CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02703467Updated Oct 21, 2019Results posted

Exhaled Hydrogen Sulphide as a Biomarker of Airways Disease in Asthma

An observational study in Asthma, sponsored by Imperial College London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-21.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study will be to determine whether there is any role for measuring Hydrogen Sulphide (H2S) in the exhaled breath in terms of management of the patient with asthma.

The investigators will recruit patients with a range of severity of asthma and health volunteers. Levels of Hydrogen Sulphide will be measured in exhaled breath and blood. Also exhaled Nitric Oxide, Spirometry and asthma symptom scores will be measured at each study visit. Participants will attend either 2 or 4 separate visits.

The investigators will determine whether there is a relationship between exhaled Hydrogen Sulphide and asthma severity.

Read the detailed description

Objectives:

  1. Perform a cross-sectional study in non-asthmatic subjects and asthmatic subjects of varying severities of the levels of Hydrogen Sulphide in exhaled breath in relation to the severity and control of asthma
  2. Compare the levels of exhaled Hydrogen Sulphide with exhaled Nitric Oxide.

We will recruit 30 health volunteers and 90 patients with a range of severity of asthma.

Particpants will attend for either 2 or 4 visits. At these visits the following measurements will be taken:

  1. Exhaled Hydrogen Sulphide
  2. Serum Hydrogen Sulphide
  1. Exhaled Nitric Oxide 3. Spirometry 4. Asthma Symptom Score (ACQ)

The investigators will use a Hydrogen Sulphide UV fluorescent machine Model T101 (0-50 ppb to 0-20 ppm) (Cal-Bay Control Inc, USA) to measure directly on line exhaled breath Hydrogen Sulphide. This method has been used previously in normal people, but we will first determine whether there is an exhaled flow-dependence on the measurement of H2S levels. The investigators will use a hand-held Nitric Oxide machine (NO Breath) to measure Nitric Oxide in exhaled breath.

Subjects must have asthma according to one or more of the following criteria documented in the last 12 months:

  1. Improvement in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume at one second) ≥ 12% and 200ml predicted after inhalation of 400 mcg salbutamol
  2. Airway hyper-responsiveness (PC20 \<8mg/ml)
  3. Diurnal variation in PEF (peak expiratory flow): amplitude % mean of twice daily PEF > 8%
  4. Decrease in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 >12% and >200mls within 4 weeks after tapering treatment with one or more of the following drugs: inhaled corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids, long-acting beta-agonists, long-acting beta-agonists and short-acting beta-agonists.

PLUS A history of wheeze occurring spontaneously or on exertion

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Exhaled hydrogen sulphide
03

In context

Asthma

3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 507 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is below the median of 150 across 970 observational studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London is the lead sponsor of 824 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The investigators will recruit a cohort healthy subjects by advertisement within the Hospital and within the general public (by newspaper advertisement). The investigators will also recruit subjects with asthma from paients attending Asthma Clinics at the Royal Brompton and Harefiled NHS Trust.

Inclusion criteria

All patients must be able to give informed consent. The definition of the severity of their asthma will be according to the GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) guidelines dependent on the amount of therapy needed to control asthma. The investigators will also include at least 45 patients with severe asthma defined on the basis of: Uncontrolled asthma: three or more of the following features present in any week in the previous 4 weeks:

  • Daytime symptoms more than twice per week
  • Any limitation of activities
  • Nocturnal symptoms once or more per week
  • Need for reliever treatment more than twice per week
  • Pre bronchodilator FEV1 \<80% predicted or personal best OR
  • Frequent severe exacerbations (≥2 per year) OR
  • Require prescription of daily or alternate day oral corticosteroids (OCS) to achieve asthma control despite the prescription of high dose inhaled corticosteroids (>1000mcg fluticasone propionate daily or equivalent) or maintenance oral corticosteroids plus a long acting beta agonist or one other controller medication (for example anti-cholinergics, leukotriene receptor antagonists or theophylline).

Diagnosis of asthma for the asthma cohort: Subjects must have asthma according to one or more of the following criteria documented in the last 12 months

  • improvement in FEV1 ≥ 12% and 200ml predicted after inhalation of 400 mcg salbutamol
  • airway hyper-responsiveness (PC20 \<8mg/ml)
  • diurnal variation in PEF: amplitude % mean of twice daily PEF > 8%
  • decrease in pre bronchodilator FEV1 >12% and >200mls within 4 weeks after tapering treatment with one or more of the following drugs: inhaled corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids, long-acting beta-agonists, long-acting beta-agonists and short-acting beta-agonists.

PLUS a history of wheeze occurring spontaneously or on exertion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current smoker, or Ex-smoker with a >10 year pack history or having smoked within the past 6 months.
  • Significant alternative diagnoses that may mimic or complicate asthma, in particular dysfunctional breathing, panic attacks, and overt psychosocial problems (if these are thought to be the major problem rather than in addition to severe asthma)
  • Significant other primary pulmonary disorders in particular pulmonary embolism, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease and lung cancer
  • Subjects with emphysema and bronchiectasis should only be excluded if this is thought to be the major pulmonary disorder rather than in addition to severe asthma
  • Diagnosis or current investigation of occupational asthma
  • Any subjects currently participating, or having participated within 3 months of the first dose in a study using a new molecular entity, or the first dose in any other study investigating drugs.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy

    Healthy subjects will have no significant medical history and no previous history of asthma or other serious illnesses. They should be non-smokers. The investigators willl measure spirometry and ensure that the values lie within the normal predicted range.

  • Asthmatics

    Patients diagnosed as having asthma will be recruited from Royal Brompton Hospital Asthma Clinics. These patients will have a range of severity of asthma ranging from mild-moderate to severe asthma patients. The diagnosis of asthma is ascertained as described in the inclusion criteria.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hydrogen Sulphide in Exhaled Breath

    Level of hydrogen sulphide in exhaled breath measured as parts per billion

    Time frame: At baseline visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. FEV1

    Forced expiratory volume in one second as percent of predicted value (%)

    Time frame: At baseline visit

  2. FVC (Forced Vital Capacity)

    Forced vital capacity as per cent of predicted

    Time frame: At 4 visits which occur during the study duration, up to 1 year

  3. Exhaled Nitric Oxide

    Levels of nitric oxide in exhaled breath in parts per billion

    Time frame: At 4 visits which occur during the study duration, up to 1 year

  4. Blood Hydrogen Sulpide Level

    Hydrogen Sulpide level measurements from blood

    Time frame: At 4 visits which occur during the study duration, up to 1 year

07

Results

Posted Oct 21, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHealthyMild-moderateSevere
Started20545
Completed20545
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryHydrogen Sulphide in Exhaled Breath

Level of hydrogen sulphide in exhaled breath measured as parts per billion

Time frame:
At baseline visit
Reported as:
Mean · parts per billion
Hydrogen Sulphide in Exhaled Breath
parts per billionHealthyMild-moderateSevere
Hydrogen Sulphide in Exhaled Breath5.0 ± 0.63.2 ± 1.04.9 ± 1.3
Statistical analysis
  • Healthy vs Severe · t-test, 2 sided · p = >0.05 (calculated)
SecondaryFEV1

Forced expiratory volume in one second as percent of predicted value (%)

Time frame:
At baseline visit
Reported as:
Mean · per cent of predicted value
FEV1
per cent of predicted valueHealthy SubjectsMild-moderate AsthmaSevere Asthma
FEV198.9 ± 4.192.0 ± 11.173.6 ± 4.3
SecondaryFVC (Forced Vital Capacity)

Forced vital capacity as per cent of predicted

Time frame:
At 4 visits which occur during the study duration, up to 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · per cent of predicted value (%)
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity)
per cent of predicted value (%)HealthyMild-moderateSevere
FVC (Forced Vital Capacity)105.1 ± 4.397.40 ± 15.388.22 ± 3.5
SecondaryExhaled Nitric Oxide

Levels of nitric oxide in exhaled breath in parts per billion

Time frame:
At 4 visits which occur during the study duration, up to 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · parts per billion
Exhaled Nitric Oxide
parts per billionHealthy SubjectsMild-moderate AsthmaSevere Asthma
Exhaled Nitric Oxide25.41 ± 6.339.42 ± 13.639.45 ± 2.2
SecondaryBlood Hydrogen Sulpide Level

Hydrogen Sulpide level measurements from blood

Time frame:
At 4 visits which occur during the study duration, up to 1 year

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Healthy0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)
Mild-moderate0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
Severe0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)0/45 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)HealthyMild-moderateSevereTotal
Mean51.1 ± 3.555.6 ± 5.955.9 ± 11.554.5 ± 9.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)HealthyMild-moderateSevereTotal
Female1333147
Male721423
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)HealthyMild-moderateSevereTotal
Count of participants———0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)HealthyMild-moderateSevereTotal
United Kingdom2054570
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Royal Brompton Hospital
    London, SW3 6HP, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 21, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02703467
Lead sponsor
Imperial College London
Collaborators
Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2016
Start date
Aug 1, 2015
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2016
Completion
Jun 30, 2016
Results posted
Oct 21, 2019
Last update
Oct 21, 2019

Study contacts

Kian F Chung, MBBS MD FRCP
principal investigator · Imperial College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion