An interventional study of Continuous suture with polyglecaprone 25 and Continuous suture with polyamide (nylon) in Cesarean Section and Sutures, sponsored by Universidade do Vale do Sapucai. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-07-20.
Sponsored by Universidade do Vale do Sapucai · Not applicable and Interventional
Context: Cesarean section is the most common surgery in women, both in developed and underdeveloped countries. However results are conflicting report in which material for intradermal suturing get better aesthetic result. Objective: To compare the aesthetic appearance of two suture materials, polyglecaprone 25 and polyamide (nylon) with intradermal sutures for skin closure in women undergoing cesarean section first. Methods: This is a clinical, prospective and randomized study which was conducted in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of a tertiary Institute, Hospital das Clinicas Samuel Libânio, in PousoAlegre, Estate of Minas Gerais. Sixty women undergoing cesarean section were first included and randomized into two groups: group I (n = 30) polyamide and group II (n = 30) polyglecaprone 25. Hypertrophy, color and width of the wound were evaluated, receiving a score, according to Trimbos table, six months after surgery. Later the results were compared to non-parametric statistical tests
Universidade do Vale do Sapucai is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Continuous suture with polyglecaprone 25
Other: Continuous suture with polyamide (nylon)
At the end of surgical procedemento of cesarean delivery , for skin closure continuous suture was performed with polyglecaprone 25
At the end of surgical procedemento of cesarean delivery , for skin closure continuous suture was performed with polyamide (nylon)
Photographic documentation for evaluation
The photographic record was sent to three experts for evaluation of hypertrophy and cross marks staining points, according Trimboset al.,1993
Time frame: 6 Months
Photographic documentation for evaluation
The photographic record was sent to another expert for evaluation of hypertrophy and cross marks staining points, according Trimboset al.,1993, besides scar mesure
Time frame: 6 Months
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidade do Vale do Sapucai