CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02699086Updated Dec 1, 2021Results posted

A Study of PDC-1421 Treatment in Adult Patients With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

A Phase 2 interventional study of PDC-1421 Capsule in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), sponsored by BioLite, Inc.. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-01.

Sponsored by BioLite, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
6
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this trial was to determine the effective doses and treatment period of PDC-1421 Capsule in subjects with ADHD.

The secondary objective was to evaluate the safety of PDC-1421 Capsule in subjects receiving PDC-1421 at various dose levels.

Read the detailed description

This study was a Part I of Phase II study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy in adult patients with ADHD. The Screening phase is intended for diagnosing and assessing the patient for possible inclusion in the study and for providing an adequate washout period. The targeted population of this Part I study is six subjects who met the intent-to-treat per-protocol basis.

Part I study is an open-label study, single-center, and dose escalation evaluation in six patients.

  1. Low dose: Six subjects will be initially evaluated for safety and efficacy assessments at low-dose (1 PDC-1421capsule TID) for 28 days. The subject will return for visit once a week during the treatment period.
  2. Checkpoint #1: There will be an evaluation with all safety assessments data to decide whether subjects pass the checkpoint to enter high-dose treatment or continue to receive a low-dose treatment by the investigator.
  3. High dose: The subjects who pass Checkpoint #1 will be initially evaluated for safety and efficacy assessments at high-dose (2 PDC-1421 capsules TID) for 28 days. Subjects will return for visit biweekly during the treatment period.
  4. Checkpoint #2: There will be an evaluation with all safety assessments data to decide whether this study passes the checkpoint to enter Part II by the investigators.
02

Conditions studied

  • Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Keywords

  • ADHD
03

In context

Hyperkinesis

729 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperkinesis; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 6 is below the median of 80 across 583 interventional studies indexed under Hyperkinesis.

Browse Hyperkinesis studies →

Lead sponsor

BioLite, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 18-70 years
  2. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must test negative to pregnancy and use appropriate birth control method from the beginning of study to the 15 days later after ending of study
  3. Subjects must be able to understand and willing to sign informed consent
  4. Able to discontinue the use of any psychotropic medications for the treatment of ADHD symptoms at screening
  5. Meet strict operational criteria for adult ADHD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5)
  6. A total score of 20 or higher on the 18-item total ADHD symptoms score of Conners' Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) at screening
  7. Have a moderate or severe symptom of ADHD with score of 4 or higher in Clinical Global Impression-ADHD-Severity (CGI-ADHD-S) at screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have any clinically significant concurrent medical condition (endocrine, renal, respiratory, cardiovascular, hematological, immunological, cerebrovascular, neurological, anorexia, obesity or malignancy) that has become unstable and may interfere with the interpretation of safety and efficacy evaluations
  2. Have any clinically significant abnormal laboratory, vital sign, physical examination, or electrocardiogram (ECG) findings at screening that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the interpretation of safety or efficacy evaluations
  3. Have known serological evidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody
  4. Are pregnant as confirmed by a positive pregnancy test at screening
  5. Have QTc values >450 msec at screening using Fridericia's QTc formula
  6. Have current of bipolar and psychotic disorders
  7. Have a current major depression disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder and eating disorder (also if treated but not currently symptomatic)
  8. Have any history of a significant suicide attempt, or possess a current risk of attempting suicide, in the investigator's opinion, based on clinical interview and responses provided on the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS)
  9. Have a history of jailing or imprisonment in the past 6 months due to worsening of symptoms of ADHD
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Low dose + Low dose

    1 PDC-1421 Capsule, trice daily, p.o. after meal for 28 + 28 days

    Drug: PDC-1421 Capsule

  • Experimental
    Low dose + High dose

    1 PDC-1421 Capsule for 28 days + 2 PDC-1421 Capsules for 28 days, trice daily, p.o. after meals

    Drug: PDC-1421 Capsule

Interventions

  • DrugPDC-1421 Capsule

    PDC-1421 Capsule is a botanical investigational new drug containing the extract of Radix Polygalae (Polygala tenuifolia Willd.) as active ingredient.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Improvement ≥ 40% in ADHD-RS-IV From Baseline up to 8 Weeks Treatment

    The primary endpoint is the change of ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline up to Week 8 of treatment in ITT population. The ADHD-RS-IV with Adult Prompts is an 18-item scale base on the DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD that provides a rating of the severity of symptoms. The adult prompts serve as a guide to explore more fully the extent and severity of ADHD symptoms and create a framework to ascertain impairment. The odd-numbered 9 items assess inattentive symptoms and the even-numbered 9 items assess hyperactive-impulsive symptoms. Scoring is based on a 4-point, yielding a possible total score of 0-54. Likert-type severity scale: 0 = Never or Rarely, 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often, 3 = Very Often. Clinicians should score the highest score that is generated for the prompts for each item. The ADHD-RS-IV was assessed from Visit 1 to Visit 8 by the investigator.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in ITT Population From Baseline up to 4 and 8 Weeks Treatment in the Conners' Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) 5 Subscales T-score.

    Conners' Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) consists of 26 items rated from 0=not at all, never to 3=very much, very frequently. Four subscales each composed of 5 items (A: inattention/memory problems; B: hyperactivity/restlessness; C: impulsivity/emotional lability; and D: problems with self-concept) as well as a 12-item ADHD index can be computed. The raw scores were converted into standard T-scores by the SAS program which was designed according to the Profile form of CAARS QuikScore forms. The higher T-scores represent a better or worse outcome. A T-score is a standard score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in all samples and across all scales.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Number of Participants With a CGI Score of 2 or Lower

    Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) score of 2 or lower. The CGI-S is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill patients). CGI-I scores range from 1 (very much improved) through to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Change in ITT Population From Baseline up to 4 and 8 Weeks in the ADHD-RS-IV Inattention Subscale, Hyperactivity-impulsivity Subscale, and Total Scale Raw Score.

    The ADHD-RS-IV with Adult Prompts is an 18-item scale base on the DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD that provides a rating of the severity of symptoms. The adult prompts serve as a guide to explore more fully the extent and severity of ADHD symptoms and create a framework to ascertain impairment. The odd-numbered 9 items assess inattentive symptoms and the even-numbered 9 items assess hyperactive-impulsive symptoms. Scoring is based on a 4-point, yielding a possible summed "total score" of 0-54, "inattentive subscore" of 0-27, and "hyperactive-impulsive subscore" of 0-27. The higher values represent a worse outcome for the total score and subscore. Likert-type severity scale: 0 = Never or Rarely, 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often, 3 = Very Often. . The ADHD-RS-IV was assessed from Visit 1 to Visit 8 by the investigator.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Nov 5, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLow Dose + Low DoseLow Dose + High Dose
Started06
Completed06
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Improvement ≥ 40% in ADHD-RS-IV From Baseline up to 8 Weeks Treatment

The primary endpoint is the change of ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline up to Week 8 of treatment in ITT population. The ADHD-RS-IV with Adult Prompts is an 18-item scale base on the DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD that provides a rating of the severity of symptoms. The adult prompts serve as a guide to explore more fully the extent and severity of ADHD symptoms and create a framework to ascertain impairment. The odd-numbered 9 items assess inattentive symptoms and the even-numbered 9 items assess hyperactive-impulsive symptoms. Scoring is based on a 4-point, yielding a possible total score of 0-54. Likert-type severity scale: 0 = Never or Rarely, 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often, 3 = Very Often. Clinicians should score the highest score that is generated for the prompts for each item. The ADHD-RS-IV was assessed from Visit 1 to Visit 8 by the investigator.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Improvement ≥ 40% in ADHD-RS-IV From Baseline up to 8 Weeks Treatment
ParticipantsLow Dose + High Dose (at Week 8)
Number of Participants With Improvement ≥ 40% in ADHD-RS-IV From Baseline up to 8 Weeks Treatment5
SecondaryChange in ITT Population From Baseline up to 4 and 8 Weeks Treatment in the Conners' Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) 5 Subscales T-score.

Conners' Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) consists of 26 items rated from 0=not at all, never to 3=very much, very frequently. Four subscales each composed of 5 items (A: inattention/memory problems; B: hyperactivity/restlessness; C: impulsivity/emotional lability; and D: problems with self-concept) as well as a 12-item ADHD index can be computed. The raw scores were converted into standard T-scores by the SAS program which was designed according to the Profile form of CAARS QuikScore forms. The higher T-scores represent a better or worse outcome. A T-score is a standard score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 in all samples and across all scales.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Change in ITT Population From Baseline up to 4 and 8 Weeks Treatment in the Conners' Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-Self Report: Short Version (CAARS-S:S) 5 Subscales T-score.
T-scoreLow Dose + High Dose (Week 0-4)Low Dose + High Dose (Week 0-8)
Inattention/memory subscale-10.0 ± 10.2-10.5 ± 11.0
Hyperactivity subscale-6.2 ± 7.1-5.2 ± 5.9
Impulsivity subscale-10.8 ± 7.1-15.2 ± 7.9
Self-concept subscale-5.7 ± 7.0-4.7 ± 6.2
ADHD index subscale-8.2 ± 7.4-10.8 ± 6.2
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a CGI Score of 2 or Lower

Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) score of 2 or lower. The CGI-S is rated on a 7-point scale, with the severity of illness scale using a range of responses from 1 (normal) through to 7 (amongst the most severely ill patients). CGI-I scores range from 1 (very much improved) through to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a CGI Score of 2 or Lower
ParticipantsLow Dose + High Dose (at Week 4)Low Dose + High Dose (at Week 8)
CGI-S02
CGI-I16
SecondaryChange in ITT Population From Baseline up to 4 and 8 Weeks in the ADHD-RS-IV Inattention Subscale, Hyperactivity-impulsivity Subscale, and Total Scale Raw Score.

The ADHD-RS-IV with Adult Prompts is an 18-item scale base on the DSM-IV-TR criteria for ADHD that provides a rating of the severity of symptoms. The adult prompts serve as a guide to explore more fully the extent and severity of ADHD symptoms and create a framework to ascertain impairment. The odd-numbered 9 items assess inattentive symptoms and the even-numbered 9 items assess hyperactive-impulsive symptoms. Scoring is based on a 4-point, yielding a possible summed "total score" of 0-54, "inattentive subscore" of 0-27, and "hyperactive-impulsive subscore" of 0-27. The higher values represent a worse outcome for the total score and subscore. Likert-type severity scale: 0 = Never or Rarely, 1 = Sometimes, 2 = Often, 3 = Very Often. . The ADHD-RS-IV was assessed from Visit 1 to Visit 8 by the investigator.

Time frame:
8 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in ITT Population From Baseline up to 4 and 8 Weeks in the ADHD-RS-IV Inattention Subscale, Hyperactivity-impulsivity Subscale, and Total Scale Raw Score.
score on a scaleLow Dose + High Dose (Week 0-4)Low Dose + High Dose (Week 0-8)
Inattention subscale-10.5 ± 8.2-12.2 ± 7.9
Hyperactivity-impulsivity subscale-7.2 ± 5.3-10.5 ± 4.1
Total scale-17.7 ± 13.2-25.7 ± 11.0

Adverse events

Collected over 9 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Low Dose + High Dose0/6 (0%)0/6 (0%)4/6 (66.7%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventLow Dose + High Dose
Eye pruritusEye disorders1/6
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders1/6
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders1/6
Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders1/6
Coating in mouthGastrointestinal disorders1/6
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders1/6
FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders1/6
Gastrointestinal painGastrointestinal disorders1/6
LethargyGeneral disorders1/6
SinusitisInfections and infestations1/6

Baseline characteristics

ITT

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Low Dose + High Dose
Median38.0 (29 to 55)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Low Dose + High Dose
Female2
Male4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Low Dose + High Dose
Height
Height(cm)Low Dose + High Dose
Median178.80 (155.4 to 182.8)
Weight
Weight(lb)Low Dose + High Dose
Median170.0 (106.0 to 190.0)
ADHD Rating Scale
ADHD Rating Scale(units on a scale)Low Dose + High Dose
Mean41.8 ± 6.6
CAARS-S:S ADHD Index (T-score)
CAARS-S:S ADHD Index (T-score)(T-scale)Low Dose + High Dose
Mean73.5 ± 8.3
CGI-severity
CGI-severity(score on a scale)Low Dose + High Dose
Mean5.3 ± 0.5
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UCSF Medical Center
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 30, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 17, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02699086
Lead sponsor
BioLite, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2016
Start date
Dec 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 15, 2020
Completion
Jul 15, 2020
Results posted
Nov 5, 2021
Last update
Dec 1, 2021

Study contacts

Keith R McBurnett, PhD
study director · University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion