CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02774356Updated Jan 18, 2017

Testing Native Language Neural Commitment at the Subcortical Level

An observational study in Language Development, sponsored by University of Minnesota. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-18.

Sponsored by University of Minnesota · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
36
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This mentored student research project is funded by the Graduate Research Partnership Program with a projected timeline for data collection in the summer of 2015. Previous research has shown that language experience alters the way the human brain processes speech information. This phenomenon takes place very early in life and is referred to as Native Language Neural Commitment. For instance, as the Japanese language does not have the l-r speech sound contrast, Japanese infants start to show difficulty in hearing differences between the English l and r sounds at 12 months of age but not when they were at 6 months old. Learning the l-r distinction later in life proves to be very difficult for the Japanese school students and adults. Brain imaging studies have further revealed specific brain regions that are changed by language learning. But the evidence in support of the Native Language Neural Commitment theory is based on cortical-level measures. The proposed study extends the measurement to the subcortical level at the brainstem. The target language that the investigators are interested in studying is Mandarin Chinese, which is known for its use of lexical tones to express different words. For instance, the Chinese syllable "ma" means "mother" when it is spoken with a flat tone, and it means "hemp" when spoken with a rising tone. English, by contrast, does not employ lexical tones, and it is considered a non-tonal language. Does the Chinese learning experience fundamental change the way that pitch information is coded in the human brain? Does it happen at both cortical and subcortical levels? Previous research has shown evidence for a positive answer to both questions. But the direct evidence for brain-behavior correlations at the subcortical level is still missing.

The proposed cross-language study will test Chinese-speaking and English-speaking adults to investigate Native Language Neural Commitment at the subcortical level. The investigators are interested in differences in the two subject populations by examining the relationship between brainstem pitch tracking and behavioral pitch perception in linguistic and nonlinguistic stimuli.

The results of the proposed project will contribute to the understanding the role of the subcortical brainstem in Native Language Neural Commitment, which have significant implications for the development of auditory/speech training programs and assessment tools utilizing the brainstem frequency following measure to monitor progress in second language learning and test clinical populations.

02

Conditions studied

  • Language Development

Keywords

  • Brainstem
  • Encoding
  • Pitch
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 1,184 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 132 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Normal healthy adult population.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Native Mandarin Chinese speakers
  2. Native English speakers
  3. Non-musicians.
  4. English speakers must have no prior experience with a tonal language.
  5. Normal hearing
  6. Age range to 18-50.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Speech-language-hearing disorders, neurophysiological/psychiatric conditions, including stroke or brain injuries, which would prevent the subject from sitting still and performing the experimental tasks.
  2. Subjects with three or more than three years of musical practice/training will be excluded.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Native Chinese speakers
  • Native English speakers without experience of a tonal language
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pitch strength of Brainstem EEG (electroencephalography) responses

    EEG signals to pitch changes in speech and nonspeech sounds are analyzed to obtain the brainstem frequency following responses (FFRs). Autocorrelation method will be applied to the FFRs to quantify each participant's brainstem pitch strength. Higher average autocorrelation value indicates greater pitch strength. This EEG measure is to see whether tonal-language speakers and nontonal language speakers differ in brainstem encoding of pitch information.

    Time frame: Outcome will be measured at one 1.5-hr session after the participant is recruited.

  2. Reaction time in millesecond for speech perception of syllables with varying pitch contour

    This behavioral measure in terms of syllable perception is to test whether syllabic perception is influenced by pitch information and whether tonal-language speakers' sensitivity towards pitch differences would affect the speech perception differently.

    Time frame: Outcome will be measured at one 1.5-hr session after the participant is recruited.

  3. Correlation between the EEG and the Behavioral measures

    Time frame: Outcome will be measured at one 1.5-hr session after the participant is recruited.

  4. Pitch tracking accuracy of Brainstem EEG (electroencephalography) responses

    Strength of stimulus-to-response correlation will assessed. Higher correlation coefficient between the fundamental frequency of the stimulus and that of the FFR response will indicate greater accuracy of the brainstem pitch tracking. This EEG measure is to see whether tonal-language speakers and nontonal language speakers differ in brainstem encoding of pitch information.

    Time frame: Outcome will be measured at one 1.5-hr session after the participant is recruited.

  5. Duration estimate of syllables with varying pitch contour

    This behavioral measure in terms of syllable duration estimation is to test whether duration estimation is influenced by pitch information and whether tonal-language speakers' sensitivity towards pitch differences would affect the duration estimation differently.

    Time frame: Outcome will be measured at one 1.5-hr session after the participant is recruited.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Zhang Lab at Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Krishnan A, Xu Y, Gandour J, Cariani P. Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):161-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.05.004. PubMed 15935624 ↗
  • Zhang Y, Kuhl PK, Imada T, Kotani M, Tohkura Y. Effects of language experience: neural commitment to language-specific auditory patterns. Neuroimage. 2005 Jul 1;26(3):703-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.040. Epub 2005 Apr 13. PubMed 15955480 ↗
  • Bidelman GM, Gandour JT, Krishnan A. Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch. Brain Cogn. 2011 Oct;77(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 10. PubMed 21835531 ↗
  • Marmel F, Linley D, Carlyon RP, Gockel HE, Hopkins K, Plack CJ. Subcortical neural synchrony and absolute thresholds predict frequency discrimination independently. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct;14(5):757-66. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0402-3. Epub 2013 Jun 13. PubMed 23760984 ↗
  • Xu Q, Gong Q. Frequency difference beyond behavioral limen reflected by frequency following response of human auditory Brainstem. Biomed Eng Online. 2014 Aug 9;13:114. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-13-114. PubMed 25108552 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02774356
Lead sponsor
University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 17, 2016
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Last update
Jan 18, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion