CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02817841Updated Feb 10, 2020Results posted

E4 FREEDOM (Female Response Concerning Efficacy and Safety of Estetrol/Drospirenone as Oral Contraceptive in a Multicentric Study) - United States/Canada Study

A Phase 3 interventional study of 15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP in Contraception, sponsored by Estetra. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to female participants aged 16 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-10.

Sponsored by Estetra · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,148
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The objectives of this study are to evaluate the contraceptive efficacy, vaginal bleeding pattern (cycle control), and the general safety and acceptability of the 15 mg estetrol (E4)/3 mg drospirenone (DRSP) combination in healthy women aged 16 to 50 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Contraception

Keywords

  • Estetrol
  • Drospirenone
  • Prevention of pregnancy
  • Oral contraception
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Estetra is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Heterosexually active female at risk for pregnancy and requesting contraception.
  • Negative serum pregnancy test at subject screening.
  • Willing to use the investigational product as the primary method of contraception for 13 consecutive cycles.
  • Good physical and mental health on the basis of medical, surgical and gynecological history, physical examination, gynecological examination, clinical laboratory, and vital signs.
  • Body mass index (BMI) below or equal to (≤) 35.0 kg/m2.
  • Able to fulfill the requirements of the protocol and have indicated a willingness to participate in the study by providing written informed consent.
  • Willing and able to complete the diaries and questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the investigational product ingredients.
  • Smoking if ≥ 35 years old, at screening.
  • Any condition associated with decrease fertility.
  • Dyslipoproteinemia requiring active treatment with antilipidemic agent.
  • Diabetes mellitus with vascular involvement (nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, other) or diabetes mellitus of more than 20-year duration.
  • Arterial hypertension.
  • Any condition associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism and/or arterial thromboembolism.
  • Any condition associated with abnormal uterine/vaginal bleeding.
  • Abnormal Pap test based on current international recommendations.
  • Presence of an undiagnosed breast mass.
  • Current symptomatic gallbladder disease.
  • History of combined oral contraceptive (COC) related cholestasis.
  • Presence or history of severe hepatic disease.
  • Presence or history of pancreatitis if associated with hypertriglyceridemia.
  • Porphyria.
  • Presence or history of hepatocellular adenoma or malignant liver tumors.
  • Renal impairment.
  • Hyperkaliemia or presence of conditions that predispose to hyperkaliemia.
  • Presence or history of hormone-related malignancy.
  • History of non-hormone-related malignancy within 5 years before screening. Subjects with a non-melanoma skin cancer are allowed in the study.
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse (including laxatives) within 12 months prior to screening.
  • Use of drugs potentially triggering interactions with COCs.
  • Any condition that could result in altered absorption, excessive accumulation, impaired metabolism, or altered excretion of the investigational product.
  • Uncontrolled thyroid disorders.
  • Participation in another investigational drug clinical study within 1 month (30 days) or have received an investigational drug within the last 3 months (90 days) prior to study entry. Subjects who participated in an oral contraceptive clinical study, using FDA/European (EU) approved active ingredients, may be enrolled 2 months (60 days) after completing the preceding study.
  • Sponsor, Contract Research Organization (CRO) or Investigator's site personnel directly affiliated with this study.
  • Is judged by the Investigator to be unsuitable for any reason.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,148 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP

    15 mg estetrol (E4)/3 mg drospirenone (DRSP) combined oral contraceptive

    Drug: 15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP

Interventions

  • Drug15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP

    15 mg estetrol and 3 mg drospirenone tablets administered once daily for 13 consecutive cycles following a 24/4-day regimen, i.e. one 15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP active tablet per day for 24 consecutive days followed by one placebo tablet per day for 4 consecutive days.

    Also known as: 15 mg estetrol and 3 mg drospirenone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With + 7-day Window) Per 100 Woman-years of Exposure (Pearl Index) in Subjects Aged 16 to 35 Years, Inclusive, at the Time of Screening

    On-treatment pregnancies are pregnancies with an estimated date of conception within the in-treatment period i.e. Day 1 to 7 days after the last intake of investigational product (whether active or inactive tablet). The Pearl Index, defined as the number of pregnancies per 100 women-years of treatment was calculated as: Pearl Index = (1300\*number of on-treatment pregnancies)/number of women 28-day equivalent cycles of treatment. Only at-risk cycles were included in the denominator of the Pearl Index calculation, unless a conception occurred during a cycle. At-risk-cycle was defined as cycle in which no other methods of birth control (including condoms and emergency contraception) were used by the subject as confirmed in the subject diary and during which the subject confirmed that sexual intercourse had occurred.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With +7-day Window) as Assessed by the Method Failure Pearl Index in Subjects Aged 16 to 35 Years, Inclusive, at the Time of Screening

    On-treatment pregnancies are pregnancies with an estimated date of conception within the in-treatment period i.e. Day 1 to 7 days after the last intake of investigational product (whether active or inactive tablet). The method failure Pearl Index, defined as the number of pregnancies as a result of method failure per 100 women-years of treatment, was calculated as follow: (1300\*number of on-treatment pregnancies as a result of method failure)/number of women 28-day equivalent cycles of treatment. Pregnancies due to user failure were excluded from the numerator. User failure pregnancies were pregnancies that occurred when the subject did not take the investigational product correctly. At-risk-cycle was defined as cycle in which no other methods of birth control (including condoms and emergency contraception) were used by the subject and during which the subject confirmed that sexual intercourse had occurred.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  2. The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With + 7-day Window) Per 100 Woman-years of Exposure (Pearl Index) in the Overall Study Population (16-50 Years)

    On-treatment pregnancies are pregnancies with an estimated date of conception within the in-treatment period i.e. Day 1 to 7 days after the last intake of investigational product (whether active or inactive tablet). The Pearl Index, defined as the number of pregnancies per 100 women-years of treatment was calculated as: Pearl Index = (1300\*number of on-treatment pregnancies)/number of women 28-day equivalent cycles of treatment. Only at-risk cycles were included in the denominator of the Pearl Index calculation, unless a conception occurred during a cycle. At-risk-cycle was defined as cycle in which no other methods of birth control (including condoms and emergency contraception) were used by the subject as confirmed in the subject diary and during which the subject confirmed that sexual intercourse had occurred.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  3. The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies as Assessed by the Method Failure Pearl Index in the Overall Study Population (16-50 Years)

    On-treatment pregnancies are pregnancies with an estimated date of conception within the in-treatment period i.e. Day 1 to 7 days after the last intake of investigational product (whether active or inactive tablet). The method failure Pearl Index, defined as the number of pregnancies as a result of method failure per 100 women-years of treatment, was calculated as follow: (1300\*number of on-treatment pregnancies as a result of method failure)/number of women 28-day equivalent cycles of treatment. Pregnancies due to user failure were excluded from the numerator. User failure pregnancies were pregnancies that occurred when the subject did not take the investigational product correctly. At-risk-cycle was defined as cycle in which no other methods of birth control (including condoms and emergency contraception) were used by the subject and during which the subject confirmed that sexual intercourse had occurred.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  4. Rate of Pregnancy (Life-table Analysis) in Participants Aged 16 to 35 Years

    The life-table analysis evaluates the cumulative probability of pregnancy over 13 cycles. Cumulative Rate and 95% CI are from Kaplan-Meier estimation. Only on-treatment pregnancies are included. On-treatment pregnancy is a pregnancy with an estimated date of conception after the date of the first dose of study medication to 7 days after the last dose of study medication (regardless of whether the last dose is an active or inactive tablet) inclusive.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  5. Rate of Pregnancy (Life-table Analysis) in Participants Aged 16 to 50 Years

    The life-table analysis evaluates the cumulative probability of pregnancy over 13 cycles. Cumulative Rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) are from Kaplan-Meier estimation. Only on-treatment pregnancies are included. On-treatment pregnancy is a pregnancy with an estimated date of conception after the date of the first dose of study medication to 7 days after the last dose of study medication (regardless of whether the last dose is an active or inactive tablet) inclusive.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  6. Number of Subjects With Unscheduled Bleeding/Spotting Episodes

    Unscheduled bleeding/spotting is defined as any bleeding/spotting that occurs while taking active hormones that does not meet the criteria for scheduled bleeding.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  7. Number of Unscheduled Bleeding Days Per Cycle

    Unscheduled bleeding is defined as any bleeding that occurs while taking active hormones that does not meet the criteria for scheduled bleeding and/or spotting.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  8. Number of Unscheduled Spotting Days Per Cycle

    Unscheduled spotting is defined as any spotting that occurs while taking active hormones that does not meet the criteria for scheduled bleeding and/or spotting.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  9. Number of Subjects With Absence of Scheduled Bleeding and/or Spotting

    Scheduled bleeding/spotting is defined as any bleeding/spotting that occurs during the hormone-free interval (i.e. Days 25 - 28) and continues through Days 1-3 of the subsequent active cycle.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  10. Number of Scheduled Bleeding and/or Spotting Days Per Cycle

    Scheduled bleeding/spotting is defined as any bleeding/spotting that occurs during the hormone-free interval (i.e. Days 25 - 28) and continues through Days 1-3 of the subsequent active cycle.

