CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02679781Updated Jan 14, 2022Results posted

Nasal Versus Oral Midazolam Sedation in Routine Pediatric Dental Care

An interventional study of oral midazolam and nasal midazolam in Conscious Sedation, sponsored by Hadassah Medical Organization. Completed at 1 site in Israel. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 6 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-14.

Sponsored by Hadassah Medical Organization · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The general objective of the study is to compare the efficacy of administering midazolam orally as syrup versus nasally with nasal atomizer. The specific objectives are to measure: 1) acceptability of the medication, 2) effect on behavior, 3) time of onset, 4) maximum working time.

Read the detailed description
  • Prospective, parallel design
  • Study and control group: 100 healthy children (ASA 1), ages: 2-6 years, uncooperative (Frankl 1-2), that needs at least two similar dental treatments. Exclusion criteria: enlarged tonsils (Brodsky's grading scale11 +3 = 50-75% airway obstruction, and +4 = >75% airway obstruction), upper respiratory tract infection or nasal discharge.
  • Randomization: At the first appointment the subjects will assigned randomly to receive oral midazolam or nasal midazolam;
  • Sedation: oral midazolam dose is 0.5mg/kg. Nasal midazolam dose is 0.2mg/kg. During treatment 50% nitrous oxide/ 50% oxygen will be administered via nasal hood.
  • Acceptability of the medication: compliance in taking the medication will be assessed and recorded as: willingly, coaxed, forced, or failed (not administered).
  • Behavior during dental treatment: Houpt scale measures behavior by rating sleep, movement, crying and overall behavior. The degree of alertness, movement and crying will be assessed before, during (every 5 min) and after the operative procedure. The rating will be done by one observer blind to the route of administration. This blind observer will also monitor the pulse and oxygen saturation.
02

Conditions studied

  • Conscious Sedation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hadassah Medical Organization is the lead sponsor of 659 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • healthy children (ASA 1), uncooperative (Frankl 1-210), that needs at least two similar dental treatments.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • enlarged tonsils (Brodsky's grading scale11 +3 = 50-75% airway obstruction, and +4 = >75% airway obstruction), upper respiratory tract infection or nasal discharge.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    oral sedation

    administration of 0.5mg/kg oral midazolam. During dental treatment 50% nitrous oxide/ 50% oxygen will be administered via nasal hood.

    Drug: oral midazolam

  • Active comparator
    nasal sedation

    administration of 0.2mg/kg nasal midazolam. During dental treatment 50% nitrous oxide/ 50% oxygen will be administered via nasal hood.

    Drug: nasal midazolam

Interventions

  • Drugoral midazolam

    administration of 0.5mg/kg oral midazolam. During dental treatment 50% nitrous oxide/ 50% oxygen will be administered via nasal hood.

    Also known as: oral dormicum

  • Drugnasal midazolam

    administration of 0.2mg/kg nasal midazolam. During dental treatment 50% nitrous oxide/ 50% oxygen will be administered via nasal hood.

    Also known as: nasal dormicum

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Compliant With Oral or Nasal Midazolam Administration

    the compliance in taking the medication will be assessed at the time of administration by one of the investigators and recorded immediately as: willingly, coaxed, forced, or failed (not administered).

    Time frame: the compliance in taking the medication will be assessed at the time of administration and recorded immediately.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Behavior During Dental Treatment

    the effect of oral or nasal midazolam on behaviour will be assessed by blind observer using Houpt scale. Houpt scale measures behavior by rating overall behavior. the scale is 1 to 6, higher score mean a better behavior. 1. = Aborted, no treatment rendered. 2. = Poor, treatment interrupted, only partial treatment was completed 3= Fair, treatment interrupted but eventually completed 4= Good, difficult but all treatment was performed 5= Very good, some limited crying or movement 6= Excellent, no crying or movement

    Time frame: the effect of oral or nasal midazolam on behaviour will be assessed during dental treatment.The length of each treatment is estimated as 30-45 minutes.

07

Results

Posted Jan 14, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOral SedationNasal Sedation
Started3733
Completed3030
Not completed73
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up12
Withdrew: Low cooperation, referral to treatment under general anesthesia61

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Compliant With Oral or Nasal Midazolam Administration

the compliance in taking the medication will be assessed at the time of administration by one of the investigators and recorded immediately as: willingly, coaxed, forced, or failed (not administered).

Time frame:
the compliance in taking the medication will be assessed at the time of administration and recorded immediately.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Compliant With Oral or Nasal Midazolam Administration
ParticipantsOral SedationNasal Sedation
willingly114
coaxed1418
forced58
SecondaryBehavior During Dental Treatment

the effect of oral or nasal midazolam on behaviour will be assessed by blind observer using Houpt scale. Houpt scale measures behavior by rating overall behavior. the scale is 1 to 6, higher score mean a better behavior. 1. = Aborted, no treatment rendered. 2. = Poor, treatment interrupted, only partial treatment was completed 3= Fair, treatment interrupted but eventually completed 4= Good, difficult but all treatment was performed 5= Very good, some limited crying or movement 6= Excellent, no crying or movement

Time frame:
the effect of oral or nasal midazolam on behaviour will be assessed during dental treatment.The length of each treatment is estimated as 30-45 minutes.
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Behavior During Dental Treatment
score on a scaleOral SedationNasal Sedation
Behavior During Dental Treatment5.17 ± 0.794.80 ± 0.80

Adverse events

Collected over From administering the medication until recovery from sedation- at least 2 hours for each patient. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Oral Sedation0/37 (0%)0/37 (0%)0/37 (0%)
Nasal Sedation0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Oral SedationNasal SedationTotal
Mean4.25 ± 1.394.46 ± 1.254.36 ± 1.32
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Oral SedationNasal SedationTotal
Female151429
Male151631
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Oral SedationNasal SedationTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Oral SedationNasal SedationTotal
Israel303060
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hadassah Medical Organization
    Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 31, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02679781
Lead sponsor
Hadassah Medical Organization
Responsible party
Avia Fux (pediatric dentist, Hadassah Medical Organization) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 10, 2016
Start date
Mar 28, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2020
Completion
Dec 15, 2020
Results posted
Jan 14, 2022
Last update
Jan 14, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion