CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02731014Updated Dec 18, 2019

Dry Needling for Patients With Neck Pain

An interventional study of Dry Needling and Sham Dry Needling in Neck Pain, sponsored by Franklin Pierce University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-18.

Sponsored by Franklin Pierce University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this trial will be to examine the short and long term effectiveness of dry needling on pain, disability, and patient perceived improvements in patients with neck pain attending physical therapy. The investigators hypothesize that patients who receive dry needling, manual therapy, and exercise will achieve greater reductions in pain and disability in the short (4 weeks) and long term (6 and 12 months) compared to those who receive sham dry needling, manual therapy, and exercise.

Read the detailed description

Background: Neck pain is a costly and common problem. Current treatments are not adequately effective for a large proportion of patients who continue to experience recurrent pain. Therefore, new treatment strategies should be investigated in an attempt to reduce the disability and high costs associated with neck pain.

Dry needling is a technique in which a fine needle is used to penetrate the skin, subcutaneous tissues, and muscle with the intent to mechanically disrupt tissue without the use of an anesthetic. Dry needling is emerging as a treatment modality that is widely used clinically to address a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Recent studies of dry needling in mechanical neck pain have shown decreased pain, increased pain pressure threshold, improved range of motion, and decreased disability in the short term. The majority of these studies examined dry needling using methods atypical to clinical practice (dry needling as a sole treatment, or fewer visits than is common practice). None included long-term follow up. A clinical trial with realistic treatment time frames and methods consistent with clinical practice is needed to examine the effectiveness of dry needling on reducing pain and enhancing function in patients presenting with mechanical neck pain.

Purpose: The aim of this trial will be to examine the short and long term effectiveness of dry needling on pain, disability, and patient perceived improvements in patients with neck pain.

Design: The investigators will conduct a randomized single blind placebo controlled trial in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines. All patients with mechanical neck pain referred to physical therapy will be screened for eligibility criteria. Participants will be randomized to receive 1) dry needling, manual therapy, and exercise or 2) sham dry needling, manual therapy and exercise. Participants will receive 7 treatments over a maximum of 4 weeks.

Methods: The primary outcome will be disability as measured by the Neck Disability Index. Pain and patient perceived improvement will also be recorded. Outcome measures will be assessed at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 12-months by an assessor who is blind to the group allocation of the participants to determine the short and long-term treatment effects.

Data Analysis: The investigators will examine the primary aim with a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with treatment group as the between subject variable and time as the within-subjects variable. The hypothesis of interest will be the 2-way group by time interaction.

Significance: The successful completion of this trial will provide evidence to demonstrate whether dry needling is effective for the management of mechanical neck pain when used in a combined treatment approach as is commonly practiced clinically.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dry Needling
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 254 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is above the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Franklin Pierce University is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age between >18 years old
  2. Primary complaint of neck pain
  3. Neck Disability Index > 10 points=20%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Red flags noted in the patient's Neck Medical Screening Questionnaire (i.e. tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, Rheumatoid Arthritis, osteoporosis, prolonged history of steroid use, symptoms of vertebrobasilar insufficiency, pregnancy, cervical spinal stenosis, bilateral upper extremity symptoms etc.
  2. Use of blood thinners
  3. History of whiplash injury within the past six weeks
  4. Evidence of central nervous system involvement, to include hyperreflexia, sensory disturbances in the hand, intrinsic muscle wasting of the hands, unsteadiness during walking, nystagmus, loss of visual acuity, impaired sensation of the face, altered taste, the presence of pathological reflexes (i.e. positive Hoffman's and/or Babinski reflexes), etc.
  5. Two or more positive neurologic signs consistent with nerve root compression, including any two of the following:

    • Muscle weakness involving a major muscle group of the upper extremity
    • Diminished upper extremity muscle stretch reflex (biceps brachii, brachioradialis, or triceps)
    • Diminished or absent sensation to pinprick in any upper extremity dermatome
  6. Prior surgery to the neck or thoracic spine
  7. Chiropractic, Physical Therapy, or Acupuncture treatment for their neck pain in the last 12-months
  8. Workers compensation or pending legal action regarding their neck pain
  9. Insufficient English language skills to complete all questionnaires
  10. Inability to comply with treatment and follow-up schedule
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dry Needling Group

    Dry Needling, Manual Therapy, and Exercise.

    Other: Dry Needling · Other: Manual Therapy · Other: Exercise

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Dry Needling Group

    Sham Dry Needling, Manual Therapy, and Exercise.

    Other: Sham Dry Needling · Other: Manual Therapy · Other: Exercise

Interventions

  • OtherDry Needling

    Dry Needling targeting the posterior musculature of the cervical and thoracic spine.

  • OtherSham Dry Needling

    Sham Dry Needling performed with Park sham acupuncture needles (Acuprime, UK) will be used to perform sham dry-needling. The device consists of 2 plastic tubes that slide into one another and cause a pricking sensation when pushed against the skin.

  • OtherManual Therapy

    Manual Therapy(mobilization/ manipulation) to address joint mobility of the cervical and thoracic spine.

  • OtherExercise

    Exercise designed to improve performance of both the deep neck flexor musculature as well as the scapular musculature. The exercise portion will also include a stretching program targeting the cervicothoracic muscles which have been placed in a shortened position as a result of poor postures.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline on the Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was created to measure pain related disability associated with activities of daily living in people with neck pain. The NDI contains ten focused sections. The NDI is easy to complete and score. Each item is scored on a 6 point scale and can reach a maximum score of 5; therefore, the maximum score is 50. This score will calculated as a percentage, with higher scores indicating higher levels of disability.

    Time frame: 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline on The Global Rating Of Change Scale (GROC)

    The GROC is a 15-point scale used to quantify a patient's improvement with treatment or to record the clinical course of a condition over time. Patients are asked to describe their overall condition since the start of treatment until the present time with options ranging from -7 ("a very great deal worse") to +7 ("a very great deal better") and 0 being described as "about the same."

    Time frame: 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

  2. Questionnaire used to assess blinding of patients to which needling intervention they received

    Used to assess blinding of patients as to which dry needling intervention the received (real or sham).

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Change from baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain

    The VAS is a single item measure of pain using a 100 mm horizontal line anchored on the left side of which represents "no pain" and the right side represents "the worst pain imaginable". The VAS will be used to calculate change in pain score from baseline to 4 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months.

    Time frame: 4 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Franciscan, ST.Francis Health
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46237, United States
  • Concord Hospital Rehabilitation Services
    Concord, New Hampshire 03301, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gattie ER, Cleland JA, Snodgrass SJ. Dry Needling for Patients With Neck Pain: Protocol of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Nov 22;6(11):e227. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7980. PubMed 29167092 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02731014
Lead sponsor
Franklin Pierce University
Collaborators
Newcastle University, Concord Hospital
Responsible party
Joshua Cleland, DPT, OCS (Professor of Physical Therapy, Franklin Pierce University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 7, 2016
Start date
Sep 2016
Primary completion
Aug 2018
Completion
Sep 2019
Last update
Dec 18, 2019
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion