An interventional study of TeachTown and Discrete Trial Training in Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 9 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-18.
Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Computer assisted interventions are becoming very popular as an intervention strategy for students with autism. There is little data on how effective they are or how their implementation affects teachers' use of other evidence-based practices. The proposed study would be the first to examine these questions in a community setting.
This study comprises a randomized controlled trial to examine 1) the effectiveness of TeachTown: Basics, one of the only evidence-based computer-assisted intervention (CAI) packages for students with autism; 2) the extent to which teachers implement TeachTown the way it was designed; 3) the effects of its use on other evidence-based practices; and 4) organizational and teacher variables that mediate changes in the use of evidence-based practices when TeachTown is introduced. While there has been a rush to take advantage of CAI, there is little research on whether it will result in better outcomes for student with autism, and be feasible or sustainable in community settings. While CAI has the potential to increase instructional time for students with autism, it may result instead in teachers reducing their use of other evidence-based practices, including the amount of interpersonal (as opposed to computer) instruction students receive. While the related constructs of exnovation, de-implementation and de-adoption have been used to describe this phenomenon for more than 30 years, they rarely have been systematically studied. The proposed study takes advantage of an ongoing rollout of TeachTown in the School District of Philadelphia. TeachTown includes a computerized instruction component, combined with offline, interpersonal instruction between the student and teacher. It is not known whether public schools have the resources to implement programs like this, regardless of their efficacy, or whether or how teachers will incorporate them into the instructional day. An especially important question is whether existing evidence-based practices are exnovated as TeachTown is implemented. To address these questions, we rely on our longstanding collaboration with the School District of Philadelphia, the 8th largest school district in the US. At the beginning of the school year, we will inventory relevant technology and observe how it is used in the District's 83 kindergarten-through-second-grade autism support classrooms. We also will survey teachers and school administrators about expectations, support and rewards for using these technologies and attitudes, norms and self-efficacy regarding the use of these technologies. We then will use a waitlist-control randomized design to examine TeachTown's effects on student outcomes and use of other practices. We will unpack the impact of the implementation of TeachTown on existing evidence-based practices using direct observation and through qualitative interviews. The waitlist design allows the district to roll out the intervention to all classrooms, which is their intent. It also allows s to increase our sample to study moderators of sustainment of existing EBPs when a new technology is introduced. The proposed study would be one of the first to examine longitudinally the uptake of new technology for children with ASD in school settings, and the first to address use of CAI. Successful completion of this study will identify malleable targets for intervention to increase the use of CAI, should that appear warranted, while sustaining existing EBPs for children with autism in community settings.
1,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Autistic Disorder; 334 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 212 is above the median of 45 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Autistic Disorder.
Browse Autistic Disorder studies →University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,635 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.
Of its 154 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 104 (68%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Students in kindergarten-through-second-grade autism support classrooms in this arm receive access to TeachTown, an online academic and pre-academic intervention designed for students with autism. Their teachers also receive coaching in the use of TeachTown, as well as coaching in other evidence-based practices for students with autism, including discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and teaching in functional routines
Behavioral: TeachTown · Behavioral: Discrete Trial Training · Behavioral: Pivotal Response Training · Behavioral: Teaching in Functional Routines
Teachers in kindergarten-through-second-grade autism support classrooms in this arm receive coaching in evidence-based practices for students with autism, including discrete trial training, pivotal response training, and teaching in functional routines
Behavioral: Discrete Trial Training · Behavioral: Pivotal Response Training · Behavioral: Teaching in Functional Routines
TeachTown is an online program for students with autism that uses an applied behavior analysis framework to provide intervention in academic and pre-academic areas
Discrete trial training is a one-on-one didactic behavioral intervention in which the teacher or therapist uses specific behavioral methods based on principles of operant conditioning, to help students gain skills
Pivotal response training is a one-on-one child-lead behavioral intervention in which the teacher or therapist uses specific behavioral methods, leveraging the students interests, to help students gain skills
Functional routines are sets of chained behaviors that students are taught that help them complete and manage specific activities in the classroom
Differential Abilities Scale, 2nd Edition
A nationally normed battery of cognitive and achievement tests.
Time frame: 8 months
Bracken School Readiness Assessment, 3rd Edition
n individual cognitive test designed for children, pre-K through second grade
Time frame: 8 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Pennsylvania