An interventional study of Low Level Laser Therapy in Mucositis, sponsored by Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-27.
Sponsored by Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The overall purpose of this study is to examine the efficacy of prophylactic low-level laser therapy (LLLT) to reduce the incidence of oral mucositis and adverse events in patients receiving combined modality therapy consisting of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
A phase II, single-arm trial to examine the efficacy of prophylactic low-level laser therapy (LLLT) to reduce the incidence of oral mucositis and adverse events in patients receiving combined modality therapy consisting of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.
Patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be enrolled to receive prophylactic LLLT in addition to standard of care measures for oral mucositis or other toxicity of therapy. The radiation and chemotherapy dose, schedule, modality, technique, and any required adjustments will not be influenced by this protocol and will follow standard existing institutional practices.
Patients will receive LLLT three times per week concurrently with chemoradiotherapy. LLLT may be delivered either immediately prior to or after the patient's daily fraction of radiotherapy. Patients will be treated extra-orally with a THOR® LED cluster for one minute along the buccal mucosa on each side and intraorally for one minute to the tongue and soft palate. During each LLLT treatment session a thorough oral exam will be performed to identify any areas of mucositis. If the patient should develop intraoral lesions they will be targeted directly with the intraoral probe for one minute to each site of mucositis. The laser settings to be used are as follows: frequency 2.5 Hz; wavelength 660 nm; and power 75 mW, for an energy of 4.5 J.
Patients will be evaluated prior to therapy, weekly during therapy, two weeks after the completion of therapy, and three months after the completion of therapy. During each assessment, the following toxicities will be assessed: pain, mucositis, dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia, dermatitis, trismus, and quality of life.
Previous studies indicate that approximately 40% of patients will experience severe mucositis with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy. The hypothesis in this trial is that the addition of LLLT to this treatment regimen will decrease the rate of severe acute oral mucositis (OM) to 20%. We plan to enroll 25 patients at our institution in 12 months after the trial opens.
488 studies on the registry are indexed under Mucositis; 70 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 50 across 394 interventional studies indexed under Mucositis.
Browse Mucositis studies →Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 158 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (86%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients meeting the eligibility criteria will be enrolled to receive prophylactic LLLT in addition to standard of care measures for oral mucositis or other toxicity of therapy. The radiation and chemotherapy dose, schedule, modality, technique, and any required adjustments will not be influenced by this protocol and will follow standard existing institutional practices.
Device: Low Level Laser Therapy
Patients will receive LLLT three times per week concurrently with chemoradiotherapy. LLLT may be delivered either immediately prior to or after the patient's daily fraction of radiotherapy. Patients will be treated extra-orally with a THOR® LED cluster for one minute along the buccal mucosa on each side and intraorally for one minute to the tongue and soft palate. During each LLLT treatment session a thorough oral exam will be performed to identify any areas of mucositis. If the patient should develop intraoral lesions they will be targeted directly with the intraoral probe for one minute to each site of mucositis. The laser settings to be used are as follows: frequency 2.5 Hz; wavelength 660 nm; and power 75 mW, for an energy of 4.5 J.
Number of Participants With Severe (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 [CTCAE v. 4.0] Grade 3-5 Oral Mucositis in Patients Treated to a Cumulative Radiation Dose of at Least 5000 cGy
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Severe World Health Organization [WHO] (Grade 3-4) Oral Mucositis in Patients Treated to a Cumulative Radiation Dose of at Least 5000 cGy
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Change in OM-related QOL Assessed Using FACT Questionnaire
The QOL assessment taken at the beginning of therapy is subtracted from the QOL assessment taken at the completion of therapy. The QOL scale is the FACT Questionnaire. Measure on a scale of 0 to 4. 0 = not at all and 4= very much.
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to completion of therapy
Duration of Oral Mucositis
Survival analysis was used to estimate the duration of oral mucositis. Patients were censored if oral mucositis not resolved by the end of the study.
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Any Grade Oral Mucositis in Patients Treated to a Cumulative Radiation Dose of at Least 5000 cGy
Grade of oral mucositis assessed using the NCI CTCAE version 4.0
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Dysgeusia Assessed by CTCAE v. 4.0
Variable is reported on the 1-5 CTCAE scale: 1. - Mild 2. - Moderate 3. - Severe 4. - Life-threatening 5. - Death The maximum recorded severity is reported.
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Dysphagia Assessed by CTCAE v. 4.0 and Diet Assessment
Variable is reported on the 1-5 CTCAE scale: 1. - Mild 2. - Moderate 3. - Severe 4. - Life-threatening 5. - Death The maximum recorded severity is reported.
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Variable is reported on the 1-10 scale Higher values represent a worse outcome The maximum recorded severity is reported
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Radiodermatitis Assessed by CTCAE v. 4.0
Variable is reported on the 1-5 CTCAE scale: 1. - Mild 2. - Moderate 3. - Severe 4. - Life-threatening 5. - Death The maximum recorded severity is reported.
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Trismus Assessed by Measurement of Interincisal Distance
Trismus is defined as a measurement of interincisal distance less than or equal to 30mm.
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Xerostomia Assessed by CTCAE v. 4.0
Variable is reported on the 1-5 CTCAE scale: 1. - Mild 2. - Moderate 3. - Severe 4. - Life-threatening 5. - Death The maximum recorded severity is reported.
Time frame: Up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Mean Cumulative Radiation Dose at Time of Onset of Severe (CTCAE v. 4.0 Grade 3-4) Oral Mucositis
The reported dose is at the first incidence of severe oral mucositis.
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Time to Onset of Severe (CTCAE v. 4.0 Grade 3-4) Oral Mucositis Following the Initiation of Radiotherapy
Survival analysis is used to analyze this endpoint
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Amount of Narcotic Analgesia Use During Treatment
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Breaks in Treatment
Breaks in treatment defined as one of the following: Missing at least 1 chemotherapy treatment; dose reduction in planned cisplatin administration; OR 3 consecutive days of no radiation therapy secondary to mucositis
Time frame: Date of completion of chemoradiation therapy
Percent Change in Body Weight During the Course of Treatment
The percent change in body weight was computed by subtracting the baseline weight from the weight after completion of treatment and dividing that quantity by the baseline weight. The confidence interval is estimated using the t distribution.
Time frame: From date of enrollment until the date of completion of chemoradiation therapy, assessed up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants Who Require Feeding Tube Placement During Treatment (Excluding Patients Who Received a Prophylactic Feeding Tube Prior to the Initiation of Therapy)
Time frame: At the date of completion of chemoradiation therapy
Number of Participants With Severe (CTCAE v. 4.0 Grade 3-4) Oral Mucositis by 5000 and 7000 cGy
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Number of Participants With Severe (CTCAE v. 4.0 Grade 3-4) Oral Mucositis by Schedule of Chemotherapy Given Weekly Versus Every 3 Weeks
Time frame: From beginning of therapy up to 3 months after completion of therapy
Time to Reach Planned Dose of Radiation Therapy
Kaplan-Meier methods are used to estimate time until reaching planned dose.
Time frame: From the beginning of therapy up to completion of therapy (9 weeks maximum)
| Milestone | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Started | 25 |
| Completed | 23 |
| Not completed | 2 |
| Withdrew: Ineligible | 1 |
| Withdrew: Never received treatment | 1 |
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Severe (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0 [CTCAE v. 4.0] Grade 3-5 Oral Mucositis in Patients Treated to a Cumulative Radiation Dose of at Least 5000 cGy | 15 |
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Severe World Health Organization [WHO] (Grade 3-4) Oral Mucositis in Patients Treated to a Cumulative Radiation Dose of at Least 5000 cGy | 10 |
The QOL assessment taken at the beginning of therapy is subtracted from the QOL assessment taken at the completion of therapy. The QOL scale is the FACT Questionnaire. Measure on a scale of 0 to 4. 0 = not at all and 4= very much.
| units on a scale | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Change in OM-related QOL Assessed Using FACT Questionnaire | 2.3 (1.9 to 2.8) |
Survival analysis was used to estimate the duration of oral mucositis. Patients were censored if oral mucositis not resolved by the end of the study.
| weeks | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Duration of Oral Mucositis | 4 (4 to NA) |
Grade of oral mucositis assessed using the NCI CTCAE version 4.0
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Any Grade Oral Mucositis in Patients Treated to a Cumulative Radiation Dose of at Least 5000 cGy | 23 |
Variable is reported on the 1-5 CTCAE scale: 1. - Mild 2. - Moderate 3. - Severe 4. - Life-threatening 5. - Death The maximum recorded severity is reported.
| participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 0 |
| Grade 2 | 23 |
| Grade 3 | 0 |
| Grade 4 | 0 |
| Grade 5 | 0 |
Variable is reported on the 1-5 CTCAE scale: 1. - Mild 2. - Moderate 3. - Severe 4. - Life-threatening 5. - Death The maximum recorded severity is reported.
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 17 |
| Grade 3 | 4 |
| Grade 4 | 0 |
| Grade 5 | 0 |
Variable is reported on the 1-10 scale Higher values represent a worse outcome The maximum recorded severity is reported
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 |
| 3 | 2 |
| 4 | 0 |
| 5 | 5 |
| 6 | 2 |
| 7 | 2 |
| 8 | 5 |
| 9 | 4 |
| 10 | 3 |
Variable is reported on the 1-5 CTCAE scale: 1. - Mild 2. - Moderate 3. - Severe 4. - Life-threatening 5. - Death The maximum recorded severity is reported.
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 5 |
| Grade 2 | 16 |
| Grade 3 | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 0 |
| Grade 5 | 0 |
Trismus is defined as a measurement of interincisal distance less than or equal to 30mm.
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Trismus Assessed by Measurement of Interincisal Distance | 2 |
Variable is reported on the 1-5 CTCAE scale: 1. - Mild 2. - Moderate 3. - Severe 4. - Life-threatening 5. - Death The maximum recorded severity is reported.
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 2 |
| Grade 2 | 17 |
| Grade 3 | 4 |
| Grade 4 | 0 |
| Grade 5 | 0 |
The reported dose is at the first incidence of severe oral mucositis.
| Gray | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Mean Cumulative Radiation Dose at Time of Onset of Severe (CTCAE v. 4.0 Grade 3-4) Oral Mucositis | 53.5 (47.68 to 59.32) |
Survival analysis is used to analyze this endpoint
| weeks | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Time to Onset of Severe (CTCAE v. 4.0 Grade 3-4) Oral Mucositis Following the Initiation of Radiotherapy | NA (7 to NA) |
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Breaks in treatment defined as one of the following: Missing at least 1 chemotherapy treatment; dose reduction in planned cisplatin administration; OR 3 consecutive days of no radiation therapy secondary to mucositis
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
The percent change in body weight was computed by subtracting the baseline weight from the weight after completion of treatment and dividing that quantity by the baseline weight. The confidence interval is estimated using the t distribution.
| percent change in body weight | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Percent Change in Body Weight During the Course of Treatment | -10.9 (-13.0 to -8.7) |
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Require Feeding Tube Placement During Treatment (Excluding Patients Who Received a Prophylactic Feeding Tube Prior to the Initiation of Therapy) | 7 |
| Participants | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Treated with 70Gy & had OM | 14 |
| Treated with 70Gy & did not have OM | 6 |
| Treated with 50-69Gy & had OM | 1 |
| Treated with 50-69Gy & did not have OM | 2 |
No measurements were reported for this outcome.
Kaplan-Meier methods are used to estimate time until reaching planned dose.
| weeks | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Time to Reach Planned Dose of Radiation Therapy | 9 (8 to 9) |
Collected over Adverse event data were collected from the beginning of treatment, up until 3 months after the completion of treatment.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy | 0/23 (0%) | 0/23 (0%) | 23/23 (100%) |
| Event | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| DysphagiaGeneral disorders | 23/23 |
| XerostomiaGeneral disorders | 23/23 |
| DysgeusiaGeneral disorders | 23/23 |
| RadiodermatitisGeneral disorders | 23/23 |
| TrismusGeneral disorders | 2/23 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Mean | 62.5 ± 7.1 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| Female | 2 |
| Male | 21 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 |
| Asian | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 |
| Black or African American | 4 |
| White | 18 |
| More than one race | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 1 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Experimental: Low Level Laser Therapy |
|---|---|
| United States | 23 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Yes — The same protocol will be opened separately at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, where an additional 25 patients will be enrolled. A Data Use Agreement will allow combination of the data for a total of 50 patients to be analyzed.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute