ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02741141PARTODYSUpdated Oct 14, 2021

A Comparative Study of the Effect of Two Partographs on the Cesarean Section Rate in Women in Spontaneous Labour

An interventional study of New partograph based on the studies of Neal and Lowe and Classical partograph in Dystocia, sponsored by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-14.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Strasbourg, France · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
the study was stopped due to a change in delivery room practices
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
633
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In the 2010-french perinatal survey, the overall cesarean section (CS) rate during labour was 21 % and 16% to 38% in case of dystocia.

The definition of " dystocia " is traditionally based on the research led by Friedman in the 1950's on a restricted population sample. Several studies over the last years seem to indicate that the different phases of labour are longer than originally described by Friedman.

Our current hypothesis is that the application of a new definition of dystocia would enable a more appropriate management of labour.

Read the detailed description

The main purpose of this study is to show a significant decrease of the CS rate with the use of the new partograph developed by Neal and Lowe.

Secondary purposes are

  • To reduce the use of oxytocin during labour without increasing maternal or neonatal morbidity;
  • To decrease immediate per-operative complications and post-operative complications associated with CS
02

Conditions studied

  • Dystocia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dystocia

55 studies on the registry are indexed under Dystocia; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 633 is above the median of 200 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Dystocia.

Browse Dystocia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Strasbourg, France is the lead sponsor of 999 studies on the registry; 358 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age ≥ 18 years

  • Affiliation to a social security insurance
  • Written consent given
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Cephalic presentation
  • ≥37 gestational weeks
  • Spontaneous onset of labour

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cesarean section
  • Induction of labour
  • Intrauterine growth restriction
  • In utero fetal death
  • Congenital malformation
  • Chorioamnionitis
  • Placenta praevia
  • Need for an emergency delivery (fetal heart rate abnormalities at admission)
  • for vaginal delivery
  • Patient under temporary guardianship, guardianship or judicial protection
  • Patient included in another study which could interfere with the results of this study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
633 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Classical partograph

    Labour dystocia is diagnosed when cervical dilation is less than 1 cm per hour or after 3 hours at complete cervical dilation without engagement of the presentation. In this case, active management of labour is started with introduction of oxytocin, artificial rupture of membranes and supportive therapy.

    Other: Classical partograph

  • Experimental
    New partograph

    The second strategy is based on the partograph developped by Neal and Lowe. An active management of labour is started when crossing the dystocia line or when there are no cervical modifications after 4 hours beyond 5 cm of cervical dilation. In this case, active management of labour is started with introduction of oxytocin, artificial rupture of membranes and supportive therapy.

    Other: New partograph based on the studies of Neal and Lowe

Interventions

  • OtherNew partograph based on the studies of Neal and Lowe

    The partograph designed by Neal and Lowe includes an "action line" which if crossed permits an active management of labour. Eventually, the only difference between the two arms is the moment when the active management of labour is started. The oxytocin is administrated according to the department protocol.

  • OtherClassical partograph

    Classical partograph used as standard care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cesarean section rate (all causes)

    Time frame: From admission in the labour ward to the delivery (duration from 0 to 24 hours approximately)

Secondary outcomes

  1. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Total amount of oxytocin used (mUI)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  2. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of uterine hyperstimulation (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  3. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of post-partum hemorrhage (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  4. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of uterine rupture (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  5. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of retained placenta (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  6. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Need of an artificial rupture of membranes (Y/N)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  7. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Color of the amniotic fluid

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  8. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Duration of the first and second stages of labour

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  9. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of vaginal delivery (spontaneous or assisted) (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  10. obstetrical measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of cesarean section (according to indication) (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  11. Maternal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Need for an epidural or general anaesthesia

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  12. Maternal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Transfusion rate (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  13. Maternal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Maternal fever during labour (°C)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  14. Maternal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of thrombo-embolic events (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  15. Maternal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears and episiotomy (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  16. Maternal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of surgical site infection, endometritis or septicemia (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  17. Neonatal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Neonatal arterial umbilical cord pH \< 7,00 and/or BD \> 12 mmol/L

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  18. Neonatal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Apgar score \< 7 at 5 minutes

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  19. Neonatal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Transfer to intensive care unit rate

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  20. Neonatal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Neonatal infection rate (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  21. Neonatal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Neonatal convulsion rate (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  22. Neonatal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Rate of neonatal deaths (%)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

  23. Neonatal measures associated with possible effects of both strategies on maternal and fetal outcome

    Neonatal encephalopathy rate (or the introduction of therapeutic hypothermia)

    Time frame: From the admission in the labour ward until the dismissal from maternity (2 to 5 days)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Strasbourg Hospital
    Strasbourg, 67098, France
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Sep 2016 to primary completion in Oct 2019, 36 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 12, 2016
First posted
Apr 18, 2016
StartActual
Sep 21, 2016
Primary completionActual
Oct 7, 2019
CompletionActual
Oct 7, 2019
Last update
Oct 14, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 14, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02741141
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 18, 2016
Start date
Sep 21, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 7, 2019
Completion
Oct 7, 2019
Last update
Oct 14, 2021

Study contacts

Adrien GAUDINEAU
principal investigator · Strasbourg's University Hospitals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion