CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02772874FISTUpdated Aug 17, 2017

Fecal Incontinence Subtypes in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders

An observational study in Fecal Incontinence, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-17.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
21
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Fecal incontinence (FI) is clinically subtyped as urge FI and passive FI based on symptoms, however the pathophysiologic significance of this subtyping is not known. FI is commonly encountered in women with pelvic floor disorders. This study aims to compare characteristics of clinical severity, quality of life, anatomy, and physiology of urge FI versus passive FI. Urogynecology patients greater than age 18 with FI at least monthly over the last 3 months will be recruited for participation. Participants will be divided into urge FI subtype and passive FI subtype. Participants will complete validated questionnaires on clinical severity and quality of life, both as related to FI and general heath. Participants will undergo pelvic examination, endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry for evaluation of anatomic and physiologic pathology. Results between both groups will be compared. The investigators hypothesize that clinical, anatomic, and physiologic characteristics differ between urge-predominant fecal incontinence and passive-predominant fecal incontinence in women with pelvic floor disorders.

Read the detailed description

Fecal incontinence greatly affects quality of life and can negatively impact an individual's activity level, body image, and likelihood of institutionalization. Female sex and advancing age are known independent risk factors for fecal incontinence. Among community dwelling adults, the prevalence of fecal incontinence has ranged from 0.4 to 18 percent. Prevalence rates of fecal incontinence are even higher in women with pelvic floor disorders, reaching up to 41%, illustrating the large bearing on quality of life of this patient population.

Fecal incontinence can be subtyped into three clinical subtypes: urge fecal incontinence, passive fecal incontinence, and fecal seepage. Urge incontinence refers to loss of fecal matter in spite of active attempts to retain contents; passive incontinence refers to involuntary loss of stool without awareness. Despite the clinical distinction of fecal incontinence subtypes, the pathophysiology of these subtypes is not known. Existing practice guidelines recommend categorizing patients into these subtypes, evaluating symptom severity by patient-reported outcomes, and assessing function of the anorectal complex with imaging and physiologic tests to best tailor management options. Although the framework for subtyping fecal incontinence exists, specific associations between subtypes and clinical, anatomic, and physiologic findings in women with pelvic floor disorders are not well delineated. Further characterizing the subtypes in relation to specific clinical, anatomic, and physiologic findings may allow us to better approach the treatment of women with fecal incontinence.

Our comparison of the two fecal incontinence subtypes, urge-predominant fecal incontinence and passive fecal incontinence, will be evaluated for clinical severity, impact on quality of life, and anatomic and physiologic characteristics using validated instruments.

Primary Aim:

To compare the severity of urge fecal incontinence versus passive fecal incontinence in women with pelvic floor disorders.

Secondary Aims:

  1. To compare anatomic characteristics in urge fecal incontinence versus passive fecal incontinence in women with pelvic floor disorders.
  2. To compare physiologic characteristics in urge fecal incontinence versus passive fecal incontinence in women with pelvic floor disorders.
  3. To compare quality of life characteristics in urge fecal incontinence versus passive fecal incontinence in women with pelvic floor disorders.
  4. To compare anorectal manometry results and patient preference of testing performed in the left lateral position versus dorsal lithotomy position.

Null Hypothesis: Clinical, anatomic, and physiologic characteristics do not differ between urge-predominant fecal incontinence and passive-predominant fecal incontinence in women with pelvic floor disorders.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fecal Incontinence

Keywords

  • fecal incontinence
  • severity
  • ultrasound
  • anorectal manometry
  • classification
03

In context

Fecal Incontinence

312 studies on the registry are indexed under Fecal Incontinence; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 100 across 79 observational studies indexed under Fecal Incontinence.

Browse Fecal Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women greater than age 18 with fecal incontinence at least monthly over the last 3 months being evaluated in the Urogynecology office setting.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women greater than age 18 with fecal incontinence at least monthly over the last 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Malignancy
  • Fistula
  • Rectal prolapse
  • Prior colorectal surgery
  • Prior radiation
  • Fecal impaction
  • Sole flatal incontinence
  • Neurologic disorders
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Urge-predominant

    All subjects who report fecal incontinence that is primarily urge-predominant will undergo self-administered questionnaires, pelvic examination, endoanal ultrasound, and anorectal manometry.

    Other: No intervention

  • Passive-predominant

    All subjects who report fecal incontinence that is primarily passive-predominant will undergo self-administered questionnaires, pelvic examination, endoanal ultrasound, and anorectal manometry.

    Other: No intervention

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    No intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fecal incontinence severity as measured by mean Vaizey score

    Vaizey score range 0 to 24

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed for this outcome at their sole primary visit and data will be presented approximately 1 year later.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Anal anatomy patency as measured by mean anal sphincter complex thickness (millimeters).

    Internal anal sphincter thickness (millimeters) and external anal sphincter thickness (millimeters) at 12, 3, 6, 9 o'clock.

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed for this outcome at their sole primary visit and data will be presented approximately 1 year later.

  2. Anal anatomy patency as measured by presence or absence of defects using endoanal ultrasound.

    The presence of defects anywhere along internal anal sphincter or external anal sphincter will be measured as present or absent.

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed for this outcome at their sole primary visit and data will be presented approximately 1 year later.

  3. Anal function as measured by the anorectal manometry measurements (see description below).

    Mean anal resting pressure at high pressure zone (mmHg), mean anal squeeze pressure (mmHg), mean anal squeeze duration (seconds), mean rectal first sensation capacity (cc), mean rectal normal urge capacity (cc), mean rectal strong urge capacity (cc), and mean maximum tolerated volume capacity (cc).

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed for this outcome at their sole primary visit and data will be presented approximately 1 year later.

  4. Rectal function as measured by the anorectal manometry measurements (see description below).

    Mean rectal first sensation capacity (cc), mean rectal normal urge capacity (cc), mean rectal strong urge capacity (cc), and mean maximum tolerated volume capacity (cc).

    Time frame: Participants will be assessed for this outcome at their sole primary visit and data will be presented approximately 1 year later.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pennsylvania, Division of Urogynecology
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bharucha AE, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR, Seide BM, McKeon K, Schleck CD, Melton LJ. Prevalence and burden of fecal incontinence: a population-based study in women. Gastroenterology. 2005 Jul;129(1):42-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.006. PubMed 16012933 ↗
  • Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA. 1995 Aug 16;274(7):559-61. PubMed 7629985 ↗
  • Macmillan AK, Merrie AE, Marshall RJ, Parry BR. The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1341-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0593-0. PubMed 15484348 ↗
  • Bezerra LR, Vasconcelos Neto JA, Vasconcelos CT, Karbage SA, Lima AC, Frota IP, Rocha AB, Macedo SR, Coelho CF, Costa MK, Souza GC, Regadas SM, Augusto KL. Prevalence of unreported bowel symptoms in women with pelvic floor dysfunction and the impact on their quality of life. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jul;25(7):927-33. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2317-2. Epub 2014 Feb 22. PubMed 24562788 ↗
  • Rao SS; American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Aug;99(8):1585-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40105.x. No abstract available. PubMed 15307881 ↗
  • Rao SS. Pathophysiology of adult fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S14-22. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.013. PubMed 14978634 ↗
  • Pahwa AK, Khanijow KD, Harvie HS, Arya LA, Andy UU. Comparison of Patient Impact and Clinical Characteristics Between Urgency and Passive Fecal Incontinence Phenotypes. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Sep;26(9):570-574. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000603. PubMed 29979355 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 17, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02772874
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 16, 2016
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Jul 1, 2016
Last update
Aug 17, 2017

Study contacts

Avita K Pahwa, MD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion