CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02792933Updated Jun 15, 2016

Air Versus Saline Solution for the Localization of the Epidural Space in Labour Analgesia

An interventional study of air in epidural space and saline in epidural space in Effects of Anesthesia Spinal and Epidural in Pregnancy, sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-06-15.

Sponsored by Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Epidural space localization using loss of resistance technique with air (ALOR) is controversial in obstetric analgesia due to a minor efficacy and risk of complications, compared with loss of resistance technique with saline (SLOR). This randomized prospective study will compare the efficacy and incidence of most common complications of both techniques in obstetric analgesia.

Read the detailed description

A local ethics committee has approved the study. A statistical power calculation was performed and 177 patients per group will be necessary to confirm a 20% difference of efficacy of the block at 30 minutes (α=0,05; β=0,1). Epidural catheter will be inserted and a standardized analgesic protocol will initiate. The efficacy of the block will be assessed after 30 minutes and at delivery. The apparition of adverse effects during puncture and labour will be annotated. The need for repuncture of the block and the repercussion of the technique on the delivery and the fetus will be recorded as well. At 24 hours, investigators will assess the incidence of pain at the site of puncture (PSP) and the level of maternal satisfaction on a 0 to10 numeric scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Effects of Anesthesia Spinal and Epidural in Pregnancy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz is the lead sponsor of 100 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Parturients asking for epidural analgesia during labour .
  • Age between 18 and 45 years.
  • Spontaneous or induced.
  • Cervical dilatation inferior to 6 cm.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Infection in the puncture site.
  • Refusal of the patient.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Severe hypovolaemia.
  • Intracranial hypertension.
  • Severe aortic or mitral stenosis.
  • Systemic infection.
  • Non collaborating patient.
  • Incapacity of communicating or lack of comprehension of the study by the parturient
  • Prior neurological symptoms or demyelinising lesions.
  • Valvular stenosis.
  • Severe spinal deviation.
  • Patient previously operated of spinal surgery in the site of puncture.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
400 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    air in epidural space

    When the ALOR epidural localization technique will be used, an intermittent pressure with fast movements will be exerted on the plunger of the syringe while the Tuohy needle will be inserted until loss of resistance was felt.

    Procedure: air in epidural space

  • Experimental
    saline in epidural space

    When the SLOR technique is used, a continuous pressure will be exerted on the plunger of the Tuohy needle until loss of resistance was felt.

    Procedure: saline in epidural space

Interventions

  • Procedureair in epidural space

    The epidural puncture will be performed in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space in a seated position. A local anaesthesia with 2-5 mL of 2% lidocaine will be applied subcutaneously using a 25Gm 25mm needle. The epidural space will be localized using a Perifix® set by inserting the Tuohy needle in the ligamentum flavum or the interspinous space. The obturator will be then withdrawn and the low resistance syringe filled with 3-5mL of air will be connected. After localizing the epidural space, the catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm. An aspiration test will be performed through the catheter in a decline position with a 2 mL syringe, and a 3mL test dose with bupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 1/200.000 will be administered to exclude an intradural or an intravascular position of the catheter.

  • Proceduresaline in epidural space

    The epidural puncture will be performed in the L3-L4 or L4-L5 interspinous space in a seated position. A local anaesthesia with 2-5 mL of 2% lidocaine will be applied subcutaneously using a 25Gm 25mm needle. The epidural space will be localized using a Perifix® set by inserting the Tuohy needle in the ligamentum flavum or the interspinous space. The obturator will be withdrawn and the low resistance syringe filled with 3-5mL of saline solution will be connected. After localizing the epidural space, the catheter will be inserted 3-5 cm. An aspiration test will be performed through the catheter in a decline position with a 2 mL syringe, and a 3mL test dose with bupivacaine 0,25% plus epinephrine 1/200.000 will be administered to exclude an intradural or an intravascular position of the catheter.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Analgesia obtained 30 minutes after the puncture of the epidural block (variation of pain score)

    Time frame: 30 min

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Antibas PL, do Nascimento Junior P, Braz LG, Vitor Pereira Doles J, Modolo NS, El Dib R. Air versus saline in the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 18;2014(7):CD008938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008938.pub2. PubMed 25033878 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02792933
Lead sponsor
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 8, 2016
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2010
Completion
Jun 2010
Last update
Jun 15, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion