ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02825524endoHPBUpdated Aug 28, 2017

Destruction of Residual Endo-biliary Dysplastic Buds After Endoscopic Ampullectomy

An interventional study of Habib™ EndoHBP in Adenoma, Bile Duct, sponsored by Hôpital Cochin. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-28.

Sponsored by Hôpital Cochin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and morbidity of biliairy radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of dysplastic endobiliairy residual lesions (low-grade dysplasia or high-grade dysplasia) after endoscopic ampullectomy for ampullary adenoma.

Read the detailed description

Neoplastic lesions may persist at the termination of the common bile duct or pancreatic duct, after endoscopic ampullectomy for adenoma. Such lesions conduct to a difficult therapeutic problem because surgery (pancreaticoduodenectomy or trans-duodenal resection) has significant morbidity compared to non-invasive lesions. The use of endoscopic destruction techniques of dysplastic lesions, including radio-frequency could be an interesting alternative to reduce the risk of invasive cancer with less morbidity. Ablation with radio-frequency (RF) is a technique of local tissue destruction in use in many applications, percutaneously or intraoperatively for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma smaller and more recently for the endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia of Barrett's esophagus. An RF probe has been developed for an endo-biliary application (Habib EndoHPB, Emcision) and 2 preliminary studies have reported the use in humans, in the indication of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. These two studies have confirmed the feasibility of the technique, with few side effects and probable anti-tumor efficacy demonstrated by expanding the area of stenosis after treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adenoma, Bile Duct
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hôpital Cochin is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of lesions of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) or high grade (HGD) in the common bile duct, confirmed by two pathological readings in relation to residual adenomatous tissue into the common bile duct after endoscopic ampullectomy for ampullome conducted in the previous year
  • Lack of residual adenomatous lesion on the duodenal side after ampullectomy and possibly additional procedures (endoscopic mucosal resection or argon plasma). (excluding other duodenal adenomatous lesions in the context of familial adenomatous polyposis
  • Consultative multidisciplinary digestive cancer meeting confirming the indication of treatment with endo-biliary radio-frequency
  • Dysplastic lesions extending over 20 mm length maximum in the common bile duct
  • Patients aged ≥ 18 years old and ≤ 85 years old
  • Patients who consented to participate in the study
  • No anesthesia (ASA 1,2,3)
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme (beneficiary or legal)
  • Lack of pregnancy and being women age procreate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions of invasive carcinoma in a patient whose clinical condition allows to consider a pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • Endo-biliary dysplastic lesions diffuse or multifocal
  • Presence of non extractable metal biliary expansive prosthesis
  • History of pancreaticoduodenectomy or hepaticojejunostomy anastomosis
  • Impassable stenosis of the common bile duct
  • Severe coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia \< 75,000 G/L , Clopidogrel treatment impossible to stop temporarily
  • Anesthesia ( ASA 4)
  • Pace maker or other active implantable medical device
  • Inability to obtain
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Endobiliary radiofrequency

    Device: Habib™ EndoHBP

Interventions

  • DeviceHabib™ EndoHBP

    During an endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, endobiliary application of radiofrequency through a dedicated probe named Habib.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. number of residual neoplasia

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. presence of low grade dysplasia or high grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. number of surgery

    Time frame: one year

  3. fever

    Time frame: 48 hours post endoscopic procedure

  4. pain

    Visual Analogue Scale

    Time frame: 48 hours post endoscopic procedure

  5. bleeding

    hematemesis, hematochezia or melena or decreased more than 2 points of hemoglobin

    Time frame: 48 hours post endoscopic procedure

  6. acute pancreatitis

    pain and increased of lipase more than 3 fold

    Time frame: 48 hours post endoscopic procedure

  7. cholangitis

    fever and abnormal hepatic blood tests

    Time frame: 48 hours post endoscopic procedure

  8. perforation

    pneumoperitoneum, retropneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax

    Time frame: 48 hours post endoscopic procedure

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Camus M, Napoleon B, Vienne A, Le Rhun M, Leblanc S, Barret M, Chaussade S, Robin F, Kaddour N, Prat F. Efficacy and safety of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for the eradication of residual neoplasia after endoscopic papillectomy: a multicenter prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Sep;88(3):511-518. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2332. Epub 2018 Apr 13. PubMed 29660322 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2012, a primary completion of Mar 2017 and a completion of Mar 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 15, 2016
First posted
Jul 7, 2016
Start
Nov 2012
Primary completionActual
Mar 2017
CompletionActual
Mar 2017
Last update
Aug 28, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 28, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02825524
Lead sponsor
Hôpital Cochin
Responsible party
Frederic PRAT (clinical professor, Hôpital Cochin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2016
Start date
Nov 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2017
Completion
Mar 2017
Last update
Aug 28, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion