An interventional study of GE Healthcare Revolution CT Scanner (CT Scanner) in General CT Imaging, sponsored by GE Healthcare. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-08.
Sponsored by GE Healthcare · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The main purpose of this study is to collect clinical raw scan data and Scanner user feedback using dual energy CT (computed tomography) scan modes on the investigational CT scanner. Additionally, image quality using prototype reconstruction algorithms that are in development will be evaluated and compared to standard-of-care images acquired with regulatory cleared diagnostic CT scanners for feasibility assessment and engineering development. Compared to standard clinical single energy (kilovolt,kV) scanning, dual energy (kV) scanning s provides more information about the material composition of the scanned patient and may allow for improved tissue, tumor characterization, and improved image quality.
GE Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 176 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.
Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (84%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Each subject will be scanned twice: the first time will be the subjects' clinically indicated CT exam and the second scan will be performed on the GE Healthcare CT Revolution (CT scanner) both scans will will be obtained.
Device: GE Healthcare Revolution CT Scanner (CT Scanner)
Raw CT Scan Data
Also known as: CT scanner
Raw CT Scan Data
No outcome assessment is currently planned. Up to 60 subjects will be scanned using GE Healthcare's Revolution CT scanner for future engineering and regulatory purposes.
Time frame: 3 months
Image Quality assessment
Likert Scale to assess image quality
Time frame: 3 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
The record gives a start of Apr 2016, a primary completion of Jul 2016 and a completion of Jul 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.