CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02742844Updated Jul 7, 2020

Clinical Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of the IMP in Patients With Non Healing Wounds Originating From Ulcers

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of APZ2 application in Skin Ulcer Venous Stasis Chronic, sponsored by RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG. Terminated at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-07.

Sponsored by RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
COVID-19 pandemic and patient recruitment issues
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
13
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy (by monitoring the wound size reduction) and safety (by monitoring occurring adverse events) of the investigational medicinal product APZ2 after one single application on chronic venous leg ulcer wounds.

Read the detailed description

This is an interventional, single arm, phase I/IIa clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of ABCB5+ mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on wound healing in patients with chronic venous ulcer (CVU). Autologous MSCs will be isolated ex vivo from a small skin biopsy and will be expanded in vitro. The IMP APZ2 containing the ABCB5+ cells will then be applied on the wound surface of CVU under local anesthesia.

Patients are followed up for efficacy for 3 months which allows to distinguish actual wound healing from transient wound coverage.

The wound healing process will be documented by standardized photography. The wound size evaluation will start on the day of the first change of wound dressing. The quality of the wound healing process will be assessed on the basis of formation of granulation tissue, epithelialization and wound exudation.

Pain will be assessed using a numerical rating scale and quality of life will be investigated with standardized and validated questionnaires. To assess long-term safety of APZ2 an additional follow-up visit at Month 12 post IMP application is included.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Ulcer Venous Stasis Chronic

Keywords

  • phase I/IIa
  • mesenchymal stem cells
  • ABCB5+
  • APZ2
  • chronic venous ulcer
  • varicose ulcer
  • skin ulcer
  • advanced therapy medicinal product
  • APZ2-II-01
  • autologous use
  • somatic cell therapy
03

In context

Varicose Ulcer

378 studies on the registry are indexed under Varicose Ulcer; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 64 across 325 interventional studies indexed under Varicose Ulcer.

Browse Varicose Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female patients aged 18 to 85 years;
  2. Chronic venous leg ulcer (as defined by the current AWMF guidelines: therapy resistant ulcer that shows no improvement within 3 months despite of optimal phlebological therapies or is not healed within 12 months) for at least 6 weeks but shorter than 3 years diagnosed by doppler ultrasonography (DUS), ankle brachial index (ABI, 0.9-1.3), physical examination and dermatological review;
  3. Wound size between 5 and 50 square cm measured by a standardized photography at the screening visit;
  4. Wound location between knee and ankle;
  5. Patients suffering from 2 ulcers at the same extremity, as long as these ulcers are separated by a minimum bridge of 1 cm of epithelialized skin;
  6. Patients must agree to have at least one biopsy performed before treatment. In case IMP production from the first biopsy is not successful, a second biopsy will be taken;
  7. Body mass index (BMI) between 20 and 40 kg/m²;
  8. Patients understand the nature of the procedure and are providing written informed consent prior to any clinical trial procedure;
  9. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative blood pregnancy test at Screening and at Visit 5 before the IMP application;
  10. Women of childbearing potential and their partner must be willing to use highly effective contraceptive methods during the course of the clinical trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

General exclusion criteria

  1. Evidence of the ulcer extending to the underlying muscle, tendon, or bone;
  2. Current long-term use (more than 14 days) of steroid medication above Cushing-threshold dose (>7.5 mg/d prednisone or equivalent);
  3. Diabetes mellitus that has to be evaluated by blood test (Hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] > 7.5%);
  4. Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) including claudication with need of treatment;
  5. Acute deep vein thrombosis (maximum 30 days from diagnosis) or a still untreated deep vein thrombosis;
  6. Unable to tolerate leg ulcer compression bandage;
  7. Infection of the target ulcer requiring treatment as judged clinically;
  8. Wound size \<1.5 cm² measured by a standardized photography at Visit 5;
  9. Any chronic dermatological disorders diagnosed at the investigator's discretion;
  10. Skin disorders, unrelated to the ulcer, that are present adjacent to the target wound;
  11. Current use of medications that influence wound healing: systemic immunosuppressives, cytotoxic medicinal products, and systemic steroids (above Cushing-threshold level);
  12. Known abuse of alcohol, drugs, or medicinal products;
  13. Cancerous or pre-cancerous lesions adjacent to the target wound;
  14. Patients anticipated to be unwilling or unable to comply with the requirements of the protocol;
  15. Pregnant or lactating women;
  16. Systemic infectious disease diagnosed by serology testing for syphilis (acute), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV˗1, HIV-2), hepatitis B (acute) or C infection at Screening or at Visit 2;
  17. Any known allergies to components of the IMP;
  18. Prior surgical procedures such as bypass or mesh-graft treatment within 2 months prior to IMP application;
  19. Treatment with active wound care agents (e.g. Iruxol, local antibiotics or silver dressings), which have not been paused 14 days before IMP application;
  20. Current or previous (within 30 days of enrollment) treatment with another IMP, or participation and/or under follow-up in another clinical trial;
  21. Previous participation in this clinical trial;
  22. Evidence of any other medical conditions (such as psychiatric illness, physical examination, or laboratory findings) that may interfere with the planned treatment, affect the patient's compliance, or place the patient at high risk of complications related to the treatment;
  23. Employees of the sponsor, or employees or relatives of the investigator.

Exclusion criteria for efficacy assessments

  1. A wound size enlargement of more than 25% between the wound assessment at the screening visit and the wound assessment at Visit 5;
  2. A wound size reduction of more than 50% between the wound assessment at the screening visit and wound assessment at Visit 5.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
13 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    APZ2 application

    Topical, single application of APZ2; 500000 cells per square cm;

    Biological: APZ2 application

Interventions

  • BiologicalAPZ2 application

    Application of IMP on patients wound.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of wound size reduction

    Percentage of wound size reduction at Week 12, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing (last observation carried forward \[LOCF\])

    Time frame: Week 12 post baseline, or last available post-baseline measurement if the Week 12 measurement is missing

  2. Assessment of adverse event (AE) occurrence

    All during the clinical trial occurring AEs will be registered, documented and evaluated.

    Time frame: At biopsy removal, 1-3 days post biopsy, 7-10 days post biopsy, 6-12 weeks post biopsy; at baseline and days 3, 8 and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and month 12 post baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of wound size reduction

    Percentage of wound size reduction at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 (without LOCF)

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 post baseline

  2. Absolute wound size reduction

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 post baseline

  3. Proportion of patients achieving complete wound closure

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 post baseline and at any time point up to week 12

  4. Time to first complete wound closure

    A priori specification not possible

    Time frame: Between baseline and week 12 post baseline

  5. Proportion of patients achieving 30% wound closure

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 post baseline and at any time point up to week 12

  6. Time to first 30% wound closure

    A priori specification not possible

    Time frame: Between baseline and week 12 post baseline

  7. Percentage of wound epithelialization

    Amount of wound epithelialization in % of wound area will be assessed by the investigator based on image analysis of images taken from the wound.

    Time frame: At baseline and days 3, 8 and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 post baseline

  8. Formation of granulation tissue and wound exudation

    Formation of granulation tissue in % of wound area will be assessed by the investigator based on image analysis of images taken from the wound. Wound exudation will be classified by the investigator using following scores: * High: Small amounts of fluid or free fluids are visible when the dressing is removed; dressing is extensively marked or wet * Moderate: Small amounts of fluid are visible when dressing is removed; wound bed may appear glossy; Primary dressing may be lightly marked * Low: Wound bed is dry; there is no visible moisture; Primary dressing is unmarked; dressing may be adherent to wound

    Time frame: At baseline and days 3, 8 and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 post baseline

  9. Pain assessment as per numerical rating scale (NRS)

    Time frame: At baseline and days 1-3, 8 and weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 post baseline

  10. Quality of life (QoL) assessment using the SF-36 questionnaire

    Time frame: At baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 post baseline

  11. Dermatologic quality of life assessment using the DLQI questionnaire

    Time frame: At baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12 post baseline

  12. Physical examination and vital parameters

    Time frame: At Screening, baseline, week 12, month 12

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Venenzentrum der Dermatologischen und Gefäßchirurgischen Kliniken, Kliniken der Ruhr-Universität Bochum im St. Maria-Hilf-Krankenhaus
    Bochum, 44805, Germany
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
    Würzburg, 97080, Germany
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02742844
Lead sponsor
RHEACELL GmbH & Co. KG
Collaborators
Ticeba GmbH, FGK Clinical Research GmbH, Granzer Regulatory Consulting & Services
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 19, 2016
Start date
Aug 2016
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2019
Completion
Jan 15, 2019
Last update
Jul 7, 2020

Study contacts

Andreas Kerstan, PD Dr.med.
principal investigator · Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie Universitätsklinikum Würzburg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion