CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02826694NC_NEXUSUpdated Jul 8, 2020Results posted

North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening

An interventional study of Well infant, whole exome sequencing and Diagnosed, whole exome sequencing in Metabolism, Inborn Errors, Hearing Loss and Hereditary Disease, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Hour to 5 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-08.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
106
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Hour to 5 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The NC NEXUS research study is exploring the utility of next generation sequencing in newborn screening and parental decision making. The National Institutes of Health (NICHD and NHGRI) are co-funding this study under a single U-19.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will enroll and perform whole exome sequencing on two cohorts of patients. One cohort will consist of two hundred newborns with no known conditions whose parents will be recruited during the mother's pregnancy. The second cohort will include two hundred infants and children up to the age of five years with diagnosed conditions including conditions detected through standard newborn screening such as phenylketonuria and other inborn errors of metabolism, hearing loss and other rare conditions that may fit criteria for newborn screening in the future.

Parents will be introduced to the study by their clinician or a study recruiter. Those who agree to enroll in Phase I will review an online decision guide and be offered a study visit conducted by a genetic counselor to obtain informed consent for genomic sequencing of their child. Parents consenting to have their child's genome sequenced will be seen after the child's birth or at a convenient pre-arranged time and duplicate saliva samples will be collected from the children and one sample will be sent to the BioSpecimen Processing (BSP) Facility and to Dr. Jonathan Berg's laboratory for sequencing and the other sent to the Molecular Genetics Laboratory (MGL) for DNA extraction and storage until needed for clinical confirmation. Results will be returned for diagnostic (in the Diagnosed cohort) and medically actionable disorders of childhood (both cohorts). Two-thirds of parents who consent to sequencing will be randomly assigned to be eligible to request additional findings and use a supplement of the online decision aid. All results will be reported to parents by trained genetic professionals (genetic counselors and clinical geneticists)

02

Conditions studied

  • Metabolism, Inborn Errors
  • Hearing Loss
  • Hereditary Disease
03

In context

Hearing Loss

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 106 is above the median of 40 across 764 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Hour to 5 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Uncomplicated pregnancy and healthy newborn

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormalities such as major malformation or chromosomal disorder detected prenatally or significant complications during pregnancy or at the time of delivery.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
106 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Well infant, whole exome sequencing

    Healthy infants and their parents enrolled in the study prenatally will participate. After the infant is born saliva sample will be collected for DNA extraction and whole exome sequencing will be done.

    Genetic: Well infant, whole exome sequencing

  • Other
    Diagnosed, whole exome sequencing

    Infants and children with diagnosed conditions whose parents enroll in the study and consent to having their child sequenced will have saliva samples obtained and whole exome sequencing will be done on extracted DNA.

    Genetic: Diagnosed, whole exome sequencing

Interventions

  • GeneticWell infant, whole exome sequencing

    Whole exome sequencing will be performed in children with diagnosed conditions. Investigators will analyze results that are associated with their condition.

  • GeneticDiagnosed, whole exome sequencing

    In addition to returning results of conditions associated with a child's phenotype, investigators will also analyze genes that are associated with conditions that have childhood onset and are medically actionable.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parental Choices Following Decision Aid

    Analysis of parents' decisions after they complete an on-line decision aid to see if they wish to participate in the study. Options will be yes, no, or undecided.

    Time frame: average of 3-6 months

  2. Number of Participants Identified With Genetic Conditions Through Whole Exome Sequencing

    Investigators analyzed next generation sequencing (NGS) results in the diagnosed cohort to determine the ability of whole exome sequencing to detect pathogenic variants in genes related to phenotype determined by standard newborn screening (NBS). The category of genes analyzed is termed the Next Generation Sequencing/Newborn Screening (NGS/NBS) category. Healthy newborns with no known genetic conditions also had the NGS/NBS category of genes analyzed.

    Time frame: approximately 3-6 months after DNA sample obtained

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parental Reaction Scores

    Test-related distress is assessed with an adapted version of the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA). It asks participants to report how often in the past week they have experienced worries and distress related to their child's genomic sequencing procedure and test results, and the social and familial consequences of sequencing and the test results. Possible responses are provided on the following scale: 0=Never, 1=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, and 5=Often. Because it refers to respondents' experience of their child's sequencing and the test results they received, it is administered only in assessments that occurred after sequencing at Time 3 (2 weeks after results visit and Time 4 (3 months after results visit). Comparisons are made between couples who could chose to receive additional information about their child's genome and a control group who were not eligible to receive additional information.

    Time frame: Time 3 - 2 weeks after results visit and Time 4 - 3 months after results visit

07

Results

Posted Jul 8, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWell Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome Sequencing
Started6145
Decision group4130
Control group2015
Completed6145
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryParental Choices Following Decision Aid

Analysis of parents' decisions after they complete an on-line decision aid to see if they wish to participate in the study. Options will be yes, no, or undecided.

Time frame:
average of 3-6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Parental Choices Following Decision Aid
ParticipantsWell Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome Sequencing
Said yes or undecided after decision aid12057
Did not want child sequenced252
PrimaryNumber of Participants Identified With Genetic Conditions Through Whole Exome Sequencing

Investigators analyzed next generation sequencing (NGS) results in the diagnosed cohort to determine the ability of whole exome sequencing to detect pathogenic variants in genes related to phenotype determined by standard newborn screening (NBS). The category of genes analyzed is termed the Next Generation Sequencing/Newborn Screening (NGS/NBS) category. Healthy newborns with no known genetic conditions also had the NGS/NBS category of genes analyzed.

Time frame:
approximately 3-6 months after DNA sample obtained
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Identified With Genetic Conditions Through Whole Exome Sequencing
ParticipantsWell Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome Sequencing
All participants — Well infant610
All participants — Hearing Loss028
All participants — Metabolic Disorder017
Positive NGS/NBS result — Well infant10
Positive NGS/NBS result — Hearing Loss05
Positive NGS/NBS result — Metabolic Disorder015
Negative NGS/NBS results — Well infant600
Negative NGS/NBS results — Hearing Loss023
Negative NGS/NBS results — Metabolic Disorder02
SecondaryParental Reaction Scores

Test-related distress is assessed with an adapted version of the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA). It asks participants to report how often in the past week they have experienced worries and distress related to their child's genomic sequencing procedure and test results, and the social and familial consequences of sequencing and the test results. Possible responses are provided on the following scale: 0=Never, 1=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, and 5=Often. Because it refers to respondents' experience of their child's sequencing and the test results they received, it is administered only in assessments that occurred after sequencing at Time 3 (2 weeks after results visit and Time 4 (3 months after results visit). Comparisons are made between couples who could chose to receive additional information about their child's genome and a control group who were not eligible to receive additional information.

Time frame:
Time 3 - 2 weeks after results visit and Time 4 - 3 months after results visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Parental Reaction Scores
score on a scaleDecision ArmControl Arm
T32.3 ± 2.41.7 ± 1.5
T42.5 ± 2.51.5 ± 0.4
Statistical analysis
  • Decision Arm vs Control Arm · linear mixed effect model · p = 0.168
  • Decision Arm vs Control Arm · linear mixed effect model · p = 0.026

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected beginning at Baseline and continued through Time 4 (3 months after results visit).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Well Infant, Whole Exome Sequencing0/61 (0%)0/61 (0%)0/61 (0%)
Diagnosed, Whole Exome Sequencing0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)2/45 (4.4%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventWell Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome Sequencing
Sample mixupCongenital, familial and genetic disorders0/612/45

Baseline characteristics

Healthy newborns and children up to age 5 with a diagnosed condition

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Well Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome SequencingTotal
<=18 years6145106
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Well Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome SequencingTotal
Female292857
Male321749
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Well Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome SequencingTotal
Hispanic or Latino8210
Not Hispanic or Latino514293
Unknown or Not Reported213
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Well Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome SequencingTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian549
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American9312
White443781
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported314
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Well Infant, Whole Exome SequencingDiagnosed, Whole Exome SequencingTotal
United States6145106
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UNC Hospitals
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Milko LV, Rini C, Lewis MA, Butterfield RM, Lin FC, Paquin RS, Powell BC, Roche MI, Souris KJ, Bailey DB Jr, Berg JS, Powell CM. Evaluating parents' decisions about next-generation sequencing for their child in the NC NEXUS (North Carolina Newborn Exome Sequencing for Universal Screening) study: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials. 2018 Jun 28;19(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2686-4. PubMed 29950170 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 18, 2013

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Sequencing data will be shared via the Newborn Screening Translational Research Network.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02826694
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), RTI International
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 11, 2016
Start date
Jun 2016
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Results posted
Jul 8, 2020
Last update
Jul 8, 2020

Study contacts

Jonathan Berg, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina School of Medicine Department of Genetics
Cynthia M Powell, MD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina School of Medicine Department of Pediatrics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion