CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02843659Updated Oct 4, 2018Results posted

Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of BMS-931699 (Lulizumab) or BMS-986142 in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

A Phase 2 interventional study of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 in Sjögren's Syndrome, sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Terminated at 34 sites in 11 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-04.

Sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Inability to meet protocol objectives
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with either lulizumab or BMS-986142 versus placebo in subjects with moderate to severe primary Sjögren's syndrome as measured by the change from baseline in ESSDAI at Week 12 between active treatment arms (lulizumab or BMS-986142, respectively) and the placebo arm.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sjögren's Syndrome
03

In context

Sjogren's Syndrome

371 studies on the registry are indexed under Sjogren's Syndrome; 104 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 50 across 244 interventional studies indexed under Sjogren's Syndrome.

Browse Sjogren's Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Bristol-Myers Squibb is the lead sponsor of 1,538 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.

Of its 429 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 223 (52%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

For more information regarding Bristol-Myers Squibb Clinical Trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects diagnosed or classified as having moderate to severe primary Sjögren's Syndrome based on the 2016 ACR-EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Classification Criteria for at least 16 weeks prior to screening
  • ESSDAI ≥ 5 including disease activity (any score > 0) in at least one of the following domains: Glandular, Articular, Hematological, Biological, Lymphadenopathy
  • Positive anti-SS-A/Ro and/or anti-SS-B/La autoantibody
  • Unstimulated whole saliva secretion > 0.01 ml/min
  • Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of HCG) within 24 hours prior to the start of study drug and must not be pregnant or breastfeeding. Male and female subjects must be willing to adhere to protocol-mandated highly effective contraception for the duration of the study and for the protocol-specified follow up period. Hormone-based contraceptive methods are not permitted

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary Sjögren's syndrome or the presence of any other systemic autoimmune disease (eg, RA, SLE, multiple sclerosis, vasculitis)
  • Very severe primary Sjögren's syndrome or severe complications of primary Sjögren's syndrome at the time of the screening visit
  • Active systemic or latent bacterial (including tuberculosis), viral or fungal infection, evidence of current or chronic Hepatitis B or C infection, or HIV infection
  • Any significant concurrent medical condition at the time of screening or baseline visit
  • Use of methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or leflunomide within 12 weeks of screening visit
  • Previous treatment with biologics therapies either marketed or in development within 6 months prior to screening visit
  • Treatment started or an unstable dose of hydroxychloroquine within 8 weeks of screening visit
  • Oral corticosteroids > 10 mg/day within 14 days of dosing (Day 1), corticosteroid therapy ≥ 1 mg/kg during the 4 weeks preceding enrollment, or intravenous, intramuscular or intra-articular corticosteroids within 4 weeks of screening visit

Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria could apply

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BMS-931699

    Subcutaneous weekly injection + daily oral placebo tablets

    Drug: BMS-931699 · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    BMS-986142

    Daily oral tablets + subcutaneous placebo (weekly) injection

    Drug: BMS-986142 · Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Weekly subcutaneous placebo injection +daily oral placebo tablets

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBMS-931699

    Specified dose on specified days

    Also known as: lulizumab

  • DrugBMS-986142

    Specified dose on specified days

  • DrugPlacebo

    Specified dose on specified days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI

    The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening

    Time frame: At baseline and week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI Scores at Week 4 and Week 8

    The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4 and week 8

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in ESSPRI Score at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12.

    ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains.

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  3. Proportion of Subjects With a > = 3 Point Improvement From Baseline in ESSDAI at Week 12

    The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening

    Time frame: At week 12

  4. Proportion of Subjects With Both >= 3 Points Improvement in ESSDAI and >= 1 Point Improvement in ESSPRI From Baseline at Week 12

    The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening

    Time frame: At week 12

  5. Proportions of Subjects With >=1 Point of Improvement From Baseline in ESSPRI

    ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains

    Time frame: At week 12

  6. Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Dryness

    ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  7. Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Fatigue

    ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  8. Mean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Pain

    ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate

    Serum and saliva biomarkers (collected from samples obtained during unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow assessments) were measured to determine the potential PD effect of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 on disease-related protein analytes. These assessments included, but were not limited to, the detection of cytokines and other protein analytes by immunoassays and/or mass spectrometry proteomic profiling.

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Stimulated Salivary Flow Rate

    Serum and saliva biomarkers (collected from samples obtained during unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow assessments) were measured to determine the potential PD effect of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 on disease-related protein analytes. These assessments included, but were not limited to, the detection of cytokines and other protein analytes by immunoassays and/or mass spectrometry proteomic profiling.

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Staining

    The test was performed by instillation of fluorescein dye and either lissamine green or Rose bengal dye to stain the cornea and conjunctiva, respectively. After instilling the dye, the ocular surface was examined through a slit lamp (biomicroscope).

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  12. Mean Change From Baseline in Schrimer's Test

    The test (without anaesthesia) was performed by placing a narrow calibrated filter-paper strip in the inferior cul-de-sac of each eye. Aqueous tear production was measured by the length in millimeters that the strip wets during the 5 minute test period

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  13. Mean Change From Baseline in the Tear Break-up Time Test

    Determined by instilling fluorescein dye and evaluating the stability of the pre-corneal tear film. After several blinks, the tear film is examined using a broad beam of the slit-lamp (biomicroscope) with a cobalt blue filter. The TBUT, defined as the time in seconds between the subjects's last blink and the first appearance of a random dry spot on the corneal surface, is measured 3 times and the mean value is recorded.

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

  14. Mean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. 0 = No Pain, 1-3 = Mild Pain(nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 = Moderate Pain (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 = Severe Pain (disabling; unable to perform ADLs)

    Time frame: At baseline, at week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18

  15. Mean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA)

    The subjects overall assessment of disease activity from 0-10 cm VAS scale with 0 being no disease and 10 cm being most severe disease

    Time frame: At baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18

  16. Mean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA)

    The investigator's or physician's overall assessment of disease activity from 0-10 cm VAS scale with 0 being no disease and 10 cm being most severe disease.

    Time frame: At baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18

  17. Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    First, precoded numeric values are recoded per the scoring key given in Table 1. Note that all items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. In addition, each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Table 2 lists the items averaged together to create each scale. Items that are left blank(missing data) are not taken into account when calculating the scale scores. Hence, scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18

  18. Mean Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

    The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a 19-item questionnaire, has been developed as a brief, multidimensional self-report instrument for assessing the key dimensions of sexual function in women

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18

  19. Mean Change From Baseline in Work Participation and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)

    Affords calculation of 4 scales to measure the impact of IBD on different domains of impairment in work or other activities: absenteeism, presenteeism (impairment at work), productivity loss (overall work impairment), activity impairment

    Time frame: At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18

07

Results

Posted Oct 4, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBMS-931699/Lulizumab InjectionBMS-986142 50 mg Tablet (Round) or 150 mg Tablet (Oval)Placebo
Started567
Completed102
Not completed465
Withdrew: Subject withdrew consent001
Withdrew: Administrative reason by sponsor454
Withdrew: Adverse event010

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI

The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening

Time frame:
At baseline and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in ESSDAI Scores at Week 4 and Week 8

The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4 and week 8

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in ESSPRI Score at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12.

ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains.

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryProportion of Subjects With a > = 3 Point Improvement From Baseline in ESSDAI at Week 12

The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening

Time frame:
At week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryProportion of Subjects With Both >= 3 Points Improvement in ESSDAI and >= 1 Point Improvement in ESSPRI From Baseline at Week 12

The ESSDAI is a clinical index that measures Sjogren's syndrome disease activity. A physician scores the disease activity level of twelve organ-specific domains in 3 or 4 levels according to their severity. For example, for no disease activity the domain score equals 0 and for high disease activity the domain score equals 3 or 4. Each domain is assigned a weight between 1 and 6, and the domain score is multiplied by the domain weight. The sum of the weighted domain scores is the overall score, which can range from 0 to 123. A higher score indicates more disease activity. Change from baseline was computed as the value at Week 24 minus the baseline value. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement and a positive value indicates worsening

Time frame:
At week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryProportions of Subjects With >=1 Point of Improvement From Baseline in ESSPRI

ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains

Time frame:
At week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Dryness

ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Fatigue

ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change in Baseline in ESSPRI Individual Component of Pain

ESSPRI, also known as EULAR Sjogren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, measures subjective symptoms of dryness, pain and fatigue. It uses 0-10 numerical scales, one for each domain. The weight of the domains is identical, and the final score is the mean score of the 3 domains

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate

Serum and saliva biomarkers (collected from samples obtained during unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow assessments) were measured to determine the potential PD effect of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 on disease-related protein analytes. These assessments included, but were not limited to, the detection of cytokines and other protein analytes by immunoassays and/or mass spectrometry proteomic profiling.

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Stimulated Salivary Flow Rate

Serum and saliva biomarkers (collected from samples obtained during unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow assessments) were measured to determine the potential PD effect of BMS-931699 and BMS-986142 on disease-related protein analytes. These assessments included, but were not limited to, the detection of cytokines and other protein analytes by immunoassays and/or mass spectrometry proteomic profiling.

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Staining

The test was performed by instillation of fluorescein dye and either lissamine green or Rose bengal dye to stain the cornea and conjunctiva, respectively. After instilling the dye, the ocular surface was examined through a slit lamp (biomicroscope).

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Schrimer's Test

The test (without anaesthesia) was performed by placing a narrow calibrated filter-paper strip in the inferior cul-de-sac of each eye. Aqueous tear production was measured by the length in millimeters that the strip wets during the 5 minute test period

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in the Tear Break-up Time Test

Determined by instilling fluorescein dye and evaluating the stability of the pre-corneal tear film. After several blinks, the tear film is examined using a broad beam of the slit-lamp (biomicroscope) with a cobalt blue filter. The TBUT, defined as the time in seconds between the subjects's last blink and the first appearance of a random dry spot on the corneal surface, is measured 3 times and the mean value is recorded.

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Mouth, Eye and Vaginal Dryness

The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. 0 = No Pain, 1-3 = Mild Pain(nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 = Moderate Pain (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 = Severe Pain (disabling; unable to perform ADLs)

Time frame:
At baseline, at week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Subject Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SubGDA)

The subjects overall assessment of disease activity from 0-10 cm VAS scale with 0 being no disease and 10 cm being most severe disease

Time frame:
At baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change Form Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (phyGDA)

The investigator's or physician's overall assessment of disease activity from 0-10 cm VAS scale with 0 being no disease and 10 cm being most severe disease.

Time frame:
At baseline, week 2, week 4, week 6, week 8, week 10, week 12, and week 18

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36)

First, precoded numeric values are recoded per the scoring key given in Table 1. Note that all items are scored so that a high score defines a more favorable health state. In addition, each item is scored on a 0 to 100 range so that the lowest and highest possible scores are 0 and 100, respectively. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. In step 2, items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Table 2 lists the items averaged together to create each scale. Items that are left blank(missing data) are not taken into account when calculating the scale scores. Hence, scale scores represent the average for all items in the scale that the respondent answered

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), a 19-item questionnaire, has been developed as a brief, multidimensional self-report instrument for assessing the key dimensions of sexual function in women

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Work Participation and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI)

Affords calculation of 4 scales to measure the impact of IBD on different domains of impairment in work or other activities: absenteeism, presenteeism (impairment at work), productivity loss (overall work impairment), activity impairment