    Time frame: Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  11. Number of Subjects With Bleeding and/or Spotting Episodes by Reference Period

    Bleeding data were analysed by 91-day reference period. There were 4 RPs: Reference Period 1 = Day 1 to Day 91; Reference Period 2 = Day 92 to Day 182; Reference Period 3 = Day 183 to Day 273; and Reference Period 4 = Day 274 to Day 364.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  12. Mean Number of Bleeding and Spotting Days by Reference Period

    Bleeding data were analysed by 91-day reference period (RP). There were 4 RPs: Reference Period 1 = Day 1 to Day 91; Reference Period 2 = Day 92 to Day 182; Reference Period 3 = Day 183 to Day 273; and Reference Period 4 = Day 274 to Day 364.

    Time frame: up to 12 months (13 cycles)

  13. Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability.

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE not present prior to the initiation of the treatment or any event already present that worsened in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatment. Since the starting point for adverse event (AE) collection was the signing of the informed consent, not the start of the investigational product, the AEs recorded prior to first investigational product administration were designated as AEs while those that occurred or worsened after the initiation of the investigational product were designated as TEAEs.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  14. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant out-of Range Hematology Results

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  15. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant out-of Range Serum Chemistry and Lipid Profile Results

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  16. Number of Subjects With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs

    Vital signs included sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and heart rate. All abnormal findings in vital signs that were considered by the Investigator to be clinically significant were recorded as adverse events.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  17. Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Physical Examination Results

    Physical examinations included an evaluation of body as a whole, skin, head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat, neck, cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal, neurologic, lymphatic/thyroid, abdomen. When reporting the results of the physical examination, the use of the "Abnormal" category was reserved for findings that were considered clinically significant, in the opinion of the Investigator; the "Normal" category included "Abnormal" results that were not clinically significant, as well as no findings.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  18. Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Gynecological Examination Results

    Gynecological examinations included breast examination (performed by palpation) and assessment of the adnexa, cervix, uterus, vagina, and external genitalia. When reporting the results, the use of the "Abnormal" category was reserved for findings that were considered clinically significant, in the opinion of the Investigator; the "Normal" category included "Abnormal" results that were not clinically significant, as well as no findings.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  19. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) Results at Baseline and End of Treatment - Percentage Maximum (Sum of First 14 Items)

    The Q-LES-Q-SF is a self-report measure designed to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in daily functioning. Participants were asked to rate 16 different items on a 5-point scale where score 1 = very poor and score 5 = very good. A raw total score is calculated by summing the first 14 items and ranges from 14 to 70. The raw total score is then transformed into a percentage maximum score using the following formula: (raw total score-minimum score)/(maximum possible raw score-minimum score). The minimum raw is 14 and maximum raw score is 70. Thus the formula for % maximum score can be written as (raw score -14)/56. A higher percentage maximum score indicates a higher life enjoyment and satisfaction.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  20. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) Results at Baseline and End of Treatment - Satisfaction With Medicine and Overall Life Satisfaction and Contentment Over the Past Week

    The Q-LES-Q-SF is a self-report measure designed to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in daily functioning. Participants were asked to rate 16 different items on a 5-point scale where score 1 = very poor and score 5 = very good. The last two items - item 15 rating "satisfaction with medicine" and item 16 rating "overall life satisfaction over the past week" are two global items that are scored individually. For both items, a higher score is associated with a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)

  21. Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in the Score of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ)

    The MDQ is a standard method for measuring cyclical perimenstrual symptoms. The participants rated common symptoms and feelings associated with menstruation using the following scale: 0 (no experience of symptom), 1 (present, mild), 2 (present, moderate), 3 (present, strong),and 4 (present, severe) observed during pre-menstrual (4 days before menstruation), menstrual (most recent flow) and intermenstrual (remainder of the cycle) phases. Reported values are values at Cycle 13 minus values at Baseline. An overall positive change from baseline represents an increase in symptom or feeling severity.

    Time frame: Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)

07

Results

Posted Nov 6, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Started1864
Completed1016
Not completed848
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up287
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject183
Withdrew: Adverse event not related to bleeding131
Withdrew: Adverse event related to bleeding51
Withdrew: Pregnancy32
Withdrew: Pregnancy wish17
Withdrew: Other reasons53
Withdrew: Protocol violation94

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With + 7-day Window) Per 100 Woman-years of Exposure (Pearl Index) in Subjects Aged 16 to 35 Years, Inclusive, at the Time of Screening

On-treatment pregnancies are pregnancies with an estimated date of conception within the in-treatment period i.e. Day 1 to 7 days after the last intake of investigational product (whether active or inactive tablet). The Pearl Index, defined as the number of pregnancies per 100 women-years of treatment was calculated as: Pearl Index = (1300\*number of on-treatment pregnancies)/number of women 28-day equivalent cycles of treatment. Only at-risk cycles were included in the denominator of the Pearl Index calculation, unless a conception occurred during a cycle. At-risk-cycle was defined as cycle in which no other methods of birth control (including condoms and emergency contraception) were used by the subject as confirmed in the subject diary and during which the subject confirmed that sexual intercourse had occurred.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Pearl Index
The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With + 7-day Window) Per 100 Woman-years of Exposure (Pearl Index) in Subjects Aged 16 to 35 Years, Inclusive, at the Time of Screening
Pearl Index15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With + 7-day Window) Per 100 Woman-years of Exposure (Pearl Index) in Subjects Aged 16 to 35 Years, Inclusive, at the Time of Screening2.65 (1.73 to 3.88)
SecondaryThe Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With +7-day Window) as Assessed by the Method Failure Pearl Index in Subjects Aged 16 to 35 Years, Inclusive, at the Time of Screening

On-treatment pregnancies are pregnancies with an estimated date of conception within the in-treatment period i.e. Day 1 to 7 days after the last intake of investigational product (whether active or inactive tablet). The method failure Pearl Index, defined as the number of pregnancies as a result of method failure per 100 women-years of treatment, was calculated as follow: (1300\*number of on-treatment pregnancies as a result of method failure)/number of women 28-day equivalent cycles of treatment. Pregnancies due to user failure were excluded from the numerator. User failure pregnancies were pregnancies that occurred when the subject did not take the investigational product correctly. At-risk-cycle was defined as cycle in which no other methods of birth control (including condoms and emergency contraception) were used by the subject and during which the subject confirmed that sexual intercourse had occurred.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Method failure Pearl Index
The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With +7-day Window) as Assessed by the Method Failure Pearl Index in Subjects Aged 16 to 35 Years, Inclusive, at the Time of Screening
Method failure Pearl Index15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With +7-day Window) as Assessed by the Method Failure Pearl Index in Subjects Aged 16 to 35 Years, Inclusive, at the Time of Screening1.43 (0.78 to 2.39)
SecondaryThe Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With + 7-day Window) Per 100 Woman-years of Exposure (Pearl Index) in the Overall Study Population (16-50 Years)

On-treatment pregnancies are pregnancies with an estimated date of conception within the in-treatment period i.e. Day 1 to 7 days after the last intake of investigational product (whether active or inactive tablet). The Pearl Index, defined as the number of pregnancies per 100 women-years of treatment was calculated as: Pearl Index = (1300\*number of on-treatment pregnancies)/number of women 28-day equivalent cycles of treatment. Only at-risk cycles were included in the denominator of the Pearl Index calculation, unless a conception occurred during a cycle. At-risk-cycle was defined as cycle in which no other methods of birth control (including condoms and emergency contraception) were used by the subject as confirmed in the subject diary and during which the subject confirmed that sexual intercourse had occurred.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Pearl Index
The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With + 7-day Window) Per 100 Woman-years of Exposure (Pearl Index) in the Overall Study Population (16-50 Years)
Pearl Index15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies (With + 7-day Window) Per 100 Woman-years of Exposure (Pearl Index) in the Overall Study Population (16-50 Years)2.52 (1.68 to 3.64)
SecondaryThe Number of On-treatment Pregnancies as Assessed by the Method Failure Pearl Index in the Overall Study Population (16-50 Years)

On-treatment pregnancies are pregnancies with an estimated date of conception within the in-treatment period i.e. Day 1 to 7 days after the last intake of investigational product (whether active or inactive tablet). The method failure Pearl Index, defined as the number of pregnancies as a result of method failure per 100 women-years of treatment, was calculated as follow: (1300\*number of on-treatment pregnancies as a result of method failure)/number of women 28-day equivalent cycles of treatment. Pregnancies due to user failure were excluded from the numerator. User failure pregnancies were pregnancies that occurred when the subject did not take the investigational product correctly. At-risk-cycle was defined as cycle in which no other methods of birth control (including condoms and emergency contraception) were used by the subject and during which the subject confirmed that sexual intercourse had occurred.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · Method failure Pearl Index
The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies as Assessed by the Method Failure Pearl Index in the Overall Study Population (16-50 Years)
Method failure Pearl Index15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
The Number of On-treatment Pregnancies as Assessed by the Method Failure Pearl Index in the Overall Study Population (16-50 Years)1.44 (0.82 to 2.34)
SecondaryRate of Pregnancy (Life-table Analysis) in Participants Aged 16 to 35 Years

The life-table analysis evaluates the cumulative probability of pregnancy over 13 cycles. Cumulative Rate and 95% CI are from Kaplan-Meier estimation. Only on-treatment pregnancies are included. On-treatment pregnancy is a pregnancy with an estimated date of conception after the date of the first dose of study medication to 7 days after the last dose of study medication (regardless of whether the last dose is an active or inactive tablet) inclusive.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Rate of Pregnancy (Life-table Analysis) in Participants Aged 16 to 35 Years
percentage of participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Rate of Pregnancy (Life-table Analysis) in Participants Aged 16 to 35 Years2.06 (1.40 to 3.04)
SecondaryRate of Pregnancy (Life-table Analysis) in Participants Aged 16 to 50 Years

The life-table analysis evaluates the cumulative probability of pregnancy over 13 cycles. Cumulative Rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) are from Kaplan-Meier estimation. Only on-treatment pregnancies are included. On-treatment pregnancy is a pregnancy with an estimated date of conception after the date of the first dose of study medication to 7 days after the last dose of study medication (regardless of whether the last dose is an active or inactive tablet) inclusive.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Rate of Pregnancy (Life-table Analysis) in Participants Aged 16 to 50 Years
percentage of participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Rate of Pregnancy (Life-table Analysis) in Participants Aged 16 to 50 Years2.00 (1.38 to 2.91)
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Unscheduled Bleeding/Spotting Episodes

Unscheduled bleeding/spotting is defined as any bleeding/spotting that occurs while taking active hormones that does not meet the criteria for scheduled bleeding.

Time frame:
Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects With Unscheduled Bleeding/Spotting Episodes
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Cycle 1532
Cycle 2345
Cycle 3337
Cycle 4302
Cycle 5238
Cycle 6253
Cycle 7229
Cycle 8204
Cycle 9221
Cycle 10184
Cycle 11159
Cycle 12175
SecondaryNumber of Unscheduled Bleeding Days Per Cycle

Unscheduled bleeding is defined as any bleeding that occurs while taking active hormones that does not meet the criteria for scheduled bleeding and/or spotting.

Time frame:
Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Number of Unscheduled Bleeding Days Per Cycle
Days15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Cycle 10.4 ± 1.42
Cycle 20.3 ± 1.08
Cycle 30.4 ± 1.20
Cycle 40.3 ± 1.00
Cycle 50.3 ± 1.04
Cycle 60.3 ± 1.04
Cycle 70.3 ± 1.04
Cycle 80.2 ± 0.94
Cycle 90.3 ± 1.01
Cycle 100.3 ± 1.07
Cycle 110.2 ± 0.94
Cycle 120.2 ± 0.98
SecondaryNumber of Unscheduled Spotting Days Per Cycle

Unscheduled spotting is defined as any spotting that occurs while taking active hormones that does not meet the criteria for scheduled bleeding and/or spotting.

Time frame:
Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Number of Unscheduled Spotting Days Per Cycle
Days15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Cycle 11.0 ± 2.21
Cycle 20.6 ± 1.50
Cycle 30.6 ± 1.40
Cycle 40.5 ± 1.31
Cycle 50.5 ± 1.26
Cycle 60.5 ± 1.30
Cycle 70.5 ± 1.31
Cycle 80.4 ± 1.18
Cycle 90.5 ± 1.21
Cycle 100.4 ± 1.20
Cycle 110.4 ± 1.08
Cycle 120.4 ± 1.09
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Absence of Scheduled Bleeding and/or Spotting

Scheduled bleeding/spotting is defined as any bleeding/spotting that occurs during the hormone-free interval (i.e. Days 25 - 28) and continues through Days 1-3 of the subsequent active cycle.

Time frame:
Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects With Absence of Scheduled Bleeding and/or Spotting
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Cycle 1230
Cycle 2254
Cycle 3274
Cycle 4233
Cycle 5209
Cycle 6225
Cycle 7191
Cycle 8183
Cycle 9180
Cycle 10137
Cycle 11136
Cycle 12134
SecondaryNumber of Scheduled Bleeding and/or Spotting Days Per Cycle

Scheduled bleeding/spotting is defined as any bleeding/spotting that occurs during the hormone-free interval (i.e. Days 25 - 28) and continues through Days 1-3 of the subsequent active cycle.

Time frame:
Up to 11 months (12 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Number of Scheduled Bleeding and/or Spotting Days Per Cycle
Days15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Cycle 16.1 ± 10.16
Cycle 24.7 ± 4.01
Cycle 34.7 ± 6.72
Cycle 44.8 ± 6.50
Cycle 54.4 ± 3.70
Cycle 64.4 ± 3.39
Cycle 74.5 ± 5.00
Cycle 84.5 ± 3.69
Cycle 94.4 ± 5.64
Cycle 104.3 ± 3.41
Cycle 114.3 ± 3.87
Cycle 124.3 ± 3.07
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Bleeding and/or Spotting Episodes by Reference Period

Bleeding data were analysed by 91-day reference period. There were 4 RPs: Reference Period 1 = Day 1 to Day 91; Reference Period 2 = Day 92 to Day 182; Reference Period 3 = Day 183 to Day 273; and Reference Period 4 = Day 274 to Day 364.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects With Bleeding and/or Spotting Episodes by Reference Period
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP - RP1
Reference Period 11,249
Reference Period 21,098
Reference Period 3982
Reference Period 4914
SecondaryMean Number of Bleeding and Spotting Days by Reference Period

Bleeding data were analysed by 91-day reference period (RP). There were 4 RPs: Reference Period 1 = Day 1 to Day 91; Reference Period 2 = Day 92 to Day 182; Reference Period 3 = Day 183 to Day 273; and Reference Period 4 = Day 274 to Day 364.

Time frame:
up to 12 months (13 cycles)
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Mean Number of Bleeding and Spotting Days by Reference Period
Days15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Reference Period 13.6 ± 1.23
Reference Period 23.3 ± 1.27
Reference Period 33.3 ± 1.25
Reference Period 43.9 ± 1.30
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability.

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE not present prior to the initiation of the treatment or any event already present that worsened in either intensity or frequency following exposure to the treatment. Since the starting point for adverse event (AE) collection was the signing of the informed consent, not the start of the investigational product, the AEs recorded prior to first investigational product administration were designated as AEs while those that occurred or worsened after the initiation of the investigational product were designated as TEAEs.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability.
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Number of Subjects With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability.1,002
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant out-of Range Hematology Results
Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant out-of Range Hematology Results
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant out-of Range Hematology Results8
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant out-of Range Serum Chemistry and Lipid Profile Results
Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant out-of Range Serum Chemistry and Lipid Profile Results
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant out-of Range Serum Chemistry and Lipid Profile Results21
SecondaryNumber of Subjects With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs

Vital signs included sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and heart rate. All abnormal findings in vital signs that were considered by the Investigator to be clinically significant were recorded as adverse events.

Time frame:
Up to 12 months (13 cycles with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Number of Subjects With Clinically Abnormal Vital Signs10
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Physical Examination Results

Physical examinations included an evaluation of body as a whole, skin, head, eyes, ears, nose, and throat, neck, cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal, neurologic, lymphatic/thyroid, abdomen. When reporting the results of the physical examination, the use of the "Abnormal" category was reserved for findings that were considered clinically significant, in the opinion of the Investigator; the "Normal" category included "Abnormal" results that were not clinically significant, as well as no findings.

Time frame:
Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Physical Examination Results
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Body as a whole -Baseline — Normal1,862
Body as a whole -Baseline — Abnormal2
Body as a whole -Baseline — Not done0
Body as a whole - EOT — Normal1,431
Body as a whole - EOT — Abnormal0
Body as a whole - EOT — Not done1
Skin - Baseline — Normal1,838
Skin - Baseline — Abnormal25
Skin - Baseline — Not done1
Skin - EOT — Normal1,412
Skin - EOT — Abnormal18
Skin - EOT — Not done1
Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose and Throat - Baseline — Normal1,856
Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose and Throat - Baseline — Abnormal7
Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose and Throat - Baseline — Not done1
Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose - EOT — Normal1,424
Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose - EOT — Abnormal2
Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose - EOT — Not done6
Neck - Baseline — Normal1,852
Neck - Baseline — Abnormal2
Neck - Baseline — Not done10
Neck - EOT — Normal1,429
Neck - EOT — Abnormal3
Neck - EOT — Not done0
Cardiovascular - Baseline — Normal1,862
Cardiovascular - Baseline — Abnormal2
Cardiovascular - Baseline — Not done0
Cardiovascular - EOT — Normal1,429
Cardiovascular - EOT — Abnormal3
Cardiovascular - EOT — Not done0
Respiratory - Baseline — Normal1,861
Respiratory - Baseline — Abnormal3
Respiratory - Baseline — Not done0
Respiratory - EOT — Normal1,428
Respiratory - EOT — Abnormal1
Respiratory - EOT — Not done3
Musculoskeletal - Baseline — Normal1,852
Musculoskeletal - Baseline — Abnormal2
Musculoskeletal - Baseline — Not done10
Musculoskeletal - EOT — Normal1,423
Musculoskeletal - EOT — Abnormal3
Musculoskeletal - EOT — Not done6
Neurologic - Baseline — Normal1,851
Neurologic - Baseline — Abnormal1
Neurologic - Baseline — Not done12
Neurologic - EOT — Normal1,423
Neurologic - EOT — Abnormal1
Neurologic - EOT — Not done8
Lymphatic/Thyroid - Baseline — Normal1,860
Lymphatic/Thyroid - Baseline — Abnormal4
Lymphatic/Thyroid - Baseline — Not done0
Lymphatic/Thyroid - EOT — Normal1,431
Lymphatic/Thyroid - EOT — Abnormal1
Lymphatic/Thyroid - EOT — Not done0
Abdomen - Baseline — Normal1,860
Abdomen - Baseline — Abnormal3
Abdomen - Baseline — Not done1
Abdomen - EOT — Normal1,431
Abdomen - EOT — Abnormal1
Abdomen - EOT — Not done0
Additional findings -Baseline — Normal3
Additional findings -Baseline — Abnormal1
Additional findings -Baseline — Not done21
Additional findings - EOT — Normal3
Additional findings - EOT — Abnormal1
Additional findings - EOT — Not done30
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Gynecological Examination Results

Gynecological examinations included breast examination (performed by palpation) and assessment of the adnexa, cervix, uterus, vagina, and external genitalia. When reporting the results, the use of the "Abnormal" category was reserved for findings that were considered clinically significant, in the opinion of the Investigator; the "Normal" category included "Abnormal" results that were not clinically significant, as well as no findings.

Time frame:
Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal Gynecological Examination Results
Participants15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Breast -Baseline — Normal1,857
Breast -Baseline — Abnormal6
Breast -Baseline — Not done1
Breast - EOT — Normal1,387
Breast - EOT — Abnormal16
Breast - EOT — Not done11
Adnexa - Baseline — Normal1,861
Adnexa - Baseline — Abnormal1
Adnexa - Baseline — Not done2
Adnexa - EOT — Normal1,404
Adnexa - EOT — Abnormal4
Adnexa - EOT — Not done6
Cervix- Baseline — Normal1,862
Cervix- Baseline — Abnormal2
Cervix- Baseline — Not done0
Cervix - EOT — Normal1,397
Cervix - EOT — Abnormal5
Cervix - EOT — Not done12
Uterus - Baseline — Normal1,861
Uterus - Baseline — Abnormal3
Uterus - Baseline — Not done0
Uterus - EOT — Normal1,402
Uterus - EOT — Abnormal7
Uterus - EOT — Not done5
Vagina - Baseline — Normal1,841
Vagina - Baseline — Abnormal23
Vagina - Baseline — Not done0
Vagina - EOT — Normal1,386
Vagina - EOT — Abnormal22
Vagina - EOT — Not done6
External genitalia - Baseline — Normal1,860
External genitalia - Baseline — Abnormal4
External genitalia - Baseline — Not done0
External genitalia - EOT — Normal1,398
External genitalia - EOT — Abnormal10
External genitalia - EOT — Not done5
SecondaryQuality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) Results at Baseline and End of Treatment - Percentage Maximum (Sum of First 14 Items)

The Q-LES-Q-SF is a self-report measure designed to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in daily functioning. Participants were asked to rate 16 different items on a 5-point scale where score 1 = very poor and score 5 = very good. A raw total score is calculated by summing the first 14 items and ranges from 14 to 70. The raw total score is then transformed into a percentage maximum score using the following formula: (raw total score-minimum score)/(maximum possible raw score-minimum score). The minimum raw is 14 and maximum raw score is 70. Thus the formula for % maximum score can be written as (raw score -14)/56. A higher percentage maximum score indicates a higher life enjoyment and satisfaction.

Time frame:
Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage maximum score on a scale
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) Results at Baseline and End of Treatment - Percentage Maximum (Sum of First 14 Items)
Percentage maximum score on a scale15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Baseline75.8 ± 13.58
EOT75.4 ± 14.80
SecondaryQuality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) Results at Baseline and End of Treatment - Satisfaction With Medicine and Overall Life Satisfaction and Contentment Over the Past Week

The Q-LES-Q-SF is a self-report measure designed to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction in daily functioning. Participants were asked to rate 16 different items on a 5-point scale where score 1 = very poor and score 5 = very good. The last two items - item 15 rating "satisfaction with medicine" and item 16 rating "overall life satisfaction over the past week" are two global items that are scored individually. For both items, a higher score is associated with a better outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) Results at Baseline and End of Treatment - Satisfaction With Medicine and Overall Life Satisfaction and Contentment Over the Past Week
Units on a scale15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Satisfaction with medicine - Baseline4.2 ± 0.69
Satisfaction with medicine - EOT4.1 ± 0.75
Overall life satisfaction - Baseline4.1 ± 0.73
Overall life satisfaction - EOT4.1 ± 0.77
SecondaryChange From Baseline to End of Treatment in the Score of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ)

The MDQ is a standard method for measuring cyclical perimenstrual symptoms. The participants rated common symptoms and feelings associated with menstruation using the following scale: 0 (no experience of symptom), 1 (present, mild), 2 (present, moderate), 3 (present, strong),and 4 (present, severe) observed during pre-menstrual (4 days before menstruation), menstrual (most recent flow) and intermenstrual (remainder of the cycle) phases. Reported values are values at Cycle 13 minus values at Baseline. An overall positive change from baseline represents an increase in symptom or feeling severity.

Time frame:
Baseline and end of treatment (Cycle 13 with 1 cycle = 28 days)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment in the Score of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ)
units on a scale15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP - Intermenstrual Phase15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP - Premenstrual Phase15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP - Menstrual Phase
Pain-0.3 ± 4.13-0.1 ± 4.19-0.6 ± 4.68
Water retention-0.1 ± 2.58-0.2 ± 2.91-0.2 ± 2.9
Autonomic reactions0.0 ± 1.560.0 ± 1.690.1 ± 1.71
Negative affect-0.1 ± 5.17-0.4 ± 5.94-0.3 ± 5.98
Impaired concentration0.0 ± 3.00-0.1 ± 3.19-0.1 ± 3.42
Behaviour change-0.0 ± 2.99-0.0 ± 3.19-0.0 ± 3.37
Arousal-0.2 ± 4.66-0.2 ± 4.42-0.2 ± 4.28
Control0.1 ± 1.690.1 ± 1.940.1 ± 1.92

Adverse events

Collected over From screening to end of treatment (13 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP1/1,864 (0.1%)25/1,864 (1.3%)1,002/1,864 (53.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent serious events
Event15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Abortion spontaneousPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions7/1864
Ectopic pregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions2/1864
DepressionPsychiatric disorders2/1864
Affective disorderPsychiatric disorders1/1864
Bipolar I disorderPsychiatric disorders1/1864
Psychotic disorderPsychiatric disorders1/1864
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders1/1864
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/1864
AppendicitisInfections and infestations1/1864
Bacterial pyelonephritisInfections and infestations1/1864
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 36
Most frequent other events
Event15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
HeadacheNervous system disorders94/1864
MetrorrhagiaReproductive system and breast disorders86/1864
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders70/1864
DysmenorrhoeaReproductive system and breast disorders66/1864
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations64/1864
AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders63/1864
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations62/1864
Weight increasedInvestigations62/1864
Viral upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations61/1864
Breast tendernessReproductive system and breast disorders54/1864

Baseline characteristics

All participants aged 16 to 50 years who received at least one dose of 15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
<=18 years74
Between 18 and 65 years1,790
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Mean27.3 ± 6.48
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Female1,864
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Hispanic or Latino488
Not Hispanic or Latino1,376
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Canada152
United States1,712
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(Kg/m^2)15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP
Mean25.89 ± 4.705
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Thomas Jefferson University Obstetrics and Gynecology
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Clinique de Santé des Femmes
    Quebec, G1S 2L6, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Dec 11, 2018
  • Study protocol · Jul 10, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02817841
Lead sponsor
Estetra
Collaborators
PRA Health Sciences
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 29, 2016
Start date
Aug 30, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2018
Completion
Nov 16, 2018
Results posted
Nov 6, 2019
Last update
Feb 10, 2020

Study contacts

Estetra
study director · Estetra

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion