CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02776904Updated Feb 26, 2020Results posted

Movement Assessment for Concussion Management

An interventional study of Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing and Gait with single and dual task in Healthy Athlete, sponsored by University of Arkansas. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-26.

Sponsored by University of Arkansas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
327
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Previous work in the area of concussion management has focused heavily on neuro-cognitive testing. In addition to routine neuro-cognitive testing through Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT),this pilot study is designed to establish a comprehensive battery of clinical assessment through the utilization of functional movement and dynamic postural control assessments. The immediate application of these assessments will be focused on the male high school football player (who is at risk for concussion) and both female and male soccer players. Our pilot study aims determine the stability of ImPACT testing in youth athletes in light of ongoing neurodevelopment in this population. In addition, this pilot work will implement additional tools focused on assessment of dynamic balance and gait. This approach will significantly enhance predictions of subsequent musculoskeletal injuries that have been shown to occur in concussed collegiate and professional athletes and that we believe are also occurring in our high school athletes. This battery of tests will provide clinicians with invaluable information to guide both rehabilitation of and return to play (RTP) decisions for concussed high school athletes.

Read the detailed description

Experiment 1. High school athletes will complete a battery of tests including the Y-balance test, a version of the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), a divided attention gait task, the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). The SEBT is an established, reliable outcome measure of dynamic postural stability through measurement of lower extremity reach distance. Our study will also utilize a force plate during SEBT testing to allow the investigators to sensitively measure center of mass in all planes. To test gait balance control and adaptation of gait strategy which have been shown to be impaired in concussed individuals acutely and chronically, athletes will walk at self-selected speed on the GAITRite® portable gait analysis walkway for three undivided attention trials and three divided attention trials during which a cognitive task, will be imposed.The GaitRite® will calculate spatio-temporal parameters during gait and has been used in the concussion literature. The PVT is a reliable and valid measurement of simple reaction time to an auditory cue. The outcome measure will be the mean reaction time. These tests were administered by licensed physical therapists, assisted by students from both the Doctorate of Physical Therapy (DPT) and PhD physical therapy programs at UCA, before the initiation of summer 2016 football practices for all athletes in the program. The total testing time per athlete will not exceed 1.5 hours. The battery will be administered again to all athletes in the football program after the season has ended and prior to the end of the school year in the spring 2017. The 2017-2019 season will test both football and soccer (male and female athletes) and will include functional testing for athletes who have had a concussion through concussion clinic.

Experiment 2. Qualified athletic trainers or Physical Therapists, with oversight by Dr. Israel, will administer the ImPACT using the same schedule as described in Experiment 1. The ImPACT is a widely used neurocognitive testing component of the standard three-prong approach to concussion management which also includes symptom inventories and static balance assessment. The computerized test evaluates concentration, attention, memory, visual motor speed, and reaction time. High sensitivity and specificity for concussion using the ImPACT has been shown. The test also has been shown to be a valid and reliable measure in the high school and collegiate populations. Composite scores for each of the non-injured athletes will be stratified by age to examine changes across the three assessments. Hunt and Ferrara have shown significant change in baseline assessments between 9th grade and 11th and 12th grade age groups driven by 9th grade test scores indicating that biennial testing for young adolescents may not be sufficient.The current recommendation for this younger age group is annual testing, though recent studies call for the investigation of even more frequent testing, thus our plan to test at six months. ImPACT testing will not exceed 1 hour. The 2017-2018 season will test both football and soccer (male and female athletes) for ImPACT testing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Athlete

Keywords

  • Concussion
  • Football player
  • Movement assessment
  • Soccer player
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Arkansas is the lead sponsor of 391 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 34 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male football players (2016 and 2017 season)
  • Male and female soccer players (2017-2018 and 2018-2019 season) OR Athletes who have been diagnosed with a sports related concussion during the season of their assigned sport and is being seen through concussion clinic at Arkansas children's hospital

    • Age 14-18
    • Written informed consent from the parent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Athletes who have not completed pre-participation physicals
  • Any condition that the investigator determines would put the subject at risk if participating in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
327 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Healthy athlete

    Healthy athletes (14-18 years old) enrolled in sports program in local schools.

    Other: Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing · Other: Gait with single and dual task · Other: Y-Balance test · Other: Psychomotor Vigilance Task

  • Other
    Concussed athletes

    Concussed athletes from a sports related injury who are 14-18 years old and referred to a regional sports concussion clinic.

    Other: Gait with single and dual task · Other: Y-Balance test

Interventions

  • OtherImmediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing

    Computerized assessment that provides information related to visual reaction time and visual memory.

    Also known as: ImPACT

  • OtherGait with single and dual task

    Walking alone and then walking while performing a memory task on a tablet.

  • OtherY-Balance test

    Dynamic balance test measuring reaching of the leg to the anterior,postero- lateral, and postero-medial directions.

    Also known as: Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT)

  • OtherPsychomotor Vigilance Task

    Assessment measuring reaction time based on auditory cues.

    Also known as: PVT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Impact ( Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) Healthy Athlete

    Verbal memory (total % correct from design memory, total correct from memory score from X's and O's) and visual memory (total number correct/4 during module 3) Scores on verbal memory and visual memory range from 70-99 (high scores are better than low scores). Visual motor speed is comprised correct responses/4 for specific modules and the average counted correctly x3 for a specific module. Scores range from 27-39.8 (high scores are better than low scores)

    Time frame: preseason, postseason, end of the school year, pre-season year 2

  2. Impact ( Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) Healthy Athlete

    Reaction time Composite is the average correct reaction time of 3 skills Scores range from 0.5 to 0.7 Lower scores are better.

    Time frame: preseason, postseason and end of the school year and preseason the following year

  3. Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters- Gait Velocity

    For the purposes of this study, parameters that were captured by the GAITRite® include: gait velocity (cm/s); Subjects walk on pathway during single task and dual task is walking while performing a visual memory task on a tablet

    Time frame: Cross-sectional baseline

  4. Gait Parameters: Step Length (Cm)

    For the purposes of this study, parameters that were captured by the GAITRite® include:step length (cm);

    Time frame: cross-sectional baseline

  5. Gait Parameters- Percent of DLS

    DLS, defined as the percent of the gait cycle (%GC) when both feet are on the ground measured in healthy males and female athletes and concussed males and female athletes

    Time frame: cross-sectional baseline

  6. Gait Parameters- % of Gait Cycle in SLS

    For the purposes of this study, parameters that were captured by the GAITRite® include: SLS, defined as the %GC weight bearing through a single limb.

    Time frame: cross-sectional baseline

  7. Y Balance Assessment- Anterior Reach Direction

    subset from healthy athlete group and concussed group Measured on YBT in anterior direction

    Time frame: Cross sectional baseline

  8. Y Balance Assessment- Posterolateral Reach Direction

    subset from healthy athlete group and concussed group Measured on YBT in postero-lateral direction.

    Time frame: Cross sectional baseline

  9. Y Balance Assessment- Postero-medial Reach Direction

    subset from healthy athlete group and concussed group Measured on YBT in postero-medial direction.

    Time frame: Cross sectional baseline

  10. Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT)

    The PVT is a reliable and valid measurement of simple reaction time to an auditory cue. The outcome measure will be the mean reaction time.

    Time frame: cross-sectional baseline

07

Results

Posted Feb 26, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHealthy AthletesConcussed Athletes
Started28146
Gait assessment17832
Impact2146
Completed28146
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryImpact ( Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) Healthy Athlete

Verbal memory (total % correct from design memory, total correct from memory score from X's and O's) and visual memory (total number correct/4 during module 3) Scores on verbal memory and visual memory range from 70-99 (high scores are better than low scores). Visual motor speed is comprised correct responses/4 for specific modules and the average counted correctly x3 for a specific module. Scores range from 27-39.8 (high scores are better than low scores)

Time frame:
preseason, postseason, end of the school year, pre-season year 2
Reported as:
Mean · score on Immediate post concussion scale
Impact ( Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) Healthy Athlete
score on Immediate post concussion scaleHealthy Athlete IMPACT Score
pre season verbal memory86.33 ± 1.470
post season year verbal memory84.0 ± 2.379
end of school verbal memory90.73 ± 2.095
pre-season year 2 verbal memory89.1436 ± 2.707
pre-season visual memory69.8361 ± 3.54
post season visual memory81.2 ± 2.5824
end of the school year visual memory81.4659 ± 2.98
pre-season year 2 visual memory82.2006 ± 2.26
preseason visual motor composite36.371 ± 2.007
post season visual motor36.727 ± 2.05
end of school visual motor38.897 ± 2.215
pre-season year 2 visual motor39.3035 ± 1.665
Statistical analysis
  • Healthy Athlete IMPACT Score · ANOVA · p = 0.0003 (Adjustment with Tukey-Kramer)3 DF
  • Healthy Athlete IMPACT Score · ANOVA · p = 0.0281 (Adjusted for multiple comparisons using Tukey-Kramer)DF 3
  • Healthy Athlete IMPACT Score · ANOVA · p = 0.0035 (Adjusted for multiple comparisons)DF 3
PrimaryImpact ( Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) Healthy Athlete

Reaction time Composite is the average correct reaction time of 3 skills Scores range from 0.5 to 0.7 Lower scores are better.

Time frame:
preseason, postseason and end of the school year and preseason the following year
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Impact ( Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing) Healthy Athlete
secondsHealthy Athlete IMPACT Score
Preseason0.5797 ± 0.016
Post Season0.5780 ± 0.01615
End of the school year0.5902 ± 0.0166
Pre-season year 20.6089 ± 0.01792
Statistical analysis
  • Healthy Athlete IMPACT Score · ANOVA · p = 0.2637 (Adjusted for multiple comparisons using Tukey-Kramer)
PrimarySpatiotemporal Gait Parameters- Gait Velocity

For the purposes of this study, parameters that were captured by the GAITRite® include: gait velocity (cm/s); Subjects walk on pathway during single task and dual task is walking while performing a visual memory task on a tablet

Time frame:
Cross-sectional baseline
Reported as:
Mean · cm/sec
Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters- Gait Velocity
cm/secGait Assessment- Velocity
Single Task Gait Velocity Male1.236 ± 0.163
Single Task Gait Velocity Female1.449 ± 0.199
Dual Task Gait Velocity Male1.030 ± 0.185
Dual Task Gait Velocity Female1.232 ± 0.196
Single Task Gait Velocity Female Concussed1.207 ± 0.238
Dual Task Gait Velocity Female Concussed0.974 ± 0.18
Single Task Gait Velocity Male Concussed1.125 ± 0.14
Dual Task Gait Velocity Male Concussed0.922 ± 0.18
Statistical analysis
  • Gait Assessment- Velocity · ANOVA · p = <0.001 (Used Tukey's Adjustment)
PrimaryGait Parameters: Step Length (Cm)

For the purposes of this study, parameters that were captured by the GAITRite® include:step length (cm);

Time frame:
cross-sectional baseline
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Gait Parameters: Step Length (Cm)
cmGait Assessment
Single task step length males68.031 ± 6.779
Single task step length female65.483 ± 6.021
Dual Task Step Length Male60.073 ± 7.858
Dual Task Step Length Female58.650 ± 5.885
Single Task Step Length Female concussed61.26 ± 7.94
Dual Task Gait step length Female Concussed57.22 ± 12.79
Single Task Step length Male Concussed65.63 ± 5.11
Dual Task Step length Male Concussed57.71 ± 6.37
Statistical analysis
  • Gait Assessment · ANOVA · p = < 0.0001Tukey's post hoc method for the pair wise comparisons between walk status and sex for step length.
PrimaryGait Parameters- Percent of DLS

DLS, defined as the percent of the gait cycle (%GC) when both feet are on the ground measured in healthy males and female athletes and concussed males and female athletes

Time frame:
cross-sectional baseline
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of GC spent on 2 limbs
Gait Parameters- Percent of DLS
percentage of GC spent on 2 limbsGait Assessment- DLS
Single task % GC in DLS Male29.077 ± 2.631
Single task % GC in DLS Female26.922 ± 2.648
Dual task % GC in DLS Male31.92 ± 3.461
Dual task % GC in DLS Females29.542 ± 3.085
Single Task % GC in DLS Female Concussed28.09 ± 3.66
Dual Task % of GC in DLS Female30.45 ± 5.29
Single task % of GC in DLS male concussed30.33 ± 2.13
Dual Task % GC in DLS Male Concussed32.32 ± 2.66
Statistical analysis
  • Gait Assessment- DLS · ANOVA · p = < 0.0001Tukey's post hoc method for the pairwise comparisons with p\<.05.
PrimaryGait Parameters- % of Gait Cycle in SLS

For the purposes of this study, parameters that were captured by the GAITRite® include: SLS, defined as the %GC weight bearing through a single limb.

Time frame:
cross-sectional baseline
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of gait cycle spent on 1 limb
Gait Parameters- % of Gait Cycle in SLS
percentage of gait cycle spent on 1 limbGait Assessment- SLS Healthy Athlete
Single task % GC in SLS Male35.290 ± 1.504
Single task % GC in SLS Female36.522 ± 1.352
Dual task % GC in SLS Male34.05 ± 1.901
Dual task % GC in SLS Females35.112 ± 1.549
Single Task % GC Female Concussed35.85 ± 1.796
Dual Task % GC Female Concussed34.407 ± 1.974
Single task % of GC in SLS male concussed34.62 ± 1.03
Dual Task % GC in SLS Male Concussed33.58 ± 1.26
Statistical analysis
  • Gait Assessment- SLS Healthy Athlete · ANOVA · p = < 0.0001Tukey's post hoc method for pairwise comparison between walk status and sex for %GC in SLS.
PrimaryY Balance Assessment- Anterior Reach Direction

subset from healthy athlete group and concussed group Measured on YBT in anterior direction

Time frame:
Cross sectional baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Index
Y Balance Assessment- Anterior Reach Direction
IndexY Balance Data
Male healthy athletes95.34 ± 10.814
Female healthy athletes94.45 ± 14.52
male acute concussed95.13 ± 9.8
female acute concussed95.14 ± 12.48
Statistical analysis
  • Y Balance Data · ANOVA · p = >0.05
PrimaryY Balance Assessment- Posterolateral Reach Direction

subset from healthy athlete group and concussed group Measured on YBT in postero-lateral direction.

Time frame:
Cross sectional baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Index
Y Balance Assessment- Posterolateral Reach Direction
IndexY Balance Data
Male healthy athletes78.08 ± 10.697
Female healthy athletes70.138 ± 10.120
Male acute concussed74.21 ± 10.44
female acute concussed83.89 ± 14.14
Statistical analysis
  • Y Balance Data · ANOVA · p = >0.05
PrimaryY Balance Assessment- Postero-medial Reach Direction

subset from healthy athlete group and concussed group Measured on YBT in postero-medial direction.

Time frame:
Cross sectional baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Index
Y Balance Assessment- Postero-medial Reach Direction
IndexY Balance Data
Male healthy athletes69.750 ± 12.590
Female healthy athletes65.860 ± 8.768
male acute concussed68.80 ± 11.13
female acute concussed69.17 ± 12.66
Statistical analysis
  • Y Balance Data · ANOVA · p = >0.05
PrimaryPsychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT)

The PVT is a reliable and valid measurement of simple reaction time to an auditory cue. The outcome measure will be the mean reaction time.

Time frame:
cross-sectional baseline
Reported as:
Mean · ms
Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT)
msHealthy Athlete PVT Score
Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT)218.57 ± 62.78

Adverse events

Collected over 3 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Healthy Athletes0/281 (0%)0/281 (0%)0/281 (0%)
Concussed Athletes0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)0/46 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Healthy AthletesConcussed AthletesTotal
<=18 years28146327
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Healthy AthletesConcussed AthletesTotal
Female11617133
Male16529194
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Healthy AthletesConcussed AthletesTotal
Caucasian13244176
African American1081109
Two or More Races011
Not Selected41041
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Joe T. Robinson High School
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72223, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):375-8. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200609000-00001. PubMed 16983222 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 5, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02776904
Lead sponsor
University of Arkansas
Collaborators
Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2016
Start date
Jun 1, 2016
Primary completion
May 1, 2019
Completion
May 1, 2019
Results posted
Feb 26, 2020
Last update
Feb 26, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion