ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02790034STARSUpdated Dec 21, 2021Results posted

Evaluation of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Sarizotan in Rett Syndrome With Respiratory Symptoms

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Sarizotan low dose and Sarizotan high dose in Rett Syndrome, sponsored by Newron Pharmaceuticals SPA. Terminated at 14 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 4 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-21.

Sponsored by Newron Pharmaceuticals SPA · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study did not demonstrate evidence of efficacy on the primary or secondary efficacy variables
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
129
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Sarizotan in reducing respiratory abnormalities in Rett Syndrome in an initial double blind 24 week period followed by an open label treatment phase of up to 168 weeks (the latter for patients with no safety and tolerability issues).

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of multiple doses of sarizotan in patients with Rett syndrome with respiratory abnormalities. The study participants will be randomized to either sarizotan between 2 and 10 mg bid or placebo bid, based on age and weight criteria.

All patients who have completed the final evaluations at Week 24 (Day 168) and have no safety or tolerability issues that would preclude continuing on the study medication and have been compliant with the trial requirements will have the option of continuing open-label treatment with Sarizotan for up to 168 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rett Syndrome

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rett Syndrome

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Rett Syndrome; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 129 is above the median of 30 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Rett Syndrome.

Browse Rett Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Newron Pharmaceuticals SPA is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Body weight ≥ 10 kg
  • Age ≥ 4 years
  • Diagnosis of Rett syndrome based on consensus clinical criteria and patients with MECP2 duplications will not be eligible.
  • Has at least 10 episodes of breathing dysrhythmia, defined by episodes ≥10 seconds of breath holding (apnea), per hour during cardiorespiratory monitoring
  • Ability to take study medication provided either as capsules or combined with food/drink.
  • Patient is cooperative, willing to complete all aspects of the study, and capable of doing so with assistance of a caregiver.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meets any of the diagnostic exclusion criteria for Rett syndrome, Typical (Neul et al, 2010);
  • Patient is participating in a clinical trial with another drug
  • to sarizotan or other 5-HT1a agonists;
  • Current (as determined by Investigator) cardiovascular, respiratory (e.g. severe asthma), gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, hematologic or other medical disorders, in addition to those directly related to the patient's Rett syndrome;
  • interval on the is greater than 450 msec.
  • Surgery planned during the study (except for insertion of gastrostomy tube);
  • Severe diabetes mellitus or fatty acid oxidation disorder.
  • Ophthalmologic history including any of the following conditions: albino patients, family history of hereditary retinal disease, retinitis pigmentosa, any active retinopathy or severe diabetic retinopathy.
  • Females who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or of and not using a hormonal .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
129 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sarizotan low dose

    2 mg or 5 mg bid based on age and weight criteria for 24 wks DB 2 mg bid (4 to \<13 years; ≥13 years of age and weighing \<25 kg 5 mg bid (≥13 years of age and weighing ≥25 kg)

    Drug: Sarizotan low dose

  • Experimental
    Sarizotan high dose

    5 mg or 10 mg bid based on age and weight criteria for 24 wks DB 5 mg bid (4 to \<13 years; ≥13 years of age and weighing \<25 kg 10 mg bid (≥13 years of age and weighing ≥25 kg)

    Drug: Sarizotan high dose

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo bid for 24 wks DB age 4 and above

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugSarizotan low dose

    2 mg or 5 mg bid based on age and weight criteria for 24 wks DB 2 mg bid (4 to \<13 years; ≥13 years of age and weighing \<25 kg; 5 mg bid (≥13 years of age and weighing ≥25 kg). Assessment of safety, tolerability and efficacy on reducing the respiratory symptoms in patients.

  • DrugSarizotan high dose

    5 mg or 10 mg bid based on age and weight criteria for 24 wks DB 5 mg bid (4 to \<13 years; ≥13 years of age and weighing \<25 kg; 10 mg bid (≥13 years of age and weighing ≥25 kg) Assessment of safety, tolerability and efficacy on reducing the respiratory symptoms in patients

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo BID followed by assessment of safety, tolerability and efficacy on reducing the respiratory symptoms in patients.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Reduction in Respiratory Abnormality in Patients With Rett Syndrome

    Measured as the percent change in the number of apnea episodes per hour during awake time, calculated using an ambulatory data acquisition system (BioRadioTM) as part of home monitoring procedure. BioRadioTM record specific respiratory and cardiac parameters.

    Time frame: Baseline up to week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Sarizotan Assessed by the Caregiver-rated Impression of Change

    Caregiver-rated Impression of Change (CIC): 7-point scale requiring the caregiver to rate how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to the baseline state. 7-point Likert-type scale for which ratings range from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse, with 4 = no change. This caregiver-rated measure considered activities, behavior, mood and functioning. This rating was performed in consultation with the study Investigator but was based largely on the caregivers' evaluation during the reporting period. The single rating of the CIC was to be based on changes in the following domains: • Activities (watching TV, interest in conversations around her, cooperation during toileting, dressing/bathing, etc.), • Communication (verbal or by eye movements, hand movements, or head movements), • Behavior (agitation, refusal to feed, scratching, social avoidance), • Participation in family/outdoor/social events)

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Dec 21, 2021
Limitations and caveats
No efficacy evaluation was performed for the open label extension, as the study was terminated prematurely by the Sponsor based on lack of demonstrated efficacy in the double-blind period.

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 14 sites in 5 countries. Enrollment occurred from 26-Oct-2016 through February 2019 . An analysis was planned when the primary efficacy data at Week 24 were available for all patients (06 August 2019 - last patient last visit for double-blind part of the study). Patients without safety and tolerability issues continued in the open label with sarizotan for an additional 24 weeks and then another 48 weeks if no safety issues were present.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlacebo
Started335640
Completed274636
Not completed6104

Outcome measures

PrimaryReduction in Respiratory Abnormality in Patients With Rett Syndrome

Measured as the percent change in the number of apnea episodes per hour during awake time, calculated using an ambulatory data acquisition system (BioRadioTM) as part of home monitoring procedure. BioRadioTM record specific respiratory and cardiac parameters.

Time frame:
Baseline up to week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · % of change in mean counts per hr
Reduction in Respiratory Abnormality in Patients With Rett Syndrome
% of change in mean counts per hrSarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlacebo
Reduction in Respiratory Abnormality in Patients With Rett Syndrome1.54 ± 10.122813.211 ± 7.507518.503 ± 8.441
Statistical analysis
  • Sarizotan High Dose vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6411 · Mean difference (final values): -5.292 · 95% CI -27.741 to 17.157
  • Sarizotan Low Dose vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2011 · Mean difference (final values): -16.966 · 95% CI -43.119 to 9.186
SecondaryEfficacy of Sarizotan Assessed by the Caregiver-rated Impression of Change

Caregiver-rated Impression of Change (CIC): 7-point scale requiring the caregiver to rate how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to the baseline state. 7-point Likert-type scale for which ratings range from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse, with 4 = no change. This caregiver-rated measure considered activities, behavior, mood and functioning. This rating was performed in consultation with the study Investigator but was based largely on the caregivers' evaluation during the reporting period. The single rating of the CIC was to be based on changes in the following domains: • Activities (watching TV, interest in conversations around her, cooperation during toileting, dressing/bathing, etc.), • Communication (verbal or by eye movements, hand movements, or head movements), • Behavior (agitation, refusal to feed, scratching, social avoidance), • Participation in family/outdoor/social events)

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Efficacy of Sarizotan Assessed by the Caregiver-rated Impression of Change
score on a scaleSarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlacebo
Efficacy of Sarizotan Assessed by the Caregiver-rated Impression of Change3.6 ± 0.673.5 ± 1.123.4 ± 0.79

Adverse events

Collected over AEs will be collected, from the time of signing of Informed Consent to the end of the safety follow-up period (14 days after last dose of study medication at 24 weeks). In addition, all subjects will be followed up for 30 days after last dose for SAEs, up to a total of 28 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sarizotan Low Dose0/33 (0%)2/33 (6.1%)25/33 (75.8%)
Sarizotan High Dose0/56 (0%)10/56 (17.9%)46/56 (82.1%)
Placebo0/39 (0%)5/39 (12.8%)30/39 (76.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent serious events
EventSarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlacebo
Accidental OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/330/562/39
SomnolenceNervous system disorders0/332/561/39
SeizureNervous system disorders1/330/560/39
Gingival HypertrophyGastrointestinal disorders1/330/560/39
Lower respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/331/560/39
GingivitisInfections and infestations1/330/560/39
Medication errorInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/331/561/39
Electrocardiogram QT prolongedInvestigations0/331/561/39
Femur FractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/330/561/39
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/331/560/39
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 13
Most frequent other events
EventSarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlacebo
SeizureNervous system disorders8/3315/565/39
SomnolenceNervous system disorders2/3310/566/39
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders5/332/562/39
Psychomotor hyperactivityNervous system disorders4/331/563/39
PyrexiaGeneral disorders4/333/560/39
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/333/564/39
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/334/564/39
DystoniaNervous system disorders3/333/561/39
Sleep DisorderPsychiatric disorders3/334/561/39
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders3/332/562/39

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlaceboTotal
<=18 years23352785
Between 18 and 65 years10211344
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlaceboTotal
Mean13.23 ± 7.19515.55 ± 9.36214.13 ± 9.15514.51 ± 8.780
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlaceboTotal
Female335640129
Male0000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino45413
Not Hispanic or Latino295136116
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian8161337
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0101
Black or African American1135
White23372282
More than one race1001
Unknown or Not Reported0123
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Sarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlaceboTotal
United States11191141
Italy813930
United Kingdom510621
Australia1023
India8141234
Duration of Rett syndrome
Duration of Rett syndrome(months)Sarizotan Low DoseSarizotan High DosePlaceboTotal
Mean87.90 ± 72.53697.18 ± 72.92273.94 ± 65.80087.94 ± 70.696
08

Study locations

14 sites
  • University of Alabama
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • University of California
    San Diego, California 92093, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, United States
  • Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • South Metropolitan Health Service Fiona Stanley Hospital
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6961, Australia
  • Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences
    Kochi, Kerala 682041, India
  • Vijaya Health Centre
    Chennai, Tamilnadu 600 026, India
  • P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre
    Mumbai, 400 016, India
  • Jaslok Hospital and Research centre
    Mumbai, 400 026, India
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences
    New Delhi, 110 029, India
  • A.O.U. Senese Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte
    Siena, Tuscany 53100, Italy
  • U.O. Neuropsichiatria Infantile
    Milano, 20142, Italy
  • King's College Hospital
    London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Abdala AP, Dutschmann M, Bissonnette JM, Paton JF. Correction of respiratory disorders in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Oct 19;107(42):18208-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012104107. Epub 2010 Oct 4. PubMed 20921395 ↗
  • Abdala AP, Bissonnette JM, Newman-Tancredi A. Pinpointing brainstem mechanisms responsible for autonomic dysfunction in Rett syndrome: therapeutic perspectives for 5-HT1A agonists. Front Physiol. 2014 May 30;5:205. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00205. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24910619 ↗
  • Abdala AP, Lioy DT, Garg SK, Knopp SJ, Paton JF, Bissonnette JM. Effect of Sarizotan, a 5-HT1a and D2-like receptor agonist, on respiration in three mouse models of Rett syndrome. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014 Jun;50(6):1031-9. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2013-0372OC. PubMed 24351104 ↗
  • Adams JA, Zabaleta IA, Stroh D, Sackner MA. Measurement of breath amplitudes: comparison of three noninvasive respiratory monitors to integrated pneumotachograph. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1993 Oct;16(4):254-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950160408. PubMed 8265274 ↗
  • Bloch KE, Li Y, Sackner MA, Russi EW. Breathing pattern during sleep disruptive snoring. Eur Respir J. 1997 Mar;10(3):576-86. PubMed 9072988 ↗
  • Brouillette RT, Morrow AS, Weese-Mayer DE, Hunt CE. Comparison of respiratory inductive plethysmography and thoracic impedance for apnea monitoring. J Pediatr. 1987 Sep;111(3):377-83. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80457-2. PubMed 3625404 ↗
  • Byard RW. Forensic issues and possible mechanisms of sudden death in Rett syndrome. J Clin Forensic Med. 2006 Feb;13(2):96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.013. Epub 2005 Nov 2. PubMed 16263320 ↗
  • Cantineau JP, Escourrou P, Sartene R, Gaultier C, Goldman M. Accuracy of respiratory inductive plethysmography during wakefulness and sleep in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 1992 Oct;102(4):1145-51. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.4.1145. PubMed 1395758 ↗
  • Clarenbach CF, Senn O, Brack T, Kohler M, Bloch KE. Monitoring of ventilation during exercise by a portable respiratory inductive plethysmograph. Chest. 2005 Sep;128(3):1282-90. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.3.1282. PubMed 16162719 ↗
  • Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B, Claman D, Goldberg R, Gottlieb DJ, Hudgel D, Sateia M, Schwab R; Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Dec 15;3(7):737-47. PubMed 18198809 ↗
  • Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0, May 28, 2009 (v4.03 June 14, 2010), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
  • FitzGerald PM, Jankovic J, Percy AK. Rett syndrome and associated movement disorders. Mov Disord. 1990;5(3):195-202. doi: 10.1002/mds.870050303. PubMed 2388636 ↗
  • Guy W (Ed). Clinical Global Impressions. In ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, revised, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare Pub. No. (ADM) 76-338. Rockville, MD: NIMH, 1976, 217-222.
  • Hammer J, Newth CJ, Deakers TW. Validation of the phase angle technique as an objective measure of upper airway obstruction. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995 Mar;19(3):167-73. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950190305. PubMed 7792119 ↗
  • Julu PO, Kerr AM, Hansen S, Apartopoulos F, Jamal GA. Immaturity of medullary cardiorespiratory neurones leading to inappropriate autonomic reactions as a likely cause of sudden death in Rett's syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1997 Nov;77(5):464-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.77.5.463c. No abstract available. PubMed 9487980 ↗
  • Julu PO, Kerr AM, Apartopoulos F, Al-Rawas S, Engerstrom IW, Engerstrom L, Jamal GA, Hansen S. Characterisation of breathing and associated central autonomic dysfunction in the Rett disorder. Arch Dis Child. 2001 Jul;85(1):29-37. doi: 10.1136/adc.85.1.29. PubMed 11420195 ↗
  • Julu PO, Engerstrom IW, Hansen S, Apartopoulos F, Engerstrom B, Pini G, Delamont RS, Smeets EE. Cardiorespiratory challenges in Rett's syndrome. Lancet. 2008 Jun 14;371(9629):1981-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60849-1. No abstract available. PubMed 18555901 ↗
  • Katz DM, Dutschmann M, Ramirez JM, Hilaire G. Breathing disorders in Rett syndrome: progressive neurochemical dysfunction in the respiratory network after birth. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009 Aug 31;168(1-2):101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2009.04.017. Epub 2009 Apr 24. PubMed 19394452 ↗
  • Kerr AM, Armstrong DD, Prescott RJ, Doyle D, Kearney DL. Rett syndrome: analysis of deaths in the British survey. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;6 Suppl 1:71-4. PubMed 9452925 ↗
  • Khwaja OS, Ho E, Barnes KV, O'Leary HM, Pereira LM, Finkelstein Y, Nelson CA 3rd, Vogel-Farley V, DeGregorio G, Holm IA, Khatwa U, Kapur K, Alexander ME, Finnegan DM, Cantwell NG, Walco AC, Rappaport L, Gregas M, Fichorova RN, Shannon MW, Sur M, Kaufmann WE. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary assessment of efficacy of mecasermin (recombinant human IGF-1) for the treatment of Rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 25;111(12):4596-601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311141111. Epub 2014 Mar 12. PubMed 24623853 ↗
  • Konno K, Mead J. Measurement of the separate volume changes of rib cage and abdomen during breathing. J Appl Physiol. 1967 Mar;22(3):407-22. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1967.22.3.407. No abstract available. PubMed 4225383 ↗
  • Landon C. Respiratory monitoring: Advantages of inductive plethysmography over impedance pneumograpy. VivoMetrics, VMLA-039-02, 2003.
  • Leino K, Nunes S, Valta P, Takala J. Validation of a new respiratory inductive plethysmograph. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Jan;45(1):104-11. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.450116.x. PubMed 11152021 ↗
  • Loube DI, Andrada T, Howard RS. Accuracy of respiratory inductive plethysmography for the diagnosis of upper airway resistance syndrome. Chest. 1999 May;115(5):1333-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.5.1333. PubMed 10334149 ↗
  • Neul JL, Fang P, Barrish J, Lane J, Caeg EB, Smith EO, Zoghbi H, Percy A, Glaze DG. Specific mutations in methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 confer different severity in Rett syndrome. Neurology. 2008 Apr 15;70(16):1313-21. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000291011.54508.aa. Epub 2008 Mar 12. PubMed 18337588 ↗
  • Neul JL, Kaufmann WE, Glaze DG, Christodoulou J, Clarke AJ, Bahi-Buisson N, Leonard H, Bailey ME, Schanen NC, Zappella M, Renieri A, Huppke P, Percy AK; RettSearch Consortium. Rett syndrome: revised diagnostic criteria and nomenclature. Ann Neurol. 2010 Dec;68(6):944-50. doi: 10.1002/ana.22124. PubMed 21154482 ↗
  • Neul JL, Glaze DG, Percy AK, Feyma T, Beisang A, Dinh T, Suter B, Anagnostou E, Snape M, Horrigan J, Jones NE. Improving Treatment Trial Outcomes for Rett Syndrome: The Development of Rett-specific Anchors for the Clinical Global Impression Scale. J Child Neurol. 2015 Nov;30(13):1743-8. doi: 10.1177/0883073815579707. Epub 2015 Apr 20. PubMed 25895911 ↗
  • Sackner MA, Watson H, Belsito AS, Feinerman D, Suarez M, Gonzalez G, Bizousky F, Krieger B. Calibration of respiratory inductive plethysmograph during natural breathing. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 Jan;66(1):410-20. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.66.1.410. PubMed 2917945 ↗
  • Weng SM, Bailey ME, Cobb SR. Rett syndrome: from bed to bench. Pediatr Neonatol. 2011 Dec;52(6):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Nov 6. PubMed 22192257 ↗
  • Gualniera L, Singh J, Fiori F, Santosh P. Emotional Behavioural and Autonomic Dysregulation (EBAD) in Rett Syndrome - EDA and HRV monitoring using wearable sensor technology. J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;138:186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.052. Epub 2021 Apr 7. PubMed 33862302 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02790034
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2016
Start date
Oct 26, 2016
Primary completion
Aug 6, 2019
Completion
May 4, 2020
Results posted
Dec 21, 2021
Last update
Dec 21, 2021

Study contacts

Ravi Anand, MD
study director · Newron Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion