ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02690077FCCUpdated Oct 3, 2024Results posted

Family-Centered Cesarean Delivery

An interventional study of Family-Centered Cesarean and Traditional Cesarean in Patient Satisfaction, Earlier Family Bond Initiation and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-03.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
149
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if patient birthing experiences differ between the family-centered and traditional cesarean methods. We hypothesize that the family-centered cesarean method will lead to more unique and personalized cesarean birthing experiences without increasing the risks of adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes from those documented with the traditional cesarean.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be consented and randomized to one of two delivery methods by the research coordinator, resident physician, charge nurse or nurse on the day of their planned cesarean section. Several variables of interest will be collected via the electronic medical record and within the OR. Additionally, assessment of patient satisfaction will be conducted following delivery. Questions from an 11-item questionnaire will be asked of the patient by the study coordinator, resident physician, nurse or charge nurses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Earlier Family Bond Initiation
  • Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Earlier Family Bond Initiation
  • Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
03

In context

Patient Satisfaction

278 studies on the registry are indexed under Patient Satisfaction; 130 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 149 is above the median of 93 across 212 interventional studies indexed under Patient Satisfaction.

Browse Patient Satisfaction studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,345 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 328 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 249 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women ≥18 years of age
  • Women with planned cesarean section
  • ≥38 weeks of gestation
  • Singleton fetus
  • Reassuring fetal status (status of scheduled, green and some yellow

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with an urgent or emergency clinical situation in which the medical staff caring for the patient determines that obtaining consent would interfere with the patient's clinical care
  • Patients that decline to consent to participate (an opt out log including the consenters initials, time of day, and reason is kept)
  • Patients with anticipated heavy intraoperative bleeding (bleeding disorders, placenta previa, suspected placenta abruption, etc.)
  • Known maternal co-morbidities that could impact neonatal well-being (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, etc.)
  • Chorioamnionitis or prolonged rupture of membranes (≥18 hours in duration)
  • Known fetal anomalies
  • BMI ≥45 kg/m2
  • Estimated fetal weight \<2000 grams
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
149 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Method 1 by Preference 1

    Delivery through the Family-Centered Cesarean for patients with known Family-Centered preference.

    Procedure: Family-Centered Cesarean

  • Active comparator
    Method 1 by Preference 2

    Delivery through the Family-Centered Cesarean for patients with known Traditional Cesarean preference.

    Procedure: Family-Centered Cesarean

  • Active comparator
    Method 2 by Preference 1

    Delivery through the Traditional Cesarean for patients with known Family-Centered preference.

    Procedure: Traditional Cesarean

  • Active comparator
    Method 2 by Preference 2

    Delivery through the Traditional Cesarean for patients with known Traditional Cesarean preference.

    Procedure: Traditional Cesarean

Interventions

  • ProcedureFamily-Centered Cesarean

    Procedure involves lowering part of the surgical drape exposing a transparent window through which the mother can watch the birth of her baby; the baby will be placed on her chest immediately after the delivery. Cleaning and evaluation of the baby will be done by a nurse who is standing at the head of the bed.

    Also known as: Gentle Cesarean

  • ProcedureTraditional Cesarean

    Procedure involves keeping the surgical drape up throughout the entire surgery so that the birthing process will not be visible to the mother, and the baby will be taken to the warmer to be evaluated and cleaned after birth but is available to be laid on the mother's chest at any point upon request.

    Also known as: Cesarean Section

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 11-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

    The primary objective of this study was to compare satisfaction with birthing experiences between women who underwent either a family-centered or traditional cesarean delivery, using a modified Likert scale, ranging from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest).

    Time frame: Assessed at time of discharge from the hospital (typically 3-5 days post-delivery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Timing of Initiation of Family Bond Following Delivery

    The secondary objective of this study is to determine if there is a difference in time-to-initiation of family bond between the family-centered cesarean delivery method and traditional cesarean delivery method.

    Time frame: Assessed in Operating Room

  2. Number (Percent) of Patients Planning to Breastfeeding After Discharge

    The tertiary objective of this study is to determine if breastfeeding was more likely to occur between the family-centered cesarean delivery method and traditional cesarean delivery method.

    Time frame: Assessed at time of discharge from the hospital (typically 3-5 days post-delivery)

07

Results

Posted Mar 31, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMethod 1 (Family-Centered Cesarean)Method 2 (Traditional Cesarean)
Started7376
Completed6861
Not completed515
Withdrew: Excluded from analyses for no or worksheet or questionnaire completed58
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject05
Withdrew: Excluded by irb02

Outcome measures

Primary11-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

The primary objective of this study was to compare satisfaction with birthing experiences between women who underwent either a family-centered or traditional cesarean delivery, using a modified Likert scale, ranging from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest).

Time frame:
Assessed at time of discharge from the hospital (typically 3-5 days post-delivery)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
11-item Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
units on a scaleMethod 1 (Family-Centered Cesarean)Method 2 (Traditional Cesarean)
How satisfied were you with your involvement with the delivery of the baby?4.6 ± 0.84.4 ± 0.9
Did the method for delivery meet your expectations?4.6 ± 0.74.3 ± 1.0
Based on previous cesarean delivery how satisfied are you with the method of delivery of your baby?4.9 ± 0.74.7 ± 1.0
SecondaryTiming of Initiation of Family Bond Following Delivery

The secondary objective of this study is to determine if there is a difference in time-to-initiation of family bond between the family-centered cesarean delivery method and traditional cesarean delivery method.

Time frame:
Assessed in Operating Room
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Timing of Initiation of Family Bond Following Delivery
minutesMethod 1 (Family-Centered Cesarean)Method 2 (Traditional Cesarean)
Timing of Initiation of Family Bond Following Delivery5.1 ± 17.216.3 ± 13.9
SecondaryNumber (Percent) of Patients Planning to Breastfeeding After Discharge

The tertiary objective of this study is to determine if breastfeeding was more likely to occur between the family-centered cesarean delivery method and traditional cesarean delivery method.

Time frame:
Assessed at time of discharge from the hospital (typically 3-5 days post-delivery)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number (Percent) of Patients Planning to Breastfeeding After Discharge
ParticipantsMethod 1 (Family-Centered Cesarean)Method 2 (Traditional Cesarean)
Number (Percent) of Patients Planning to Breastfeeding After Discharge4733

Adverse events

Collected over 2 years, 1 month (participants were followed through discharge).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Method 1 (Family Centered Cesarean)0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)0/73 (0%)
Method 2 (Traditional Cesarean)0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)0/76 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Method 1 (Family Centered Cesarean)Method 2 (Traditional Cesarean)Total
Mean28.9 ± 5.629.5 ± 5.229.2 ± 5.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Method 1 (Family Centered Cesarean)Method 2 (Traditional Cesarean)Total
Female6861129
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Method 1 (Family Centered Cesarean)Method 2 (Traditional Cesarean)Total
White non-Hispanic262046
Black non-Hispanic272451
Hispanic121527
Other325
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Aurora BayCare Medical Center
    Green Bay, Wisconsin 54311, United States
  • Aurora Sinai Medical Center
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Armbrust R, Hinkson L, von Weizsacker K, Henrich W. The Charite cesarean birth: a family orientated approach of cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(1):163-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.991917. Epub 2015 Jan 9. PubMed 25572878 ↗
  • Smith J, Plaat F, Fisk NM. The natural caesarean: a woman-centred technique. BJOG. 2008 Jul;115(8):1037-42; discussion 1042. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01777.x. PubMed 18651885 ↗
  • Magee SR, Battle C, Morton J, Nothnagle M. Promotion of family-centered birth with gentle cesarean delivery. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;27(5):690-3. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.05.140014. PubMed 25201938 ↗
  • de Alba-Romero C, Camano-Gutierrez I, Lopez-Hernandez P, de Castro-Fernandez J, Barbero-Casado P, Salcedo-Vazquez ML, Sanchez-Lopez D, Cantero-Arribas P, Moral-Pumarega MT, Pallas-Alonso CR. Postcesarean Section Skin-to-Skin Contact of Mother and Child. J Hum Lact. 2014 Aug;30(3):283-286. doi: 10.1177/0890334414535506. Epub 2014 May 20. PubMed 24847031 ↗
  • Moran-Peters JA, Zauderer CR, Goldman S, Baierlein J, Smith AE. A quality improvement project focused on women's perceptions of skin-to-skin contact after cesarean birth. Nurs Womens Health. 2014 Aug-Sep;18(4):294-303. doi: 10.1111/1751-486X.12135. PubMed 25145718 ↗
  • Kram JJF, Montgomery MO, Moreno ACP, Romdenne TA, Forgie MM. Family-centered cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100472. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100472. Epub 2021 Aug 26. PubMed 34454161 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 15, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02690077
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2016
Start date
Jun 1, 2016
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2018
Completion
Oct 29, 2021
Results posted
Mar 31, 2023
Last update
Oct 3, 2024

Study contacts

Marie M Forgie, DO
principal investigator · Aurora Health Care, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion