than 25 different lesser metatarsal osteotomies described to date. The Weil osteotomy is the most widely used surgical treatment in open distal metatarsal surgery, a popularity based upon the simple technique, stable fixation, excellent union rates and predictable results.
According to the principles of traditional surgery, surgical manoeuvres requiring large incisions and aggressive techniques should be needed to effectively resolve the different pathological elements producing the deformity in order to eliminate this serious injury. These principles concerns surgeons like White, who described a modification of the distal metaphyseal osteotomy through a percutaneous approach without visualization and without internal fixation to obtain a metatarsal in optimal weight-bearing position. Percutaneous surgery of the foot, also known as minimal invasive surgery (MIS), allows interventions to be carried out through extremely small incisions without direct exposure of the surgical field under radiologic monitoring, thus causing minimal injury to adjacent tissues, and reducing the surgical trauma. Over the last few years, Foot Surgery has come to be recognised as a major Orthopaedic subspecialty, where the percutaneous surgery plays an important role. The Triple´s Weil osteotomy described by Maceira is the most widely used surgical treatment in open distal metatarsal surgery but nowadays, percutaneous osteotomy has proven to be a valid technique that yields results similar to open osteotomy for the treatment of metatarsalgia and other forefoot problems. It has been somewhat controversial the choice between the different operative treatments, being nowadays the triple´s Weil osteotomy (TWO) and the distal minimally invasive osteotomy (DMMO) the most popular, gaining both defenders and retractors surgeons in open and percutaneous surgery.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results between two different surgical treatments: triple´s Weil osteotomy (TWO) and distal minimal invasive osteotomy (DMMO).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The investigators design an open randomized controlled clinical trial with patients operated in the same centre.
The patients are randomized to TWO and DMMO groups. Number of osteotomies is based on the criteria of Leventen formula. In all patients the metatarsal osteotomy can be combined with different surgical procedures in presence of associated deformities: (i) SCARF osteotomy for hallux valgus (HV) deformity, (ii) flexor and extensor tenotomies with distal phalangeal percutaneous osteotomy for lesser toes deformities.
This is the only study on the registry with Manuel Cuervas-Mons as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with metatarsalgia and without response to non-operative treatment after six months, needing surgical treatment for relief of their symptoms. Triple´s Weil osteotomy is performed.
Procedure: Triple Weil´s Osteotomy
Patients with metatarsalgia and without response to non-operative treatment after six months, needing surgical treatment for relief of their symptoms. Distal metatarsal minimally invasive osteotomy is performed.
Procedure: Distal metatarsal minimally invasive osteotomy
A 10mm longitudinal incision is made with a No.15 blade in the second intermetatarsal space immediately behind the dorsal interdigital fold, parallel to the extensor tendon. An intra-articular osteotomy in the metatarsal head is performed angled 45º relative to the long axis of the metatarsal and in a dorsal-distal to proximal-plantar direction. A second osteotomy is performed perpendicular to the metatarsal shaft,.The osteotomy is fastened with a 2.0mm snap-off screw. Once all the osteotomies are completed, the incisions are closed with a 2/0 monofilament suture.
Also known as: TWO
A 5mm longitudinal incision is made with a MIS blade No.64 in the intermetatarsal space immediately behind the dorsal interdigital fold, parallel to the extensor tendon. Under fluoroscopy vision, an extra-articular osteotomy in the metatarsal neck is performed angled 45º relative to the long axis of the metatarsal and in a dorsal-distal to proximal-plantar direction. The osteotomies scheduled preoperatively are performed, repeating the same procedure for each ray needing an osteotomy. Once all are completed, the incisions are closed with a 4/0 monofilament suture.
Also known as: DMMO
Change from Baseline American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) at 3 and 12 months
Score for pain, function and alignment
Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Change from Baseline Short form Health survey 36 (SF-36) at 3 and 12 months
Score for quality of life
Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Change from Baseline Visual Analog Score (VAS) at 3 and 12 months
Score for pain
Time frame: Preoperative, 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Benton-Weil´s questionnaire
The questionnaire incorporate actual VAS and clinical results subjectively evaluated with three questions: (i) Does the surgery meet your expectations? (ii) Would you recommend the procedure to a friend in similar conditions? (iii) Would you have undergone the procedure, knowing now your outcome?
Time frame: 12 months follow-up
Change from 3 months MTPJ joint mobility at 12 months
Metatarso-phalangeal joint (MTPJ) mobility described as the range of motion (ROM) of the joint, measured by a goniometer MTPJ range of motion is measured in a open chain patient who is lying down with the knee extended and the foot at rest in spontaneous plantar flexion. Full ROM of plantar flexion combined with dorsiflexion was classified in: normal ROM ≥70º, moderately stiff ROM 30º to 70º, and severely stiff ROM \< 30º..
Time frame: 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Change from Baseline Metatarsal formula at 12 months
Changes in the radiological metatarsal formula are measured with the average recoil of the metatarsal heads between the preoperative and the 12 months follow up measurement.
Time frame: Preoperative and 12 months follow-up
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Metatarsalgia