Time frame:
At baseline, week 4, week 8, week 12, and week 18

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 18 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)2/7 (28.6%)
Lulizumab (BMS-931699) 12.5mg QW0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)4/5 (80%)
BMS-986142 350 mg QD0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)4/6 (66.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboLulizumab (BMS-931699) 12.5mg QWBMS-986142 350 mg QD
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/70/51/6
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboLulizumab (BMS-931699) 12.5mg QWBMS-986142 350 mg QD
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/71/51/6
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations1/71/50/6
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/71/50/6
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations0/71/50/6
Soft tissue infectionInfections and infestations0/71/50/6
Injection site reactionGeneral disorders0/71/50/6
PainGeneral disorders0/71/50/6
Blood pressure increasedInvestigations0/71/50/6
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders0/71/50/6
Gastrointestinal inflammationGastrointestinal disorders0/71/50/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)BMS-931699/Lulizumab InjectionBMS-986142 50 mg Tablet (Round) or 150 mg Tablet (Oval)PlaceboTotal
Mean49.2 ± 11.3451.2 ± 8.7752.6 ± 13.3051.2 ± 11.41
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BMS-931699/Lulizumab InjectionBMS-986142 50 mg Tablet (Round) or 150 mg Tablet (Oval)PlaceboTotal
Female56718
Male0000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)BMS-931699/Lulizumab InjectionBMS-986142 50 mg Tablet (Round) or 150 mg Tablet (Oval)PlaceboTotal
White44715
Black or African American0000
Asian0000
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Other1203
08

Study locations

34 sites
  • St Joseph Heritage Healthcare
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • Local Institution
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • Local Institution
    Sarasota, Florida 34239, United States
  • North Georgia Rheumatology Group
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30096, United States
  • Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
    Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, United States
  • Local Institution
    Tupelo, Mississippi 38801, United States
  • Arthritis And Osteoporosis Associates, Pa
    Freehold, New Jersey 07728, United States
  • New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109, United States
  • Local Institution
    Mineola, New York 11501, United States
  • Pmg Research Of Wilmington Llc
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, Llc
    Middleburg Heights, Ohio 44130, United States
  • Altoona Center For Clinical Research
    Duncansville, Pennsylvania 16635-8406, United States
  • Local Institution
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Local Institution
    Wexford, Pennsylvania 15090, United States
  • Acme Research, Llc
    Orangeburg, South Carolina 29118, United States
  • West Tennessee Research Institute
    Jackson, Tennessee 38305, United States
  • Tekton Research Inc
    Austin, Texas 78745, United States
  • Local Institution
    Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • Local Institution
    Santiago De Chile, Metropolitana 7501126, Chile
  • Local Institution
    Bogota, Cundinamarca, Colombia
  • Local Institution
    Bogota, Colombia
  • Local Institution
    Cali, Colombia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana
    Pisa, 56126, Italy
  • Local Institution
    Mexico City, Distrito Fededral 11850, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Guadalajara, Jalisco 44650, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Merida, Yucatan 97070, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Veracruz, 91910, Mexico
  • Local Institution
    Cercado De Lima, Lima 1, Peru
  • Local Institution
    Lima, LIMA 31, Peru
  • Instituto De Ginecologia Y Reproduccion Inv. Clinical Sac
    Lima, LIMA 33, Peru
  • Klinika Reumatologii i Chorob Wewnetrznych
    Wroclaw, 50-556, Poland
  • Local Institution
    San Juan, 00909, Puerto Rico
  • Local Institution
    Moscow, 121374, Russian Federation
  • Local Institution
    Stellenbosch, Western CAPE 7600, South Africa
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Feb 13, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 15, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 4, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02843659
Lead sponsor
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 26, 2016
Start date
Oct 18, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 24, 2017
Completion
Jul 24, 2017
Results posted
Oct 4, 2018
Last update
Oct 4, 2018

Study contacts

Bristol-Myers Squibb
study director · Bristol-Myers Squibb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion